Slashdot Mirror


Vermont City Almost Encased In a 1-Mile Dome

destinyland writes "A Vermont city once proposed a one-mile dome over its 7,000 residents. (They paid $4 million a year in heating bills, and HUD seriously considered funding their proposal.) The city's architectural concept included supporting the Dome with air pressure slightly above atmospheric pressure. (Buckminster Fuller warned their biggest challenge would be keeping it from floating away...) There would be no more heating bills, fly-fishing all year, and no more snow shoveling. And to this day, the former city planner insists that 'Economically it's a slam dunk.'"

5 of 456 comments (clear)

  1. Re:So... by uncledrax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    i think it's not so much about the need to heat the whole dome, but rather the fact that the dome would trap all the heat (and pollutants) inside the dome. The lack of air exchange would trap alot of the heat, pretty much exactly how a greenhouse works.

    Frankly, I encourage these people to complete their dome. It'll reveal insight into how bad (or maybe good too?) the idea is and what can go wrong with them.
    Also, it'll be good practice for when/if we decide to colonize extra-terran bodies. I don't think anyone has tried a larger-scale enclose ecosystem like this before (yes I know it won't be entirely enclosed.. but gotta start somewhere).

    If you want to make little science, occasionally you have to break some beakers.

    --
    ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
  2. Re:Rain? Insects? Birds? by youroldbuddy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would they have to pipe all the water in? You can just as well channel it through the dome? Even channel it throught at night. What about insects and pollinators? They live fine in greenhouses. Why shouldnt they live in a dome. And who cares about migrating birds for such a small area?

  3. Re:Houston Has Similar Plans by afidel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dude, it's a town of 7,000 people, the old ladies sitting on the porches will be sufficient to enforce any ban.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  4. Re:So... by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually the dome would have less surface area than the town. Take all the surface area of all the buildings and add it up. You will find that at makes a pretty good heat exchanger compared to a nice smooth dome.
    Rain water? What a great resource. You would catch it falling all the dome and and use it. I could even be used for the drinking water. Same for the snow melt from the dome. If nothing else it could be used for irrigation.
    Air Quality? Yes you would should ban cars from inside the city as well as fire places. You might not need to but it would probably be for the best if you did. For the dome to work you would want to have some pretty powerful air blowers to keep it pumped up. That should provide enough airflow for the air quality to be as good as a none domed town. Us air to air heat exchangers to allow for even more air flow when needed.

    The one huge danger I see is fire. What is a building catches on fire? Is the dome fire proof? That risk could be reduced but if you are doing to dome an existing town you would have a lot of older buildings that may not be as fire safe as you would like.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  5. Re:Houston Has Similar Plans by scrim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At just one percent of glass, ETFE is described as 99 percent nothing.

    Then why didn't they name it "Congress"?

    Because unlike Congress ETFE is transparent.

    --
    Mark S Twitter/AIM/Skype:ekivemark B: http://ekive.blogspot.com