Slashdot Mirror


Asimov Estate Authorizes New I, Robot Books

daria42 writes "In a move guaranteed to annoy long-term science fiction fans, the estate of legendary science fiction author Isaac Asimov, who passed away in 1992, has authorized a trilogy of sequels to his beloved I, Robot short story series, to be written by relatively unknown fantasy author Mickey Zucker Reichert. The move is already garnering opposition online. 'Isaac Asimov died forty years after they were first written. If he had wanted to follow them up, he would have. The author's intentions need to be respected here,' writes sci-fi/fantasy book site Keeping the Door."

8 of 426 comments (clear)

  1. 0th law of famous sci fi writers' estates by syousef · · Score: 5, Funny

    The 0th law is thou shalt sell out and cash in big.

    It overrides the other 3 laws ;-)

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  2. Re:Heh by PaintyThePirate · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, that would be the same if Asimov rose from the dead and decided to write three more books.

  3. but it begs for sequels! by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, Robot
    You, Robot
    Him, Robot
    They, Robot.

    In other languages there's even more conjugations possible!

  4. Re:How about we pay the author not to write them? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmmm. I know you're right, but they DID manage to capture almost 3% of Starship Troopers. That was an amazingly good job on Hollywood's part, wasn't it? Just imagine - if they use the same directors and screenwriters, they might get as much as 5% of the Robot series. Wow. What an idea.

    Nahhh - sitting through 95 minutes of mindless drivel that is totally unrelated to the story just to see those 5 good minutes is unendurable.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  5. New book: by W1sdOm_tOOth · · Score: 2, Funny

    1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
    2) A robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
    3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
    4) ???
    5) A robot collects profit.
    6) WTF???

    --
    If you're not confused, you're not paying attention
  6. Re:Cry, Robot... by symbolset · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's bad enough that the man's offspring will be exploiting his written work from now until copyrights expire in 9320 CE. That his heirs should corrupt his legacy with spinoffs is despicable. It's equivalent to mounting his corpse on an animatronic frame to lead tours at EPCOT center. Strike that - it's worse - he probably would approve of the latter. Make that "The Creationist History Museum".

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  7. Re:How about we pay the author not to write them? by Nitewing98 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't you mean "R. Danielle Steele?"

    --

    Nitewing '98

    Everything works...in theory.

  8. Re:Cry, Robot... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 3, Funny

    As far as I'm concerned, DS9 is canon, Voyager should be shot out of a cannon, and Enterprise should be shot WITH a cannon.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.