Slashdot Mirror


iRobot Introduces Morphing Blob Robot

Aristos Mazer sends word of research out of iRobot on a "chembot," or morphing blob robot, that looks like dough and moves by shifting its sides from solid-like to liquid-like states. This will allow it, in theory and after lots of refinement, to pass through cracks by squeezing. iRobot calls the new technique "jamming." The research project was funded by DARPA. The video clearly shows the early stage the work is in, but when you think about it the possibilities are a little unsettling.

177 comments

  1. I, for one.... by lag10 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    welcome our new blobular overlords.

    1. Re:I, for one.... by lag10 · · Score: 1

      While that may be true, the intention of posting such things is to induce some sort of amusement.

      It obviously didn't work for you.

    2. Re:I, for one.... by hort_wort · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I didn't expect a response for my comment saying I was also tired of the overlord joke, or to be modded down.

      Fellas, look, if you're going to be nerds who make fun of people's fads all the time, you can't ignore your own. Once that happens, you're just like the football jocks who gave us all swirlys. Minus the girls. And the muscle. And the good looks. But at least we'll still have the bigger yahoos, am I right?

    3. Re:I, for one.... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      What do you need a hummingbird for?

    4. Re:I, for one.... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Prevent them from conquering the Earth.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  2. Looks eerily by Daimanta · · Score: 1

    like the eggs of the Zerg.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:Looks eerily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure thats what the Rover was in Prisoner.

    2. Re:Looks eerily by fractoid · · Score: 1

      I heard that they spent half the film's budget on a giant robot that was meant to be the Rover, and then a cable snapped and they dropped it in the ocean. Later that day they saw a weather balloon rolling along and thought "stuffit, that looks freaky enough to chase our hero".

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  3. That's impressive? by winkydink · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've got a sourdough starter that will kick that thing's jammy little ass.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:That's impressive? by Fluffeh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, totally agree. I can't say that I was amazingly impressed by this at all. Okay, so it's a ball that moves by making bits hard and bits soft. The movement on the thing seemed so incredibly "strugglesome" and getting that thing through a crack? Yeah, right.

      Cool, yes, fairly, but lets not have the summary overhype the actual story. It's not a robot. It's a sack of gritty air. Also, there is a ponytail sized bunch of wires hanging out of it. Also, it sort of rolls semi randomly. Also, it was shown moving over a perfectly flat tabletop. Not quite the images of terror I was expecting. Call it how it is.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    2. Re:That's impressive? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also, it was shown moving over a perfectly flat tabletop. Not quite the images of terror I was expecting. Call it how it is.

      Daleks could only move over flat surfaces too.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re:That's impressive? by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      They could also turn anything into a flat surface.

    4. Re:That's impressive? by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

      Ok, so it's not that cool looking, but the potential here is great... especially once the things can be self-contained.

      The main reason this thing seems kind of lame right now, is likely due to the fact that the support lattice is only a simple sphere. Give these guys a couple more years, and I bet they'll be able to support far more complex structures, perhaps even to the point of reshaping its own support lattice at varying resolutions.

      Once they can manage that much, it should be possible for them to start working on complex IK chains to create virtual joints on the fly. Think of it being able to morph from a sphere to an insect like body with legs and back again, based on the environmental conditions it's deployed into.

      Another potential use, moving large objects on top of it as it maintains a solid, level surface, while below, it moves in a manner similar to snakes. This could be done both as a serpentine pattern and as a method some snakes use by gripping the ground with their scales and then contract and expand their body to slide forward.

      The potential here should not be underestimated.

      --


      8==8 Bones 8==8
    5. Re:That's impressive? by countach · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they required a BBC employee underneath to move it along.

  4. Uh oh by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Please tell me this research isn't being done on a remote island...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Uh oh by bkpark · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Please tell me this research isn't being done on a remote island...

      Don't you mean, "Please tell me this research is being done on a remote island", in case something goes wrong?

    2. Re:Uh oh by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, this technology has been out for years and nothing's happened yet.

    3. Re:Uh oh by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean, "Please tell me this research is being done on a remote island", in case something goes wrong?

      I don't know, aren't remote islands the perfect place to develop our first ever Shoggoths?

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    4. Re:Uh oh by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry, this technology has been out for years and nothing's happened yet.

      For referencing that TV show I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    5. Re:Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What could possibly go wrong?

    6. Re:Uh oh by lennier · · Score: 1

      It's okay, the odds against failure are precisely a million to one.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    7. Re:Uh oh by prometx42 · · Score: 1

      We can neither confirm nor deny whether this research is taking place at a secure undisclosed location, such as said remote island on which there may or may not be a menacing volcano in the shape of a demonic humanoid skull... -DARPA

    8. Re:Uh oh by prometx42 · · Score: 1

      The operative word there being yet ...

    9. Re:Uh oh by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2, Funny

      We're one step closer to tentacle-rape robots. Just pray to god the japanese don't get hold of this.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    10. Re:Uh oh by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I think they should keep it away from Japanese school girls.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    11. Re:Uh oh by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      For referencing that TV show I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

      I remember watching the first episode, in which Alex first gets her powers. First time she uses the morph trick, she leaves her clothing behind and has to hide behind some handy-dandy boxes. Say what you will, a teenage boy remembers when he learns another way for a girl to get out of her clothes. Unfortunately, the improbable-accident-with-illegal-chemicals route doesn't work half as well as a decent wine.

    12. Re:Uh oh by jcoy42 · · Score: 1

      Okay, seriously, we are on totally different wavelengths here.

      I'm not a religious person, but please dear god in heaven, give this to the Japanese!!

      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    13. Re:Uh oh by IonOtter · · Score: 1

      Okay, seriously, we are on totally different wavelengths here.

      Somehow, I don't think anyone buying such a device will consider it's use "rape"...

      --
      [End Of Line]
  5. Nokia Morph by religious+freak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nokia has a somewhat similar concept of this as well, implemented for mobile devices http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX-gTobCJHs

    Concept design, but pretty cool to watch.

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    1. Re:Nokia Morph by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      That's not a concept, that's a cartoon. From that realm, I'm far more interested in the ability to not fall by not looking down.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    2. Re:Nokia Morph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell is this modded off-topic?

      The video is exactly one potential future use of this blob-bot.

    3. Re:Nokia Morph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's offtopic because the technologies involved are completely unrelated.

    4. Re:Nokia Morph by JordanL · · Score: 1

      It's my understanding that most of the technology in the Nokia video is actually pretty well fleshed out, it would just take a trillion dollars to build it because we have no adequate ways to manufacture it.

    5. Re:Nokia Morph by x2A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No it's not. A thing that you can change the shape of is different to a thing that can change its own shape. The second can surely benefit from the first (flexible circuit board printing & components etc) but the first is only really likely to benefit from the second as two things spending money researching one problem may yield twice the results (or patents, of course)

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    6. Re:Nokia Morph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not even remotely similar.

    7. Re:Nokia Morph by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 1

      It's my understanding that most of the technology in the Nokia video is actually pretty well fleshed out, it would just take a trillion dollars to build it because we have no adequate ways to manufacture it.

      So you're saying they need to ring up a trillion dollars in debt then apply for a government bailout?

  6. Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new shape-shifting overlords.

  7. The Ball! by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Finally, now we can make "the ball" guard from The Prisoner.

    I am not a number! You're number 6! I am not a number, I'm a free man!!

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:The Ball! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      What do you mean "the ball"? It's hardly be an object of terror if it was called "the ball", now would it?

      It's called Rover.

    2. Re:The Ball! by WraithCube · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's wrong with calling an object of terror "the ball"? Cubes are our companions, balls our terror, and pyramids somehow related to mysterious or secret groups or aliens with strange powers.

      I'm not sure where a robot blob fits on the scale though. I guess it depends on whether it decides to server or destroy humanity. Then it should squeeze in nicely next to either flubber or skynet.

    3. Re:The Ball! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      You are number 6!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    4. Re:The Ball! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      So... you're a Borg?

    5. Re:The Ball! by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      Cubes are our companions

      are you sure you didn't mean prisons? Then again, maybe you're lucky enough not to spend 8+ hours a day in a cube.....

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    6. Re:The Ball! by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 1

      Successful "Portal" reference? Check. Successful "whooooosh" as parent missed the reference? Check.

    7. Re:The Ball! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Not everyone plays all the games. Especially on Slashdot, where Microsoft = teh evil, one can be expected to not have Windows or Xbox.

      Invalid Whoooosh.

  8. I'll be bock.... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    Seriously. How much longer before it's driving a semi trying to kill some kid that supposedly saves man kind?

    1. Re:I'll be bock.... by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      Have you seen this boy?

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  9. Hey! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Taco is NOT a robot! I've seen him write an original summary!

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:Hey! by Thinboy00 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've seen him write an original summary!

      When did this happen?

      --
      $ make available
    2. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Original in the sense that it had nothing at all to do with the article in question?

    3. Re:Hey! by rubycodez · · Score: 0, Troll

      also, I heard he can't even squeeze his ass into a coach plane seat

    4. Re:Hey! by skine · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've seen him write an original summary!

      When did this happen?

      Don't worry, it won't happen again.

      I've made a few...adjustments...

  10. Medical applications by GaryOlson · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I know some digestive system specialist is thinking of ways this can be used in intestines for diagnosis and treatment. Those guys will use any equipment which gives patients a bad feeling both before and during the procedure. But, I could see how installing cameras at all vertices on the blob could be useful for taking a complete picture inside a cavity. And how this could move around blockages which currently require more aggressive methods of removal/retraction.

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    1. Re:Medical applications by Jahava · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are some basic problems with this - specifically, iRobot's demonstration uses the addition and removal of air to control both size and hardness. In bodily cavities, not only would air be in limited supply, but in some areas (i.e. blood stream) it's downright not welcome!

    2. Re:Medical applications by matzahboy · · Score: 1

      It would be easy enough to alter the inflation gas to something more available

    3. Re:Medical applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Air is compressible.

    4. Re:Medical applications by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 5, Funny

      Luckily, the use of blood to control the size and hardness of a mechanical system is a well-demonstrated technology.

    5. Re:Medical applications by x2A · · Score: 1

      Cuz the legs on this thing do look a scary thing to have tugging away on your insides! I'm sure they've thought of that and it's actually fine, but still... look at it... eek! There's gotta be better ways of moving than that!

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    6. Re:Medical applications by Genda · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the video of the robot's egress from the patient, would almost certainly be an instant wild hit on Youtube!!!

    7. Re:Medical applications by Mad-Bassist · · Score: 1

      Yikes! It looks like the future of medicine isn't all medical tricorders and hyposprays... it's robotic colon spiders and robotic tape worms!

      --
      "The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
    8. Re:Medical Applications by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      discharges the cancerous slurry

      Ladies and gentlemen, I nominate this phrase for the coveted "Most Disgusting String of Words Seen on Slashdot" award for 2009.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    9. Re:Medical applications by Mab_Mass · · Score: 1

      Luckily, the use of blood to control the size and hardness of a mechanical system is a well-demonstrated technology.

      I'm skeptical, especially as you failed to provide any references or video documentation of such a system.

    10. Re:Medical applications by Ovspec · · Score: 1

      Video documentation? I'm sure we've all seen plenty :)

    11. Re:Medical applications by Bat+Country · · Score: 1

      Epic whoosh, or more subtle joke? Too hard to tell.

      --
      The land shall stone them with the bread of his son.
  11. What I want.... by mark-t · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... is a small robot vacuum a lot like the Roomba that can *ALSO* automatically empty its canister into a larger bin whenever the vacuum is full.

    1. Re:What I want.... by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I *hate* to get into a humans vs robots argument, but seriously, just hire a good maid.. you'll never think robots are close to the same capabilities of humans again.

      I wish every "home robot" designer would do this, maybe we'd start getting some robots that are actually capable.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:What I want.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Maids cost whole a lot more. In less than 3 months, I would spend just as much on a maid as a Roomba vacuum costs... the electricity usage itself being negligible. I won't argue that a human maid probably does a better job, but the difference isn't enough to justify that much extra expense. At least IMO.

    3. Re:What I want.... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      In less than 3 months, I would spend just as much on a maid as a Roomba vacuum costs

      If, after 3 months, you haven't realized that your Roomba is a toy that can't do a tenth of the job of what it is required to do then you're doing better than most of us.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:What I want.... by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      if only the roomba had a vagina :(

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    5. Re:What I want.... by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 3, Informative

      Like this one: http://www.probotics.com/dispcat.asp?ab=18

      "The Karcher RC-3000 automatic vacuum cleaner features a battery powered, self emptying, 11" vacuuming robot and self recharging base station. ..."

      I can't find a price, but last time I saw, it was about twice the price of the Roomba.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    6. Re:What I want.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This already exists... Check out the Karcher Robocleaner. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10GS7wFX8VE

      It's like a Roomba, except its home base is also a bin into which it barfs its contents when it docks. Oh, and it costs 5-10x times as much as a Roomba, depending on where you look... assuming you can find one for sale. I gave up on finding one when I saw the price.

    7. Re:What I want.... by samkass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Roomba does two things that I really appreciate: 1. Cleans up under the dinner table and gets all the stuff my kids drop, and 2. cleans the dust way under the bed that breeds dust mites.

      No, it doesn't do as well as a regular vacuum. But it's small and does its thing however often you want.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    8. Re:What I want.... by rachit · · Score: 1

      if only the roomba had a vagina :(

      -1 disturbing?

    9. Re:What I want.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A squirming blob in a french maid's outfit is still a squirming blob.

    10. Re:What I want.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I had no idea that iRobot already made such a thing. Thanks for the link.

    11. Re:What I want.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... is a small robot vacuum a lot like the Roomba that can *ALSO* automatically empty its canister into a larger bin whenever the vacuum is full.

      Look at the RoboCleaner RC3000 - a tad bit expensive though....

  12. wow no obligitory T-1000 comment ? by Brigadier · · Score: 2, Interesting

    now I know something is going on with slashdot, I totally expected a barage of T-1000 rants, and knee jerk joke threads.

    1. Re:wow no obligitory T-1000 comment ? by Boomerang+Fish · · Score: 1

      Nah, the T1000 was a wimp... it's the terminatrix from the third movie that makes me feel funny in certain areas I'm not supposed to talk about...

      --
      I drank what?

    2. Re:wow no obligitory T-1000 comment ? by binarylarry · · Score: 2, Funny

      public?

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    3. Re:wow no obligitory T-1000 comment ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To slashdot's credit, there was a "mimeticpolyalloy" tag. Just sayin'.

    4. Re:wow no obligitory T-1000 comment ? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      now I know something is going on with slashdot, I totally expected a barage of T-1000 rants, and knee jerk joke threads.

      Well, somebody did make an overlords joke. Admittedly, though, the 0 score and the redundant mod was a twist only Shyamalan would have attempted.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  13. Additional Robots by natebarney · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now, if they can make D12, D10, D8, D6, and D4 robots, I'll never fail another critical roll again!

    1. Re:Additional Robots by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      A robot D11 that can squeeze through small openings? Not autonomous, I hope. Or at least obedient to the Three Laws.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  14. Credit where credit is due by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

    Dr Susan Calvin has really excelled herself this time.

  15. d'oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    looks like dough and moves by shifting its sides from solid-like to liquid-like states

    Sounds like my wedding night.

  16. Finally by sleeponthemic · · Score: 1, Funny

    The buttplug of the future.

    --
    I record my sleeptalking
    1. Re:Finally by EdIII · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can see that I am not the only deeply perverted Slashdotter here.

      to pass through cracks by squeezing . iRobot calls the new technique "jamming."

      Come on, they are just asking for it.

      Although I think the best market for this is initially one populated by disgusting perverts (a larger market than anyone wants to admit) there is something incredibly terrifying about a military machine whose primary target is your asshole .

      Imagine the horror. Somewhere in eastern Afghanistan there are men huddled in a cave fervently whispering. Talking not about smart missiles, bunker busters, and fuel bombs, but about smart AI blobs of fast moving jelly that get inside you and your death is one by your asshole exploding slowly through intense pressure deep in your bowels .

      Between one of those horror blobs and 10 Navy Seals, I think I would choose death by Navy Seals instead.

    2. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up, please. +42 funny.

    3. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think DARPA might fund your ideas.

    4. Re:Finally by x2A · · Score: 2, Funny

      A suicide bummer?

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    5. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? You would rather be bummed to death by 10 Navy Seals?

    6. Re:Finally by EdIII · · Score: 1

      A suicide bummer?

      Dear God.... What if it isn't??

      They could be ... re-usable on the battlefield. Solar rechargeable even! I can see a AI sub-routine labled "A2M".

    7. Re:Finally by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Informative

      What, didn't you hear about the butt-bomb? Link. They damn near assassinated the head of the Saudi antiterror squad.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up yours, buddy!

    9. Re:Finally by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I can see that I am not the only deeply perverted Slashdotter here.

      to pass through cracks by squeezing . iRobot calls the new technique "jamming."

      Come on, they are just asking for it.

      Although I think the best market for this is initially one populated by disgusting perverts (a larger market than anyone wants to admit) there is something incredibly terrifying about a military machine whose primary target is your asshole .

      Imagine the horror. Somewhere in eastern Afghanistan there are men huddled in a cave fervently whispering. Talking not about smart missiles, bunker busters, and fuel bombs, but about smart AI blobs of fast moving jelly that get inside you and your death is one by your asshole exploding slowly through intense pressure deep in your bowels .

      Between one of those horror blobs and 10 Navy Seals, I think I would choose death by Navy Seals instead.

      And shitting yourself with fear just gives them an opportunity to STRIKE!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    10. Re:Finally by Mad-Bassist · · Score: 1

      I'm still laughing my ass off at this one. It reminds me of the vampire parasites from the Necroscope books.

      The thought of enemy soldiers afraid to sit down or sleep... hmm, what would Sam Raimi do?

      --
      "The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
  17. Unsettling? by Gothmolly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is everything either a YRO or Orwellian issue here? Can't it just be cool?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Unsettling? by Talgrath · · Score: 1

      You must be new to Slashdot, welcome! Just for future info, anything with a budget of more than $100 must be either a sinister plot to take away your rights or extremely dangerous here at Slashdot. Slashdot, where crazy hobos that like to hold signs hang out and chat!

    2. Re:Unsettling? by peipas · · Score: 1

      The tin foil industry resembles those questions.

    3. Re:Unsettling? by x2A · · Score: 1

      Some people have no sense of cool... I tend to ignore them, occasionally trying to convince the odd one or two to quit being little bitches, but it rarely changes anything. Occasionally it does though, and new people find excitement in cool things, that's pretty cool, and then they start hunting for cools things themself, and sometimes share with you something cool that you didn't already know. But there's still a huge amount of people out there are dumb, panicky, phobic, short sighted, closed minded, with internet connections and even slashdot accounts.

      They may even outnumber us, but it is our visions and dreams that live on. You are not alone :-)

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  18. The Blob! by stockard · · Score: 1

    If it gets much bigger, we'll have to call Steve McQueen for help!

  19. chembot by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    Why is it named "chembot" when it uses purely mechanical processes for motion? I was expecting compounds exhibiting some sort of electrochemical or electromechanical properties. This robot appears to use an entirely hydraulic system.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:chembot by microcars · · Score: 1

      mod parent up please

      --
      I like microcars
  20. A more conventional robot seems more effective. by argent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why would this be more effective than a robot consisting of 20 linear actuators inside a tough enclosure? For that matter a serpentine or ferret-like robot would be more effective at fitting through narrow openings. There's reasons large animals abandoned amoeboid motion in favor of crawling or slithering.

    1. Re:A more conventional robot seems more effective. by x2A · · Score: 2

      It's research, which is the act of converting questions that you may not even know yet into answers.

      It may perfectly well turn out that your question is correct (heh) and there is no benefit to a robot made entirely out of this technology... or it may turn out that it's very good at getting into small spaces and lifting (may have post earthquake uses?) or that this material on the end of something has uses that it perhaps wouldn't do on its own.

      Will never know without the research.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    2. Re:A more conventional robot seems more effective. by x2A · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "There's reasons large animals abandoned amoeboid motion in favor of crawling or slithering"

      Oh and yes there was... big things are harder to organise and maintain... from the tiny (when atoms get too big they split) to the large (when civilisations get too large they split, we have seen this happen many times). Cells are the same... to become big animals, you have to go from being single celled to multiple celled, to multiple celled with specialist cells to perform different functions better than a single cell could perform all of them. Arranging that into a fluidic mass is much harder than giving it structure and legs and muscles etc. That doesn't mean that legs are better; just easier for nature to come up with.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    3. Re:A more conventional robot seems more effective. by Genda · · Score: 1

      In fact some variation on this concept is by far the most efficient means to get a robot of any reasonable size through tiny cracks and/or around small travel spaces. The other variant of this technology would be a swarm based robot. Put some small sensing and processing power inside thousands of tiny robots which can communicate (effectively making a super-organic robot.)

      As for your assertion regarding large animals... the largest creature on the planet is a super massive fungal colony encompassing hundreds of square miles. A single organism of immense size and complexity that move by... you guessed it, amoebic psuedopodia.

    4. Re:A more conventional robot seems more effective. by argent · · Score: 1

      This design is not a swarm or a slime mold, it has nothing to do with that kind of colony organism. it's a single macroscopic device, one that has no relationship to either.

      Neither your swarm robots and slime molds move by inflating different parts of a membrane with their bodily fluids or cytoplasm, on a macroscopic scale, as an amoeba or this robot do. That is, the similarity between the macroscopic behavior of a slime mold and an amoeba is not structural. It's not the same mechanism.

    5. Re:A more conventional robot seems more effective. by argent · · Score: 1

      In other words, you don't know the answer to my question either.

      I understand the point of research. I can see possible uses for this kind of material, even. I'm asking why this design might be expected to be superior to more conventional ones for locomotion, even in tight spaces, for macroscopic robots.

    6. Re:A more conventional robot seems more effective. by x2A · · Score: 1

      "In other words, you don't know the answer to my question either"

      Why must there be a "the answer"?

      "I'm asking why this design might be expected to be superior to more conventional ones"

      Once it can get rid of the external wires, it can disguise itself as a football (or soccer ball for those in the states) perhaps? Maybe it's more resistent to damage, as it can be made air/water tight, withstand shock (as components are surrounded in effectively an air bag). The fact it can be used in any orientation is probably an advantage, and all this while remaining mechanically very simple, so there aren't any hinges, joints, ball bearings etc that can break or sieze up. They could also be used in non-ball form, as artificial muscles for a skeletal robot, depending on how much force it can be made to exert.

      Once technology's available, people find uses for it. No one could think of any uses for the integrated circuit when that was first invented. I'm sure if you put your mind to it you could think of some situations it would be superior too, but as this is DARPA funded, any long term plans or goals already in mind for it may not be made public.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    7. Re:A more conventional robot seems more effective. by argent · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's more resistent to damage, as it can be made air/water tight, withstand shock (as components are surrounded in effectively an air bag).

      This is also true for the equivalent design using conventional piston actuators, or the serpentine design.

      and all this while remaining mechanically very simple

      Valves require hinges, joints, ball bearings, etcetera... piston actuators are mechanically simpler than this design.

      They could also be used in non-ball form, as artificial muscles for a skeletal robot, depending on how much force it can be made to exert.

      Hmmm, I think I might have mentioned that the technology might be useful in other applications, I just don't see this application as having a great deal of promise, which is why I wondered what I might be missing.

      No one could think of any uses for the integrated circuit when that was first invented.

      [citation needed]

    8. Re:A more conventional robot seems more effective. by x2A · · Score: 1

      Yep, there are different ways of doing things! This just happens to be another way, and whilst you may be right that a ball with a load of wires sticking out the back may not be all too useful, it is a research prototype, with few sections of the material that hardens/softens allowing not a huge amount of control etc... with different shapes/sizes of sections put together in different ways, this obviously changes. Take the example I gave for a skeletal robot using this as artificial muscles... well what if the skeleton was made from the same stuff? It could collapse all gooey (except the core which obviously remains hard) and by inflating the skeleton (or parts of it) take form. Try doing that with pistons.

      I've not seen this 'serpentine design' you mentioned, so cannot comment on that.

      "[citation needed]"

      Would love to provide, but it was a BBC documentary on Noyce (who played a major role in bringing the silicon transistor to market, the silicon IC, and co-founded Intel with Moore), but the documentary's no longer online (and could not be watched anyway if you're outside the UK). But fine, if you need another example, try electricity, or "a computer in every home". Your resistance is not uncommon.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    9. Re:A more conventional robot seems more effective. by argent · · Score: 1

      you may be right that a ball with a load of wires sticking out the back may not be all too useful

      I think you misunderstood what I'm talking about. This technology has a lot of potential uses... consider a chair that could switch between a soft "bean bag" shape and a rigid form. The question is... why is this a good application of the technology, not whether it has good applications.

      In addition, this has nothing to do with the macroscopic appearance of the device, or whether this kind of robot would be useful, but the implementation. This technology is a clumsy mechanism to implement the desired functionality. With or without the wires it requires a bulkier and less efficient mechanism than using conventional actuators to implement the same design. In fact you could use a "soft piston" design to get the same effect, simply by replacing the wall segments with bubble-wrap-like protrusions and inflating them inside a soft envelope. The amount of pressure that could be applied would be higher, because it would not need to be restricted by the counterpressure from the matrix of beads... leading to a simpler "soft robot" that would fit into smaller volumes (you could contract the pistons to the point where the robot took up little more space than the pump and payload, which isn't possible in this design) and operate on less power (giving it more running time or a higher velocity).

      It could collapse all gooey (except the core which obviously remains hard) and by inflating the skeleton (or parts of it) take form. Try doing that with pistons.

      That's not how this stuff works. When it collapses it gets hard, when it expands it gets soft. The soft skeleton you're describing is already in use in a number of applications... I'm sure you've seen examples in playgrounds and amusement parks.

      PS: when Ken Olsen made that comment I already had a computer in my home.

    10. Re:A more conventional robot seems more effective. by pontifier · · Score: 1

      Patent #3608961

      --
      -John Fenley
  21. Wow by ShooterNeo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Imagine being an insurgent hiding in a cave once the Pentagon equips this robot with a bomb, or better yet, Sony batteries...

  22. All I can say is... by Interoperable · · Score: 1

    Eeeeeewwwwwww!

    --
    So if this is the future...where's my jet pack?
    1. Re:All I can say is... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      I notice that the person who handled it wore gloves...

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  23. And what's next? by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Another robot that would empty that bin into another larger bin?
    And a larger robot to empty that one into a even larger bin?

    We can't just keep building larger and larger robots and bins. We would run out of space pretty soon. Then where would we be?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:And what's next? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Nah... I can empty the larger bin manually... the biggest problem I have with the roomba in my experience is that its cannister is so small that it can't usually vacuum for more than about 15 minutes without having to empty it, which means it requires supervision, since that's not enough time to leave it alone to do its job.

    2. Re:And what's next? by Cyrus20 · · Score: 1

      its not that hard to clean manually without the aid or supervising of robots.

    3. Re:And what's next? by x2A · · Score: 1

      "We can't just keep building larger and larger robots and bins"

      Isn't that Apple's main business model? :-p

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    4. Re:And what's next? by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Gah... how dirty is your home? You must have other pets, I mean have pets...

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    5. Re:And what's next? by dominious · · Score: 1

      We can't just keep building larger and larger robots and bins. We would run out of space pretty soon. Then where would we be?

      Sure we can: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHH3iSeDBLo&feature=related

    6. Re:And what's next? by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Another robot that would empty that bin into another larger bin? And a larger robot to empty that one into a even larger bin?

      We can't just keep building larger and larger robots and bins. We would run out of space pretty soon. Then where would we be?

      With larger and larger cleaning robots? Simple. We get Mel Brooks and Rick Moranis to pilot the biggest one and steal air from other planets.

    7. Re:And what's next? by Bat+Country · · Score: 1

      No, they build thinner robots and bins.

      --
      The land shall stone them with the bread of his son.
  24. Similar projects by glebovitz · · Score: 1

    I read an article recently in my alumni magazine about a collaboration between Intel and Carnegie Mellon to develop microscopic or miniature robots that use magnetic or static charges to attract and repel each other to propel a collection of them. The changes in charges and magnetic states also allows them to shift from a globular to a solid state. The article sounded similar to borg nanoprobes. From the article, it appears that they started doing this 5 years ago and have made significant progress.

    I wonder if the iRobot technology is similar?

    1. Re:Similar projects by x2A · · Score: 2, Informative

      "From the article, it appears that they started doing this 5 years ago and have made significant progress"

      Research in this area has made significant progress, yes, but still a long long way to go. There will probably be milestones along the way though, where a partially successful device may have lesser uses, but uses nontheless. There are already nanostructures that 'swim' using energy (eg, sugars) in the liquid they are put in, but when I saw those, they were just dumb self propelling motors, there was no control element to it.

      "I wonder if the iRobot technology is similar?"

      I don't know about other iRobot tech, but this stuff isn't. The video explains how it works.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  25. I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Welcome our new shape-shifting overlords.

  26. Tried that... didn't work by denzacar · · Score: 1

    They called it a Mech at first, but people kept complaining how it lacks legs, and missile arms, and swords...
    And that is not counting those who complained how Mech is not a robot but a vehicle.

    So... they jumbled the letters a bit and called it chem-bot.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  27. Medical Applications by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    A variety of medical applications come to mind.

    Inject liquid-form robot next to broken or diseased bone. Robot flows into position alongside bone, then solidifies itself to splint the bone.

    Inject liquid-form robot next to tumor. Robot flows into position, surrounding tumor. Robot then solidifies into hundreds of tiny scalpel blades, which chop up the tumor. Robot then flows a syringe out of the patients body, and discharges the cancerous slurry.

    --
    -kgj
  28. It's a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Shoggoth!

  29. X the Unknown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    X the Unknown

  30. Powered by jellybeans? by BRock97 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now which flavor of jellybean turned it into a ladder and which one turned it into a bridge?

    --

    Bryan R.
    The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
    1. Re:Powered by jellybeans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Licorice was Ladder. Tangerine made a Trampoline. That's all I can remember...

  31. WTF!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do these egg-heads not go to the movies, evar? Why do they hate us so much?

    We're all fucked.

  32. That's all well and fine... by not-too-smatr · · Score: 2, Funny

    but shouldn't we invent Mega Man before we invent one of his enemies?

  33. Anon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok am I the only one missing this? A ROBOT
    funded by DARPA, which can morph parts if itself between SOLID
    and LIQUID states?
    Next thing they'll tell us is that it's a snake...

  34. WELCOME! by kidMike · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new Jamming Morphing Doughy Overlords.

    --
    -- You can't drink all day. (Unless you start in the morning...)
  35. What about the gun? by LowlyWorm · · Score: 1

    But will the gun still get stuck when it squeezes between bars?

    --
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
  36. World of Goo! by lennier · · Score: 1
    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    1. Re:World of Goo! by Lordnerdzrool · · Score: 1

      Also the announcement is just in time for the relevant Wii title A Boy and His Blob.

      And yeah, its based on that old NES game of the same name.

  37. How is this a "robot"? by microcars · · Score: 1

    It is not automonous
    It is tethered to a power supply (in this case:pneumatic, but it could be hydraulic, electric,mechanical, whatever...)
    I don't get the "ChemBot" part either, there is no chemical change. I just see compression/relaxation cycles.

    I used to work in Special Mechanical Effects for films and commercials and we made all sorts of crap like this that was remotely controlled with bladders and shit in it and we never called it a "robot".

    --
    I like microcars
    1. Re:How is this a "robot"? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Virtually no 'research' robots are autonomous, especially in the early stages. I'd imagine that it's a "robot" because unlike your remote controlled "bladders'n'shit yo" for special effects, it's controlled by a computer in response to sensors and commands, rather than being controlled by a human via a funky umpteen-axis remote control thing.

      If, contrariwise, your special effects were algorithmically controlled (being on a MIDI-style preset pattern doesn't count) then they were robots too, whatever you call them.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    2. Re:How is this a "robot"? by Lordnerdzrool · · Score: 1

      The definition of real robot does require it be autonomous, but being tethered to a power supply is not a restriction for a robot. Not any definition I have ever seen.

      Of course, rarely do people use the term that strictly, specifically in the military, where such robots would often not be preferred to human controlled ones. I.e. A completely autonomous Predator drone would be very very bad, if it was to actually determine what is or is not a threat on its own and blow the brains out of what is and avoid harming what is not. "Robots" they send into warfare, that I know of, are all controlled by humans, but make their tasks easier or safer (such as remote observance or bomb defusing, etc.)

    3. Re:How is this a "robot"? by microcars · · Score: 1

      The definition of real robot does require it be autonomous, but being tethered to a power supply is not a restriction for a robot. Not any definition I have ever seen.

      That makes perfect sense, thank you. Only now do I think of all the research projects from Carnegie Mellon that I have seen autonomously hopping around on one leg and tethered to a central power core.

      --
      I like microcars
    4. Re:How is this a "robot"? by microcars · · Score: 1

      ...unlike your remote controlled "bladders'n'shit yo" for special effects...

      I'm a grandfather. The only time I use the word "yo" is when I want my 3 grandkids to laugh hysterically at me.

      --
      I like microcars
  38. That's fine, but does it do... by macraig · · Score: 1

    .... floors?

  39. Late again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. is really starting to fall behind when it comes to giving me my geek news on time. This blob was all over facebook a week ago.

  40. Primary function? by LoudMusic · · Score: 0

    That's the most technologically advanced dildo I've ever seen ...

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  41. I, for one.... by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... would feed them honey flavored jelly beans.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  42. Do they have.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they have a pleasure model?

  43. Re: Welcoming our new overlords by Cheesetrap · · Score: 1

    Not like you have a choice - they're training them to *squit* through the cracks in the blast doors, fer fack's sake! *facepalm*

    *starts stocking up on Selley's No-More-Gaps(tm)*

  44. Sounds like the cookie cutters in the Diamond Age. by Yoozer · · Score: 1

    Robot then solidifies into hundreds of tiny scalpel blades, which chop up the tumor.

    Or the person, if things go haywire.

  45. There was a T-1000 joke before by merikari · · Score: 1

    There was a T-1000 joke thread, but it traveled back in time and accidentally terminated its former self.

    --
    My other SIG is a Sauer.
  46. Actually... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    There is a MUCH simpler solution. Larger bin INSIDE the roomba.
    All it requires is more plastic - no need for extra robotic thingies.

    Best part... It could be made as an attachment.
    You wouldn't have to buy a new roomba, just the bigger dust bin attachment that would replace the old one.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  47. What is the point? by LS · · Score: 1

    Why would you need a robot that can squeeze through cracks? Just make a robot that is smaller than the cracks. I guess one can imagine a scenario where a robot or its components need to be larger than a certain size to complete certain tasks, but has to get through a crack first, but that scenario is not coming to mind right now.

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  48. It's a Karcher product... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... so, it will get rid of sandniggers as well!

  49. DARPA + Robots = Metal Gear Solid? by Theoboley · · Score: 1

    Looks like Hideo Kojima isn't such a dreamer after all...

    --
    Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
  50. iRobot, meet iRobot by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    They'll have to teach the Roomba to not ingest its blob brother.

  51. T1000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh fuck, someone better call John Connor

  52. They should call it... by geekmansworld · · Score: 1

    SnotBot.

  53. The Beach Ball Alien from Dark Star! by Mad-Bassist · · Score: 1

    All it needs are a pair of hands.

    --
    "The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
    1. Re:The Beach Ball Alien from Dark Star! by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more along the lines of Meatwad from ATHF.

  54. Only if you're a visionary by abbynormal+brain · · Score: 0

    I can understand how "unimpressive" videos like that can be ... however, consider the possibilities once this technology matures:

    Inspection: Attach mini camera's and inspect those hard to reach places (space shuttle tubing, etc)
    Toy Industry: Speaks for itself. A small to large chunk of a billion dollar industry ain't bad.
    Robotics: This technology could act as "tissue" for life-like robots - which currently lack the smooth free flowing movement and "muscle" replication.
    Military: Self-adjusting micro cameras or taps. Self-propelling explosives.
    Etc...

    I don't mean this to sound like a "dis" ... but, c'mon - this technology has potential.

    --
    L'esperienza de questa dolce vita (The experience of this sweet life) - Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy
    1. Re:Only if you're a visionary by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      I can understand how "unimpressive" videos like that can be

      I had to watch it with the audio off (long story). That final segment was quite impressive - impressively creepy, what with the fast cuts between:
      the robot bulging strangely on one side like something wanted to get out,
      the robot moving jerkily, and
      the computer screen with the flashing diagram.

      It really seemed like it was going to make a lunge for someone's throat or explode into a cybernetic Lovecraftian horror. My mind was playing a horror-themed soundtrack with someone screaming "Oh, God! What have I done??"

  55. Discharges the Cancerous Slurry by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    "Most Disgusting String of Words Seen on Slashdot" award for 2009.

    W00t! Thanks!

    --
    -kgj
  56. does it clean ? by a1programmer · · Score: 0

    I hope it's at least made out of some sort of sticky material, so that it will at least pick up some dirt as it rolls around on the floor.

  57. It's kind of.. by KrimZon · · Score: 1

    It's kind of cute. They should make it fluffy. But not self replicating.

  58. Jamming new? by pontifier · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell, it has existed at least since 1938 when patent #2138974 describes electromagnetic "jamming" for the purposes of making a foot mold using a "magnetic box". Pneumatic "jamming" has existed since at least 1949 where patent #2472754 describes the effect... also for the purpose of making a foot mold.

    --
    -John Fenley
  59. Gross by Titanarm · · Score: 1

    That's gross!

  60. Re:Finally - Already done by randy+of+the+redwood · · Score: 1
    Too late, its already being done. Best part is we didn't need to make it locate the terrorists, they plant it themselves.

    http://www.kansascity.com/105/story/1479693.html

    --
    The sun is the same in a relative way, but you are shorter of breath and one day closer to death