Slashdot Mirror


10% of US Energy Derived From Old Soviet Nukes

Nrbelex writes "The New York Times reports that about 10 percent of electricity generated in the United States comes from fuel from dismantled nuclear bombs, mostly Russian. 'It's a great, easy source' of fuel, said Marina V. Alekseyenkova, an analyst at Renaissance Bank and an expert in the Russian nuclear industry that has profited from the arrangement since the end of the cold war. But if more diluted weapons-grade uranium isn't secured soon, the pipeline could run dry, with ramifications for consumers, as well as some American utilities and their Russian suppliers.'"

21 of 213 comments (clear)

  1. In Soviet Russia... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... oh my goodness, I can't bring myself to do it. Go on without me! For great justice!

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry - I'll take one for the team.

      In Soviet Russia, nukes derive energy from you!

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    2. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, nuclear weapons disassemble YOU!

  2. In Post-Soviet Russia... by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nuclear weapon powers USA!

    --
    "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    1. Re:In Post-Soviet Russia... by lagomorpha2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      But what happens when we encounter a situation where we need our over 10,000 nuclear warheads?

  3. So... the solution is more nukes? by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

    So the solution to the energy problems we face, is to stockpile more nukes so we can use them for fuel when they get past their "best used by" date?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:So... the solution is more nukes? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1, Funny

      Freezer burn ist easily fixed by heating dor product in de microwave at power level tree or lower.
      (Make sure container ist wrap-ped in celophane so moischure can note esscape.)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:So... the solution is more nukes? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is an example of the german version of spanglish. Germish? Englerman?

      Tequila? Vodka? Beer?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:So... the solution is more nukes? by theaveng · · Score: 2, Funny

      other more renewable resources.

      You mean like trees, wood, and paper? --- Ow! I'm being stoned by greenies

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    4. Re:So... the solution is more nukes? by mambodog · · Score: 2, Funny

      So... you're getting stoned with greenies, then?

  4. Quick, Another Cold War . . . by saisuman · · Score: 3, Funny

    before we run out of uranium!!

  5. What a waste... by parlancex · · Score: 4, Funny

    Think of all the countries they could have incinerated with those nukes!

    1. Re:What a waste... by Conchobair · · Score: 5, Funny

      If we are sending it to Glen Beck the question is:

      Why hasn't Obama denied he is powering America's future with his secret Communist/Soviet nuclear power? What is he hiding?

  6. Re:There would BE no supply problem... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Better yet bring radium back to popular use. When Curie first discovered it they made makeup out of the stuff.

    So that's where the term 'hot chick' came from. Thanks, always wondered about that.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  7. Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who by AlpineR · · Score: 4, Funny

    There were nukes built by Soviets. And there were nukes built for delivery to Soviets. (Intercontinental ballistic missiles: When it absolutely, positively has to be there in twenty minutes.) Whether most of that material would belong to Soviets or Americans depends on who launched first.

  8. I don't believe it by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2, Funny

    The New York Times reports that about 10 percent of electricity generated in the United States comes from fuel from dismantled nuclear bombs, mostly Russian.

    Wow, that Bono really has a global impact!

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  9. Offset by JesseBHolmes · · Score: 2, Funny

    The power from old Russian nukes we use today does not offset the loss of energy we still suffer from as a result of the Cold War-era tapping of our precious bodily fluids!

  10. Re:Gotta wonder by danbert8 · · Score: 2, Funny

    But what about all that helium? Won't that cause global warming or cooling or some other disastrous consequence for humanity?

    --
    Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
  11. Now tell me by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't it better to have all that energy released gradually, instead of all at once? :)

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  12. This proves the old saying... by Burning1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dismantle a nuclear bomb, and you can light a city for a year. Drop a nuclear bomb...

    1. Re:This proves the old saying... by Krannert+IT · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dismantle a nuclear bomb, and you can light a city for a year. Drop a nuclear bomb...

      Not in my back yard