Slashdot Mirror


Fear Detector To Sniff Out Terrorists

Hugh Pickens writes "Evidence that the smell of fear is real was uncovered by US scientists last year who studied the underarm secretions of 20 terrified novice skydivers and found that people appear to respond unconsciously to the sweat smell of a frightened person. Now the Telegraph reports that researchers hope a 'fear detector' will make it possible to identify individuals at check points who are up to no good. 'The challenge lies in the characterization and identification of the specific chemical that gives away the signature of human fear, especially the fear in relation to criminal acts,' says Professor Tong Tun at City University London, who leads the team developing security sensor systems that can detect the human fear pheromone. The project will look at potential obstacles to the device, such as the effects of perfume and the variances in pheromone production and if the initial 18-month feasibility study is successful, the first detectors could be developed in the next two to three years. 'I do not see any particular reason why similar sensor techniques cannot be expanded to identify human smells by race, age or gender to build a profile of a criminal during or after an incident,' Tong added."

69 of 342 comments (clear)

  1. Detects terrorists... by the_one(2) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... or people who are afraid of being suspected of terrorism

    1. Re:Detects terrorists... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or people who are afraid of flying?

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    2. Re:Detects terrorists... by backbyter · · Score: 3, Funny

      or young men who are afraid that their dreams for a virgin will be confused with somebody else's dreams of 71 virgins.

    3. Re:Detects terrorists... by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or people who are nervous about their big business meeting, or meeting their possible future in-laws, etc etc

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Detects terrorists... by tapanitarvainen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Guess it would work best in reverse: people who are *not* afraid are obvious psychopaths...

    5. Re:Detects terrorists... by Forge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Meanwhile the guy with a box cutter and a few pounds of C4 smells horny (for his 70 virgins) not fearful.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    6. Re:Detects terrorists... by Whalou · · Score: 4, Funny

      What happened to the other 2? Are they running out of virgins up there?

      --
      English is not this .sig mother tongue...
    7. Re:Detects terrorists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only the female ones.

    8. Re:Detects terrorists... by Shikaku · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lesbians.

    9. Re:Detects terrorists... by realityimpaired · · Score: 5, Informative

      Y'know.... a man can change the scent/pheromones his body gives off as easily as taking a drug like cyproterone. The effects are temporary, but taking it in doses of about 50mg/day for a week before flying will have a big enough impact on the way your body produces pheromones that most people won't be able to read you properly. Stop taking the drug, and your body resumes normal operation...

      Not suggesting, of course, that the terrorists would think to use a drug that, in people with a Y-chromosome, is usually used to treat transgenderism (and occasionally used to treat prostate cancer), but there are a very large number of drugs out there on the market, some available over the counter, that will affect your body's hormone balance, and will in turn affect the pheromones that your body produces. With so many ways to screw with the results available, I'd be very surprised if they could get such a system to work properly with an acceptable false positive/false negative rate....

    10. Re:Detects terrorists... by db32 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are you kidding, that would be perfect. I mean really...watching DHS traumatize a bunch of already frightened travelers. Oh this is going to be awesome! Afraid of flying, afraid of traveling alone, claustrophobic, business travelers afraid of giving the presentation they are being sent to do, every week sees groups of people traveling to military bases to start basic training and I bet most of them are pretty afraid of how it may go. The possibilities are endless! This is going to be so awesome.

      Especially when we arrest the arabic man who was just nervous about introducing his girlfriend to his parents.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    11. Re:Detects terrorists... by MadnessASAP · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In away your right, from what I understand suicide bombers aren't even remotely afraid or even consider what they are doing to be anything but gods holy work. They probably wont even register in the slightest on these detectors. Whereas the people who are worried about receiving securities own special "enema" will be.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    12. Re:Detects terrorists... by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is exactly what I would assume to be the case. Though there may be the fear of getting caught but... I doubt it. I think the false positive rate on anything like this is going to be through the roof.

      Frankly, I will laugh and hoot the first time someone is awarded a huge sum because of the trauma they experienced when their panic disorder brings on the start of an attack and trips off the sensor. Because, as we all know, being suddenly pulled aside by a person in uniform is exactly the sort of thing that a person having an uncontrollable panic attack needs to calm them down. The sort of ham handed treatment typical of people who feel that someone paying them and putting them in a silly uniform gives them the right to harass other people is exactly the sort of thing that will really move their treatment forward.

      Terrorism is a largely imaginary threat. Panic disorder is a real and debilitating disorder.

      I am seriously against damaging real people to catch imaginary ones.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    13. Re:Detects terrorists... by WinterSolstice · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No kidding - I'm doubting the effectiveness of this, since I am afraid of flying, but I see no reason why a suicide bomber would be.

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    14. Re:Detects terrorists... by realityimpaired · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Terrorism is a real threat, it's just nowhere near as large a threat as some would make it out to be. You're likely to be killed in a domestic terrorist attack in the same way you're likely to die of exposure in the winter: Something to be conscious of, something to keep an eye out for, something to take precautions against, but not something to live in constant fear of.

      We shouldn't be hurting people with false positives, and like you, I think that a system such as described in TFA is going to have an unacceptably high false positive rate and will probably be accompanied by an unacceptably high false negative rate, but I don't agree that we should be complacent or work under the assumption that nothing's going to happen... as the sample size increases towards infinity, the probability of finding something that matches case X approaches 1, even for an extremely unlikely X... in other words, given enough time, something *will* happen. There are some seriously messed up people out there who would like nothing more than to hurt western society in some giant spectacular ball of flame. Just that most of them either don't have the means, or don't have the will to actually do something about it. We should still do what we can, within reason, to reduce the likelihood of their success. It's that "within reason" that most people seem to have lost sight of.

    15. Re:Detects terrorists... by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd have thought a bit of "Dutch courage" would have a similar effect.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    16. Re:Detects terrorists... by Golddess · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While the first two are perhaps ambiguous (although why are you clicking unknown links at work?), with a name like nakedgirls4.jpg, you can't honestly have expected puppies and kittens, could you?

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    17. Re:Detects terrorists... by vux984 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...in other words, given enough time, something *will* happen.

      And sooner or later a micro-meteorite is going to slam through someones skull and end their life. However, we should do absolutely nothing about this.

      We should still do what we can, within reason, to reduce the likelihood of their success. It's that "within reason" that most people seem to have lost sight of.

      Exactly what is "within reason" here? Terrorism as a risk falls miles behind "diabetes". Its even far below "accidental incident with fire arm". It chums around with risks like "breaking neck falling down stairs".

      Clearly we don't need a "Deparment of Staircase Security" with a multibillion dollar budget to make our stairways safer. What do we need? A response proportional to the risk is pretty minimal.

    18. Re:Detects terrorists... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Terrorism is a real threat, it's just nowhere near as large a threat as some would make it out to be.

      Yeah, well, we're talking about airport terrorist screening here. Terrorism on airplanes is pretty much over. The idea that we need to protect against guys getting on with box cutters is absolutely ludicrous. If anything, the shift in public perception of hijacking should have allowed a relaxing of security at airports, as the passengers will immediately hogtie, pummel, and sedate any idiot dumb enough to try anything. Really, the only thing left to look out for is explosives, and that's a fairly simple chemistry problem. All this shit with taking off shoes, smelling us for fear, and peering through our clothes with machines is expensive security theater to mitigate a problem that's already been solved.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    19. Re:Detects terrorists... by camperdave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah! So if you *DON'T* trigger the detector, you are a terrorist.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  2. Supercomputer involved to be named "Deep Sniff"? by unitron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What if the fear they detect in you is the fear of missing your flight while you're held up trying to convince security that you aren't a threat?

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  3. The signature of human fear by clickety6 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Luckily airports are only ever full of relaxed, calm people who have no fear of flying whatsoever.

    And being dragged off to be interrogated as a terrorist in some darkened back-room by three of four rent-a-thugs can only serve to ease their fears of flying...

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    1. Re:The signature of human fear by DragonTHC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is so true.

      All a fear detector detects is fear. Not intent or cause. Once they realize how many people are afraid in airports, they will quickly scrap this stupid idea.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    2. Re:The signature of human fear by dissy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All a fear detector detects is fear. Not intent or cause. Once they realize how many people are afraid in airports, they will quickly scrap this stupid idea.

      Unfortunately that is probably exactly what they want.

      This device is 'scientific proof' (AKA the computer said so) for arresting any one of 90% of the people there that they might want to arrest for some reason.

      Think dousing rods here. It's an enforcement departments wet dream.

    3. Re:The signature of human fear by bencoder · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Once they realize how many people are afraid in airports, they will quickly scrap this stupid idea.

      No, it doesn't work like that. More false positives and inconvenience are never a problem for these people. That just means they can apply for more stolen^H^H^H^H^H^H^H government money to deal with the extra people.

    4. Re:The signature of human fear by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who said they'd be limited to airports?

      will make it possible to identify individuals at check points

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    5. Re:The signature of human fear by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And there are people who can be calm under any circumstance. If you're full of opiates you don't care about (or fear) anything. Then there's "liquid courage" at the airport bar.

      This smells like failure.

    6. Re:The signature of human fear by clickety6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody said they'd be limited to airports.

      It's just that a fear of flying isn't normally a problem when the checkpoint is at the railway station or a border crossing. ;-)

       

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  4. Yeah, but... by FlyByPC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you have a true religious fanatic, who is looking forward to dying for a cause he believes in -- and is looking forward to eternity in the paradise-of-his-choice for his actions, would he* still show physiological signs of fear?

    * (I think statistically, "he" is a fair generalization here.)

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    1. Re:Yeah, but... by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, but the guy who's afraid that such a person is on the flight will be. These persons will be detected and prevented from boarding, thus they avoid the imagined risk. It's added value for the neurotic!

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Yeah, but... by zerosomething · · Score: 3, Funny

      then we need to be able to smell anticipation for paradise, or would we just confuse that with a bunch of horny guys.

      --
      It all starts at 0
    3. Re:Yeah, but... by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny

      > No, but the guy who's afraid that such a person is on the flight will be. These persons will be detected and prevented from boarding, thus they avoid the imagined risk. It's added value for the neurotic!

      So lessen the odds by bringing a bomb onto the airplane. Do you know what the odds of TWO people bringing a bomb onto an airplane are?

      And if you can get someone else you trust never to explode a bomb to bring one on an airplane, your flight will be even safer, because do you know how much rarer it will be for THREE people to bring a bomb onto an airplane?

      Heck, have the captain, the co-pilot, the flight engineer, and the head stew also bring bombs on board. the probability of an EIGHTH person bringing a bomb on board is soooo small ....

      Now, where's my grant money?

      (no, it's not original - it's adapted from Isaac Asimov's Joke Book - which is now probably on some sort of watch list because certain people with no sense of humor act like they have a baguette shoved up their ass, so don't trot down to your local library to read it)

  5. But worry not! by BlackSash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People that are afraid of flying (or more accurately, crashing) will not need to worry about being picked out of the line for 'smelling suspiscious'! Not at all...

    --
    Posting obviously for anonymous reasons.
  6. Simple solution by petes_PoV · · Score: 2, Informative
    take tranquilisers and eat plenty of garlic.

    You'll also get the whole set of seats to yourself.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  7. Up to no good? by Eudial · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd be more alarmed to find someone who wasn't afraid to pass a checkpoint like this. How can you defend yourself from the allegation of some machine saying that you exhibit fear, and therefore is a terrorist? Furthermore, sociopaths and psychopaths will have little trouble passing these checkpoints.

    So you'll get plenty of false positives, and plenty of false negatives.

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  8. Oops by dissy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now the Telegraph reports that researchers hope a 'fear detector'' will make it possible to identify individuals at check points who are up to no good.

    What about us law abiding citizens who are only afraid that our governments checkpoint workers are up to no good?

    It is already a very real possibility for one of those people to make up any type of claim they want and detail you without letting you speak to a lawyer nor involve any courts.
    The reason given can be as ridiculous as 'He had terrorist looking hair' and still be valid. Plenty of legit reason to be afraid of those people.

    Not to mention the fact I have no doubt at least a subset of these checkpoints will be at places where fear is natural (IE airports, fear of flying, or fear of falling out of the sky in a fireball)

    Will deodorant and perfume be classified as a terrorist munition now?

    1. Re:Oops by throbber · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Will deodorant and perfume be classified as a terrorist munition now?

      They already are.
      Have you tried carring deodorant and perfume in your hand luggage recently?

  9. Fearolin? Criminofearolin? by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The idea that there's a special chemical signal for "fear in relation to criminal acts" seems to come out of absolutely nowhere. Shouldn't there be some research into whether such a chemical signal exists before device development occurs? If it's not a magic detector of latent emotion or the cause of emotion so I'm not sure how much better it would be than noticing which people "look a bit afraid". It's going to be just as susceptible to picking up people who find flying difficult or are worried about being falsely accused of being a terrorist because they look funny.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  10. Underarms?! by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Funny

    "And in the news today, hundreds of teenage boys were arrested under the Prevention of Terrorism Act. They were later released after it turned out they were simply wearing Axe deodorant"

  11. The only thing we have to fear... by kevinNCSU · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They decided people weren't taking FDR's warning seriously enough so they'd give us a damn good reason to fear fear itself.

  12. waste of time by runyonave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do scientist have nothing better to do nowadays. Fear is an emotiona that could be the result of hundreds of different causes. Fear from stress, fear of losing money, fear of an individual, fear of going to an intervew etc, etc. How do these scientist aim to differentiate fear of criminal activity from other causes. Waste of time.

  13. Profit!!! by redhog · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. Get a degree in chemistry
    2. Create artificial "fear hormone"
    3. Bottle hormone in spray-flask
    4. Spray "on your car" outside airport (and wash car with a piece of cloth) - make sure to spray passers-by
    5. ???
    6. Profit!!!!

    --
    --The knowledge that you are an idiot, is what distinguishes you from one.
    1. Re:Profit!!! by RKThoadan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If this is really put into use I guarantee you that pranksters will be doing exactly that. They don't even care about the Profit!!!! They'll do it just for the lulz.

    2. Re:Profit!!! by Lurker2288 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think the first three steps would also qualify you to be a Batman villain.

  14. More profiling... by cbope · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Great, just what we need, more profiling in place of real security. And just how is this supposed to work with psychopaths who do not experience the emotion of fear?

  15. Positive Feedback Loop? by rotide · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1: Develop System to detect when someone is "afraid"

    2: Let citizens know that those who are "afraid" will be detected, detained and questioned for "citizen safety".

    3: Citizens are now afraid to go through on the idea that maybe they will somehow set off the alarm.

    Tons of false positives. After the first story of a false positive, some people become afraid of being a false positive as well. As more and more stories of false positives arise, more and more people become afraid and become more false positives.

  16. No... no, you won't... by denzacar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Detect terrorists, that is.

    Not while there are anti-anxiety drugs out there.
    What you will detect is a bunch of false positives that will keep you busy "detecting" while trucks loaded with bags of ammonium-nitrate explosive merrily (but calmly) pass you by.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:No... no, you won't... by darthflo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even without anti-anxiety drugs, can anybody confirm that the kind of terrorist who actually pulls off attacks will be fearful? I could very well imagine them being as calm as can be, completely convinced what they're doing is the right thing. After all, standing there with a bomb strapped to your chest pretty much implies you believe in that "heaven with 71 virgins" delusion, no matter if you take out a couple hundred civilians or just two guards, it's martyrdom and it's spoils (mostly spoiled intestines hanging everywhere) for you.

  17. Doubleplusgood? by Shienarier · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't this a step towards thought crime?
    "He's scared, arrest him!"

  18. Let's Be Serious by Voulnet · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The officers would only pull Arab-looking dudes, and many of those dudes might produce fear signals not because of terrorism, but because they're afraid of being treated badly at US airports like many of their brethren are.

    1. Re:Let's Be Serious by oldspewey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Basically, we just spent a bunch of money to get worse results and create more chaos.

      Well then I'm sure somebody somewhere is wearing a satisfied smile and telling themselves "my work is done here!"

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  19. I must not fear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... fear is the mind killer, fear is the little death that brings airport security...

  20. Great by MemoryDragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have been suffering on anxiety disorder now for the last 15 years, does that mean I will get an anal search every time I cross the border now?

  21. I love it! by pehrs · · Score: 2, Funny

    I really like the idea! Preferably it should be combined with US patent 6970105 (Passenger control system during a plane flying) http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6970105.html

    So we fit all passengers with large collars containing big needles with sedatives. At the first smell of fear we inject a propper dose of sedatives in their necks. The problems with terrorism and fear of flying solved at the same time.

    I really must run and patent this idea right now... And get the movie rights!

  22. Love these comments... by vistapwns · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Time to lose my Karma I guess... A terrorist is going to be a LOT more afraid of getting on that plane and detonating a bomb on it, and possibly getting caught by security, than an average person is going to be afraid of flying or that his mom my discover his porn, or whatever other funny reasons you guys can come up with... Second, even if there are false positives, I think that's expected by the scientists, nothing is 100%, but if you can increase your odds of picking up a terrorist by some odd percent, and decrease false positives (because terrorists are a LOT more afraid I would think) then you have saved money, saved everyone's time, and increased safety. As far as pranksters with bio-chem degrees, well, when this thing starts picking up a lot of false positives, those pranksters will probably be caught and we won't see much of that. (i.e. all the fear scent 'sprayed' people say they were all in parking lot B, then the security checks the cameras, and finds the car that sprayed them and those idiots get arrested.) I think we should at least give it a chance before condemning the idea with condescending knee-jerkiness.

    --
    "...I think the Microsoft hatred is a disease." - Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:Love these comments... by pehrs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is the terrorist supposed to be afraid? Many of them have trained for years to do the hijacking, and fear is not what those who survived described. Besides, many of the terrorists here in Europe have been taking drugs to ensure top performance. So what you are looking for is not somebody scared out of his pants. You are looking for a calm professional on benzedrine.

    2. Re:Love these comments... by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A terrorist is going to be a LOT more afraid of getting on that plane and detonating a bomb on it,

      And there is the fallacious assumption of your entire argument. You assume that there even are people trying to get on planes with bombs these days. Further more, you assume that there are enough of those people, in comparison to innocent travelers, to pose a significant risk. Honestly, how many airplane hijackings/terrorist acts have you heard of since 9/11? Any 'terrorist' (or activist or freedom fighter or whatever) that has any shred of intelligence whatsoever is not going to be trying to use airplanes for terror attacks after 9/11. It is unoriginal, and therefore risky. I would wager (no, its not fact, I know that) that the next significant report of terrorism (meaning X many people died) is going to come in some form of an attack that was completely unexpected and unaccounted for.

      Beefing up airport security to extremely high levels (some security is necessary and should exist) is a very flashy attempt to close a barn door, lock it, nail-board it shut, and put a bomb shelter around it after the horse has already left.

  23. Detects everybody... by captainpanic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A number of false positives reported in the media, and everybody will fear that machine...

  24. Know what's a bigger problem than terrorism? by Spatial · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Almost everything.

  25. Re:Terrorists will just learn to be fearless by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It should stop the rogue unprepared school shooting type person.

    Or cause them to shoot the guard manning it. I've never felt 'safer' in a building with a metal detector. I've certainly felt less free.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  26. Re:Supercomputer involved to be named "Deep Sniff" by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Like this guy. By the way, it's not illegal to cash $4700 in cash, nor do you have to answer nosy bastards questions about it, unless they obtain a warrant (signed by an impartial judge), or you are crossing an international border. This poor fellow just wanted to travel from St. Louis to Arlington Virgnia.

    edited version- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMB6L487LHM
    full recording- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEJpzVPmih0

    I think I would have told these St. Louis police to read me my Miranda Rights, and then exercised my right to remain silent, rather than talk. Bunch of thugs. "It occurs to me that goose-stepping morons like yourself should try reading books instead of burning them." - Indiana Jones father, aka Sean Connery

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  27. Last time I checked... by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Being afraid isn't a crime, nor is it probable cause for a search.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  28. Re:Supercomputer involved to be named "Deep Sniff" by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just noticed this: "Your subject has negative warrants for arrest and negative prior history. He does have a valid oil land(?) that expires 2014." What the frak? They have a central computer to track all our history, even in foreign states that are 1000 miles away from where we live? Dang.

    Other annoyances:

    - "Why do you have this money?"
    - "What's your occupation?"
    - "It's not a matter of the law." - The Constitution is the law. It specifically forbids this type of detainment unless a judge okays it.
    - "You're acting like a child." - No he's acting like a liberated person. Slavery ended 150 years ago. Liberated people have no masters and have the right to remain silent.
    - "I don't have to let you travel." - The U.S. government official is violating the inalienable right to travel freely across the Union of states. (See SCOTUS cases.)
    - "We'll have to take him down to the station and let the DEA and FBI question him..... we'll find out if you stole this money." - Wow. He's carrying lots of money, so suddenly he's an expected drug dealer or user? We have to involve the DEA??? I guess it's not safe to go on vacation anymore.
    "What's Campaign for Liberty?" - that's something that doesn't exist anymore

    Like I said before rather than play games with these goose-stepping thugs, I'd simply exercise my Miranda rights and shut up. That's what I did when I was detained in Texas. They wanted to search the trunk of my car. I refused. They held me in the cold night air for an hour asking questions and demanding the trunk be opened, and I refused to talk. Finally let me go. It's bullshit that officers think they can detain a guy on vacation and search his trunk without a warrant. (SCOTUS has confirmed they can not.)

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  29. Re:Probably will NOT work on terrorists by uncledrax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I dunno.. I'm sure those skydivers made up their mind how things are will happen.. and even knowing that they stand a very very very very little change of dying, they can still exhibit Fear.

    Also, even if the person in question had completely made peace with the fact they are gonna blow themselves up, what about the fear of being caught -before- being able to do the act? If you rot away in prison and get shivved, you're not a martyr, so you 'wouldn't get your heavenly reward'.. assuming you believe such poppycock in the first place.

    The points about anti-anxiety drugs and the fact there will be sooo many false-positives for terrorists means that although this is neat stuff ,they have a long way before being able to put it in airports for practical use as a security measure.

    --
    ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
  30. Re:Supercomputer involved to be named "Deep Sniff" by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is why I drive a car almost everywhere I go. I haven't flown in an airplane since 9/11 - it was a hassle before and now it's even more so.

    I recall when I had to make a business trip from Oklahoma City to Minneapolis. My coworkers thought I was nuts when I said I was taking my car, so we had a kind of race. We both left the office early in the morning, and arrived in Minneapolis at about 7 p.m. that night. There was only half an hour difference. Plus I got $700 reimbursement for "car wear-and-tear" whereas they got nothing. Plus I didn't have to deal with airport stress.

    I've driven my car everywhere from Alaska to California to Florida to Nova Scotia.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  31. Re: Not remotely afraid... by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sufficiently organized malice is indistinguishable from incompetence.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  32. FDR said it. Or was it Churchill? by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    We have nothing to fear but [the smell of] fear itself.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  33. Skydivers have known this for years... by guru312 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I've been a parachute instructor, jumpmaster and jump pilot since 1972. This issue is old news for us.

    I searched DropZone.com and found this link: http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_view_flat;post=2005174;page=2;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;mh=25; which actually may not work for folks without an account on DZ.com.

    As so many posters have mentioned the false positives which will be created by such a nutty idea will be huge. A huge percentage of people are terrified of flying. Even I hate it...unless I'm flying the plane or wearing a parachute.

    One of the dumbest applications of physiological response knowledge I've ever read.

    Where is my parachute? I want off this the planet.

  34. Stop with the "THEY ARE EVIL!" propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In away your right, from what I understand suicide bombers aren't even remotely afraid or even consider what they are doing to be anything but gods holy work.

    They are people, too. Humans who their religion, peer pressure, status in society (you don't see wealthy businessmen blowing themselves up), etc. has forced to do something horrible. While they are doing something really bad, they are still humans and have emotions.

    What do you think that a person thinks before blowing himself up in the middle of a crowd? Among people, some of whom might remind them of their own familymembers, for example? Maybe they have doubts about whether what they are doing is right or not (they have been told that it is right, but is it...). Maybe they are thinking of those family members who the'll never see again but who will be financially provided by the terrorist organization. Maybe they are thinking about surrendering to the officials while knowing that they will be no doubt thrown to jail for the rest of their life (with no fair trial) even if they do so (and their families might starve then). Maybe they are thinking what will happen if they get caught, can't push the button and certainly will neither get to heaven or get their families provided with...

    Religious or not, these are humans we are talking about. They might do horrible things when the circumstances force them to but even then, they do have emotions.