Installing Linux On Old Hardware?
cptdondo writes "I've got an old laptop that I've been trying to resurrect. It has a 486MHz CPU, 28 MB of RAM, a 720 MB HD, a 1.44MB floppy drive, and 640x480 VESA video. It does not have a CD drive, USB port, or a network port. It has PCMCIA, and I have a network card for that. My goal is to get a minimal GUI that lets me run a basic browser like Dillo and open a couple of xterms. I've spent the last few days trying to find a Linux distro that will work on that machine. I've done a lot of work on OpenWRT, so naturally I though that would work, but X appears to be broken in the recent builds — I can't get the keyboard to work. (OK, not surprising; OpenWRT is made to run on WiFi Access Point hardware which doesn't have a keyboard...) All of the 'mini' distros come as a live CD; useless on a machine without a CD-ROM. Ditto for the USB images. I'm also finding that the definition of a 'mini' distro has gotten to the point of 'It fits on a 3GB partition and needs 128 MB RAM to run.' Has Linux really become that bloated? Do we really need 2.2 GB of cruft to bring up a simple X session? Is there a distro that provides direct ext2 images instead of live CDs?"
Then you too can be a true nigger, and anyone who finds any fault with anything yo
CLUE: A "base system" means you don't check the box that says "desktop system" when you get to the tasksel screen, that way you can apt-get only what you need after install. Dumbass.
Considering how much the trend in Linux is to simply copy the look, feel, and functionality of Windows it's not surprising that it's also copied Windows' trend toward being bloated.
I haven't seen anything innovative come out of Linux in years. Everything is simply "copy this" and "copy that" from other operating systems.
It's sad when the most exciting innovations in the *NIX world come from Apple, and not from the grassroots open source community.
-- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
Guess you idiots can't read as he stated the laptop he's talking about pre-dates USB and doesn't have any. Nor does it have a NIC and the HD is less then 1GB
About the only solution I can see is a debian floppy installation that should allow you to get the PCMCIA nic working if drivers are available. From there, you can install a bare bones minimal system that'll do what you want.
Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
This is something I've thought about for ten years. When people try out linux, or when techies try out linux, it's always on a spare machine which is inevitably worse for specs than their windows box. Inevitably they never fully make the switch.
So many years ago I decided I would treat linux well and give it the preferred hardware. Guess what, I was much more satisfied having a great system rather than something hobbling along. The user experience was obviously a total notch up and so you get a better impression of linux because it can then do so much more.
My opinion on this particular story is that it's completely bogus to think you'll approach something you'll make significant use of with the specs we see given. When you see a garbage system, hobbling along, ask yourself, what did I actually expect to come out of this? Something almost as good as my dual-core windows desktop? Come on.
Just try it. Give linux your windows hardware and put windows on your worse, spare hardware. See how it feels when the shoe's on the other foot. Not so fun anymore.
Now, perhaps something constructive. Why bother with this old machine when you can dumpster dive for better *easily* or you could buy a sheeva plug for $99?
Selah.ca. Pause, and calmly think on that.