Slashdot Mirror
Google Under Fire For Calling Their Language "Go"
Norsefire writes "Since releasing the 'Go' programming language on Tuesday, Google has been under fire for using the same name as another programming language that was first publicly documented in 2003. 'Go!' was created by Francis McCabe and Keith Clark. McCabe published a book about the language in 2007, and he is not happy. He told InformationWeek in an email: 'I do not have a trademark on my language. It was intended as a somewhat non-commercial language in the tradition of logic programming languages. It is in the tradition of languages like Prolog. In particular, my motivation was bringing some of the discipline of software engineering to logic programming.'"
It's actually pretty funny Google itself didn't see this coming. Results in Google for go programming language are about the existing Go! language and the main developers book about it.
In this case Google should really change the name since its been used in an existing programming language for years. But maybe they are:
"We recently became aware of the Go! issue and are now looking into the matter further," a company spokesperson said in an e-mail.
A couple academic papers too, dating back to 2003. No docs isn't that accurate.
The way I see it, TM or copyright are really useful so you don't have to demonstrate that you were using that name before... he doesn't have it, so he has to show that he had a book, that the language was published in 2003 with that name, etc.
Even without a registered trademark, I think they'd have a good case that Google is trying to pass off their new language as the original Go.
Actually, unregistered trademarks are valid, too. In North America, the trademark system is a "first to use" system, not a "first to file".
However, the original Go is not a commercial product, so there is no trademark issue. Google will likely consider changing the name just because it's stupid to create a new programming language and give it the same name as an existing one, but trademark won't enter into the discussion.
"You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein
It is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goo_(programming_language)
Google's language is called Go! (with an exclamation mark.) The preexisting language whose existence has been suddenly and rudely revealed is called Go without the exclamation mark.
Other way around. Google's language is "Go". McCabe's language is "Go!".
Dont get me started on the Japanese chess game Go.
I don't know if your post was supposed to be either sarcastic or funny, but Go is neither Japanese nor chess.
It's Chinese, and it's older than chess.
The game commonly referred to as "Japanese chess" is Shogi.
Go originated in China, but is played in Japan. TFA is about naming things Go, so it might be worthwhile to note that Go is the Japanese name for the game.
Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
A+ != A# != A# C != C# (in fairness they are related) There are several languages refereed to as D F != F# L != L# M != M4
If you can't tell the difference between to similarly named programming languages perhaps programming isn't for you!
But C# = Db F = E# and moreover B# = C
Actually, "Go" is the Japanese name for the game. That's a Romanization, obviously, but is considered phonetically close to the Japanese pronunciation.
Not to sound cranky, but how hard would it be to check the relevant section of the Wikipedia article? Quoting:
An earlier section indicates that it's called baduk in Korean. (Not even gonna bother trying to transcribe the hangul characters.) The Western name for the game comes to us from Japan.
So yes, "Go" is the English/Western name for the game, but it was first the Japanese name for the game. The Wikipedia article claims Edward Lasker brought the game to the U.S. in 1905; he had picked it up in Germany. The Japan Go Association popularized the game in the West in the 1960s through an English language magazine called Go Review.
Anyway, among typical human beings, spoken language is primary. What it sounds like is what counts. There should be no such ridiculous expression of prejudice against a Romanized word.