Slashdot Mirror


AbiCollab Takes On Google Docs and Zoho Writer

msevior writes "Just released today, the free software AbiWord word processor, employed by the One Laptop Per Child project, tightly integrates with a new collaboration Web site to enable easy real-time collaborative editing of documents. AbiCollab.net also enables documents to be stored online, allows format conversion on the fly, stores the history of the docs in svn, provides direct links to HTML-ized docs that update as you save them, and allows easy sharing of docs amongst friends and groups. All in all, new competition for Google Docs and Zoho Writer, but featuring a real word processor rather than an app in a browser."

23 of 82 comments (clear)

  1. Slashvertisement! by shashark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "...but featuring a real word processor rather than an app in a browser"
    Seriously, what on earth is that supposed to mean ?

    1. Re:Slashvertisement! by 1155 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It means the person who wrote this is sick of web "applications", and prefers desktop applications. Like most sane people.

    2. Re:Slashvertisement! by shashark · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll tell you what my problems are with that statement:
      1: If the suggested app is a desktop app, why compare it with Google docs or Zoho docs ?
      2: The whole premise of 'taking on google docs' without having browser as a delivery mode doesn't make sense. Google docs is popular [if at all] NOT because it has more features - it is popular because it can work from within a browser. Get what I mean ? No downloads, no clients, no 'need to take my machine or harddrive with me' - get it ?
      3: I'm assuming the features touted here are present in Microsoft Word through Sharepoint and/or Groove [never used both though]. So what's so innovative about this app ?

      Seriously, anyone ?

    3. Re:Slashvertisement! by msevior · · Score: 4, Informative

      In answer to your questions:
      1. Because it allows collaborative editing for documents hosted on a website. Press "save" in abiword of a document loaded from the site and it is saved back to the site. Just like google docs and zoho.

      2. Because some people do need to work together to create documents. Ever had a document emailed to you that requested changes? Now you just connect straight on the service.

      3. Your assumption is incorrect. Sharepoint does not allow the deep, instant collaboration between arbitrarily sized collection of people provided by abiword+abiword. Certainly not at the price offered by abicollab.net ether ($0.00).

      One of the most touted features of OLPC is the "Write" word processor which allows children to work on documents together. Now everyone with a Windows or Linux computer can do that in a fully fledged word processor.

    4. Re:Slashvertisement! by Daengbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's really more about the real-time collab aspect than the web app part. Abiword has had collab for a while, but it was kind of difficult to set up. Hopefully, AbiCollab makes this process simpler. Eventually, I'd like to see the collab move toward Telepathy so that I can just use my contact list and connect that way. The revisions and everything sound awesome, though.

    5. Re:Slashvertisement! by msevior · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Eventually, I'd like to see the collab move toward Telepathy so that I can just use my contact list and connect that way.

      Yes. We're quite a way along the path to getting a fully fledged telepathy backend working. Like all these things in Free Software, we could do with more resources. We finally got the web interface all sorted out though, so now it's released.

      You are right in that the website has lots of additional and useful features. Like having the full history of the document and extremely easy web publication of the document in pdf, html, odt rtf, docx etc.

    6. Re:Slashvertisement! by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 2, Informative

      "...but featuring a real word processor rather than an app in a browser" Seriously, what on earth is that supposed to mean ?

      This isn't a slashvertisement; by "app in a browser," they mean the dazzling display of massive AJAX that is characteristic of Google Apps. AbiCollab is not this; if you looked into it more, you'd see you actually need a plug-in to make this work.

      Thus, AbiCollab really isn't an "app in the browser" in the traditional sense of a Web application--it's a desktop application hosted by a Web browser via a plug-in. That is what they meant. Of course, whether this is a good or bad thing is another story, since unlike Google Apps, you can use this only on platforms that are supported by some desktop application (and that have the AbiCollab plug-in).

      --
      R.Mo
    7. Re:Slashvertisement! by uwog · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, MS Word does now allow collaborative editing of Word documents (they do for spreadsheets and presentations).

  2. More Like Pride of Authorship by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 3, Informative

    The submitter, msevior, is one of the Abiword devs, long-term.

    I used Abiword several years back. I think I used every linux word processor ever made for a while several years back. Finally settled with Open's. Think it was because of compatibility issues with the rest of the world (the Real one, the one I live in) who used MS, I honestly can't recall. Has Abiword gotten better in that regard? I do know that I'm a bit too far down the road with Open, which has garnered a satisfying momentum and robustness in its own right, to switch now. Unless Abiword is a helluva lot less expensive than Open. Oh yeah, they're both free. Never mind.

    1. Re:More Like Pride of Authorship by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OpenOffice does seem to have better compatibility -- though, oddly, AbiWord seems to create much cleaner, more human-readable ODT files than OpenOffice.

      The main advantage is that AbiWord was much lighter, partly because it's just a word processor. I used to use AbiWord for word processing, Gnumeric for spreadsheets, etc. Which doesn't matter to me anymore, now that OpenOffice starts in about two seconds for me, cold or hot.

      The main other advantage of OpenOffice was stability -- AbiWord used to crash a lot, but that seems to have gotten better.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  3. Does anyone actually *want* collaborative software by RMH101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, "collaborative whiteboards" and multi-user editing environments have been around since early Netscape Communicator days - but does anyone actually use or want them? Sure, a system for checking out documents so several people can make changes, but simultaneous editing of documents - what's the use case for them? Who's asking for this? Who's even using it?

  4. It's a locked in EXTERNAL web site, no thanks. by frith01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This app only works as long as the abicollab.net website is functional, and they will get to see a copy of anything you do. This would only be a useful alternative
    if there was a separate deployable web-service that could be INTERNALLY hosted.

    The main reason for us not using google apps is that the documents would be vulnerable to privacy issues. This solution does not fix that problem.
    If you have access to external web site, you might as well use a web based app.

    1. Re:It's a locked in EXTERNAL web site, no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You collaborate across jabber with no use of abicollab.net. It's integrated with telepathy on gnome too...

    2. Re:It's a locked in EXTERNAL web site, no thanks. by msevior · · Score: 4, Informative

      We hear you. This can easily be arranged. The service can be deployed on a smallish server that could easily handle several hundred simultaneous collaborative documents (enough for a high school for example) or scale up to handle what we expect from the whole web. Most of the processing grunt needed is actually in the clients. This a huge advantage compared to Google apps which rely on the server for their CPU cycles.

    3. Re:It's a locked in EXTERNAL web site, no thanks. by buchner.johannes · · Score: 3, Informative

      This article talks a little -- but not too much -- about how it works:
      http://www.abisource.com/wiki/AbiCollab
      It seems to use "gocollab", or that was a previous name?

      In 2005: http://gnomejournal.org/article/31/gocollab----peer-to-peer-document-collaboration

      The next major version of GNOME Office will introduce a new way of handling the problem, called GOCollab. GOCollab will basically marry the already built-in revision systems of Abiword and Gnumeric with a P2P network comparable to file sharing applications like Gnutella or eMule. This means that neither Bob nor Jane nor anybody else needs a central server to be set up and run, and most of their changes to a document will be merged together automatically.

      I am sure you can replace AbiCollab.net with your own server. Would be nice though if the websites code was Open Source.

      Here are some screenshots of the website in action: http://abisource.com/release-notes/2.8.0.phtml

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    4. Re:It's a locked in EXTERNAL web site, no thanks. by uwog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes. for sure in a commercial form. If I were the only one to decide, I'd open source all of it right now, but we'll see how that turns out.

    5. Re:It's a locked in EXTERNAL web site, no thanks. by megabyte405 · · Score: 3, Informative

      AbiCollab (the feature of AbiWord) has a number of backends for you to use in collaboration. One is Jabber-based, one is TCP, and one is the "AbiCollab.net Service" - so you can run it either centrally hosted or peer-to-peer.

      --
      I recognize people by their sigs. Is that a bad thing?
  5. articles/reports/project proposals by excelsior_gr · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have you ever tried to write a document like an article with many co-authors, an interdisciplinary project report or proposal? Being able to simultaneously change the document saves a LOT of time. Over here, we go with LaTeX and SVN.

  6. Re:Does anyone actually *want* collaborative softw by Metsys · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We are.

    We've been having to use Gobby for collaborative writing because it's the only secure way for us to do writing sessions online. Sure, having some text formatting in a program like that would be nice, but we've been copying the Gobby sessions over to our Wiki and the formatting is done there anyway, so there isn't much of a need for that but it still would be nice for future projects.

    Even down the road when we can afford to relocate and work in the same building instead of having all our studio members living in different states, we are still going to do our writing sessions with some kind of real-time collaborative writing software. You have no idea how much easier it is to make changes yourself instead of pointing at someone's screen telling them what to type, or how much faster you can both write when you can both be working on different parts of the script at the same time, or having someone edit your mistakes immediately. When you are actually discussing the story constantly with a co-writer, you really want software like this.

    As for whiteboards, we'd really like to have the same real-time collaborative editing that we enjoy with Gobby for our design and art production as well. We've tried things like OpenCanvas or those online paint chat applications, and nothing really cuts it. So for that we are settling with VNC and uploading the files to each other when we need to do some serious red-lining.

  7. Re:Who cares? by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Google, presumably, coz now the only feature their stripped down excuse for a word processor had over anything else has been added to a real wordprocessor.

    Also, every company dumb enough to think storing internal docs on an out-of-house remote server is a good idea.

    What is needed is a plugin for Abiword that can be used to save to *any* svn server, not just the hosted service. That way a company can ensure that their internal documents remain internal. It also means that you can *choose* to be at the whim of a service provider, or *choose* to go it alone.

    Such a feature in a word processor would be a *huge* selling point to companies and savvy individuals alike, a selling point that can be used as a real benefit to offset to the very real costs of migrating away from MS Office.

    --
    I hate printers.
  8. Re:Is it me alone... by AP31R0N · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i've found GDocs useful for sharing, but not a viable competitor to MSO or ever OO.o (in terms of features). Based on your post, i've created a Zoho account and will give it a try. i use GDocs mostly for its integration into all my other Google stuff. It's convenient to be in my GMail account and then hit Documents, and there i am. Getting my friends to go to yet another site to share stuff might annoy me and my friends, as made up as they are.

    What i'd really love is for docs and email to be seamless *cough* GWave *cough*. But i don't have an invite yet.

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  9. Re:Flash buttons for login and register? by uwog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Haha, blame the design people. Apparently they really care about how a tittle piece of text looks :) I'll kill the flash off as soon as possible, but we were on a deadline.

  10. Re:So, can I get the server side software? by uwog · · Score: 2, Informative

    We are working on making a downloadable "server component" available. Until we do, you'll indeed have to trust us to keep our servers online.