Slashdot Mirror


Placebo Effect Caught In the Act In Spinal Nerves

SerpensV passes along the news that German scientists have found direct evidence that the spinal cord is involved in the placebo effect (whose diminishing over time we discussed a bit earlier). "The researchers who made the discovery scanned the spinal cords of volunteers while applying painful heat to one arm. Then they rubbed a cream onto the arm and told the volunteers that it contained a painkiller, but in fact it had no active ingredient. Even so, the cream made spinal-cord neural activity linked to pain vanish. 'This type of mechanism has been envisioned for over 40 years for placebo analgesia,' says Donald Price, a neuroscientist at the University of Florida in Gainesville, who was not involved in the new study. 'This study provides the most direct test of this mechanism to date.'"

34 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Acupuncture to be reanalysed by foobsr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would be interesting to see if similar effects could be observed regards acupuncture which is rated to be in the realm of placebo by 'old school' medicine.

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    1. Re:Acupuncture to be reanalysed by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 4, Interesting

      well, according to my understanding of the placebo effect its entirely mind over matter, so i could wave a TV remote at your face and say that this is more effective for pain relief than Morphine. if you believe it, it just may be. i'm personally a fan of placebos, though many arent. truthfully, if it works, it doesnt matter if i'm being tricked, and as i put my flamesuit on because i can feel whats coming, having worked in the medical field, including emergency medicine i can honestly say that any instances where an emergency is occurring i've _never_ seen a placebo used. efficacy is more important in a situation where life and death is concerned. if you have a 'tension hedache' and you're seeking prescription medication, dont bitch and moan when your headache disappears from a sugar pill.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    2. Re:Acupuncture to be reanalysed by TwistedGreen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Acupuncture has been analyzed and re-analyzed to death already. There has never been any reliable effect, and as studies become increasingly more well-designed, effect sizes diminish or disappear completely. This is a sign that there is nothing happening. Amusingly, acupuncture with fake needles is consistently shown to be just as effective as real acupuncture. It's telling that proponents often consider that to be evidence in favour of acupuncture.

    3. Re:Acupuncture to be reanalysed by Tangential · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I always wondered if those videos from China showing cows undergoing surgery using acupuncture as a pain blocker were faked. Hard to believe that there could be any placebo effect with animals.

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But then I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain
    4. Re:Acupuncture to be reanalysed by bluesatin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Would conditioning apply in things like reducing pain, or does it only apply to voluntary actions?

      If you give a painkiller while poking an animal in a certain location repeatedly, if you remove the painkiller without it being able to tell; will the poking elicit the same response as with the painkiller?

    5. Re:Acupuncture to be reanalysed by Carewolf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Cows doesn't have inner pain receptors like humans do. They only feel the pain from breaking the skin, but no pain from a doctor operating inside. For this reason operations and experiments on cows often happens using nothing but a local anesthesia to numb the skin.

    6. Re:Acupuncture to be reanalysed by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hardly mind over matter, simply a bio-chemical organ that can be induced to produce a range of neurotransmitters and hormones based upon psychological states. Don't be fooled though, whilst reactions might be controllable and the negative impact that stress and tension has upon recovery can be alleviated when a supportive environment is provided, it will not change the nature of the ailment itself. So a placebo is not really a placebo but a psychological treatment to assure the patient and alleviate stress and tension, which allows natural healing processes to function more effectively.

      Note dependent upon the background of the patient this can also include religious support as long as the belief is there and of course the illness falls within scope of natural healing processes which would otherwise be circumscribed by fear and stress. No mind over matter, no miracle cures although of course genetic diversity and probability allows for luck to cure the most lethal of ailments, you know one in a million don't bet on it though as you far more likely to end up in the 999,999 group.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    7. Re:Acupuncture to be reanalysed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is when someone mistakes treating symptoms for treating causes. If you feel better, but you're still dying, then you're still dying.

    8. Re:Acupuncture to be reanalysed by that+IT+girl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Mod UP--this is what a lot of drugs do, one of the worst offenders being statin drugs for high cholesterol. In addition to causing muscle-degenerative problems after long-term use, artificially lowering the cholesterol in the bloodstream does not solve the actual problem, which is the reason it was there to begin with. Long story short, cholesterol is what 'patches up' holes in the vessel walls caused by wear and tear, foreign particles in the blood, or (big one here) inflammation. And some of the biggest things that cause inflammation in general are refined sugars, foods one has an allergy or sensitivity to (dairy and wheat being big ones), "bad" fats (omega-6 rather than omega-3) and of course smoking. Getting rid of the cholesterol doesn't get rid of the inflammation, and in fact makes your body unable to repair the damage as well. Fix the underlying problem and the amount of cholesterol will go down.

      Sorry to go off on a tangent, but this is something I've done a lot of research on lately, and it's something that seems to get ignored by the mainstream. I'm guessing it's mostly because curing the source of a problem means the drug companies can't make money off someone as long, perpetually suppressing the outward symptoms while the real issue continues to fester. It's like continuing to spray air-fresheners and light scented candles around the garbage can instead of just taking the stinking bag out.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    9. Re:Acupuncture to be reanalysed by blackest_k · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pain is where you find it, its certainly not everywhere in the human body.
      I had a stent put in my heart last week and the only anesthetic needed is a local in the groin where they feed the wire in.

      I also have to inject myself in the stomach twice a day and there are some sites which will hurt and others which are completely painless. I just gently prod with the needle till i find a pain free spot and just let the needle sink in under its own weight.

      I'd also rate dental pain as probably the worst pain in the male body , it's possible child birth might be more painful but we have no way of knowing. I believe cancer tops all other pain.

      Getting my fingers and hands sliced up in an attempted mugging about the same as a wasp sting (a brief sharp pain). Heart attack is about the same as a tattoo but scary.

      best pain killer has to be morphine not just for the pain relief but for the relaxed attitude , you just don't feel panic or fear. If I have a choice in how I die other than in my sleep it would be whilst under the influence of morphine.

    10. Re:Acupuncture to be reanalysed by gblackwo · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe cancer tops all other pain.

      Had Leukemia, didn't hurt at all. Some of the stuff to treat it did though.

    11. Re:Acupuncture to be reanalysed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd also rate dental pain as probably the worst pain in the male body

      You've obviously never passed a kidney stone.

    12. Re:Acupuncture to be reanalysed by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i'm personally a fan of placebos, though many arent. truthfully, if it works, it doesnt matter if i'm being tricked

      The problem is that the people who practice placebo treatment never just sell themselves as providing pain relief; they sell magical cures for real medical problems which need real medicine.

      I would be happy if the FDA allowed "alternative pain management" to be sold and regulated, so long as they threw everyone claiming their hocus-pocus cured diseases into prison. Can you imagine how wonderful it would be to see chiropractors, homeopaths, and faith healers behind bars?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    13. Re:Acupuncture to be reanalysed by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whoa, careful there on the "bad" fats label.

      We NEED saturated fats. Men use it to produce testosterone. It's also used to repair tissue. In fact, new research shows its the carbs doing the damage, as men which replaced bad carbs with "bad" fat LOWERED their bad cholesterol. Sounds like more research is needed.

    14. Re:Acupuncture to be reanalysed by ubermiester · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hardly mind over matter, simply a bio-chemical organ that can be induced to produce a range of neurotransmitters and hormones based upon psychological states

      How are the two different exactly? The "bio-chemical" organ you refer to is, I suppose, is the brain? If that's the case, most experts - such as yourself - say the brain is where most people keep their mind (though new research suggests many male subjects keep their mind in a different organ closer to the waist). And the "range of neurotransmitters and hormones" produced based on "psychological states" would appear to be the mind interacting with that oh so squishy matter we call our central nervous system. So why do you strain so much to "debunk" the mind over matter truism.

      The placebo effect relies in no small part on the "faith" effect, which we use every day to overcome our physiologically limited ability to comprehend the world. Faith does not (necessarily) allow people to walk through walls or levitate, but it does allow us to do all kinds of important things, including and not limited to the discovery of new knowledge.

      For example, your well founded faith in the scientific method allows you to maintain focus while facing mysteries often seem to defy not only experimental observation, but the very intuitions upon which those observations are based.

      Do you have faith that we will figure out what's inside a black hole? Will we'll figure out where and what all that missing mass and energy is? Will we ever know why the photon goes through both holes at the same time? The scientific method has attained considerable momentum because of it's ability to shed light on mysteries we have long thought unknowable. That does NOT mean it will always succeed. The uncertainty principle, for example, claims that it has already failed in at least one important case (i.e., Schrodinger's cat). Knowing something about the state of an atom means affecting that atom, which also means we cannot always make "objective" observations. We can only make extremely well-educated guesses and hope that we're not wrong that often. This realization put a HUGE hole in the scientific method, but our faith allowed us to continue working and make ever more important discoveries.

      So when you tell someone that the pill they took was just sugar, why is it a surprise that their faith is undermined and the unconscious processes that resulted in pain relief (or whatever) are also undermined?

    15. Re:Acupuncture to be reanalysed by raygundan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I doubt you'll find a doctor who would prescribe these drugs without first suggesting you get off your arse and do some exercise. Nobody does this, of course, so prescriptions for these drugs get handed out as the next best thing when a patient won't do what is needed for themselves. It's not some huge profit conspiracy, although there is certainly profit involved-- but if you end up on statins without having given a serious effort at altering diet and exercise, it's your own fault.

    16. Re:Acupuncture to be reanalysed by afaik_ianal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just don't ever try sex for a migraine.

      Not much risk of that around here...

  2. Not diminishing. by Jaysyn · · Score: 5, Informative

    The placebo effect isn't getting weaker, it's getting more effective. The /. article linked even states that. It the reason why if prozac was a new drug today it more than likely would have been rejected by the FDA.

    Also see these Wired & TechDirt articles.

    http://www.wired.com/medtech/drugs/magazine/17-09/ff_placebo_effect?currentPage=all

    http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090827/0212446014.shtml

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  3. Ears and eyes also involved? by noidentity · · Score: 2, Informative

    Weren't the ears and eyes of the voluneers also involved? If they hadn't heard the claim, it wouldn't have had the same effect (and did they actually have a control where they rubbed a cream without saying it would diminish pain, perhaps saying it would prevent damage to the skin or perhaps even that it would make it hurt more?). I'd have RTFA except it's behind a paywall.

    1. Re:Ears and eyes also involved? by TwistedGreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, that's the point. The study is showing physiological effects of patient expectation. Patient expectation is based on past experience, cultural beliefs, and whatever the doctor (or any other person in authority, for that matter) tells you, even if the treatment is just an inert cream or a sugar pill. This study is just confirmation that when a patient claims to feel less pain, there is actual nervous system activity to support this perception.

  4. this is not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have chronic headache and have been a subject in studies. It is well-known that anticipation is an observable component to pain notification and response. To an almost hilarious extent, pain is like gravity in cartoons: if you don't believe it exists, you're less likely to experience it.

    captcha: scratchy (they fight...)

    1. Re:this is not surprising by adamchou · · Score: 2, Interesting

      if you don't believe it exists, you're less likely to experience it

      well, in that same sense, is it possible that the headache is only there because you believe it to be there? with all due respect, i don't know your medical background. just throwing out food for thought.

  5. Re:What I want to know by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Never applied for one, but I think this is probably the result of the "get paid for medical testing" ads you see in the back of free circulars in & around college towns.

    p.s. Why the hell is this marked Troll?

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  6. No need to worry when the doctor says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bend over... this won't hurt a bit... I've got some special cream to rub in...

  7. Three cheers for kdawson by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 5, Informative

    I gotta say, posting a link claiming the placebo effect is "diminishing over time" when that link is to a Slashdot article saying precisely the opposite is a new low.

    Hell, you don't even have to click on the link: you can see what it actually says just by reading the URL!

    --
    Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
    1. Re:Three cheers for kdawson by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, way to go, mixing up two time scales, just to bash kdawson again.
      While I agree that he may not be the greatest story poster, this time, you was way over your head.

      Because what he meant, is that when you apply the placebo, then because one expects the effect of a medicine to diminish after a certain time, the body simulates that for placebos too.
      And what you meant, is that placebos nowadays work better than they worked e.g. decades ago.

      These are two totally different time scales.
      Imagine it as taking a big structure that looks like this: /|
      And putting lots of these tiny structures that look like this on its slope: |\
      The first one is yours. The second one is his.

      No conflict at all. Just a knee-jerk reaction.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  8. Your mind by s-whs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > Even so, the cream made spinal-cord neural activity linked to pain vanish.

    The cream did no such thing, the people's minds did this. It's quite unsurprising that as the brain processes pain (which is just information about damage to tissue), that the brain can also switch it (the processing, i.e. feeling) off.

    I can do this whenever I want. First time I did this when I was 12 or so, and for the umpteenth time the lid of the kettle to boil water for tea fell off, and I burnt my hand. Painful and annoying. I said to myself: Enough, no more pain! And gone it was. Not really anything special I believe, see e.g. fakirs.

    Of course the 'placebo effect' is more than just turning off pain, it's also about getting better without medicine, i.e. making your body do things to repair itself. This I also do consciously (i.e. I tell myself that my immune system should work harder to kill the 'intruders' :)) and may be the reason why I'm almost never ill, and when I am, I recover very quickly (I never go to a doctor).

    Reminds me of a Married with children episode btw.:
        [ Al ] I feel strong!
            { Peggy says something }
        [ Al ] I feel weak...

    (paraphrasing).

  9. From someone that has constant pain.. by skgrey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a degenerative disease, have had a laminectomy, bone spur removals, and have some messed up disks and nerve damage. I've been in some amount pain for about six years and have run the medicine gauntlet.

    From experience, I've been prescribed medicine where the doctor's told me "this is much better than what you are on, it will manage your pain much more effectively". I got all excited, and started taking it. On the first day I was miserable. The second and third days were even worse. After a week I switched back.

    I really think that the placebo effect only works for small amounts of pain, or for certain kinds of pain (there are a lot of different types). In my case, I ended up with a spinal implant (kind of like an internal tens unit) and take a small amount of medicine to manage the pain. It still hurts every day, but I get by much better and work a 40 to 50 hour week and raise kids.

  10. Placebo and pain modulation... by blahplusplus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... it make's sense that placebo effect exists because the ability to shut on and shut off pain perception is critical to human development.

    There is a condition where people feel no pain at all, see this article here of a girl who feels no pain.

    http://www.cnn.com/2006/HEALTH/conditions/02/03/btsc.oppenheim/

  11. The Point? by LKM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't quite understand your point. We already know that acupuncture works. We also know why it works: it works 100% through the placebo effect. This newly discovered mechanism may or may not apply to acupuncture, but it doesn't really matter; we already know that acupuncture has no specific activity for the condition that is being treated. This new discovery does not change this simple fact, and thus does not require us to re-analize acupuncture.

    The results would be exactly the same as earlier tests.

  12. Was it the cream or the brain? by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The researchers who made the discovery scanned the spinal cords of volunteers while applying painful heat to one arm. Then they rubbed a cream onto the arm and told the volunteers that it contained a painkiller, but in fact it had no active ingredient. Even so, the cream made spinal-cord neural activity linked to pain vanish.

    According to this, there's no way to tell whether it was the cream or the brain. The doctors didn't rub cream on anyone without telling them anything and/or rub cream on anyone saying that it contained suspended HCL? Tell people they were rubbing a pain killer powder on their skin? There was no control group? This wasn't a well planned experiment. Just having a soothing balm on the skin might be enough to lower heat pain. Speaking of which: did they try any other types of pain? Heat pain feels quite a bit different from impact pain.

  13. Re:More Confirmation of Scientific Materialism by radtea · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The perception of pain, and indeed all neurological processes, are not incorporeal and can be shown to have actual physical mechanisms.

    Three hundred and fifty years after Willis et al showed that the brain was the physical seat of perception, it is incredible that the mythology of "mind over matter" is even coherent to anyone anymore: mind is matter. Why anyone believes otherwise is a mystery.

    Yet we still see people in response to this article saying "the placebo effect isn't an effect", as if the physiological response that results in an altered state of belief isn't real because they believe for some reason that psychological states aren't real. The placebo effect is a perfectly ordinary physiological effect, as all psychological effects are. That we can access our physiology via words, ideas and beliefs is no great suprise, since those words, ideas as beliefs are generated by our physiology as well.

    I guess maybe most people are simply too dim to understand the concept of a system that can act as both a creator/transmitter of beliefs and a reciever/responder to beliefs, although given their own hands, for example, act both as input and output devices makes that a little hard to credit.

    It would be extremely interesting to know exactly where the failure of reasoning occurs in people who believe that mind and matter are independent and unrelated things, and the mind is somehow "less real" than the matter that constitutes it.

    --
    Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  14. Oh come on, guys by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No active ingredient? They did apply a cream. If you've had painful heat applied to your arm, rubbing butter on it will make it feel better; lidocaine would feel MORE better*, but this isn't a sugar pill.

    * "Me fail English? That's unpossible!"

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  15. My Anecdote by pwagle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I was 15, I had a bicycle wreck where I received major road-rash on my entire left side. Unable to tolerate the pain that evening enough to sleep, I went to the emergency room, where I was given codeine. That helped a lot. The next morning, I had to take a shower. Expecting that to hurt a lot, I, for some reason, decided to see if I could "shut off" the pain while exposing the road-rash to the running water. Somehow I did some mental twist that completely shut off the pain. My interpretation/guess at the time was that the codeine taught my brain a technique to shut off the pain. This would be interesting if true. I've been able to repeat this several times since then, but not with headaches. Took neural anatomy years later, where I found out that facial nerves don't come from the spine. I also found out that the spine itself has controllers that control muscles. The brain controls those controllers. My interpretation/guess is that I need the spinal controllers to control pain, and I don't have those for facial (sinus?) pain. I'm uncomfortable calling this "placebo" effect. Seems like its something else. But maybe that's because here I have a mechanism, and I prefer to label only the mysterious as "placebo".