Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

History In Video Games — a Closer Look

Posted by Soulskill on from the begins-and-ends-in-the-1940s dept.

scruffybr writes "Whether it's World War 2, the American Wild West or ancient Greece, history has long provided a rich source of video game narrative. Historical fact has been painstakingly preserved in some games, yet distorted beyond all recognition in others. Whereas one game may be praised for its depiction of history, others have been lambasted for opening fresh wounds or glorifying tragic events of our near past. Games have utilized historical narrative extensively, but to what extent does the platform take liberties with, and perhaps misuse it?"

8 of 139 comments (clear)

  1. Where is the news? by mseeger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The same thing has happened in the movies. Often historical events were only used as distorted background. And movies are as games made for entertainment purposes. So what counts is entertainment value not historical accuracy.

    CU, Martin

    1. Re:Where is the news? by zwei2stein · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People tend to actually take these things as fairly accurate depictions of what it really was like. Its just another one for nation of dum'.

      Hell, even evening news are made with 'It does not have to be real, just entertaining' motto.

      (And I shudder what future archaeologists with do with our pop culture as source material ... any history geek will tell you how average Joes understanding of history nowadays was pretty fucked up Shakespeare & co.).

      I'd consider entertainment value quite awesome, but then you end up with people who have no idea about past, or are comfortable about fact that 'history' can be 'adjusted' to fit better whatever you agenda is. And that is worrying, even if it is just for entertainment.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
  2. Non issue by iamapizza · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a bloody video game. They have no obligation to you to be historically accurate, it's just a "standard" that we've set amongst ourselves probably out of boredom. Go cry about something else please. If you want accuracy (arguable), then read a history book.

    --
    Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out.
    1. Re:Non issue by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You could say that about novels, too, yet people complain about Dan Brown's historical inaccuracies to no end.

      --
      10 PRINT CHR$(205.5+RND(1)); : GOTO 10
    2. Re:Non issue by Jurily · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a bloody video game. They have no obligation to you to be historically accurate,

      Of course not. It's just that most players can't tell the difference between the realistic parts and the fiction.

    3. Re:Non issue by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's more than that. It is my opinion that Brown specifically leverages people's misconceptions, prejudices, and even bigotry to make stories that will feed right into their beliefs, and which the more gullible will take as being based on historical fact, all the while claiming, truthfully, that it's all just for fun. He knows this happens. I believe he wants this to happen. Yet, there is plenty of plausible deniability to fall back on. On one hand, he can't help it if some of his audience are uncritical idiots who believe his stories are based on history, but he also has to know, and apparently is willing to accept that this will happen.

      There's no small amount of people fictionalizing history in a way which undoubtedly sows confusion and misunderstanding (Oliver Stone comes to mind), all the while claiming "it's only made up" while simultaneously being aware that many, many people will assume it's based on fact.

      And of course, there's no small amount of people who are simply distorting history to suit their own agendas.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  3. Hmph by Arimus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course thanks to the genius of Holywood we all know the Enigma machine was really stolen by a bunch of Americans (U-571) and not by Poles....

    Movies have been playing silly buggers with history since the first movies, video games are no different. Both are forms of escapism from reality.

    Why's this a) a suprise and b) taken so long for some to figure out?

    --
    --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
  4. Historians talk about history very differently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The idea that history is "factual" rather than a rolling series of arguments is both interesting and amusing.

    I wonder, with what vehemence, slashdotters would react if historians of science and technology ceased reporting on the human practice of science, and began advising on code design?

    "Games have utilized historical narrative extensively, but to what extent does the platform take liberties with, and perhaps misuse it."

    Mainstream media rarely depicts the historian's conception of history as currently practiced. At best it is Whig history (telling history to create moral lessons for today). At worst it is a fantasy purporting to a relationship with reality. Do you really expect games to speak into the complex construction of self-identity? The formation of power within classes leading to social conflict? The institutional factors behind the limits of political decision making within and between states? Or the emergence of sub-altern narratives (the utterly voiceless repressed) through careful emergence of non-standard documentary traditions?

    At best your demand is Grognard: that the belt-buckles are accurate and that Division X was not in Location Y. If you truely want to look at games serving history, look up Stalin, a three turn economy simulator designed to test Stalin / Trotsky / Bukharinite debates about preventable deaths.