Slashdot Mirror


Caves of the Moon

jeno passes along this excerpt from New Scientist: "A deep hole on the moon that could open into a vast underground tunnel has been found for the first time. The discovery strengthens evidence for subsurface, lava-carved channels that could shield future human colonists from space radiation and other hazards. ... The hole measures 65 meters across, and based on images taken at a variety of sun angles, the hole is thought to extend down at least 80 meters. It sits in the middle of a rille, suggesting the hole leads into a lava tube as wide as 370 meters across."

33 of 172 comments (clear)

  1. Beware by ari_j · · Score: 2, Funny

    Beware the mole people!

  2. Before you get exited about gaping moon holes... by Rip+Dick · · Score: 5, Funny

    The moon is a harsh mistress...

  3. Liquid Hot MAG-MA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "It sits in the middle of a rille, suggesting the hole leads into a lava tube as wide as 370 meters across."

    This is really cool, but the main problem with living in lava tubes is...

    LAVA.

    1. Re:Liquid Hot MAG-MA! by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Given the moon's lesser gravity, you should be able to jump right over the lava. That's right folks, this going to be one great big real-life Mario Brothers game!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  4. Beware of the Cave Dwellers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    3.5 billion years into existence and we've finally hit the first plot point.

    1. Re:Beware of the Cave Dwellers! by Megaweapon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thong... the fish is ready.

      --
      I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
  5. Just to get it out of the way ... by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's no moon! It's a space station.

    That hole is probably where it fires its main weapon from.

  6. Obviously... by sabernet · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is R. Daneel Olivaw's hideout

    1. Re:Obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm on ur moon, controlin ur destiny

    2. Re:Obviously... by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't be silly, he won't be built for another couple of thousand years. We still have to turn the planet radioactive first.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  7. In other news: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    A similar hole was discovered on Uranus...

    1. Re:In other news: by rhyder128k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      M'ars

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
  8. Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The moon isn't like a truck - it's a series of tubes.

  9. So then, now we know by countertrolling · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The moon is made out of Swiss cheese...

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  10. Access point to the hyperlogos by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sorry I can't find a better link, but you don't really need a lava tube for settlement, it just makes it cheaper and easier. You're still going to need an inflatable habitat or similar (honestly, what else makes sense?) to sit in the tube.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Access point to the hyperlogos by mpe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sorry I can't find a better link, but you don't really need a lava tube for settlement, it just makes it cheaper and easier. You're still going to need an inflatable habitat

      The obvious problem with an inflatable habitat is that anything the size of dust is going to make at least one hole in it. Patching is likely to take up quite a bit of someone's time.

      or similar (honestly, what else makes sense?) to sit in the tube.

      Install two bulkheads some distance apart and pressurize the space in between to 75 kPa.

    2. Re:Access point to the hyperlogos by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Informative

      The obvious problem with an inflatable habitat is that anything the size of dust is going to make at least one hole in it.

      This isn't a kid's balloon. As I recall, the skin is about six inches thick, and made of kevlar.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  11. Re:Just one question... by KDR_11k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure but the same could happen to your home. Events of that type are pretty rare and hell, if something can smash through solid rock it'll probably smash through the ceiling of your surface moonbase too.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  12. Re:I love astronomy! by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would love to hear your simpler explanation. Any will do, since you have a bunch of them.

  13. Re:Bin Laden? by JDeane · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who is this we?

    Do you have some sort of multiple personality disorder?

    I guess your collective has no sense of humor "Your sense of comedy will be assimilated, resistance is futile, clowns are irrelevant"

    Hehehehe too fun :)

  14. Chewy... by Annorax · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... I've got a bad feeling about this.

  15. Re:Just one question... by BeardedChimp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not really, our atmosphere prevents any smallish rocks from hitting us (and a lot of them do hit the atmosphere just watch a meteor shower). The moon has no such convenience as seen by looking at its continuous craters.

  16. Ice by mbone · · Score: 5, Informative

    These are almost certainly "sinkholes" into lava tubes, where lava runs out the center of a partially frozen lava flow. (Apollo 15 showed pretty clearly that at least the Hadley Rill was a collapsed lava tube.) There are lava tubes you can visit on the big island of Hawaii.

    The interesting thing to me about this is that the interior of these tubes, being far from the Sun and in a vacuum, might easily contain an appreciable amount of water ice, for the same reason that the lunar poles might, but with a much more convenient distribution across the Moon's surface.

    Besides, wouldn't it be cool to explore these 3 billion year old caves?

  17. So easy ... by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 2, Funny

    a moon-caveman could do it?

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  18. Mapping Lunar Caves by sanman2 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Seriously though - I wonder what would be the best kind of sensors/instrumentation to map underground caves and tunnels on the Moon from orbit? Isn't there supposed to be something called "cavern sensing radar" or "ground penetrating radar" that can do this stuff? If so, then how come it hasn't been done yet? Surely we're not just going to rely on finding these choice living locations by just luckily spotting some hole in the ground?

    If Man is going to return to the Moon and make a permanent base there, then it might as well be done in a cave, which is much more naturally sheltered from harmful cosmic rays and meteors, as compared to living in some inflatable habitat on the surface. Heck, that's why our cavemen ancestors liked caves to begin with - because they were uniquely sheltering environments. Shouldn't there be some kind of effort to map out the lunar underground to reveal where the best locations might be? As they say in real estate - it's location, location, location!

    1. Re:Mapping Lunar Caves by mbone · · Score: 3, Informative

      Very low frequency radar could do this, such as the SHARAD radar used to map the subsurface water ice on Mars.

      This will not be as easy as it might seem - SHARAD uses 15-25 MHz radar, or wavelengths from 1-3 meters. A 10 meter diameter tunnel (a fairly large lava tube) would only be a few wavelengths across, and thus would be hard to see.

      Apollo 17 orbited a 60 meter wavelength radar system, but I don't think that this had either the surface coverage or the resolution to realistically see lava tubes.

      With this finding, I expect some nation will find the money to orbit a suitable radar around the moon to hunt for more tubes.

    2. Re:Mapping Lunar Caves by mpe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously though - I wonder what would be the best kind of sensors/instrumentation to map underground caves and tunnels on the Moon from orbit? Isn't there supposed to be something called "cavern sensing radar" or "ground penetrating radar" that can do this stuff?

      Such radar typically used on Earth tends to be in contact with the ground. So you'd need to land a vehicle. Also IIRC it is difficult to get a stable Lunar orbit, due to both the Earth being nearby and the Moon not being of uniform density.

    3. Re:Mapping Lunar Caves by JDeane · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Also IIRC it is difficult to get a stable Lunar orbit, due to both the Earth being nearby and the Moon not being of uniform density."

      So there could potentially be huge caverns on the moon? enough to make a difference in the amount of gravity? Now that sounds like a reason to go back to the moon!!! I am sure they will not be as interesting as caves here on earth (or they could be cooler in a different way I guess)

      I am excited about the Moon again now :) hmmmm who's going next? I heard something about a Chinese mission maybe they will find something cool.

      Too bad some one couldn't invent MRI for planets (I do not really understand MRI tech but it would be cool if they could do it lol)

    4. Re:Mapping Lunar Caves by sillybilly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even if there is no lunar underground cave system, we could always dig one if the need arises. Moon mining could be done subsurface, to save the unmanned underground vehicle / remote controlled robots from temperature fluctuations and space radiation exposure. People and plants and animals are unlikely to ever live on the moon, other than as a work outpost, because there is not enough gravity for healthy functioning for highly extended periods such as over a few decades. Unless you construct a space station, spin it to create gravity, and stick that in a huge huge huge underground lunar cavern, with the axles supported by very strong pillars. Then you get extra protection from asteroid hits and radiation, but you'd still have to manage an on-surface solar panel array that gets lunar day and night fluctuations every 27.3 Earth days. Unless you can find and concentrate up enough uranium and thorium underground to manage simply with nuclear power, and no need for solar energy. Unless you figure out how to use and control fusion, whose fuel is abundant and whose nuclear waste is much less, mostly irradiated structural radiation, whose properties are not too far from outer space irradiated structural components.

      In free outer space, off the surface of the moon, you can spin a large enough cylinder to generate artificial gravity needed by most lifeforms for proper functioning (humans, plants), and the spinning structure does not need superstrong bearings for axial support, it just floats in a free space orbit. Asteroid hits and radiation would mandate periodic replacement of the outermost shield, but if you have triple or tentuple airlock/shield layers, the innermost shields should stay safe. Of course it'd still need a longrange radar to catch and vaporize very large and very fast flying asteroids Patriot rocket style, similar to the ones used in the 1st gulf war, shooting at Scud missiles mid flight and destroying them, or at least throwing them off track.

  19. Re:Just one question... by mbone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This lava flow comes from the late heavy bombardment and so the lava tube is well over 3 billion years old. Yes, the roof might fall in, but (given that there is no erosion, and no ground water dissolving the rocks) if it hasn't collapsed in 3+ billion years, the odds are in your favor.

    Now, that doesn't mean that these tubes are necessarily stable, and you would certainly want to be cautious on the first visit, and provide a roof to protect against cave-ins caused by human activity, but many of the lava tubes on Earth are quite stable, and similar tubes on the Moon would be great places to set up shop.

  20. Re:Lava, on The Moon, really? by mbone · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's been postulated a long time - 150 years or more. Apollo showed very clearly that the Mare are big basalt lava flows, and there are various other rilles and other lava related features.

  21. Re:Bin Laden? by mpe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So they finally found out where Osama has been hiding....
    A cave on the moon!!! That bastard probably runs around calling it a "Death Star"


    Well that's one way to get a bigger budget for manned space exploration :)

  22. Re:Lava, on The Moon, really? by mbone · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Moon has highlands and Mares. The highlands are old (saturated by craters at all scales) and mostly made of a type of granite, while the Mare are relatively younger (not saturated by craters at the km scale) and made of basalt lava. This basalt lava is mostly thought to have come from the late heavy bombardment - a period of massive collisions on the Moon about 3.9 billion years ago which is now hypothesized to be from a disruption of the asteroid belt from the orbital migration of the outer planets.