Slashdot Mirror


NASA Attempts To Assuage 2012 Fears

eldavojohn writes "The apocalyptic film 2012 has dominated the box office, taking in $65 million on opening weekend. But with all those uninformed eyeballs watching the film, NASA has found itself answering so many common questions that their Ask an Astrobiologist blog offers calming, professional reassurance that there is no planet Nibiru, nor will it collide with Earth (although I do recall a massive solar storm forecast). NASA's main site even offers a FAQ answering similar questions. NPR has more on NASA scientist David Morrison and his efforts to calm the ensuing public hysteria, but survivalists are already planning for the big one. Pretty funny, right? Not according to Morrison: 'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves. I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?" And I don't know how to answer those questions.'"

52 of 881 comments (clear)

  1. Wow. by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just, wow.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Wow. by mofag · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that's what the suicide offers are for - to reduce the number of stupid people. Seems like a naturally self-correcting system to me. I say let it run its course. Next thing we will have 10foot disclaimers on the entrance to cinemas telling the dumb masses that its just pretend.

    2. Re:Wow. by Volante3192 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Those poor people on Gilligan's Island...

    3. Re:Wow. by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know if people are so stupid that they watch a movie and think that its, really going to happen, to the point that they are going to commit suicide, I say let them. we definitely don't need any more stupid people on this planet.

      --
      Mean what you say...say what you mean.
    4. Re:Wow. by abigor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does the Cylon attack come before or after 2012?

    5. Re:Wow. by Bught_42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps they'll issue a mass Darwin Award.

    6. Re:Wow. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think that's what the suicide offers are for - to reduce the number of stupid people.

      "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death.

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection -- mostly because doing so would challenge mainstream religions, not to mention most American's understanding of their nation's history and place in the world. When you've got a culture where many people take ancient Hebrew creation myths as true and are not laughed at, it's no surprise that belief in the imminent destruction of Earth by collision with the rogue planet Nibiru will proliferate.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    7. Re:Wow. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can't disagree, but in the case of the mother who was going to kill herself and her children, I can't help thinking that just being related to someone that stupid shouldn't be a capital offence...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:Wow. by Faylone · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes.

    9. Re:Wow. by CrazedSanity · · Score: 4, Funny

      Okay, let's round up all the people that believe 2012 is in any way related to actual scientific fact, and let them go see The Invention of Lying. If they don't get the coincidence, explain to them it already is 2012 according to the Gregorian calendar...

      --
      Sanity is like a condom: rather have it and not need it, than need it and not have it.
    10. Re:Wow. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Stupid people raise stupid people.

      Whatever the genetic component of intelligence may be, it is clear that environment and education make a huge difference. These kids would end up a lot smarter simply by being brought up by someone other than their stupid bitch of a mother.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    11. Re:Wow. by nebaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is this close enough?

      "And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven, burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters; And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter." (Revelation 8:10, 11 - KJB).

      --
      Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    12. Re:Wow. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death.

      Correct, but I think deciding to kill yourself and your loved ones based on a work of fiction counts as stupid.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:Wow. by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Funny

      > "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid",

      No, I'm pretty sure believing what you see in a movie is stupid.

      Honestly, these people see 'Transformers', 'Superman', 'Batman', 'Star Trek', 'Dogma', 'Godzilla', and '2012'. Then they choose to believe the world is ending but they won't be saved by Superman or Batman. They won't be killed first by giant robots or a giant lizard. And angels and demons... well ok they probably do believe in Dogma.

      Actually these people probably already have a mental problem and fear the world is ending BEFORE seeing 2012. Seeing the movie just gives them an excuse to bring it out.
      Why else would they choose this one as the real one?

      Personally, I choose to believe in 'The Last Starfighter'. I am practicing, Centauri, I'm practicing...

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    14. Re:Wow. by Toonol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You think the Amish are stupid? I'm not sure there's any justification for that belief.

    15. Re:Wow. by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death.

      In this case it is exactly the same.

      These reports did not come from some long overlooked rainforest tribe, but rather from people intelligent enough to call NASA with worries and fears. These are people able to read or at least watch TV news, or surf the net.

      Yet they can't distinguish between a movie trailer and real life.

      That, my friend, is not ignorant, but rather, stupid, in bold type, writ large.

      The chance of educating these people is slim to none. The recidivism rate of stupidity is astoundingly high. The success stories few and fleeting.

      No one wants to wake up on December 24th to watch their dim witted neighbor's body being carried from the next apartment due to hysteria induced suicide.

      But by the same token, no one wants to hand-hold these people thru every motion picture release based on a misinterpretation of a calendar developed by people who never invented the wheel and who's year had only 360 days.
         

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    16. Re:Wow. by PyroMosh · · Score: 5, Funny

      O RLY?
      (not even a little bit work safe)

    17. Re:Wow. by jebrew · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bubba from Folsom would like to lodge a disagreement with the second half of your statement...now try asking where he's going to lodge it.

    18. Re:Wow. by dnahelicase · · Score: 4, Informative

      yeah, but to calm any fears of the end times, remind them that Jesus said that they "would come like a thief in the night" (1 Thess 5:2). If anyone is expecting it, that is exactly not the time it is going to happen. If people have predicted that 2012 will be the end for hundreds of years, then I imagine that means it has one of the lowest probabilities of happening - the bible doesn't lie.

    19. Re:Wow. by timeOday · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection

      99.99% of Christians are not going to fear Nibiru after watching 2012, so it's only fair to distinguish between them and the people Morrison is talking about. You must realize, he is fielding questions from a population of millions of people, some significant percentage of whom are literally psychotic (which actually means losing touch with reality, not being an axe murderer). This "idiocracy" meme (that the masses are stupid and we are the smart ones) is just ego stroking - don't feel good just because you're more sane than the bottom 0.001% who are off their meds.

    20. Re:Wow. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, while everyone waits for the world to end on December 21, it will actually end on December 20, and no one will have expected that. :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    21. Re:Wow. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      don't feel good just because you're more sane than the bottom 0.001% who are off their meds.

      Look, I gotta take it where I can get it, alright?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    22. Re:Wow. by Temujin_12 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just tell them there is no mention of Nibiru in the Bible

      I did that, but apparently theres a mention of a "star called wormwood which will fall into the sea"

      [facepalm]

      I agree.

      [facepalm].

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection -- mostly because doing so would challenge mainstream religions

      "The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of critical thinking -- mostly because doing so would challenge the intellectually lazy's of mainstream religions"

      As a Christian, I frequently mentally (and sometimes physically) [facepalm] when talking with other religious people.

          -Young earth creationists

          -Militant anti-evolutionists

          -God gave us the earth so anything we do to it must be His will

          -That person doesn't believe the same things as me so they must be going to hell

          -That person sins, so I'm justified in hating/judging/ostracizing them

          -etc. etc. etc.

      These aren't the markings of a religious person or mainstream religion in general and it is dishonest to attribute these kinds of things to everyone who is religious . These are merely are the markings of those who have failed to have an open mind and apply reason and logic to their faith. These kinds of people are more concerned about being right than what's right. And what's more condemning to them is that they are more concerned about being right than they are in following the core tenants of their faith to show charity and compassion towards their fellow men.

      On the flip side, what further bruises my forehead is when I see a person or group of people who have faith in God do adjust their beliefs to new evidence they see while still holding on to elements of their faith they see as still consistent with that evidence and they are ridiculed for doing so by others claiming to be critical thinkers. Why would such a person attack the essence of the scientific method, namely the adjustment of theories against evidence? The answer is too often that, although they'd like to think otherwise, those who attack people simply for having (or not having) faith in God fear what they don't understand and thus feel the need to tear down it. It's our nasty primal instinct kicking in. Take away the fear and replace it empathy and understanding of why people choose (or don't choose) to have faith in God, and the desire to attack, belittle, or demean will go away on both sides.

      --
      Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
  2. It's easy by DanTheStone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You respond with, "It's only a movie. The world isn't ending. Don't kill your children, your pets, or yourself."

    1. Re:It's easy by shadowkiller137 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No NASA should respond with "Yes it's real and we need $1 trillion in funding to determine how to stop it" and then spend that on real research.

    2. Re:It's easy by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

      No NASA should respond with "Yes it's real and we need $1 trillion in funding to determine how to stop it" and then spend that on real research.

      That's awesome. And then in 2013 when the public goes "Hey, you took that $1 trillion and built a space station and a moon base and a bunch of rockets and solar power stations and telescopes and rovers and stuff, when you were supposed to be preventing the end of the world!"

      And NASA can say "What do you think all that stuff was for? It worked, didn't it?"

      LOL. Make it so.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  3. How this scam works by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful
    1. First buy a lots of call options of thinly traded mundane non volatile stock of canned goods and survival/camping gear purveyors.

    2. Create a hysteria and panic about the world ending due to Y2K or Planet Nibiru or Mayan Calender cycle ending or Banks collapsing or Obama winning the elections.

    3. ...

    4. Stock of survivalgears_are_us.com zooms up and ..... profit!

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:How this scam works by Verdatum · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or just do what Penn & Teller did. Offer "2012 Reverse Mortgages". To paraphrase, "We'll give you a bunch of money to spend on whatever hedonism you like for the next 2 years, and in 2013, in the infinitesimal chance that it's still standing and we're still alive to claim it, we take your house!"

    2. Re:How this scam works by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The joke will be on them when they discover the value of real estate in 2013.

  4. In other news by syrinx · · Score: 4, Funny

    NASA reports that giant alien spaceships have not in fact destroyed the White House and Empire State Building.

    Reports of time-traveling robots looking for John Connor are unsubstantiated at this time.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:In other news by Verdatum · · Score: 4, Funny

      My God! If the robots aren't looking for John Conner, that must mean they've already found him! WE'RE DOOMED!

  5. How Histery Repeats .... by foobsr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The War of the Worlds (radio)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_War_of_the_Worlds_(radio)

    Quote: "Some listeners heard only a portion of the broadcast, and in the atmosphere of tension and anxiety leading to World War II, took it to be a news broadcast. Newspapers reported that panic ensued, people fleeing the area, others thinking they could smell poison gas or could see flashes of lightning in the distance."

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    1. Re:How Histery Repeats .... by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the case of The War of the Worlds, the radio broadcast WAS designed to sound "real", complete with interrupting musical programs for special announcements and so on. Someone who tuned in in the middle of the show would have missed the announcement that it was just a radio program, and it predated the transistor radio by a decade so most of the people who decided to flee or whatever wouldn't have had a way to keep up with the program and hear any other announcements that they were listening to a fictional story.

      There's no excuse at all for 2012.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  6. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How many of those sending their questions to NASA are part of the 2012 movie marketing campaign?

  7. oh, please! by macbeth66 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves

    You tell them to come in, explaining that you have a secret rocket that will take some of us off of this planet. When they arrive, you have social services take the kids away and the police can take her to the nearest asylum for the criminally insane.

  8. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Ian+Alexander · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because taxpayers are contemplating suicide over this 2012 nonsense?

  9. When should I kill myself? by vanyel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Before you breed...

  10. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Computer_kid · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is actually done by NORAD. It started in 1955 when a Sears had an advertisement encouraging children to call Santa Claus, but gave the phone number for NORAD.

  11. Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is the first film I've worked on that caused actual general panic. Grudge 2 scared people, but it's actually a little gratifying to think that work I did is scaring people even AFTER they walked out of the theater. At the time we were making it I knew the whole black president/conspiracy thing was definitely going to push a lot of buttons, just considering the way things are right now, but to be honest, the whole scientific backstory of the film is so thin I never actually considered that people would genuinely fear a cataclysm as depicted in the movie. "Mutating neutrinos"... really?

    ps. I was the lead sound effects editor on the show. Along with blowing up Yellowstone and other sundry destructions, I personally cut about 80% of the computer screen beeps. And I cut every one of them just for you guys, because I know you love them so much :D

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    1. Re:Flattering, I guess... by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 5, Funny

      I won't see the movie immediately, but I'll pre-emptively say that the beeps were entirely unnecessary, inappropriate, or plain impossible, and no programmer worth their salt would make an interface that noisy. But I'm sure you were just following orders. You know who else was just following orders?

      Seriously, I'm going to see it just for the beeps now, cos I'm intrigued how an informed person would accomplish this task as opposed to the mindless goons who think they know how computers work.

    2. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'll love it. Even the progress bars beep!

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  12. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense? What's next? Scientific evidence, that there is no Santa Claus? That black cats crossing your path do not cause "bad luck" (whatever that is)?

    It's a blog post and a FAQ. That's it. No probe to prove there is no planet Nibiru, no expensive mission. Are you really worried that one man probably spent a few days writing this up?

    Frankly, I thought it was nice to hear that a NASA scientist is working to take the time to respond to a worried public and trying to minimize that time by having an informative page. When I was a kid, I wrote to NASA from Minnesota all the time. Every single time they responded. I still have fact sheets on all of their shuttle craft in my parent's closet. I read those things over and over trying to imagine how someone could come up with such amazing machines. Go ahead, spend a few minutes to hand write them a letter, you might be surprised with the response:

    Ask NASA

    Public Communications Office
    NASA Headquarters
    Suite 5K39
    Washington, DC 20546-0001
    (202) 358-0001 (Office)
    (202) 358-4338 (Fax)

    And if you came here to complain that NASA wastes tax payer money, you're in the wrong place. NASA's budget is about half of one percent of the Federal budget--don't even get me started on what our defense budget comes out to be. That's a ridiculously low amount of money for an agency that's charged with a major component of our future and probably the whole future of the Earth and its inhabitants.

    Your subject confuses me further ... what exactly are you implying these questions and blog are strawmen for?

    --
    My work here is dung.
  13. This is part of NASA's purvey. by Jack9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ignorance is not stupidity. NASA has addressed the ignorance. Good for them.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  14. I see potential in this by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, so if you run into one of these idiots, and she happens to be cute, just tell her that you are a Mao Shan master and you know the perfect ceremony to stop Nibiru from hitting the Earth, if you could just get a little help from her...

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:I see potential in this by prefec2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And if the "ritual" have been performed in the right way (after some training of course) the planet never shows up. So you were right, weren't you. And so you are a real Mao Shan Master.

  15. Re:Let them kill themselves by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And remove themselves from the gene pool.

    Almost no stupidity or suicidal tendancies are hereditary. Most mental disabilities are caused by accident or disease. A very large number of children are born every day with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome to (other then being alcoholics) perfectly sane, normal, intelligent people. The "Darwin Award" is pure bullshit; evolution doesn't work like that.

    If a stupid woman has fifteen kids and ten die, and you have never had sex, she won the Darwin game and you are its loser.

  16. Not stupid, just scared by darthwader · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lots of people have commented on how incredibly stupid these people are. I don't think it's quite that simple.

    I think that they're just scared. There's so much fear in our culture, people are scared of health care, scared of a black president, scared of terrorists, scared of oil prices, scared of cell phone companies, scared of pirates (the Somalian kind), scared of pirates (the MPAA kind), scared of the RIAA and MPAA, scared of swine flu, scared of unemployment, scared of having a job that doesn't pay a living wage, scared of peanuts, scared of global warming, scared of pollution, scared of home invasions, scared of floods, earthquakes and fires, scared of nuts with guns, scared of the government taking away everyone's guns.

    Fear makes you irrational. It suppresses the "carefully think about the situation" part of your brain, and supercharges the "fight or flight" part. If people stopped to think rationally about it, they would realize it is fiction. But the fear prevents them from thinking rationally.

    We live in a constant state of fear, and our culture (or our media, depending on how you look at it) keeps giving us more reasons to be afraid.

    What we need is more reason to be hopeful, not fearful. If we remove the irrational fears about health care, presidents, terrorists, MPAA, pirates, global warming, etc., then we would also have fewer irrational fears about the planet Nimbus crashing into Earth on December 21st, 2012.

    --
    I hate it when I make a joke and I get modded "+5 insightful". Mod the stupid comments "funny", not "insightful", pleas
  17. This is pretty simular. by pavon · · Score: 4, Informative

    The problem isn't people watching the movie 2012, it is the viral advertising surrounding it. They ran ads that made the movie sound a dramatization of a real idea rather than complete fiction, ala the Day After Tomorrow, and encourage them to search the web for the "real truth". The studio created a fake website purposing to be a scientific institute predicting a collision with earth in 2012. On top of this loonies have been talking about a 2012 apocalypse of some sort since we first understood the Mayan calendar, and latter some of them latched onto the Nimbiru idea after the books came out, so the internet is full of websites giving "evidence" of this catastrophe, many of whom claim to be scientific websites themselves.

    Yeah, people with a decent bullshit detector should be able to figure out that this is all crap, but it's not like they just watched a normal movie and thought it was read - the studio is trying to present it as though it were real, by making it a conspiracy that the mainstream is covering up.

  18. Why are you still talking? by DarthVain · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Kill yourself now, before its too late!"

    alternative ending:

    "Why bother, we are all gonna die in 2012!"

    alternate alternate ending:

    "Well its 2009, and the world ends in 2012, so if we take one number, 2009 and subtract it from 2012 you get the number 3. Its called math. So you should kill yourself in about 3 years. If you want to get really accurate, you could look at a calender and see what month it is, and what day, and really work out exactly when to do it! Either way, it isn't for awhile and your probably likely to die drowning looking up during a rain storm before that, so leave me alone..."

    alternate alternate alternate ending:

    "Don't worry about it we will be hit by a meteor or a comet long before then!"

    As an aside I have also heard that this Mayan 2012 prediction is all buffoonery. They Mayans thought their the world would end just like we think the world ends after December. It was their calender for keeping track of time. I think it was implied that you just restart the calender once the cycle is over. Perhaps it is so implisit that they didn't feel the need to explain this just the same we don't put a sticker on every calender we ever make that says "Not to worry, world not ending, new calender next year!"

  19. Education Time! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Informative

    A friend of mine is taking an Arky (Archaeology for those less hip) Class, as she is an ancient & medieval history major, and she is taking a class this semester SPECIFICALLY on the Mayans. Her Prof is one of the archaelogists who work on sites like Tucan. The prof held an open public lecture in the University of Calgary in the first week of November here. My friend and I both attended, and while I never did believe in the whole Mayan Myth it's interesting to see where its origins begin.

    So this prof is basically a Mayan pro, she can translate most inscriptions just by looking at them (no reference needed) and she intimately understands their number and Calendar system. The first thing to know about Mayan numbers is that they don't use Base 10, they use base 20. The other thing to know is that there is not ONE Mayan Language. They were similar to all of Europe, where the europeans had french, English, spanish, german, etc, the Mayans had about 6 to 8 different Variants. And with that in mind, they were never a single nation, each city had it's own king/queen type leader, and they peacably would trade with the other cities of the area. No one city was truly the capital, but those major trade hubs and those with rarer goods tended to prosper more than the little towns.

    Anyways, so the Mayans used 2 different Calendars, and I can't remember how big, but there was a sizable gap in between the usage of each (I think like 800 years?). But basically what it breaks down into is the Short count and the Long count.

    The Short count is very much like our Calendar today, 18 months of 20 days each with 5 days at the end of the year for some religious purpose (Similar to the egyptians). They also had Names for days of their week, like Monday Tuesday Wednesday (Except Mayan Gods instead of Norse Gods). So if I were to say, Friday, December 25th, you'd know I mean this Christmas and not last Christmas or the next Christmas because they don't land on a Friday. This works well for 8 years until Christmas lands on a Friday again. You could be more precise about the date if you gave me the year, which is where the Long Count comes in.

    We attribute a year to 365 days. So I would say that Dec 31 2009 would be day 733285. The Mayans didn't use years, they merely counted days. Which is neat in some ways because there were 20 days in a month (And they're number system is base 20, remember?) But also a bit of a hassle in others, because there are 18 months.

    So the way Archaeologists expressed their long count is in a series of numbers seperated by decimals (It looks like a long IP Address to me). Day 1 would be like 0.0.0.0.0.1 and Day 23 would be like 0.0.0.2.3 - - Except here's the kicker - Mayans didn't set day 0 as anything in particular. In fact, their creation story takes place well after 0. This leads many people to believe that the Mayans set a date in the future as some signifigance and worked their way backwards. What day that could be or what they believed it would be has yet to be discovered. There are some speculations. No, its not 2012.

    Essentially the numbers further to the left represent longer periods of time, so each 1.0.0.0.0 in the long count is really like 8767 years give or take, which is a really long friggen time, right? We celebrate every year pretty much, but every odd once in a while we hold huge celebrations, like when we ushered in the new millenia in the year 2000. That sort of thing was also important to the Mayans. If I recall correctly, we're roughly around the 13.0.19.0.0 era on the Mayan Calendar. So when it rolls around to be 13.1.0.0.0 - wouldn't that be a rollover worth celebrating? To the Mayans it would be. Guess what day that happens to fall on? You're right, December 21 2012.

    So now that you've got a crash course on the Calendar and how it works, where exactly does the Prophecy come in? I'll tell you. Amongst the ruins of cities, Mayans had what we call Stelas. They are basically big stones which have stories and such carved into them, very much like a monu

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. Re:Like, oh I don't know. Mythbusters? by Thing+1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think what NASA is doing is the right thing, but they should do it more clearly and get someone like Carl Sagan [...]

    Yeah, that's just what the superstitious need: Zombie Carl to explain the not-coming apocalypse!

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.