Slashdot Mirror


Of Encrypted Hard Drives and "Evil Maids"

Schneier has a blog piece about Joanna Rutkowska's "evil maid" attack, demonstrated earlier this month against TrueCrypt. "The same kind of attack should work against any whole-disk encryption, including PGP Disk and BitLocker. ... [A] likely scenario is that you leave your encrypted computer in your hotel room when you go out to dinner, and the maid sneaks in and installs the hacked bootloader. ... [P]eople who encrypt their hard drives, or partitions on their hard drives, have to realize that the encryption gives them less protection than they probably believe. It protects against someone confiscating or stealing their computer and then trying to get at the data. It does not protect against an attacker who has access to your computer over a period of time during which you use it, too."

55 of 376 comments (clear)

  1. surprise by jacquesm · · Score: 5, Informative

    physical access > digital security

    1. Re:surprise by EvanED · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually one of the points of full disk encryption is that it gives you a measure of protection even when physical security is compromised.

      Why on earth would do you do it otherwise?

    2. Re:surprise by aetherworld · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Slow news day?

      That article is actually like saying that there is no point to install a very expensive and secure door lock on your front door because it doesn't help you when you go get groceries and leave your door open. Duh. I'm sure most people realize that the point of disc encryption is not to protect your data while it's unencrypted in memory.

    3. Re:surprise by Abreu · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot Lizard-Spock

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    4. Re:surprise by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It gives you a measure of protection if your device is stolen. It does nothing for you if you are worried about an attacker who has access to the system without having to steal it.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    5. Re:surprise by Golddess · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except it's not quite like that. It sounds more like you lock your door and leave to get groceries. Before you get back, someone comes up to the door and installs something that can scan the key that is used to unlock the door. That person leaves, you return, unlock the door, and go in. You later head out again, locking the door behind you, and that other person comes up, recovers their device, makes a duplicate key based on the device's contents, and now has access to your home.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    6. Re:surprise by aetherworld · · Score: 3, Insightful

      True. I didn't really see it that way. Thanks for pointing it out.

      Still, it's kind of obvious that once someone gains physical access to your device, they can do anything with it. You could swap the keyboard with one that records all keystrokes or simply install a physical key logger device or do whatever you want with it.

    7. Re:surprise by malakai · · Score: 5, Informative

      My god the mod's today suck. All of these "Then don't leave yourself logged in" responses are getting +mod.

      This attack has NOTHING to do with you leaving your session authenticated and open. It's about a boot-loader level phish scheme.

      Basically, you come back to your laptop which you left off, you boot it up not noticing anything out of place, and you log in an unlock your drives. Meanwhile, little did you know that the intruder put a very small OS on to your laptop which runs your primary OS as a virtual OS. It's got low level hooks to all the basic INT's and can read any memory without chance of any program within your primary OS (now virtualized) detecting it.

      Then you log off and go out to dinner. The maid comes in, boots up, hits a key-sequence, and dumps a log to a USB drive. In that log somewhere is your password to your encrypted drives. Game over dude... game fucking over.

    8. Re:surprise by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Funny

      No no no, the suprise is that -hotel maids- are teh 1337 haxorz.

      I guess it couldn't be TOO bad, whenever I forget to put the "do not disturb" sign on my hotel room when I leave, the maids usually don't steal my stuff, they just neatly organize it. If they sneak into my computer, they'd probably defrag the hard drive and that's about it.

    9. Re:surprise by witherstaff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Feds did this to bypass PGP on a mobster's computer almost a decade ago. Well not exactly a bootloader, they put in a keylogger. Gee, if a Gman thought of this back in double ought, why is this making news for nerds today?

  2. At the next defcon... by purpledinoz · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm imagining a bunch of geeks dressed up in maid outfits.

    1. Re:At the next defcon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn you... I have an over active imagination, that made me throw up in my mouth. Just for that look at this horrifying thing.

    2. Re:At the next defcon... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Informative

      Worse than that. It says the outfit is sold out. I am NOT going outside or answering the door this Halloween.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:At the next defcon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Holy crap slashdot, you scare me! That was not sold out when I posted it.

    4. Re:At the next defcon... by laejoh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just like my dear papaaaa!

  3. Fine line between security and paranoia by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seriously, if you're worried about some hacker assassin breaking into your house or office and installing a bootloader, you're either doing something REALLY secretive (in which case the computer probably shouldn't even be on a network to upload any data back in the first place) or you're the kind of person who thinks Obama has your name on an "important persons" list and is coming for your guns. If someone has physical access to your machine and has the skills to install a bootloader, you're pretty much boned anyway, encryption or not (encryption isn't going to stop a simple keylogger). That's nothing new. Fortunately, for the vast vast majority of us, there are very few hacker black operatives who are running around breaking into hotel rooms just so they can get a single Visa number from Bob the dipshit middle manager. Newsflash Bob, YOU'RE NOT THAT IMPORTANT!

    Oh, and I love how the article calls the prospect of a ninja hacker hotel maid sneaking a bootloader onto your laptop and then sneaking back into your room later to retrieve the data a "likely scenario." What hotels is this guy staying at anyway?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Fine line between security and paranoia by Umuri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Offhand, i'd say any prominent high-class hotel that might be used by foreign businessmen on a trip.

      I mean, you do have a point, bob the middle manager isn't that important. However there are quite a few business people who this really would be that important to. Corporate espionage is high, and you know china has been doing focused attacks over the network.

      Sneakernet is always faster, so if they can train up a few pretty women, pay them a decent programmers wage to have them steal stuff that is the work of 10 engineers or even hundreds, that's a pretty sound economic payoff don't you think?

      I think stuff like this has it's purpose, and those who really are at risk need to be educated about it. For the other 95% of us, i think it's useful info to be aware about, just like don't leave your purse out visible in your car. Sure it probably won't happen, but there are always people who would.

      --
      You never realize how much manually made unmanaged "linked" lists suck, till you have src.link.link.link.link...
    2. Re:Fine line between security and paranoia by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You vastly underestimate the number of people traveling internationally and engaged in activities that the host governments find to be of interest.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    3. Re:Fine line between security and paranoia by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bob the middle manager isn't that important, but Bob routinely sends email to Dave the director and Charles the CxO. By trojaning Bob's computer you can start to build a pretty decent profile of the corporate activities going on within, and above, Bob's department ... including travel schedules of some other bigger fish in the corporate pond.

      Do this to 3 or 4 Bobs, and pretty soon you'll have an understanding of the corporate org chart, upcoming projects, and most importantly you'll be able to target your future EvilMaid attacks with pinpoint accuracy.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  4. Just another good reason... by detachment2702 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just another good reason to take your bootloader with you on a thumb drive or other type of removeable media.

  5. bootloader checksum by arabagast · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you are the kind of person that are in the danger zone of this happening (not that you would leave a computer with such sensitive information in your hotel room.); You would probably feel a lot better if you were able to checksum the bootloader when returning, maybe from an external usb drive. This would offcourse run it's own OS, not being done from the bootloader(for obvious reasons).

    --
    Doolittle : ...What is your one purpose in life?
    Bomb no.20 : To explode of course.
    1. Re:bootloader checksum by oldspewey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      one client I worked for that had a no thumb drives allowed policy

      I've dealt with clients like this too - no thumb drives, no phones with cameras - and in most cases these clients left gigantic vulnerabilities in other areas that made the threat of a few crappy cellphone pictures laughable.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    2. Re:bootloader checksum by amplt1337 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wouldn't it be even easier to simply keep all the important data on the USB stick? And run the OS off a R/O CD?

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    3. Re:bootloader checksum by Terrasque · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That won't work if the attacker use a hardware keylogger (which can be inserted under a laptop's keyboard - how often do you check there?).

      An easier way to checksum bootloader is via a tamper-proof hash stored in the encrypted area. But that require that the computer is actually telling you the truth, which is doubtful if they already went far enough to change the bootloader. But then again, your idea also require that the computer is honest... They could have replaced the bios itself, or made a small bootloader that worked its magic fast and silent, and then proceeded like a normal boot, starting from usb like bios would do..

      I was thinking of this a few months ago, actually, and the only solution I found was to either always have it with you (impractical), or store it in a trustworthy safe (could also be slightly impractical to haul around). And still you have to be certain of your environment (spy cameras, tempest type snooping, in some cases recording the sound of your key clicks...).

      Also, if you want it connected to a network, well darnit, you got another can of worms.. First, you need to update it, or else its vulnerable fast. Second, you need to trust the OS providers and the actual update. Could someone have stolen the signing key and faked an update? Is the company / employees really trustworthy? Are you sure the developer's machine isn't hacked and is used to spread dangerous code?

      I tried to make a system where I (if I had a lot of resources) couldn't possibly find any way around. I just couldn't find any. All of them had a potential loophole.

      My conclusion was : Pick an approperiate level of paranoia and go from there. And never expect it to be 100% secure.

      --
      It's The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules."
  6. And that's the lesser evil by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Funny

    You could have found the evil bartender.

    You leave your laptop at the hotel and you go out to take a beer. There, you meet the evil bartender, who because of a common past becomes your friend and starts inviting you to more and more beer. Then he closes the bar and you both go to a strip club where you meet the evil bartender's girlfriend and her friend who we shall call "Foxette".

    The next morning, you wake up in an unknown appartment with Foxette and a guy you don't even know. You quickly get out of there and go to work, with such a massive headache than when asked about the laptop's full disk encription, you answer is "the what?".

    1. Re:And that's the lesser evil by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Has anyone seen my kidney?"

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  7. Bootloader? BitLocker? by sam0737 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I didn't read the RTFA, but aren't MSFT's BitLocker supposes to validate the boot path (from BIOS code to bootloader up to the BitLocker decrypter) with the help of the TPM chip?

    1. Re:Bootloader? BitLocker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I didn't read the RTFA, but aren't MSFT's BitLocker supposes to validate the boot path (from BIOS code to bootloader up to the BitLocker decrypter) with the help of the TPM chip?

      It does, and thus the attack doesn't work here:
      "The key used for the disk encryption is sealed (encrypted) by the TPM chip and will only be released to the OS loader code if the early boot files appear to be unmodified."
      Now we'd just need someone to reverse the decision that TPMs are all evil and should not be used.

    2. Re:Bootloader? BitLocker? by Cyberax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes. You can have almost perfect _physical_ security with TPM.

      Alas, most of developers are allergic to it, even if it has good uses.

    3. Re:Bootloader? BitLocker? by rcamans · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A lot of designs do not have the tpm chip implemented. I know, because I am a designer, and most of the design requirements I fill do not include or want a tpm chp. This will only be in all systems when Intel makes it a part of their system chips (what used to be the north bridge / south bridge combination, and is now the PCH or silverthorne).

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
    4. Re:Bootloader? BitLocker? by mlts · · Score: 2, Informative

      Windows 7 is different from Vista in the way businesses and enterprises use it. Vista had two editions that were activated via an internal KMS system (very important when you have thousands of PCs and do not want them touching the Internet for activation). Windows 7 has only one edition that has this functionality, the Enterprise edition. This is available via volume license key agreements. Other than the MAK/KMS model of activation, this edition is the exact same as Ultimate which has BitLocker, BranchCache, and the other items.

      So, if a company is using a volume license of Windows 7, they will have access to BitLocker functionality. Server-wise, Windows Server 2008 and Windows Server 2008 R2 both have BitLocker functionality built in.

      This way, if a corporation that is running Windows 7 orders a bunch of laptops, they would be fools not to order ones with TPM chips because their OS will easily support this functionality. If they have an Active Directory infrastructure and no existing encryption product (PGP, PointSec), getting BitLocker deployed enterprise wide wouldn't be too difficult with AD holding recovery keys to machines.

      I'm glad Microsoft did this. No worry if a company has Business or Enterprise editions for features (like the issues with Vista). Now, if a company has a VLK and uses a key management server for internal activations [1], they have BitLocker available with W7.

      [1]: I'm not a fan of activation at all. Personally, my wish is they would have gone back to how XP VLK editions handled this. Businesses are not going to be pirating Windows because the BSA will come for a visit. Pirates will crack any activation. So, there is no real antipiracy benefit to Microsoft in forcing businesses to have an activation infrastructure.

  8. Just use a CD by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Informative

    When you encrypt your system partition with Truecrypt it forces you to make a CD (you actually have to burn and mount it before it will let you continue). This CD contains a copy of the bootloader and encryption key. If you always boot off that CD it won't help to attacker to replace the bootloader on the HDD.

    Of course they could target the CD but at least you can keep a mini CD in your wallet at all times.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  9. Re:My bootloader is on USB by Viol8 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its funny the levels kiddy porn file sharers have to go to these days to stay 1 step ahead of the police.

  10. Easily foiled by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Evil maids are easy to spot because of their goatees.

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  11. Re:Bucket List by mccalli · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someday I want to invent an attack, but only because I want the privilege of naming it.

    And some day I'd like to be hit by the attack you invent, because saying that I've been hit by an "all-knowing frog" attack would simply be cool.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  12. Why are we talking about this? by dachshund · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can see why it's called the "evil maid" attack; a likely scenario is that you leave your encrypted computer in your hotel room when you go out to dinner, and the maid sneaks in and installs the hacked bootloader. The same maid could even sneak back the next night and erase any traces of her actions.

    Maybe if she's an idiot. Once you've installed your own bootloader, it can neatly remove itself. (After installing malware, or transferring the encryption keys and data it needs over the network.) Why in the world would the maid unnecessarily repeat the riskiest part of the entire attack?

    But more to the point, it must be a slow week. Why are "serious" security researchers even wasting time on something this obvious? Of course your software-based hard disk encryption is hosed in the event that an attacker gets hold of your machine and can alter the bootloader. Hell, the really sophisticated bad guys aren't even going to do anything this difficult or risky. After all, the encryption key has to be in RAM somewhere whenever you're using software-based encryption (hardware encryption excluded). A well-engineered piece of malware will recover it, and two-factor authentication isn't going to help you.

    Even trusted boot will only get you so far against a motivated adversary with this much sophistication. Don't leave your vital computing equipment behind in your hotel room.

  13. Re:My bootloader is on USB by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

    If someone wants your information that bad, they just need a pair of pliers to succeed with the attack.

    1) Step one: apply pliers to target's scrotum.
    2) Ask them once to access the laptop.
    3) If any resistance is given, squeeze the pliers just a tad.

    Now, leave it to a bunch of nerds to come up with technical workarounds and miss the real point.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  14. Re:Bucket List by Gulthek · · Score: 5, Funny

    The hypnotoad security tool protects against the all-knowing frog attack, but comes with its own drawbac--ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOOL.

  15. Bitlocker? by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bullshit.

    The bootloader is signed. Use this in combination with the TPM chip (embedded smartcard) on your laptop - AS SPECIFIED BY THE GUIDANCE - and use a PIN. There's no loading the disk or getting at the data without cracking AES. At least once.

    So... Start your engines.

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    1. Re:Bitlocker? by mlts · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The best BitLocker protection is a combination of PIN + TPM + USB flash drive. This way, if a thief rips off your laptop, but you have your USB flash drive with you (either in your wallet, around the neck, or on a keychain), you are pretty much assured that they will not have access to data, no matter what they try.

      For additional protection since Windows 7 has been released to everyone, perhaps consider BitLocker To Go for all external drives. With this, you can encrypt your external disks using (I hope) a decent passphrase, have the drives available for mounting automatically, and save the recovery volume key offsite somewhere secure.

    2. Re:Bitlocker? by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you lose the TPM, you aren't going to be able to unencrypt the drive.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    3. Re:Bitlocker? by Stu101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I like the theory. However one thing to bear in mind is that the integrity of Bitlocker itself is questionable. I know for a *FACT* that "3 letter agencies" have backdoor keys. Ask any IT forensics person. Microsoft even have closed, invite only sessions for enforcement agencies to show them how to bypass bitlocker security.

      That in itself means that the government/big brother is guarenteed to be able to bypass MS based secruity. Ask yourself this, can you see Osama Bin laden using bitlocker to protect his stuff ?

      Take this further, do you want the government to have access to your files, just a quick phone call to MS and wham, all your shit laid bare.

      --
      http://www.writeitfor.us - Writing IT for the IT generation.
    4. Re:Bitlocker? by cbhacking · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As somebody who actually worked on BitLocker during an internship at MS, that's bullshit. I was working directly with the metadata and its parser, including the recovery keys. There was absolutely no "TLA Agency" recovery key. The master key for each volume is encrypted and stored on the volume itself (and each volume has a unique key). This is exactly the key used to decrypt the drive, and is never stored in plaintext anywhere. How do you get around this?

      You can't store a recovery key for each volume in some secret database - the master keys, and their encryption keys, are unique.
      You can't store a secret recovery key on the volume - it would have shown up when the disk was accessed at block device level.
      There are probably plenty of other ideas that don't work, but I assure you, there aren't any that do. BitLocker was extensively examined by crypto experts, and no backdoors or methods to break it were discovered.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    5. Re:Bitlocker? by Rakishi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If your motherboard crashes and the TPM chip goes pfft, is there a way to recover the drive?

      And if your hard drive head crashes and physically destroys your platters if there a way to recover the drive? If you laptop is run over by a steam roller is there a way to recover the drive? If you laptop is stolen is there a way to recover the drive?

      Shit happens. If you don't have up to date backups then you're an idiot and deserve to lose your data, plain and simple.

  16. Re:Bucket List by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Funny

    saying that I've been hit by an "all-knowing frog" attack would simply be cool.

    That's rather a rude way to describe being beaten by the French.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. Re:My bootloader is on USB by russotto · · Score: 5, Funny

    If someone wants your information that bad, they just need a pair of pliers to succeed with the attack.

    1) Step one: apply pliers to target's scrotum.
    2) Ask them once to access the laptop.
    3) If any resistance is given, squeeze the pliers just a tad.

    Now, leave it to a bunch of nerds to come up with technical workarounds and miss the real point.

    Workaround 1) Make sure only women have the information.
    Workaround 2) Preventative castration
    Workaround 3) Shoot anyone with pliers who comes within 10 feet
    Workaround 4) Duress code which releases false information. (this one's likely practical but only as a delaying tactic; it's going to hurt a lot when the interrogator finds the information doesn't verify)

  19. Oh, I am soooooo glad... by X.25 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that I got out of that shithole called 'security world'.

    It was really fun and interesting until 2003, but these days it's a joke.

    Hey, even in year 1997 we all realized that once someone has physical access to your computer - you are fucked.

    And here we are, in year 2009, reading "research" telling us things we all already know.

    Sigh...

    P.S: maid doesn't need to install any fancy shit, a keylogger will do just fine.

  20. TPM not necisarily evil. by pentalive · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The TPM can be used for good or evil, It all depends on if the owner == the user == the one holding the master key.

    If I own the machine, and I am the user of that machine - I want the master TPM key and the ability to sign stuff for myself.

  21. Re:Trojans still work by Megahard · · Score: 2, Funny

    So the Evil Maid comes into your room and uses a Trojan?

    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
  22. Re:Missing the point by HikingStick · · Score: 2, Informative

    I worked for a quasi-governmental agency for a number of years. Although we adopted disk encryption, our primary defense was the one you describe: you don't go anywhere without your laptop. That's right--not left in the conference room over lunch, or even unattended in the airport bathrooms. I still can't believe how many brain donors set their laptop bags down near the entrance or the sink and then go do their business. It's either in the stall, over your shoulder, or on the floor against your legs. They were even told not to leave them in their cars if they stopped at the grocery store on the way home (we had one stolen that way during a "3 minute" stop). We even had some good training videos that showed how quickly someone could swap laptop bags (for so long, most of them looked alike), or pop open the bag and replace the laptop with a phone book in under 30 seconds while a speaker was busy talking to guests after a presentation.

    In addition, there were reports that had to be filled out to inform management if a laptop was lost or stolen. There were disclosures to the entities that were supervised. The consequences of losing a laptop were so painful that no one wanted to lose one.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  23. Something you have, something you know. by ACMENEWSLLC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For that matter, the guys video taping the room to sell you and your wife's activities to that voyeur site aims the camera at your laptop, watches your keystrokes, and boom - he has all you passwords you type in. Banking? PayPal? E-Mail.

    You really need to use both a password and a physical device. Such as RSA tokens. My bank offers this for online banking. I have several for different things.

  24. As wikipedia likes to say by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Citation Needed."

    Sorry, but I'll need something more than the word of some random guy on the Internet to believe this for a number of reasons, not the least of which being that such a backdoor would be something security testers would notice.

  25. Information wants to be free by rwa2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, #1... security measures only serve as deterrents. There will be a way around every security device, the only metric you really need to worry about is whether your:

      (cost to circumvent) / (value of assets + cost to secure)

    ratio is conveniently higher than your neighbors (ha ha, security people hate any mention of "convenience").

    So... #2: by far the best thing you can do is to make sure your assets are relatively worthless compared to what other "target" have. Live a frugal life. Keep offsite backups of your photo albums. Don't keep secrets. And if you do, bury them with enough other crap (maybe using steganography if necessary) to decrease the signal/noise enough to make finding and sorting through the information kind of useless to those not in the know. Maybe you have lots of invalid bank and credit card information lying around. Or put a whole bunch of passwords in your secret password vault, in case it gets compromised (good sites will eventually lock them out for trying them all, and failed attempts will also tip you off and give you time to respond).

    Next measure in the equation is to increase the cost of your perpetrator to circumvent security measures or commit crimes, far above what they'd gain by stealing your assets.

    Cheap deterrents first: live up a flight of stairs... thieves are inherently lazy and will go for the "low hanging fruit" instead of you. In the context of this article, put your laptop up high in a closet or stash it in a drawer... make them search through dirty laundry for it.

    The best society wouldn't need any security at all... if there was enough transparency and free flow of information, all thieves would get caught and reprimanded. So participate in the whole neighborhood watch thing, make sure your perp has to perform his act in very public settings, uniquely tag your stuff, and post warnings to remind them and make them nervous about getting arrested / shot / going to hell etc.

    Finally, we get to the part of the equation where you actually have to actively do something for extra security measures.

    First, make it a habit to perform the rudimentary simple steps of locking your door and always having your keys on you. Deadbolt is much better than the handle switch, and also helps insure that you remembered your keys. I involuntarily lock my house and car doors now, and always brush my pockets with my hands to check that my keys and wallet are still there. At this point, I usually notice within 5 minutes if something's missing.

    Passwords and encryption are just more sophisticated keys and locks. Not uncircumventable, but much better than nothing. But before spending lots of money on more complex 2- & 3-factor keys and locks ... especially those that can completely shoot you in the foot and result in losing all your data... most people invest in other measures ... alarms and security cameras that would increase the chances of the perp getting caught. I haven't seen a whole lot that focuses on this area yet... the phone home mechanisms and stuff like that, but I figure it would be much more productive to concentrate on these kinds of security measures in the near term.

  26. 3 Words... by hofmny · · Score: 2, Informative

    BIOS BOOT PASSWORD