Slashdot Mirror


BlueHippo Scam Collected $15M, Only Shipped One PC

An anonymous reader writes "Turns out that those BlueHippo commercials advertising financing for computers and other electronics for anybody, regardless of credit, were way more sleazy than you thought. The FTC is bringing this fraud down, but not too soon. 'According to the FTC, the company's brazen business model continued without interruption after the 2008 settlement. "In fact, in the year following entry of this Court's Stipulated Final Judgment and Order for a Permanent Injunction, BlueHippo financed — at most — a single computer to the over 35,000 consumers who placed orders for computers that could be financed during the period,' the FTC told a court (PDF) yesterday. In the meantime, the company took in a cool $15 million in payments from consumers, who don't appear to have received anything in return.'"

21 of 216 comments (clear)

  1. I'm fairly surprised, actually... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not surprised that BlueHippo are a bunch of worthless subhumans; but that they would be so audacious about it.

    Had they actually shipped a few thousand bottom-of-range refurb Compaqs or whatever, which are pretty damn cheap by the pallet load, they never would have attracted fire from the FTC. The way that their "business" was structured(at least back when I checked their website when I first heard about them), they should have been able to clear fairly impressive margins on the backs of the poor and clueless even without cheating. And, if they had avoided legally actionable fraud, they presumably would still be operating today.

    Why would somebody do that? Is enforcement so weak that getting away with it is a rational expectation?

  2. Instead of referring to just "Blue Hippo" by NoYob · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How about naming the asshole or assholes behind it? So that way, if we see those lying thieves we'll know to run. Many times, these guys close up shop and just start all over again with a different business entity.

    How many would invest with Bernie Madoff if he somehow miraculously got out of prison - regardless of the name of his company?

    --
    It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    1. Re:Instead of referring to just "Blue Hippo" by TSHTF · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the court documents linked in the article: Joseph K. Rensin is the sole owner and shareholder of BlueHippo Funding, LLC. FTC 26. Mr. Rensin acted as Chief Executive Officer of BlueHippo from its inception in 2003 until July 20, 2009. See FTC 28 at 7-8; FTC 22G at 3. As CEO, BlueHippo's corporate officers, including the Chief Marketing Officer, reported directly to Mr. Rensin. FTC 28 at 20-22. In addition, Mr. Rensin was involved in BlueHippo's day-to-day operations, "manag[ing] the overall structure and direction of the business" and "overseeing the senior management team in formulating strategy." Id. at 22; FTC 22G at 3.

    2. Re:Instead of referring to just "Blue Hippo" by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Previously, Rensin operated a collection agency at the same address. He was sued for that one as well. And lost.

  3. Re:Shocking! by lannocc · · Score: 5, Funny

    The fine print clearly stated

    Oxymoron

  4. Re:Shocking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's what user mode in Opera is for. It makes any hidden text or fine print clearly visible in a normal font. I am sure there is a Firefox addon or setting that does something similar, but it is very hard if not impossible to make fine print stay hard to read with any decent web browser.

  5. Re:Winning gold at the scam olympics by mkiwi · · Score: 5, Informative

    So they have your SSN for the user name. Just think of what they could do if they knew your mother's maiden name! Oh never mind, that's the password!
    https://www.bluehippo.com/csv2/Login.aspx

  6. Immoral people by blindbat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can never make enough laws to keep people like this from exploiting others.

    It would never occur to those of us who have been raised with an inkling of an idea of good and evil to treat others in such a despicable manner.

    It has nothing to do with free market. It is an issue of ethics and values.

    Without the adoption of some standard of right and good within the individual heart, there is no hope of restraining people from similar scams.

    1. Re:Immoral people by Machtyn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Policemen and laws can never replace customs, traditions and moral values as a means for regulating human behavior. At best, the police and criminal justice system are the last desperate line of defense for a civilized society. Our increased reliance on laws to regulate behavior is a measure of how uncivilized we’ve become." -Walter Williams, “Laws Are a Poor Substitute for Common Decency, Moral Values,” Deseret News, Apr. 29, 2009, A15

      Your statement reminded me of this quote.

  7. so frustrating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not doing great financially, but those of us in the know are pretty good about staying on the connected side of the digital divide.

    Not only that, but we are the same folks that keep old parts around and every now and then are able to build a workable setup for someone that could really use a computer. People that are thrilled to have something, even if it comes with a CRT monitor and has a 7 year old video card.

    I've 'volunteered' hours working on crappy emachines for people because I know they can't go out and buy something fast and great.

    F you BlueHippo. I know these people personally, and a computer means a lot to them.

  8. Go Try to log in... by jesseck · · Score: 5, Informative

    I went to their website (Google for bluehippo), and when I clicked "Purchase" I was taken to a login screen.. where my username is my SSN, and password is my mother's maiden name. Yeah, I'll give them some more personal info after I enter that...

    1. Re:Go Try to log in... by CaroKann · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you have trouble logging in with that, their helpful "Trouble Logging In" screen gives you plenty of other ways to log in. You just have to select and enter one of the following combinations:

      Social Security Number/Home Phone
      BlueHippo Account Number/Home Phone
      Social Security Number/House Number
      Bank Account Number/Zip Code (!)
      Social Security Number/Password (Mothers Maiden Name?)

  9. Re:Shocking! by sdiz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    just make the fine print a jpeg file with low quality or embed in flash

  10. Re:Is this the free market? by mc6809e · · Score: 5, Informative

    So I see that Gates and Buffet said recently that the economy is picking back up and all is well and there is no reason for anyone to be worried and the free market is perfect.

    But how can it be perfect if the we cannot protect those who need protection most from those who would steal their money.

    The elderly are doing the same thing to workers right now through Social Security and Medicare.

    We're promised future product (retirement money and health care) if we make payments up front. And it's unlikely the state will be able to deliver since they've already spent the money.

    Sound familiar?

  11. Re:Shocking! by Entropius · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is the first time that the Nyquist sampling theorem has had an application to legal bullshit, I think. Wow.

  12. Re:Winning gold at the scam olympics by JimboFBX · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least they used HTTPS.

  13. Class Action Laywers and Scammers? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Sorry, I don't believe it. Scammers don't run a solvent enterprise that a class-action lawyer would approach. The lawyer wants money, the scam is a scam, not an operating business, and doesn't hang around with money for a lawyer to recover.

    Do you have any good examples?

  14. Re:Is this the free market? by copponex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We've effectively gone from a system that we could opt out of (for the most part) into one where the government forces you to give it up till you bleed. Tell me how much better things are again?

    I see your point, but the idea you're missing is that much of technology moves from a luxury to a necessity very quickly. Ten years ago you could compete in the job market with no computer skills, and that's no longer the case. Shorter patent lifespans would allow companies to profit from good research, but not set back an entire society to profit a single corporation. Imagine if GE came out with a solar panel that was dirt cheap to manufacture, but charged 400 times more than it cost to make. China, India, and Russia could reverse engineer the product, and then we'd be competing with international companies that pay far less for electricity.

    Furthermore, you have zero input on the actions of corporations who provide these necessary luxuries, like oil, electricity, information infrastructure, and so on. At some point, you have to assign a third party with more power to keep them in check, or we'll all be living in company towns, shopping at company stores, which isn't a hell of a lot better than soviet communism.

  15. Re:Why bother? by witherstaff · · Score: 5, Funny

    The problem with BlueHippo was they thought small. If they got too big to fail then everything would have been alright.

  16. Comeuppance. by Web+Goddess · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People have god-given frailties, which scammers EXPLOIT by victimizing people's blind spots or weak points. Your post blaming the target of BlueHippo fraud was insensitive and cloddish. But you will mature over the next few years, and become more aware that humans who are *average* or even *below average* still deserve our respect. You, too, have your blind spots and two Achilles heels.

    Wendy / the Darwin Awards

  17. Re:Shocking! by file+terminator · · Score: 5, Informative

    Er, is this a serious post? You do realize that the link leads to a thumbnail, don't you?

    Remove the -thumb part of the URL, and you get something more readable. Still a pretty lousy scan, but perfectly legible.