Psystar Crushed In Court
We've been following the case of Mac cloner Psystar for some time now. Apple was just handed a summary judgement over Psystar, and as usual Groklaw has the scoop. Here is the order (PDF), though PJ supplies it in text form at the link above. "Psystar just got what's coming to them in the California case. ... It's a total massacre. Psystar's first-sale defense went down in flames. Apple's motion for summary judgment on copyright infringement and DMCA violation is granted. Apple prevailed also on its motion to seal. Psystar's motion for summary judgment on trademark infringement and trade dress is denied. So is its illusory motion for copyright misuse. ... So that means damages ahead for Psystar on the copyright issues just decided on summary judgment, at a minimum. The court asked for briefs on that subject. In short, Psystar is toast." Reader UnknowingFool adds, "There are still issues to be decided but they are only Apple's allegations: breach of contract, induced breach of contract, trademark infringement, trademark dilution; trade dress infringement, state unfair competition, and common law unfair competition. Even if Psystar wins all of them, it is unlikely to help them very much."
OS X is a decent operating system, but few people can be satisfied by a single hardware vendor. Might as well write off Apple as a player now, as it's unlikely they'll ever release the death grip and let the world play with OS X.
Oh really? Why then is Microsoft trying to clone everything apple is doing?
Zune, Microsoft Store, the new "iPhone killer" windows mobile, etc, etc
Apple could be a very serious threat to Microsoft if they changed their attitude towards businesses.
Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
A particular Apple machine might suit my purposes at one time, but that doesn't imply that they'll always be able to meet my needs. I wouldn't lash myself to the mast of Apple any more than I would Dell or Acer or any other hardware vendor. So long as OS X is tied to a single vendor, it's absolutely irrelevant to any reasonable person.
Please explain how Psystar is justified in creating an altered derivative work of Apple's copyrighted operating system.
This space left intentionally blank.
I agree; PJ is annoying. Someone needs show her this and make her shit bricks: https://phonemasters.de/en/PearC-Starter
PearC is doing EXACTLY what Psystar is doing, but in Germany, so Apple can't do anything to stop them! Kind of awesome :D
---linuxrocks123
vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
If Ford sold the only cars with steering wheels and automatic transmissions, then I might agree that your analogy is apt.