Slashdot Mirror


Future Blu-ray Movies To Come With Playable Game Demos

Audiofan writes "Enthusiasts have long suggested the PlayStation 3 to their family and friends as one of the better and most affordable Blu-ray players. Lately, prices of Blu-ray players have been coming down, but the PS3 is still one of the better options out there. Sony is taking advantage of this by starting to offer game demos on their Blu-ray offerings. While these demos will only be playable on the PS3, they hope the extra value will help drive sales."

170 comments

  1. I can't wait... by tacarat · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... for the porn industry to whip up something fun with this.

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    1. Re:I can't wait... by Rebelgecko · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think you mean "whip out"

      --
      CATS/Diebold '08- All your vote are belong to us!
    2. Re:I can't wait... by EspressoFreak · · Score: 0

      no, he meant whip up

    3. Re:I can't wait... by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 0

      Well if you can trip people up with it, then hey. I ain't gonna stop ya. Might hurt though. :P

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
    4. Re:I can't wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      will the games be just like all the commercials? that way i will see a black guy, an asian chick, and a white woman and i'll say "wow, what an artificially diverse cast!"

    5. Re:I can't wait... by somersault · · Score: 1

      *whoosh*

      PS that whip up is not even the same whip up from the original post..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re:I can't wait... by edge_gid · · Score: 1

      In Poland, it would be asian chick, white woman, and a photoshopped white guy with an odd looking hand....

      (For the sensitive or ignorant types see this)

  2. Too easy... by playerone · · Score: 0

    Now we can get our crappy sweatshop games right on the same disk as the average movie tie in.

    Can't see this being very useful in the real world.

    --
    --Question Authority--
    1. Re:Too easy... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh you crazy consumers...

      You'll get a feature limited demo of our crappy sweatshop game, with ads on all the loading screens(also present in $60 full version and $80 non-resellable-DLC-fuck-you-gamestop edition), on the same disk as the average movie tie in.

      And by god, you'll like it(or we'll blame piracy).

    2. Re:Too easy... by tacarat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You forgot the trojan that gets installed if your player happens to be a computer.

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    3. Re:Too easy... by urIkon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm amazed you can exhibit such foresight from under that bridge!

      I often scoff at marketing ploys, but game demos are a good thing. As long as this doesn't increase the price of the discs, this is more value for your dollar- it isn't as if you have to play the demo to watch your movie.

      Now, just watch them bundle some highly anticipated game demo exclusively with some crap film- SURPRISE HOME MOVIE SALES HIT OF THE SUMMER!

    4. Re:Too easy... by tacarat · · Score: 1

      Oooh, that's a nasty, BOFHish, twist. I salute you.

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    5. Re:Too easy... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      It isn't a trojan if there is a cryptic reference to it somewhere in our illegibly tiny 55 page EULA...

    6. Re:Too easy... by greatica · · Score: 1

      Most people, I think, don't even know what a Trojan is, so why should they care about it?

    7. Re:Too easy... by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Most people outside of slashdot probably have a vague idea.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    8. Re:Too easy... by Idiomatick · · Score: 5, Funny
      I never understood why a condom brand would want to associate itself with the trojans.

      Buy our brand. When you have sex the girl won't even notice you infiltrating, then once inside all your little soldiers will pop out and reek havok. Then you can tell her, 'Haha, Suprise!'

    9. Re:Too easy... by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 3, Informative

      The greeks did that to the trojans. The trojans had an unbreakable wall. I think that's the idea.

    10. Re:Too easy... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wasn't so unbreakable after all, was is?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    11. Re:Too easy... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      The Greeks built the horse. The Trojans were dumb enough to haul it inside the city walls.

      Paris, prince of Troy, started the whole bloody war when he seduced the already married Helen of Sparta.

    12. Re:Too easy... by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But who's really going to pay the price of a Blu-ray disc to play the game demo, even if they REALLY want to? I mean sure, if its on the same disc as a film you'd buy anyway... but to buy Terrible Parody Movie 9 to play the demo of the ohmygodsweetjesusawesome Halo (or any other highly popular game) game coming out the next spring... no.

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
    13. Re:Too easy... by Hadlock · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think this is more of a case of "hey, we have extra space left over, we can sell that as premium video game advertising space!". Joe developer might not get much per disc to put a demo on a straight to video disc, but how much is EA, Valve, or Bethseda willing to pay to put Metal Gear Solid 5 demo, Grand Turismo 7 demo etc on something as big as Transformers 3 Blu Ray disc? The production studio/director probably sign away marketing rights on their DVD/Blu Ray already, so this is money straight in the distributor's pocket, pure and simple. On crappy B movies, distributors might make more money selling game demo ad space for games like Army Men 5: Melting in Iraq or Big Game Hunter 9: Return of Bigfoot or whatever crapware, than they actually do selling the movie on the disc.
       
      Once the technology exists to play PS3 demo games on a blu-ray disc, this is like printing free money for Sony.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    14. Re:Too easy... by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      RTFA? Oh, wait, I forgot where I was for a moment. ;)
      Anyways, yes this is almost exactly what they're doing. Bundling an *extremely* highly anticipated game demo with a reasonably successful film. In this case it's the God of War 3 demo bundled with District 9. A movie I want to own and a game I want to try. So as long as it doesn't cost any extra, yes I will be buying this. :)

    15. Re:Too easy... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Yeah - typical Greek view. He seduced her like she got no say in the matter. More likely she was just tired of being married to some old king who obviously wasn't a very nice person as he was willing to kill his own daughter to please Poseidon. Personally I just attribute the whole affair to Eris, she of the Golden Apple (Hail Eris!) ;)

      Anyway, we should enjoy our Greek Myth while we can. Hollywood is about to butcher them yet again.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    16. Re:Too easy... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Personally, this would annoy me. I hate trailers on discs. I (and I assume most people) only buy discs because we'll want to keep the movie and watch it again in time. And when I do, it's very irritating to see trailers for old movies pop up or (with the early Blu-Rays) a feature piece telling me how great Blu-Ray is. I would feel the same way about demos for games.

      On top of this, a producer would be shooting itself in the foot by not making a demo available elsewhere, e.g. for download online. So if it's already available, then why would the people getting the Blu-Ray need a second source?

      But mainly, I just want my movie collection to be a collection of the things I actually want. Not littered with rapidly out of date ads. If I wanted an ad-supported model, I'd find one. People who pay for content always resent finding the seller trying to make a quick buck by subjecting them to ads as well.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    17. Re:Too easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been thinking the same exact thing off and on for a month now. I keep trying to work it up into a good comedy routine.

    18. Re:Too easy... by AnotherUsername · · Score: 0

      Hmm...
      I think I'll just get my PS3 game demo the same place I get them now - the Playstation Network. They're free, and chances are, it'll be the exact same demo on the movie I probably didn't want to begin with.

      Instead of using the extra disc space for a game demo, how about they use it for special features and alternate versions(director's cut and theatrical on the same disc would be nice). I love my Kingdom of Heaven Director's Cut, but the fact that a Blu-Ray disc has none of the special features that were on the regular DVD irritates me. I am told that there are no special features because the a.) the movie is 45 minutes longer, b.) the video is higher quality, and c.) the audio is higher quality as well. Well, I may be one of the few, but I would be willing to pay more for the movie if they would include a second Blu-Ray disc that was entirely special features, as well as the original theatrical version.

      When a release of a film is done right, and there are plenty of extras that go along with it, I am willing to reward those who are responsible. However, if a studio is adding 'extras' to a release that really have very little to do with the actual movie, I get quite irritated. Adding a game demo to a Blu-Ray disc simply to use up space actually makes me a bit angry. This tells me that I am not getting a.) high quality video, b.) high quality sound, or c.) special features that I will actually enjoy.

      When I play a game demo, and I enjoy it enough, I buy the game. Then I delete the demo, because I have no further use for it. When I play a game demo, and I do not like it, I simply delete it, and never think about it again. By coupling a game demo to a movie, I am forced to forever have to keep the game demo, whether I like it or not. If I buy a movie, I want a movie, with extras pertaining to the movie. If I buy a movie, I am not buying a game. When I buy a game, I do not expect a movie trailer to come with it. That is not why I bought the game. Both demos and trailers are generally free on the Playstation Network. Why do I need to have a movie tie-in game be forced onto me. Most movie tie-in games suck. I don't like to think about them. Nor do I want them on my Blu-Ray disc, taking up space that could be used for my special features that I love so much.

      Disclaimer to above post:
      I know that this post has been very a roundabout one, so please forgive me. It's 3:15 in the morning, and I am just getting done watching a 6 hour Dr. Who marathon(damn you Netflix!), and I am tired. So please forgive me.

      --
      I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
    19. Re:Too easy... by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I never understood why a condom brand would want to associate itself with the trojans.

      New ad campaign: "Put on a Trojan and you'll get inside her walls"

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    20. Re:Too easy... by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      So you are saying it is "Wear our condom, you are an idiot." How the fuck does that help?

    21. Re:Too easy... by selven · · Score: 1

      Technically the gods killed the guy who said that they shouldn't trust the horse with snakes, and everyone else was afraid and hurled it in, so you can't really blame them.

    22. Re:Too easy... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I would feel the same way about demos for games.

      It's just going to be another option on the menu, which won't even appear unless you have a PS3 (if they are at all competent anyway.) Or perhaps another trailer in the intro trailers, which you can skip or which don't play if you buy movies from non-jackasses.

      But mainly, I just want my movie collection to be a collection of the things I actually want. Not littered with rapidly out of date ads.

      So, uh, rip 'em down to the movies. Aside from the whole DMCA thing, it's still a legal act. If you're doing it solely for the purposes of backups, nobody is going to sue you. Or simply refuse to purchase media not provided on your terms, and enjoy staring at the wall.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:Too easy... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      You may be an idiot, but Aphrodite has given you a rather large endowment.

    24. Re:Too easy... by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      You don't have to break into if you can trick others into letting you in. That's the point of the trojan horse.

    25. Re:Too easy... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I like game demos. They overwhelmingly show me that I don't want to buy games. Sometimes they show me the opposite, which is rare, but leads to fun. I don't even mind ad screens; the only thing I do mind is when I can blow through the demo in less than an hour. But I guess since lots of people only want an hour, it's an effective means of getting money out of some of them. Unfortunately, there's usually not enough depth in such a demo to convince the rest of us to buy it...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:Too easy... by Megane · · Score: 1

      Personally, this would annoy me. I hate trailers on discs.

      Do you hate trailers, or do you hate forced trailers? I can't see how you can have any problem with trailers hiding behind a menu selection, or sometimes two menus (as a sub-item of an Extras menu).

      This is a problem with DVD too, it's just that (from what I hear, not having yet drunk Sony's kool-aid) it already takes Blu-Ray what, 60 or more seconds to get where you can start watching the movie when the studio doesn't pull their arrogant "WE'RE SO AWESOME WATCH OUR FLYING LOGO AGAIN WITH CONTROLS DISABLED" crap?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    27. Re:Too easy... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You'll get a feature limited demo of our crappy sweatshop game

      The same feature limited demo of our crappy sweatshop game that you can download for free from Playstation Store.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    28. Re:Too easy... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Most people, I think, don't even know what a Trojan is, so why should they care about it?

      If I'd only known what a Trojan was a few years ago, I'd still be single.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    29. Re:Too easy... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Remember, the trojans did to young boys what the Greeks did to them.

      Surprise!

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    30. Re:Too easy... by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 1

      The precedent is already there.

      It's the only reason anyone bought Crackdown.

    31. Re:Too easy... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Anyway, we should enjoy our Greek Myth while we can. Hollywood is about to butcher them [imdb.com] yet again.

      Young man, the original Clash of the Titans was one of the finest films ever made.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    32. Re:Too easy... by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      Then you cannot watch the movie until you have
      1. watched all the advertisements
      2. passed level one of the game.

      Have a nice, romantic evening!

    33. Re:Too easy... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      OT: The new Clash of the Titans is going to have Ralph Fiennes and Liam Neeson.

      I always thought they were the same guy. It'll be interesting to see if they are in any scenes together.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    34. Re:Too easy... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I like demos, too.

      I wondered why there was no demo for Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 until I played the game and finished it in just over 5 hours.

      The demo would have been about 13 seconds long.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    35. Re:Too easy... by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 1

      Your post is very whiny and not really relevant to anything.

      By coupling a game demo to a movie, I am forced to forever have to keep the game demo, whether I like it or not.

      Jesus, who cares? It's not like you ever have to play it again. This is like complaining that your VHS copy of Ninja Turtles 3 has out-dated ads for products you can't buy anymore. Deal with it.

      This tells me that I am not getting a.) high quality video, b.) high quality sound

      Why does it tell you that? Because the movie didn't fill up the blu-ray by itself? Then how would you expect them to get extras on your beloved purchases? Do you know how much capacity a blu-ray disc has?

      If I buy a movie, I want a movie, with extras pertaining to the movie.

      This is anecdotal, but I generally want to watch the damned movie when I buy it, not listen to asinine commentary or watch stupid videos about the catering for the set.

    36. Re:Too easy... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      but game demos are a good thing

      Especially since you can download them from the Playstation Store without having to shell out for the Blue Ray version of 2013 - This Time it's for Real starring Ralph Fiennes and Liam Neeson as reincarnated identical twin Mayan princes who travel forward in time to finish what their calendar only started.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    37. Re:Too easy... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Apparently it was. You may want to remember that the Greeks didn't win by breaking the wall.

    38. Re:Too easy... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Informative

      More likely she was just tired of being married to some old king who obviously wasn't a very nice person as he was willing to kill his own daughter to please Poseidon.

      That was Agamemnon, not his brother Menelaus. Agamemnon's wife Clytemnestra got to show him what she thought of that when he got home from the war.

    39. Re:Too easy... by rjolley · · Score: 1

      Which was AWESOME by the way. Far better than the demo you bought the game for.

    40. Re:Too easy... by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      I thought the LEGO Batman/Indiana Jones games would be fun, because I like Batman/Indiana Jones, and I love LEGO.

      I'm glad XBox Live had demos, saved me some money.

    41. Re:Too easy... by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      I agree in that I do also get my demos from PSN.. but recently, I am finding PSN is getting pretty crowded (not a bad thing, as it shows more games are available). Add to that the time taken to download a 650MB - 1GB demo (still takes time).

      I woudl not "mind" if there is about 650MB spare left on the BD to also include the game demo... especially one linked to the film.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    42. Re:Too easy... by timbck2 · · Score: 1

      the studio doesn't pull their arrogant "WE'RE SO AWESOME WATCH OUR FLYING LOGO AGAIN WITH CONTROLS DISABLED" crap?

      a.k.a. masturbation.

      Some random text to get past the all caps filter.

      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    43. Re:Too easy... by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      the only thing I do mind is when I can blow through the demo in less than an hour.

      I honestly can't remember any demo on a modern system that was >= 1 hour in length. Most are only around 20 minutes--and many are even shorter (Heavenly Sword was 5 minutes, IIRC).

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    44. Re:Too easy... by artson · · Score: 1

      "You forgot the trojan that gets installed if your player happens to be a computer."

      Roger that. Nothing from Sony. Not now, not ever. I don't know how many sales I've steered away from Sony, but it has been a lot. Bad cess to them.

      --
      In times of trouble, the smell of frying onions usually gives confidence and comfort.
    45. Re:Too easy... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      But the winning/non-winning was never the topic/point/question.
      It was about getting through the wall. Which they unquestionably did.

      And this is what makes it a bad association to a condom.

      By the way: Wow, how did we get to condoms from blu-ray movies? Porn again? ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    46. Re:Too easy... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's easy to see why you got modded as Flamebait; I had an argument in my living room last night about CoD MW2. Well, *I* didn't really have it... One person asserted it was the best console FPS ever. The other asserted that it was boring (he'd beaten it) and that it had poor play control. The guy who loved it got all heated. He's the guy who gets all super butt-hurt when I tell him Sony is evil and must be destroyed for what they did to Lik-Sang, which in turn is something they did to all gamers everywhere, and for what they did with rootkits on Audio CDs, though, so I don't pay too much attention to his opinions.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. save the space.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for a good encode of the movie itself. leave the gimmicks out of it.

    1. Re:save the space.. by DrXym · · Score: 1

      I agree the movie quality shouldn't suffer. However many disks do have some space left over so why not use it?

  4. Blu-ray is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Can't these companies get it through their thick skulls that Bluray is a dead on arrival format? That consumers don't see it as a necessary update to their plain DVDs, which they see as good enough even with the advent of HD televisions?

    Companies are just trying to beat consumers over the head with Bluray for long enough in the hope that some day it might actually catch on, thanks to their wonderfully deep pockets (while they say that they're losing money due to piracy...), instead of letting the market decide what fails and lives. In the past, Bluray would have long been dead, but now Sony and other companies pushing this DOA format are stubbornly determined to make it succeed despite overwhelming apathy for it.

    Let it die. Yes, a few people buy it, but no more than the normal amount of "early adopters" for any new technology. It's over, let it pass into history as yet another failed format nobody wants.

    Anonymous Coward because I *know* there will be people accusing me of technophobia, hatred of new technology, etc, instead of seeing my argument as what it is -- basic common sense reasoning.

    1. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by some_guy_88 · · Score: 0

      Right on. Nothing wrong with high resolution video, but Bluray is a crappy distribution medium.

      I'm even surprised dvds became so popular. The thing that drives me nuts about dvds is the damn menus they put at the start. I just want to watch the movie. I don't want to watch a 30 second un-skipable menu animation and then have to press enter on a remote and then watch another 5 second "leaving the menu" animation. I just want the movie.

      Don't get me started about the ads that make you feel like a criminal at the start of rental dvds.

      And they wonder why people use bittorrent..

    2. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      You must be blind as a bat.

    3. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Alas poor Superbit, we hardly knew ye.

    4. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I refuse to buy a blu-ray player for the following reasons:

      Xbox360 pwnz
      I can pirate everything in 1080p and stream it to my HDTV using the aforementioned xbox
      I can also pirate the full games that would be included on the blu ray disc, for the 360 of course

    5. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      I'm even surprised dvds became so popular. The thing that drives me nuts about dvds is the damn menus they put at the start. I just want to watch the movie.

      Don't assume, just because that's your preference, that it applies to everyone. Given the presence of extra content on most DVDs, not to mention DVDs for TV programs where multiple episodes appear on a single disc, a menuing system for accessing that content makes a ton of sense. In fact, one of the reasons I haven't bothered to try and rip my DVD collection is that no format will *preserve* those menus (and all the content they provide access to), save for a straight ISO rip, which has the problem of immense size.

      That said, having portions of a DVD that actively disable controls (ie, FF, RWD, etc) is flat out evil (which is why my DVD player is Xine).

      And as an aside, the reason BR is DOA is that a) they're frickin' expensive, and b) HD penetration is still not all that impressive, and for your average consumer, the upgrade just ain't worth the trouble (and yes, videophiles, you can fuck off... I said *average* consumer).

    6. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hardly. Case in point: I refuse to by a huge TV because, frankly, I don't have the room, and I consider it nothing more than conspicuous consumption. So I've settled on a 32" TV... which is, TBH, still huge, but I happen to watch it from a couch that's a good 12-14 feet away (it's on an angle, so the viewing distance varies a bit). And from that distance, at that screen size, SD and HD are indistinguishable simply due to physical limitations in the human eye related to angular resolution.

      So unless I plan to buy a huge TV, or move my couch half-way across the room, HD is pointless. And I can't imagine I'm the only one in that boat. Furthermore, for those where the difference in resolution would be visually distinguishable, many simply don't consider the upgrade worth the bother, as SD is good enough (particularly given the quality of a decent DVD upscaler).

    7. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      The DVD menus are nowhere near as annoying as fast-forwarding and rewinding tapes.. I'll take an extra 10-30 seconds of useless intro over that any day.

    8. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to think like you until I bought a 42" LCD HDTV (1080p, naturally). The image is razor sharp and the difference is now very noticeable to me when I see SD content or use an old TV. In passing it might not seem like such a big deal, but in day to day usage it really does make a visible difference.

      On top of that, I can use it as a PC monitor.

    9. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by wisty · · Score: 1

      Yep. DVD killed VHS because it was easy to use and a lot more robust. No rewinding the tape when you finished. No stuffing the tape back into the cartridge when it spat the dummy. No fingerprints, fuzzy lines, and pictures wrapping vertically up and down the screen.

      The menus are a PITA, but they are still better than VHS.

      Also, the "special features disks" are pain. Would it be a huge ask to clearly mark those things? Big red letters with "special features" would save people a lot of time and frustration.

    10. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In recent years I have rented two DVDs where the previews were unskippable. Thats annoying. And in the future:

      This disk has been licensed for three viewers. To proceed beyond the anti pirating presentation your player must detect three viewers facing the screen with eyes open for the entire 20 minutes.

    11. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 1

      Definitely. I'll tolerate the intros, which aren't really that bad. Oh hey, I can start the DVD and let it play through to the main menu while I go make popcorn or something for the movie. Plus the special features that you usually get on a DVD. Never saw those on tapes.

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
    12. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Cochonou · · Score: 1

      Indeed, a menuing system makes a ton of sense.
      However, what may be more discutable is the way DVD/Blu-rays boot straight to the menu. Personally, I would have preferred if they started the movie right away (the menu would be still accessible from a keypress). I don't really need a menu to set up the audio track or the subtitle track - most hardware of software players allow to do this without interrupting the movie.
      And of course, as you said, booting straight to the movie doesn't make a lot of sense for TV programs. But we do not have a to have a single rule for every kind of content.

    13. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by timmarhy · · Score: 1, Insightful
      i've had lots of people give me this exact line, then i sit them down to watch a HD movie on my 1080p 70 inch tv, and they all want one.

      all you are doing is making excuses as to why your tv is "good enough". well sir not everyone is content with "good enough"

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    14. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      And as an aside, the reason BR is DOA is that a) they're frickin' expensive

      Since when?

      Most of the Blu-Ray disks I've bought of older movies have been cheaper than the equivalent DVD was when it came out, and the last few box sets of TV shows have been only a few dollars more than the same show on DVD... if not less, in some cases.

      That's not to imply that some Blu-Ray disks aren't crazily priced, but most would have looked like a bargain compared to when I started buying DVDs in the 90s. The whole 'Band of Brothers' TV show on Blu-Ray cost me about $35, for example.

      Then again, if you think that 4-8GB is 'immense size', you may think $35 for one of the best TV shows of recent years at HD resolution is 'frickin expensive'.

    15. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing that drives me nuts about dvds is the damn menus they put at the start. I just want to watch the movie. I don't want to watch a 30 second un-skipable menu animation and then have to press enter on a remote and then watch another 5 second "leaving the menu" animation. I just want the movie.

      Don't get me started about the ads that make you feel like a criminal at the start of rental dvds.

      That's why I only watch DVDs via a computer. The software players I've used so far all had an option to directly jump to the start of the movie (past all the YOU ARE A CRIMINAL!!!!11 ads).

      Plus you can change settings like language and subtitles via the player's menu; always at the same place, you don't have to stop the movie, go to the menu, find the settings, etc.

    16. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I use to think like you, even after we got a HD tv. I looked at it and went "so what? Its just like the old tv." After a few months of using it I then went and looked at someone's old SD tv and I could immediately tell the difference.

      So hey, while ever you don't know the difference, it won't kill you. But the second you do, you won't be able to go back.

    17. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, you could fast forward a VHS tape 30 seconds to get the the good scene (ahem) but it takes longer than that on a DVD to show the "The FBI prosecutes pirates" screen in Russian, Slovak, Turkish...

    18. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by selven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So when I pirate my movies, with no unskippable anything, I get a superior product? Did any of these people take a basic economics course?

    19. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

      Plus you can change settings like language and subtitles via the player's menu; always at the same place, you don't have to stop the movie, go to the menu, find the settings, etc.

      I own a 50$ Philips DVD Player & I can change subtitles etc through the remote without going to the main menu!

    20. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 0

      Heh heh. Same thing happened to me. I finally got a PS3 last year, and switched my Netflix account to allow Blu-Ray. I wasn't expecting much, but, geez, even on my 52 incher it was enormously better than than any DVD. Sad to say my first Blu-Ray was "Transformers". I can never undo that. :-(

    21. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Right now, (perhaps not in the future), DVDs are still superior to the ripped version. Most people don't have the connections to download a full resolution version of a DVD rip, nor do they have their TVs set up to display a video feed from their computer. They also don't want to be bothered burning it to a DVD, marking it, etc.

      In the future, this will likely not be the case, but right now for DVD to DVDrip comparisons, DVD is still slightly ahead.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    22. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you are doing is justifying the money you spent by trolling on Slashdot.

    23. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      I don't even have a TV you insensitive Clod. I get by with my 28" 1920x1200 monitor...

      The difference between a 1080p blu-ray and a regular DVD is night and day, honestly you have to be blind not to see it. Once you get used to watching movies in HD, it becomes difficult to go back to SD...

    24. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      He just said "pirate DVD movies", which you can easily do via DVD-R-to-DVD-R copies once a single person has removed the protection on the first generation copy. There are still people out there selling pirated DVDs, no downloading necessary.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    25. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Anon. Coward wrote:
      Can't these companies get it through their thick skulls that Bluray is a dead on arrival format? That consumers don't see it as a necessary update to their plain DVDs, which they see as good enough even with the advent of HD televisions?

      I sure as hell don't. Standard def DVDs look like shit on a large (>30 inches) set, especially with all the annoying DVD artifacts. Give me the high-definition movies and tv shows please.

      someguy wrote:
      Nothing wrong with high resolution video, but Bluray is a crappy distribution medium.

      I'm going to guess you're like most people, and think a "better" distribution medium is the internet. Well that may work for me, but it won't work over my 750k DSL connection. And what about those millions of Americans still stuck with 50k dialup? Or imposed overage fees if you go over 250 gig?

      A disc is still the best way to reach everybody's homes with high-def content. PLUS because it's on a physical disc, it can be sold after you grow tired of it. You can't resell a Download on Ebay, but you can sell a DVD or Bluray

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    26. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      We were both, however, referring to the convenience factor.

      Where the hell would I find one of those people? Certainly not closer to me than the nearest BestBuy. And even then, are they selling bit for bit DVD rips, or bootlegs that they just label as DVDs?

      As I said, it is close, and when the network conditions of the US improve you will likely see the pirated versions beat regular DVDs (with unskippable ads/warnings) But until then, regular DVDs still are head with at least 2/3rds of the market.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    27. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>HD penetration is still not all that impressive, and for your average consumer, the upgrade just ain't worth the trouble

      It depends. If someone asked my advice, I'd still recommend buying a Bluray player over yet-another-DVD player. Why? Because even on a standard definition set, you can see the difference in quality (Bluray has no compression artifacts), and also the price differential is not that great. Bluray is the future; might as well prepare yourself now.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    28. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      The menu's not really a big deal IMHO. I've found in most cases I can just keep pressing the "okay" button, and the player will immediately hop from the menu to the movie. Using this method I find I can start the DVD movie faster than on my old VHS tapes (which have 3-4 minutes of lead time).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    29. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by DrXym · · Score: 2, Informative

      That "dead on arrival" format is experiencing growth comparable to DVD in its day. And even if it did die for whatever reason so what? Tools like AnyDVD make it fairly straightforward to rip the content to HDD at which point you have a high quality 1080p movie which will be good for years to come.

    30. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      On the other hand:

      My Super VHS vcr can record any television program, even those that DVRs refuse to capture (due to DRM). And the quality is just as good as DVD. There are certain advantages to using analog formats which ignore digital anti-copy schemes.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    31. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Sadly I think some people really can't tell the difference, or rather can't conceptualize the difference unless you show them HD and SD running side by side. Once they see it they can tell instantly, but getting over that hurdle is an issue. I think this is why the industry is so keen to introduce 3D. It's a lot hard to claim you can't see the difference between a 2D and 3D image.

    32. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>And from that distance, at that screen size, SD and HD are indistinguishable simply due to physical limitations in the human eye related to angular resolution.
      >>>

      Perhaps but you still have the issue of compression artifacts - DVD has them and Bluray doesn't. Don't believe? Take a DVD movie and fast-forward to a dark scene (like a firelight scene). Do you see all the strange blocks floating around in the background? Those are artifacts. Now look at the same scene on Bluray - the blocks disappear.

      You can also detect other differences, like "mosquitos" floating around in the bright scenes, which are present on DVD but absent from Bluray. Those are harder to see but stick-out when you know what to look for.

      I have a 25" standard def CRT, and even I can see the difference. DVD is "dirty"; Bluray is clean.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    33. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Megane · · Score: 1

      ...meanwhile your remote is crammed with a bunch of buttons that you have to remember in the dark, and have to be properly set up when you get a multi-system remote. Touch-screen is not a solution, because it doesn't give tactile feedback, forcing to look at your remote to do anything.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    34. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean.

      I used to think that girl who played "Veronica Mars" was hot when I watched her on live television. Then I got the Bluray and suddenly she was not. She looked no better than the girl next door. :-(

      ;-)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    35. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Ya know, I've seen the same thing since I upgraded to Digital over-the-air TV. It's so nice-and-clear that when I watch my brother's analog cable hookup, it looks blurry to my eyes.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    36. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Megane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I sure as hell don't. Standard def DVDs look like shit on a large (>30 inches) set, especially with all the annoying DVD artifacts. Give me the high-definition movies and tv shows please.

      Turn down your fucking Sharpness control. This is one of those crap options that add noise to the picture just make things look better in the sales room. For most TV sets, the correct setting is ZERO, though some sets (notably Sony) support negative sharpness and the zero setting is in the middle of the bar.

      Most of the "artifacts" of DVD are actually due to this. I've even seen completely player-generated screens (not based off of MPEG or JPEG) have "artifacts" because of the ringing from Sharpness.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    37. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Turn down your fucking Sharpness control.

      (checks). My television is set to 0; ditto my DVD and Bluray players. Now don't you feel kinda silly - jumping to false conclusions?

      And watch your language young man. ;-)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    38. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      P.S.

      >>>This is one of those crap options that add noise to the picture

      Actually you're wrong about that. I'm not sure what purpose "sharpness" serves on a DVD player, but on a television the goal is to take the Composite luma + chroma signal and separate them (via COMB filtering). So you see a sharpness control on a TV does have a purpose, especially for older analog sources like your cable company, VCR, digital-to-analog converter box, or DVD with composite out.

      In any case even with sharpness turned down to 0 (off), I still can see artifacts like macroblocking and mosquitos on my DVDs. On Bluray those compression artifacts disappear. Why? Because Bluray has less compression, and also a more-advanced codec base (MPEG4 versus MPEG2) that overall produces a better picture.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    39. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      You would have a point, except that every single DVD player remote control has two buttons for jumping directly to the menu. One for jumping to the title menu and one for jumping to the global menu (in practice they are often the same). Most common use case is wanting to watch the film, or the episodes in order. This should be the default; pop in the disk and have it play. Second most common is wanting to watch the special features. This should be easy; pop in the disk and hit the menu button.

      There is no 'jump directly to the start of the movie' button on the remote, so making the menu the default only makes sense if every single menu has play movie or play all as its default option (and a great many don't, they have episode select or sound setup as the default).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    40. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, I can tell the difference, I just don't care. A lot of what I watch (on a projector, so on about a two metre display) is from iPlayer or streamed from the company I rent DVDs from. This is lower than DVD quality, but it's good enough. If I'm noticing the artefacts then it's probably because the show is too boring to be immersive. Given the choice between this and 1080p then, all other things being equal, I'd take the 1080p version. All other things are not equal though and so I'll take the greater convenience and the lower quality over the higher quality and lower convenience.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    41. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      Strangly, the Blu Rays that I have bought RECENTLY actually DO go stright to the film (as the menu is just a "java" app that is overlayed.

      Maybe things are changing in the BluRay world?

      --
      Have a nice day!
    42. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      Where the hell would I find one of those people? Certainly not closer to me than the nearest BestBuy. And even then, are they selling bit for bit DVD rips, or bootlegs that they just label as DVDs?

      Not very common in the US, but this is the main way people in less wealthy nations get their "pirated" movies, where personal computers and decent internet are not widespread.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    43. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Why would they do that when they can buy legislation?

    44. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by timbck2 · · Score: 1

      Heh. The first Blu-Ray I ever saw (due to coincidental timing on my Netflix queue) was "The Soloist". I'll always regret that - what a slow, boring film!

      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    45. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you're doing is justifying your lack of money by trolling on slashdot.

    46. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Some people are awed by eye-candy, others by substance. Most HD releases are garbage. If you want to watch good films, you watch the Criterion Collection, Artificial Eye, Tartan Video and similar releases and those films look good even at 640x480. Only children are awed by purdy colours and explosions!

      Ingmar Bergman, Akira Kurosawa and Krzystof Kieslowski don't look better in 1080p.

    47. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I bet you watch it all in black and white too. After all, only children are awed by purdy colours. Why, I bet you also watch it muted with the subtitles on. After all, really intelligent people don't need this new fandangled sound technology. The best movies are silent films.

    48. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      I'm even surprised dvds became so popular. The thing that drives me nuts about dvds is the damn menus they put at the start. I just want to watch the movie. I don't want to watch a 30 second un-skipable menu animation and then have to press enter on a remote and then watch another 5 second "leaving the menu" animation. I just want the movie.

      Yeah, just because some DVDs (mostly kid's movies) have annoying animations, we should throw the entire format under the bus. I mean, it's not like it's the greatest home movie format of all time. Who cares that you can watch The Third Man or Casablanca at home, in quality unheard of even 15 years ago? There are a few DVDs that have mildly annoying animations! Throw this shit in the trash heap with Beta, I deign it beneath me.

      Now, some_guy_88, back to downloading anime that was ripped from a DVD off Bittorrent and for you! Fight the man!

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    49. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Can't these companies get it through their thick skulls that Bluray is a dead on arrival format? That consumers don't see it as a necessary update to their plain DVDs, which they see as good enough even with the advent of HD televisions?

      In the words of the Jesus..."Laughable, mang!"

      If you think Blu-Ray is a failed format, I wonder what you would have thought of LaserDisc, which sold far less than Blu-Ray ever did, yet persisted as a niche format for 20 years.

      Blu-Ray is on the rise, as is HDTV adoption. This holiday season, we're going to see the first $99 Blu-Ray players, which will broaden adoption even further. You might be perfectly happy with your VCR and your 27 inch Trinitron, but there's no need to make up some bitter rant about Blu-Ray has failed in the marketplace. It's just technology-if you don't like it, don't buy it.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    50. Re:Blu-ray is dead. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Ingmar Bergman, Akira Kurosawa and Krzystof Kieslowski don't look better in 1080p.

      Actually, film resolution is higher than 1080p, so yes, they do.

      And Criterion is just starting to put out BluRays...which is awesome news for film majors and stuck up idiots like me!

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  5. Hooray, more garbage by greatica · · Score: 1

    IMDB > Actor biographies
    Google Images > Special Artwork
    YouTube & Movies Sites > Deleted Scenes and Behind the Scenes Documentaries
    Blogs > Director's commentaries
    Apple/Youtube > Upcoming releases
    Ripping Disc to cleanse the movie > FBI Warning
    Watching mold grow > Overdone menus
    Surfing the net on my own > Launching my browser with your dumpy "special access" software.
    Root Canal > DVD Quizzes

    And now...

    Downloading Demos > Having them bundled

    Hooray, I love more garbage that will make my movies seem even more dated when I watch them 10 years later.

    Who am I kidding? They probably won't even put the demos on the disks...they'll just waste your bandwidth by using BD Live to download the demo.

  6. Right on, Sony! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Great idea! This'll be bigger than UMD Vide... oh...

    Nevermind...

    1. Re:Right on, Sony! by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Stop running down UMD! It would have worked if it weren't for those meddling kids, dammit!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  7. alternatively... by EspressoFreak · · Score: 1

    it's only a matter of time that we'll be watching full blu-ray movies off the ps3 network, kind of like the itune store where we can pay couple dollars and keep the movie for 3 days or so.

    1. Re:alternatively... by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 1

      Or at least a part of Netflix on PS3 sometime in the future. I don't think it'd be that hard to add Blu-ray quality movies to the online queue. The only issue that might stop it from happening would be the bandwidth needed to transfer a Blu-ray quality movie.

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
    2. Re:alternatively... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

      Blu-Ray discs are 50GB. The video file for the movie "Love Actually" is 40GB. I'm only allowed to download 250GB a month.

      How do you expect this to work?

      --
      http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    3. Re:alternatively... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get another ISP. Comcast sucks!

    4. Re:alternatively... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      He didn't say now, he said in the future. BluRay video is around 30Mb/s. My current connection is 10Mb/s so clearly not fast enough, although my ISP offers 50Mb/s. Give it a couple of years and you'll see 50Mb/s becoming standard and a lot more people having 100Mb/s. Combine this with aggressive edge caching and improvements in compression techniques and you can stream movies at 1080p.

      Currently iPlayer streams 720p (1280x720 H.264) at 3200Kb/s, which works well. The quality is better than DVDs though not as good as a decent BluRay master and uses under half of my available bandwidth. Taking this up to 1080p is just a matter of increasing the bandwidth. To get to BluRay quality is a factor of ten increase in bandwidth with the same compression, but given the rate at which available bandwidth is increasing that doesn't seem too far in the future. And right now, streaming 720p seems more attractive than 1080p on little plastic disks.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:alternatively... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Get another ISP.

      DSL is even slower.

  8. I see some Success here by Sirusjr · · Score: 1

    As much as many here are too smart to be fooled by this, think back to when Dragon Quest VIII came with a pack-in demo of FFXII. I doubt much of the gaming populace actually bought DQVIII to play it rather than to play the demo (although I like to think that people bought it for DQVIII). However with downloaded demos a much bigger thing nowdays I don't see how this would work. If other demos work just fine when uploaded to the internet and burned on a CD (at least for the xbox 360) then I fail to see how that will be impossible to do here as well. Thus the demo will just show up on bittorrent sites for all to enjoy without wasting their money on District 9.

    1. Re:I see some Success here by spathi-wa · · Score: 1

      .... without wasting their money on District 9.

      I disagree, IMO District 9 is well worth the money

    2. Re:I see some Success here by Cochonou · · Score: 1

      They probably want to drive up the sales... of their games. I don't really see anybody to be more inclined to shell money out because of a game demo. In the other way however, it might be more effective, as a distribution channel. If the game demo is already available on a disk you own, you might be more tempted to try out the demo, especially if it's from a game you have never heard about.

  9. I just want to play for 1h so game demos are great by electrosoccertux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is awesome. Most game demos have to give you enough to wet your appetite for more. Most of the time you can realize the game would suck, but the demo usually has a few redeeming qualities making the 30 minutes that you play the demo rewarding and entertaining.

    So: I'm all for it.

  10. Matroska can contain the whole DVD menus and all! by bornagainpenguin · · Score: 2, Informative

    One of the reasons I haven't bothered to try and rip my DVD collection is that no format will *preserve* those menus (and all the content they provide access to), save for a straight ISO rip, which has the problem of immense size.

    I believe it is possible to do exactly this with Matroska, as described here.

    --bornagainpenguin

    --
    Have a Virgin Mobile USA smartphone? Give VMRoms.com a try!
  11. I'm so over these stupid shiny plastic discs by matty619 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really hope that bluray is the last of this shiny plastic disc phenomenon. I had a somewhat respectable VHS collection, then amassed a healthy DVD collection, jumped on the HD-DVD bandwagon with the HD player add-on for the 360 before that battle was lost, and now I've got about the same number of bluray discs.

    We've been told time and again, when you buy an album, or a copy of a movie, you don't *own* that copy, you have merely licensed it. So I'm not allowed to make a backup for personal use of the copy of my license, when the new format comes out, I have to buy a new "license" for the IP I have already licensed.... I am sooo ready to simply "license" movies via a Netflix like subscription service....I'll pay $20/month (less than the cost of 2 premium cable TV channels) if I can "rent" any movie I like on the fly. I've already got a 20 Mb/s internet connection, and with DOCSIS 3.0 coming to my area next year, should be fast enough to stream reasonably compressed HD content. No more need to buy and keep track of fragile little discs...or have to re-purchase when the next format comes out 12 years later.

    I'm just over it.

    1. Re:I'm so over these stupid shiny plastic discs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turn on your xbox 360 next week...

    2. Re:I'm so over these stupid shiny plastic discs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The transition from VHS to DVD was a necessary break from the past. What I don't understand is why you can't simply play your DVDs on your Blu-Ray player? You haven't lost anything there and you certainly don't need to buy a new copy unless you want the higher resolution version.

    3. Re:I'm so over these stupid shiny plastic discs by reashlin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh I get it, your so sick of moving from format to format, media to media, license to license that your ready to jump ship from Blu-ray to a subscription download service. Good on ya.

      You'd be better off just keeping the old 'players' around and not jumping on every new bandwagon that rolls into town. You can still buy decent combined DVD/VHS players so its won't likely take up too much space on that front. I'm sure you've still got your 360 around and likely a PS3. So I don't see why you have to replace anything.

    4. Re:I'm so over these stupid shiny plastic discs by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>>jumped on the HD-DVD bandwagon

      That's your own dumb fault. If you had been smart (like me ;-) ), you would have patiently waited for the BD and HDDVD war to be over. I learned that early on, when I bought Betamax instead of VHS. Better to wait to see who has won.

       

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:I'm so over these stupid shiny plastic discs by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      You are correct. I still have about 200 VHS titles and lots of VHS-C home movies. As long as I've got a VCR, those movies will be mine to watch and view whenever I feel like it. No need to upgrade.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    6. Re:I'm so over these stupid shiny plastic discs by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you really think it's going to work that way? You think studios are just going to give up the lucrative model they have now just so you can pay a small flat fee for all-you can-eat? No, let me tell you how it would REALLY work if they got rid of those "shiny discs": It would be exactly the same as it is now, with you paying $20-$25 per movie, only now you would only get a downloaded copy which you couldn't then resell or loan to a friend. The end.

      And that is why you should PRAY that those shiny discs stick around.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:I'm so over these stupid shiny plastic discs by elrous0 · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'm so dumb that I spent that $100 for the HD-DVD addon for my 360. And all I got out of it was over a hundred HD movies for $5-$7 a piece after the format died--many of which are the exact same titles the smart blu-ray people are paying $30-$35 for. I even was dumb enough to buy the first season of Battlestar Galactica on HD-DVD several years before it came out on blu-ray. And can you believe my dumbass even went so far as to spend $40 a pop on a couple of extra 360 HD-DVD player add-ons just to make sure I would always have a working HD-DVD player? Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go sit on my retarded ass and watch a HD movie from my huge collection that cost me a fraction of what smart guys like you paid for your victorious blu-ray collection.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:I'm so over these stupid shiny plastic discs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir, your are not only a dumbass but a really funny dumbass :)

    9. Re:I'm so over these stupid shiny plastic discs by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>over a hundred HD movies for $5-$7 a piece

      Yes I've picked-up a few of the dual DVD-HDDVD discs for cheap as well. BUT what happens when your HD DVD player dies? You won't be able to find a replacement to play all those HDDVD discs. You'll either have to buy them a second time on Bluray, or just go "oh well" and throw those movies in the trash.

      That's what ultimately happened to my Betamax collection. Tons of tapes and no way to play them. Some of the movies I repurchased, but for the most part I feel I wasted my money

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    10. Re:I'm so over these stupid shiny plastic discs by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      I really hope that bluray is the last of this shiny plastic disc phenomenon.

      Nope, there's nothing wrong with shiny plastic discs.

      The media industry just needs to start treating them the way the tech industry wants them to be treated: dumb places to dump your dumb data on. Nothing more, nothing less.

      If we want interactive rich media that people try to shovel on movie discs, we'll buy a video game instead. If we ever feel the need to willingly deal with this license and encryption bullshit, we will consult a psychiatrist next morning.

      Let's go back to the basics and just use the discs to transport video in a commonly agreed format that a player device can play. That's all we ever really needed. If you don't want people to copy the film, put "plz don't copy k?" in the disc label.

      Last I checked, DVD format doesn't mandate region coding, encryption or interactive content. I haven't checked Blu-Ray specs but I sure hope it doesn't either.

  12. Good for Sony by Toonol · · Score: 1

    But this might be a little irritating to any blu-ray player manufacturers NOT named Sony.

  13. Just lower the price instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "they hope the extra value will help drive sales"

    Instead of increasing the value to "match" the price, they should simply lower their price.

    1. Re:Just lower the price instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that it really doesn't work that way. This is bundling. My guess is the demos are necessary to sell the games and will be distributed in other ways as well, so sticking them on a blu-ray disk is a pretty cheap extra distribution channel whose costs are mostly bureaucratic within Sony.

      Put another way, not doing this is in the blu-ray disk distribution divisions is not saving money that will allow them to lower the price in the PS3 division.

  14. How much data? by AlgorithMan · · Score: 0

    The picture quality of DVDs is much better than the blu ray advertisements try to make you believe (at least on non-crap players) so if they sacrifice to much disk space for demos, the picture quality of the movies might get to close to the DVD quality to have a reason for a switch to blu ray...

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
    1. Re:How much data? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      1080p screen, PS3 player. Same movie on DVD and Blu-ray (both over HDMI straight from PS3 to screen), the Blu-ray version wins hands down. The difference is night and day. Maybe that points to my screen being a dumb 1080p monitor and not trying to enhance the crappy DVD picture quality. Some friends have really nice 1080p Sony TVs and their DVD quality (also through a PS3 over HDMI) is noticeable better, likely due to their TV doing extra image processing on the video signal that mine doesn't.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:How much data? by reashlin · · Score: 1

      Also check if your PS3 is doing any up-scaling. Your friends might have this turned on while you don't. I'll still agree the difference is night and day but I'd advise checking anyway.

    3. Re:How much data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And more importantly, check that you don't play DVDs with PS3 which simply sucks as a DVD player.

      There's a night & day difference between a good quality DVD player (for example Oppo BDP-83) and a not-so-good-one (PS3). Both might (up)scale the image just fine, but how they deinterlace is much more important.

  15. PS3 *CAN* be used as a DVR by 117 · · Score: 4, Informative
    From TFA:

    just about the only thing you can't do with a PS3 is use it as a DVR.

    This might be true in the US, but in other regions the PlayTV hardware add-on enables you to do exactly that. PlayTV allows you to watch live free-to-air TV and HDTV through the PS3, and record those programs to the PS3's hard drive. I bought the PlayTV add-on (I'm in the UK) as it was cheaper than buying a standalone DVR for free-to-air broadcasts, and have found it to be easier to use and far more reliable than the standalone alternatives available here

    1. Re:PS3 *CAN* be used as a DVR by Malc · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work with Freesat though, does it? I can't get Freeview in my flat, and there isn't enough room inside for an internal aerial big enough - the whole building is wired for Freesat though. And why can't the iPlayer download to the harddrive like on PC or Mac? And why is the PS3 fan so loud?

    2. Re:PS3 *CAN* be used as a DVR by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      I also have the PlayTV..

      You forgot to mention few other usefull features...

      a) the recorded stuff is in standard MPEG format (for sd) and is already in the right stream format for burning to DVD-Video without transcoding.

      b) it seems to already support AVC/Mp4 and only requires a software update (maybe already provided)

      c) two tuners, record one program watch another. Though it would be nice if it can also record two at the same time.... probably a software update (i dont think there is a restriction based on USB bandwidth, as it already provides two streams when you are watching one program and recording another)

      d) Powered straight from usb, no need for another power brick, works via a powered USB hub too.

      e) Its EPG is really good. you can search for programs via keyword.

      f) Use PSP, and remote play to set the recorder remotely, or watch TV remotely (even via the Internet)

      --
      Have a nice day!
    3. Re:PS3 *CAN* be used as a DVR by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      one more thing. ITs recorded as a Mp2 TS, so the entire stream is recorded, including subtitles stream, and alternative Audio streams.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    4. Re:PS3 *CAN* be used as a DVR by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      And why is the PS3 fan so loud?

      The fan isn't too loud considering the amount of power draw. The 360's fan, however, sounds like a jet at takeoff.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  16. Re:I just want to play for 1h so game demos are gr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a grammar nazi, but it's "whet your appetite". 'Whet' means 'sharpen'.

  17. Damn, I read Futurama... by Lispy · · Score: 1

    That would have been awesome, Futurama blu-Ray with playable Game Demo...but NO! ;-/

  18. Re:I just want to play for 1h so game demos are gr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly, i love games with movies, even some mini-games that came on DVDs.

    Since someone mentioned Final Fantasy up there, the Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within mini-editor game that lets you re-sequence one of the scenes was pretty damn fun.

    I wish more film makers would put some fun back in to the DVD releases.

  19. Awesome! by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    They will go on the shelf next to all those dvds with the action viewable from different camera angles and lots of alternate endings and stuff we were promised when the same kind of idiots in suits were selling us a new more profitable format.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  20. "On My 70 incher..." by voss · · Score: 1

    I have a 32 inch 720p lcd tv and a 24 inch 1080p monitor. I also have a blu-ray player and hdmi. While yes I can see the difference between upscaled DVDs and blu-ray discs, its simply not worth paying triple the price for the blu-ray.

    The problem is not the blu-ray discs the problem is the blu-ray player does such a good job at upscaling DVDs that on most 32 inch and smaller tvs it is "good enough" that you dont feel the need to spend the money to replace the DVD disc.

    What the blu-ray fanatics arent saying when they describe about how their friends eyes are popping, is they are comparing watching their blu-rays on 72 inch lcd tvs versus watching non-upscaled dvds on an sdtv, the PS3 does not automatically upscale dvds unless you have the correct firmware and have the settings set for it , oops they didnt tell you that did they?

    They also didnt tell you that upscaling on a ps3 is not as good as many regular upscaling dvd players let alone standalone blu-ray players because the system doesnt do that much postprocessing. Why would that be?

    I guess sony doesnt really want people seeing upscaled content, that doesnt sell blu-ray discs does it?

    1. Re:"On My 70 incher..." by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>its simply not worth paying triple the price for the blu-ray.

      Shop on Ebay, or from private sellers on Amazon. You can get about half your blurays for free, or with significant discounts

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:"On My 70 incher..." by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      Ermmm.. ok.. lets pull apart some of your trollish stuff....

      a) the PS3 DOES upscale DVDs and some other SD content VERY well... and it gets better... Arguably its one of the best upscalers around. I really dont know what you are talking about by saying its not as good.
      http://www.avforums.com/forums/ps3/641470-ps3-dvd-upscaling-performance.html
      http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=852732
      http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1180189

      b) the firmware which introduced DVD upscaling is now VERY old, and on a NORMAL ps3 would have been updated more than 2 years ago, either via the internet (newer firmware always required to access PSN), or updated via certain games/Blu Ray discs.

      The plain fact is, most upscalers are now very good, and you woudl be very hard pressed to choose between them. The PS3 is VERY good, and is likely to get better, due to its powerfull processor.

      And yes, Sony, although would love to sell more BD, they also sell DVDs and do promote the PS3 as a great DVD player.

      --
      Have a nice day!
  21. Re:Matroska can contain the whole DVD menus and al by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    That is both fascinating and interesting but also total bullshit as a process. I don't want to have to hack DVDs. Maybe if handbrake had an option for it, but I've had very poor luck with MKVs made by handbrake anyway.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  22. Digital goes Physical. Be happy Dammit. by jeruvin · · Score: 1

    I prefer to download my game demos. This is the combination of two physical forms of media that can be completely digital and available over an Internet connection. I guess I shouldn't be shocked after they started offering streaming Netflix on the PS3 using a disc. Sony, once again you amaze me with your ability to not try very hard.

    1. Re:Digital goes Physical. Be happy Dammit. by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Yeah it does seem stupid that the netflix thing comes on a disc (albiet temporarily supposedly) instead of just being a free download on the playstation store thing.

      Then again netflix has the whole send DVDs to people thing down pat, it is their main business after all. So maybe that was cheaper for them than whatever Sony wanted to charge them to put it up?

      But PS3 demos on blueray movies is just plain idiotic, they're already downloadable...

    2. Re:Digital goes Physical. Be happy Dammit. by jeruvin · · Score: 1

      Microsoft and the Xbox 360 have some sort of exclusive deal to have Netflix. It seems that may be why it's on a Blu-ray disc. Soon as they are able to it'll be pushed out on some PS3 update. Randomly searched for a found source (other people have commented on this as well) http://gamer.blorge.com/2009/10/28/ps3-netflix-circumvents-xbox-360-exclusivity-deal/

  23. When you upscale an artifact by tepples · · Score: 1

    What I don't understand is why you can't simply play your DVDs on your Blu-Ray player?

    The larger, sharper TVs used with a Blu-ray Disc player show larger, sharper artifacts that in fact were always in the DVD media. When you upscale an artifact, all you get is a bigger artifact.

    1. Re:When you upscale an artifact by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      all you get is a bigger artifact

      My God. It's full of stars!

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  24. I've got no problems with my PS3 upscaling... by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1

    They also didnt tell you that upscaling on a ps3 is not as good as many regular upscaling dvd players let alone standalone blu-ray players because the system doesnt do that much postprocessing. Why would that be?

    I have a Toshiba upscaling DVD player and a PS3. I have seen no indication whatsoever that the PS3 has any limitations or problems with upscaling DVDs. They look very nice on my 52" 1080p TV. I only bother with Blu-Ray for F/X blockbusters; for chick flicks with the wife I don't need to be able to read the notes on the refrigerator behind the characters.

    Where, exactly, are you getting the information that the PS3's upscaling is gimped? At one point, early on, it didn't do upscaling. But that was fixed back in May 2007 (firmware 1.80), and there's been a couple improvements since then...

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  25. Re:I just want to play for 1h so game demos are gr by dunezone · · Score: 1

    When the game sucks you release the demo weeks after the initial release, thus suckering people into buying the real product because they wont / cant wait, only to be disappointed.

    Although, the recent trend has been to release a early beta and when you run into problems they say its beta and it will be fixed in the commercial release.

  26. How to sell more PS3s by Krau+Ming · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Dear Sony, You know what would boost sales of the PS3? Removing head from arse, and making it back-compatible with PS2 games again.

  27. Re:Matroska can contain the whole DVD menus and al by bornagainpenguin · · Score: 1

    That is both fascinating and interesting but also total bullshit as a process. I don't want to have to hack DVDs. Maybe if handbrake had an option for it, but I've had very poor luck with MKVs made by handbrake anyway.

    The point is parent said it wasn't possible to make a backup of his DVDs with menus, commentaries and etc, and I've just pointed him to a method by where it is indeed possible to do so. Could the process be made easier? No doubt, but that isn't the scope of this discussion--the discussion centers on the fact it can be done if he wants to do it so badly.

    Personally I think parent was just being contrarian, since everyone else was posting about how they preferred to rip their DVDs to avoid the silly menu delays and animations so just to be contrary parent posted lamenting that he loved the DVD menuing and animations... But there is a way to do it and now parent knows how. If you think it should be easier, perhaps you could post an HOWTO making it easier?

    --bornagainpenguin

    --
    Have a Virgin Mobile USA smartphone? Give VMRoms.com a try!
  28. Re:Matroska can contain the whole DVD menus and al by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    Uh, no, that page describes how to rip a DVD to Matroksa in order to preserve the actual video content, audio channels, and subtitle streams. There's *nothing* in there about ripping the actual menu structure, and AFAIK, the Matroska menu spec a) is in it's infancy, b) has no tooling to make DVD -> MKV w/ menus actually doable, and c) isn't supported by any players out there.

    'course, I'd *love* to be proven wrong. :)

  29. Re:Matroska can contain the whole DVD menus and al by bornagainpenguin · · Score: 1
    From the article I linked:

    And that should do it. After a fair bit of disk-churning, you should have a Matroska file containing all of the elements from the original DVD title.

    Some emphasis added. Also, although I recognize this would be considered anecdotal evidence I've in the past encountered MKVs engineered to work this way, with title screens, commentary, multiple audio streams, etc so I do know they exist and that it is possible to do so. While the article is intended for people who want lossless quality, I'm sure it is possible to adjust parameters when encoding to bring about the file sizes you want without ending up with junk. I've seen anime (yes I know anime is different, but still it worked so the files were) encoded to be a mere forty megabytes in file size while retaining their high definition quality.

    So, yeah there's some work involved in it, but it is possible.

    Also if you need a player and don't want to just use a PC hooked up to your TV with XBMC then you could always try popcorn hour, or some of the machines listed here. You might have to research for awhile but you should be doing that any way, right?

    --bornagainpenguin

    --
    Have a Virgin Mobile USA smartphone? Give VMRoms.com a try!
  30. What the what by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    I didn't realize that giving away something that's already free and plentiful can add value. Unless they're planning to create a scarcity of game demos -- which sort of defeats the point -- then this adds little or no value, except possibly for people without PSN access.

    1. Re:What the what by Fumus · · Score: 1

      Not everyone can be bothered to wait half a day for a huge demo to download only to find it boring after ten minutes. This would allow people to play large demos of unheard of games because it's already there so they can give it a shot.

    2. Re:What the what by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      For practical purposes, if it takes you 12 hours to download a demo, then you can be included in the group of people without PSN access.

      Regardless, a 12 hour download is still likely faster than waiting for a release of the BluRay, especially since movie tie-in game releases typically coincide with theatrical releases. By the time the BluRay comes out, you can probably find the game in the bargain bin anyway.

  31. Re:Matroska can contain the whole DVD menus and al by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    From the article I linked:

    And that should do it. After a fair bit of disk-churning, you should have a Matroska file containing all of the elements from the original DVD title.

    Some emphasis added.

    Right. The original DVD *title*. ie, the video content of the DVD.

    Seriously, read the steps. It involves pulling out the various video and audio titles, and generating a combined Matroska container with that data in it. But nowhere are the *menus* actually ripped. Only the content itself is transformed in that process, producing a multi-program multiplex containing a bunch of programs composed of a video and multiple audio tracks.

    Again, I researched this. Heavily. Last I checked, there was a script which attempted to analyze the DVD menu structure and then create a Matroska analog but it simply didn't work. Again, things may have changed since then, but that was the state of the world the last I checked, and the site you linked to provides no evidence that things have changed (that's not to say things haven't, just that that site doesn't address the issue being discussed).

    Now, maybe in the last 6 months to a year some sort of MKV revolution has happened, and it's probably time I re-researched this. Here's hoping you're right and my information is out of date. :)

  32. Exactly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We could have lived with DVDs until about now (year 2010) with good upscaling techniques. The push for a new format was just a marketing ploy to sell more stuff. Now that we are actually creating a huge amount of HD quality video (from the cameras), it is almost necessary to upgrade the format to hold the all the data.
    But when they were just putting the old movies on blu-ray, they were simply upscaling the video before it went on disc instead of upscaling during playback. Waste... of... money...
     
    The really funny part is, the blu-ray killer format is right around the corner, even before blu-ray is well established in the market. This is probably just a ploy to divert attention to their new (and already antiquated) technology.

  33. Physical discs are relegated to collectibles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I jumped into the cheaper, better HD-DVD market and still watch them occasionally. The truth is that the physical disc format for movies has become antiquated for me. I no longer care about owning the physical disc of a movie unless it is a collectible and I don't really collect anymore. Thus, after having been an avid movie collector for years, HD-DVD was it for me. Blu-Ray can rot in hell along with the PS3.

    I would have been fine with a PS3 that was cheaper and did not use Blu-Ray, but the fact that Sony insisted on forcing Blu-Ray into the gaming community at a higher price point and in effect, pushed an inferior media format(Blu-Ray) on everyone else outside the gaming market, leaves me with no interest in ever purchasing another Sony product. I used to buy Sony exclusively for everything. Sony has lost roughly 17K of my money since the Blu-Ray debacle occurred. I won't even buy Sony products for my friends and family as gifts anymore.