Slashdot Mirror


NASA Attempts To Assuage 2012 Fears

eldavojohn writes "The apocalyptic film 2012 has dominated the box office, taking in $65 million on opening weekend. But with all those uninformed eyeballs watching the film, NASA has found itself answering so many common questions that their Ask an Astrobiologist blog offers calming, professional reassurance that there is no planet Nibiru, nor will it collide with Earth (although I do recall a massive solar storm forecast). NASA's main site even offers a FAQ answering similar questions. NPR has more on NASA scientist David Morrison and his efforts to calm the ensuing public hysteria, but survivalists are already planning for the big one. Pretty funny, right? Not according to Morrison: 'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves. I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?" And I don't know how to answer those questions.'"

116 of 881 comments (clear)

  1. Wow. by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just, wow.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Wow. by mofag · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that's what the suicide offers are for - to reduce the number of stupid people. Seems like a naturally self-correcting system to me. I say let it run its course. Next thing we will have 10foot disclaimers on the entrance to cinemas telling the dumb masses that its just pretend.

    2. Re:Wow. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well magical thinking is magical thinking. Makes you wonder how many people think all the shows on TV are documentaries?

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    3. Re:Wow. by Volante3192 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Those poor people on Gilligan's Island...

    4. Re:Wow. by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know if people are so stupid that they watch a movie and think that its, really going to happen, to the point that they are going to commit suicide, I say let them. we definitely don't need any more stupid people on this planet.

      --
      Mean what you say...say what you mean.
    5. Re:Wow. by abigor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does the Cylon attack come before or after 2012?

    6. Re:Wow. by Bught_42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps they'll issue a mass Darwin Award.

    7. Re:Wow. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think that's what the suicide offers are for - to reduce the number of stupid people.

      "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death.

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection -- mostly because doing so would challenge mainstream religions, not to mention most American's understanding of their nation's history and place in the world. When you've got a culture where many people take ancient Hebrew creation myths as true and are not laughed at, it's no surprise that belief in the imminent destruction of Earth by collision with the rogue planet Nibiru will proliferate.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    8. Re:Wow. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can't disagree, but in the case of the mother who was going to kill herself and her children, I can't help thinking that just being related to someone that stupid shouldn't be a capital offence...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Wow. by Faylone · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes.

    10. Re:Wow. by FreeFull · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just tell them there is no mention of Nibiru in the Bible

      --
      No ascii art.
    11. Re:Wow. by CrazedSanity · · Score: 4, Funny

      Okay, let's round up all the people that believe 2012 is in any way related to actual scientific fact, and let them go see The Invention of Lying. If they don't get the coincidence, explain to them it already is 2012 according to the Gregorian calendar...

      --
      Sanity is like a condom: rather have it and not need it, than need it and not have it.
    12. Re:Wow. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Stupid people raise stupid people.

      Whatever the genetic component of intelligence may be, it is clear that environment and education make a huge difference. These kids would end up a lot smarter simply by being brought up by someone other than their stupid bitch of a mother.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    13. Re:Wow. by Golddess · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If that were 100% true, then children would always share the same religious beliefs as their parents, and I can tell you right now that I certainly do not share my parent's religious beliefs.

      (No I am not going to tell you what my beliefs are or those of my parents, I want to leave this intentionally ambiguous.)

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    14. Re:Wow. by nebaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is this close enough?

      "And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven, burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters; And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter." (Revelation 8:10, 11 - KJB).

      --
      Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    15. Re:Wow. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death.

      Correct, but I think deciding to kill yourself and your loved ones based on a work of fiction counts as stupid.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    16. Re:Wow. by The+-e**(i*pi) · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I remember from my psychology class that what religion you follow has no heritability, but how religious you are is at least partially heritable.

      Also, Intelligence has a negative correlation between children and parents, at least according to Wikipedia.

    17. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      With an answer like that, you'd think one works at Infinity Ward!

    18. Re:Wow. by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Funny

      > "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid",

      No, I'm pretty sure believing what you see in a movie is stupid.

      Honestly, these people see 'Transformers', 'Superman', 'Batman', 'Star Trek', 'Dogma', 'Godzilla', and '2012'. Then they choose to believe the world is ending but they won't be saved by Superman or Batman. They won't be killed first by giant robots or a giant lizard. And angels and demons... well ok they probably do believe in Dogma.

      Actually these people probably already have a mental problem and fear the world is ending BEFORE seeing 2012. Seeing the movie just gives them an excuse to bring it out.
      Why else would they choose this one as the real one?

      Personally, I choose to believe in 'The Last Starfighter'. I am practicing, Centauri, I'm practicing...

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    19. Re:Wow. by gedrin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you saying that if we fail to elect Robot-Nixon we'll face nuclear armageddon at the hands of the vengeful decendants of our robotic slaves?

      --
      Moderation : -1 Conservative Viewpoint
    20. Re:Wow. by Abreu · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just tell them there is no mention of Nibiru in the Bible

      I did that, but apparently theres a mention of a "star called wormwood which will fall into the sea"

      [facepalm]

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    21. Re:Wow. by Toonol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You think the Amish are stupid? I'm not sure there's any justification for that belief.

    22. Re:Wow. by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death.

      In this case it is exactly the same.

      These reports did not come from some long overlooked rainforest tribe, but rather from people intelligent enough to call NASA with worries and fears. These are people able to read or at least watch TV news, or surf the net.

      Yet they can't distinguish between a movie trailer and real life.

      That, my friend, is not ignorant, but rather, stupid, in bold type, writ large.

      The chance of educating these people is slim to none. The recidivism rate of stupidity is astoundingly high. The success stories few and fleeting.

      No one wants to wake up on December 24th to watch their dim witted neighbor's body being carried from the next apartment due to hysteria induced suicide.

      But by the same token, no one wants to hand-hold these people thru every motion picture release based on a misinterpretation of a calendar developed by people who never invented the wheel and who's year had only 360 days.
         

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    23. Re:Wow. by PyroMosh · · Score: 5, Funny

      O RLY?
      (not even a little bit work safe)

    24. Re:Wow. by jebrew · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bubba from Folsom would like to lodge a disagreement with the second half of your statement...now try asking where he's going to lodge it.

    25. Re:Wow. by dnahelicase · · Score: 4, Informative

      yeah, but to calm any fears of the end times, remind them that Jesus said that they "would come like a thief in the night" (1 Thess 5:2). If anyone is expecting it, that is exactly not the time it is going to happen. If people have predicted that 2012 will be the end for hundreds of years, then I imagine that means it has one of the lowest probabilities of happening - the bible doesn't lie.

    26. Re:Wow. by timeOday · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection

      99.99% of Christians are not going to fear Nibiru after watching 2012, so it's only fair to distinguish between them and the people Morrison is talking about. You must realize, he is fielding questions from a population of millions of people, some significant percentage of whom are literally psychotic (which actually means losing touch with reality, not being an axe murderer). This "idiocracy" meme (that the masses are stupid and we are the smart ones) is just ego stroking - don't feel good just because you're more sane than the bottom 0.001% who are off their meds.

    27. Re:Wow. by interploy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death.

      While I agree that ignorance != stupid, if a person is getting their "facts" from a hollywood movie, they are not suffering from mere ignorance.

    28. Re:Wow. by el3mentary · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apart from Judaism, they consider it inheritable on the mothers side IIRC.

      --
      I reject your reality and substitute my own.
    29. Re:Wow. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, while everyone waits for the world to end on December 21, it will actually end on December 20, and no one will have expected that. :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    30. Re:Wow. by Apatharch · · Score: 3, Funny

      But what about the other 0.009%? They're the ones I'm worried about.

    31. Re:Wow. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      don't feel good just because you're more sane than the bottom 0.001% who are off their meds.

      Look, I gotta take it where I can get it, alright?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    32. Re:Wow. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful

      99.99% of Christians are not going to fear Nibiru after watching 2012, so it's only fair to distinguish between them and the people Morrison is talking about.

      A large percentage -- not all, but many -- of those Christians fear that some big magic grandpa in the sky is going to throw them into a lake of fire where a horned monster will supervise their torture for infinite time.

      That is an ever wackier belief than the Nibiru catastrophe -- at least we know planets exist, unlike (the literal versions of) gods, devils, and souls.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    33. Re:Wow. by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Somewhere there is a grown man--a very pathetic man--who is attempting to lift things with the Force.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    34. Re:Wow. by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
      "'I've had three from young people saying they were contemplating committing suicide. I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves. I had one last week from a person who said, "I'm so scared, my only friend is my little dog. When should I put it to sleep so it won't suffer?"

      You know...this didn't really bother me or grab my attention THAT much, till I read that last one about the guy putting his dog down.

      Geez..I dunno what it is but I have a soft spot for animals. I mean, I can watch a slasher movie where Freddie or Jason chainsaws 20+ teens into pieces, BUT...let them kick one dog....and I'm outta there.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    35. Re:Wow. by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 2, Interesting

      wormwood can also be meant to imply poisoned or rotten. thats what (allegedly) makes true absinthe dangerous, in that pure wormwood oil is poison.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    36. Re:Wow. by spidercoz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No one wants to wake up on December 24th to watch their dim witted neighbor's body being carried from the next apartment due to hysteria induced suicide.

      Speak for yourself, I hate that bastard. Merry Fucking Christmas, dipshit.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    37. Re:Wow. by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Ignorant" can be cured. By teaching. "Refusing to be taught" is a different matter.

      And, bluntly, if you manage to get to 30 years of age in what we deem a "civilized" country and are still ignorant, it's usually not a lack of available information.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    38. Re:Wow. by Follier · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Ignorant" is not the same as "stupid", and can be cured by means much less dramatic than death.

      Absolutely.

      Knowing nothing about science, astronomy, logic, or reality = ignorance.
      Buying into the 2012 claptrap = gullibility.
      Seeing an action movie and thinking it's real = stupidity.

      I'm glad we could clear that up. (seriously though, I agree with your assessment that magical thinking is a cultural thing, and we should all have far less tolerance for it.)

    39. Re:Wow. by Jonny_eh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Notice that in movie trailers whenever the death of an animal is implied (@ 1:34), they specifically show that it turns out the animal is alive, of course, in the same trailer they can kill oodles of humans. They go out of their way to show the animal is alive despite the fact that it can take away from the joke and waste precious 'trailer' time.

    40. Re:Wow. by 16384 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Much easier than that:

      Mat 24:35-36 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.

    41. Re:Wow. by Temujin_12 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just tell them there is no mention of Nibiru in the Bible

      I did that, but apparently theres a mention of a "star called wormwood which will fall into the sea"

      [facepalm]

      I agree.

      [facepalm].

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection -- mostly because doing so would challenge mainstream religions

      "The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of critical thinking -- mostly because doing so would challenge the intellectually lazy's of mainstream religions"

      As a Christian, I frequently mentally (and sometimes physically) [facepalm] when talking with other religious people.

          -Young earth creationists

          -Militant anti-evolutionists

          -God gave us the earth so anything we do to it must be His will

          -That person doesn't believe the same things as me so they must be going to hell

          -That person sins, so I'm justified in hating/judging/ostracizing them

          -etc. etc. etc.

      These aren't the markings of a religious person or mainstream religion in general and it is dishonest to attribute these kinds of things to everyone who is religious . These are merely are the markings of those who have failed to have an open mind and apply reason and logic to their faith. These kinds of people are more concerned about being right than what's right. And what's more condemning to them is that they are more concerned about being right than they are in following the core tenants of their faith to show charity and compassion towards their fellow men.

      On the flip side, what further bruises my forehead is when I see a person or group of people who have faith in God do adjust their beliefs to new evidence they see while still holding on to elements of their faith they see as still consistent with that evidence and they are ridiculed for doing so by others claiming to be critical thinkers. Why would such a person attack the essence of the scientific method, namely the adjustment of theories against evidence? The answer is too often that, although they'd like to think otherwise, those who attack people simply for having (or not having) faith in God fear what they don't understand and thus feel the need to tear down it. It's our nasty primal instinct kicking in. Take away the fear and replace it empathy and understanding of why people choose (or don't choose) to have faith in God, and the desire to attack, belittle, or demean will go away on both sides.

      --
      Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
    42. Re:Wow. by COMON$ · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Dude this is slashdot, if you mention Christianity the readers just substitute "ignorant masses". You have to stick to certain rules in this forum. It is the fad of our culture right now to Christian bash, after all they are not as good as the rest of humanity, they are just silly ignorant people who are a plague on society that need to be dealt with.

      According to /.ers there is no rational in believing in any God, but it is ok to say you are part of any religion as long as it isn't one related to Judaism.

      It is also rational to know without a doubt that there is no God.

      On a brighter side it is good to see another rational christian on these forums and that I am not alone. Now brace yourself, my post is about to get modded into oblivion.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    43. Re:Wow. by Exception+Duck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Used to be they would kill/hurt animals. No special effects.
      Probably still do in some movies, maybe not in the west but ...

    44. Re:Wow. by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Funny


      Or just show them this re-edit of the 2012 trailer: link. It's pretty much impossible to take the film seriously after seeing that. (Assuming you were inclined to take the film seriously in the first place).

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    45. Re:Wow. by ultranova · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Children not having anything to do with the concept of innocence... right.

      As someone who still remembers his childhood, I'd like to point out that children are indeed inocent - which means that they are the closest things to demons this side of Hell, torturing other people for fun without even a hint of guilt or conscience. Sure, they are a joy to be around if you're adult and thus superior in power, but absolute horrors otherwise.

      The same is true of animals, of course - a dog can be absolutely loyal to its master yet an absolute horror to everyone else.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    46. Re:Wow. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of bullshit detection -- mostly because doing so would challenge mainstream religions

      "The problem is that we don't train people in the fine art of critical thinking -- mostly because doing so would challenge the intellectually lazy's of mainstream religions"

      "Critical thinking" is a fancy name for bullshit detection. And mainstream religion is intellectually lazy -- people, sadly, prefer the simple answers, and any spiritual practice that requires intellectual rigor loses out to some version based on "parrot this doctrine".

      The answer is too often that, although they'd like to think otherwise, those who attack people simply for having (or not having) faith in God fear what they don't understand and thus feel the need to tear down it.

      No, most people who do not have "faith in God" were, at one point, religious believers and so understand such faith quite well.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    47. Re:Wow. by chickenarise · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the flip side, what further bruises my forehead is when I see a person or group of people who have faith in God do adjust their beliefs to new evidence they see while still holding on to elements of their faith they see as still consistent with that evidence and they are ridiculed for doing so by others claiming to be critical thinkers. Why would such a person attack the essence of the scientific method, namely the adjustment of theories against evidence?

      The scientific method is a belief system. It is the belief that I can presume a falsifiable theory to be true until it is proven false. The problem the scientific method has with religion is that you are taking a theory that is in no way falsifiable and believing it is true. So you are not being consistent with your beliefs, sorry.

      The answer is too often that, although they'd like to think otherwise, those who attack people simply for having (or not having) faith in God fear what they don't understand and thus feel the need to tear down it. It's our nasty primal instinct kicking in. Take away the fear and replace it empathy and understanding of why people choose (or don't choose) to have faith in God, and the desire to attack, belittle, or demean will go away on both sides.

      Wrong. I feel the need to tear it down because a whole bunch of you religious folks decide the policies that affect my life, and sometimes these policies are based on policy from the Bible which was magically inspired by God (the unfalsifiable entity).

      --
      One convenient locations...in Africa.
    48. Re:Wow. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uhhh - wait. We are all aware that a canine critter is a carnivore, right? A predator. A killer. Well - actually, most of them are scavengers. But still.

      Just to be clear, I like dogs too - but I have no delusions about their innocence. Cats too. The only reason we get along with cats so well, is because we are huge, and they are small. Reverse the size, and those foul beasts would enjoy playing cat and human with us.

      Given a choice between a freaking huge cat, or a freaking huge dog, I'll take the dog. Dogs really are kinda innocent - they just snap your head off and swallow. Those cats are evil......

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    49. Re:Wow. by DoninIN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm hoping I make three.
      However /. slowly becomes more like FARK with the passing of time. Things get dumbed down and the shouting content goes up. There's suddenly a wave of empowered bigotry against the religious and religion in general. Primarily from people who like to think they're smart, probably most of them are smart. I don't get why that is. I do get that a lot of is a backlash against the particularly intolerant strains of religions, but I'm always amused at the ease with which these tolerance police glibly stereotype people based on their religion, as long as it's either a big on that's an easy target, or a funny one with a lot of celebrities. If I were a little smarter my only response to them would be something like "Stalin wuz atheist like U sew U sux0r!" or something.

    50. Re:Wow. by rainsford · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So despite living in a country completely dominated by Christian beliefs, to the point where even HINTING that a Presidential candidate isn't Christian is a viable campaign tactic, some people (such as the parent) will insist that Christians are persecuted and looked down on for their beliefs. For people who hold religious beliefs that are ACTUALLY in the minority, this is incredibly irritating and not a little bit self-promoting. And it's worth noting that a post filled with whining and putting words into other peoples' mouths, despite predictions of getting "modded into oblivion" is actually 3: Insightful as I post this.

    51. Re:Wow. by Philip_the_physicist · · Score: 2, Informative

      Personally, it would be better if they find him on the 21st. The smell might put me off my mince pies.

  2. It's easy by DanTheStone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You respond with, "It's only a movie. The world isn't ending. Don't kill your children, your pets, or yourself."

    1. Re:It's easy by shadowkiller137 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No NASA should respond with "Yes it's real and we need $1 trillion in funding to determine how to stop it" and then spend that on real research.

    2. Re:It's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes it's only a movie, but judging by the reaction, it's more convincing than "An Inconvenient Truth".

    3. Re:It's easy by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

      No NASA should respond with "Yes it's real and we need $1 trillion in funding to determine how to stop it" and then spend that on real research.

      That's awesome. And then in 2013 when the public goes "Hey, you took that $1 trillion and built a space station and a moon base and a bunch of rockets and solar power stations and telescopes and rovers and stuff, when you were supposed to be preventing the end of the world!"

      And NASA can say "What do you think all that stuff was for? It worked, didn't it?"

      LOL. Make it so.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:It's easy by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Will the secret city made in the shape of a 3.5" floppy disc?

    5. Re:It's easy by camperdave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but Heaven help NASA if they fail to stop it and the angry public comes looking for their trillion dollars back.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  3. How this scam works by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful
    1. First buy a lots of call options of thinly traded mundane non volatile stock of canned goods and survival/camping gear purveyors.

    2. Create a hysteria and panic about the world ending due to Y2K or Planet Nibiru or Mayan Calender cycle ending or Banks collapsing or Obama winning the elections.

    3. ...

    4. Stock of survivalgears_are_us.com zooms up and ..... profit!

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:How this scam works by Verdatum · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or just do what Penn & Teller did. Offer "2012 Reverse Mortgages". To paraphrase, "We'll give you a bunch of money to spend on whatever hedonism you like for the next 2 years, and in 2013, in the infinitesimal chance that it's still standing and we're still alive to claim it, we take your house!"

    2. Re:How this scam works by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The joke will be on them when they discover the value of real estate in 2013.

  4. In other news by syrinx · · Score: 4, Funny

    NASA reports that giant alien spaceships have not in fact destroyed the White House and Empire State Building.

    Reports of time-traveling robots looking for John Connor are unsubstantiated at this time.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:In other news by Verdatum · · Score: 4, Funny

      My God! If the robots aren't looking for John Conner, that must mean they've already found him! WE'RE DOOMED!

  5. How Histery Repeats .... by foobsr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The War of the Worlds (radio)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_War_of_the_Worlds_(radio)

    Quote: "Some listeners heard only a portion of the broadcast, and in the atmosphere of tension and anxiety leading to World War II, took it to be a news broadcast. Newspapers reported that panic ensued, people fleeing the area, others thinking they could smell poison gas or could see flashes of lightning in the distance."

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    1. Re:How Histery Repeats .... by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the case of The War of the Worlds, the radio broadcast WAS designed to sound "real", complete with interrupting musical programs for special announcements and so on. Someone who tuned in in the middle of the show would have missed the announcement that it was just a radio program, and it predated the transistor radio by a decade so most of the people who decided to flee or whatever wouldn't have had a way to keep up with the program and hear any other announcements that they were listening to a fictional story.

      There's no excuse at all for 2012.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  6. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How many of those sending their questions to NASA are part of the 2012 movie marketing campaign?

  7. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?

    It's one way of doing science PR these days, I guess.

  8. oh, please! by macbeth66 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've had two from women contemplating killing their children and themselves

    You tell them to come in, explaining that you have a secret rocket that will take some of us off of this planet. When they arrive, you have social services take the kids away and the police can take her to the nearest asylum for the criminally insane.

  9. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Ian+Alexander · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because taxpayers are contemplating suicide over this 2012 nonsense?

  10. When should I kill myself? by vanyel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Before you breed...

  11. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Computer_kid · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is actually done by NORAD. It started in 1955 when a Sears had an advertisement encouraging children to call Santa Claus, but gave the phone number for NORAD.

  12. Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is the first film I've worked on that caused actual general panic. Grudge 2 scared people, but it's actually a little gratifying to think that work I did is scaring people even AFTER they walked out of the theater. At the time we were making it I knew the whole black president/conspiracy thing was definitely going to push a lot of buttons, just considering the way things are right now, but to be honest, the whole scientific backstory of the film is so thin I never actually considered that people would genuinely fear a cataclysm as depicted in the movie. "Mutating neutrinos"... really?

    ps. I was the lead sound effects editor on the show. Along with blowing up Yellowstone and other sundry destructions, I personally cut about 80% of the computer screen beeps. And I cut every one of them just for you guys, because I know you love them so much :D

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    1. Re:Flattering, I guess... by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 5, Funny

      I won't see the movie immediately, but I'll pre-emptively say that the beeps were entirely unnecessary, inappropriate, or plain impossible, and no programmer worth their salt would make an interface that noisy. But I'm sure you were just following orders. You know who else was just following orders?

      Seriously, I'm going to see it just for the beeps now, cos I'm intrigued how an informed person would accomplish this task as opposed to the mindless goons who think they know how computers work.

    2. Re:Flattering, I guess... by radtea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but to be honest, the whole scientific backstory of the film is so thin I never actually considered that people would genuinely fear a cataclysm as depicted in the movie. "Mutating neutrinos"... really?

      Yeah, I can't even hate you for working on it, nor the producers et al for creating it. It's just a movie, after all, so you don't fall into anything like the same class as the people who are promoting the 2012 thing as fact for their own benefit.

      If anyone ends up killing themselves or ruining their lives, it'll be at the feet of those bastards, not artists and businesspeople who are honestly trying to make a buck piggy-backing on the phenomenon. You lot have pursued the only honourable way of profiting from this kind of idiocy, and more power to you.

      That given, my question is: if we have people who want to ban cell phones because of zero evidence that they emit any harmful radiation, when will see a movement to ban panic-mongers? Panic-mongers do cause demonstrable harm and in the case of the LHC black-hole lies are known to have precipiated at least one death (a teenage girl who committed suicide.) So while artists making clearly absurd fiction ("mutating neutrinos"?) are in the clear, I think we should be looking very carefully at how to come down hard on panic-mongers. They are far more dangerous than any of the ridiculous threats they promote.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    3. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You put the beeps in for the same reason the male actors wear makeup, and scenes at night always are in blue light. It's a convention. If you make things blink on a 100 foot projection screen and they don't make a sound, people's get distracted by the absence somehow.

      As someone who does this for a living but also is a hobbyist Objective-C/Cocoa/Ruby developer, I do find myself thinking about whether the beeps are triggered by key events, or if they should be emanating from windowserver, and we absolutely put some thought into the design of "Informational" versus "Alert" versus "Fatal" indicator beeps...

      Also airplane cockpits are a whole other deal!

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    4. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'll love it. Even the progress bars beep!

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    5. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      > "Mutating neutrinos"... really?

      Well, that does occur in nature. Neutrinos emanating from our sun change type on the way here. Until a few years ago this was not known. The missing neutrino count from the sun (compared to theoretical predictions) was a big mystery in astrophysics, which is now explained by neutrinos changing type.

    6. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Informative

      Consider seeing it in Dolby Digital :) I don't get any more money either way, but seeing it at the $3 theater is almost worse than seeing it at home. Movies like this don't really work unless you're being actually pummeled by the sound and projection.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    7. Re:Flattering, I guess... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just as a foot note, the Mayan's equate the end of their calendar as like December 31st. The calendar just starts over.

      Just as a footnote to your footnote, the only character in the movie who relates the end-of-the-world to the Mayans is a complete nutjob (played very well by Woody Harrelson). The rest of the cast is much too busy running and screaming and dying to worry much about the Mayans' prophetic ability.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    8. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I can't even hate you for working on it, nor the producers et al for creating it. It's just a movie, after all, so you don't fall into anything like the same class as the people who are promoting the 2012 thing as fact for their own benefit.

      I always saw the whole "destruction of the world" as sortof an excuse to have a movie about a "conspiracy to save humanity." The interesting part of the movie isn't necessarily how Los Angeles is destroyed as much as why people in government and in echelons of the super-wealthy keep it a secret. That's what the movie is really about, and it's something that will probably get more examination over time, as the film settles into its place in film history.

      When I started on the film last year, the election was still going on and the whole "conspiracy" of 2012 seemed very redolent of the TARP bailout, and of typically American debates about state power and prerogatives in general (note that the film was written and shot long before the October crash, or Lehman Bros. or any of the government responses to the Great Recession). Roland E. is quite liberal, and his way of squaring the circle of the state-individual conflict is by offering altruism as the only way of escaping (1) zero-sum battles for survival on the one hand, as personified by the Yuri character, and (2) state coercion, as personified by Anheuser/Oliver Platt. In the end, the conflict created by the destruction of the Earth becomes a means for the government to become secretive and corrupt, and for the wealthy to settle their personal grudges with people not-so-wealthy; the conspiracy to "contain panic" appears rational from thwe outset, but once it becomes clear it must be implemented, it's revealed to be nakedly inequitable and evil, and a complete abrogation of universal human values.

      Yes, I've watched this movie several hundred times now and have had a lot of time to think about it.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    9. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Informative
      A "best boy" is either:
      • The first assistant to the Key Grip, who is the head of the grip department. These are guys that pick up and carry things around, like a film's 24-hour staff moving service -- film equipment, sets, props and photographic equipment are often bulky and unweildy. The best boy grip's main job is to sit at the truck and keep inventory on all of the gear, make sure the grips show up on time, make sure nothing is broken and repairs get done, etc.
      • The first assistant to the Gaffer, who is the chief electrician on set. A best boy in this case is usually called "best boy electric" and does the same sort of thing the best boy grip does, except with the lighting equipment.

      There's some variance throughout the world, but this is the typical doctrine for union US film sets.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    10. Re:Flattering, I guess... by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 3, Funny

      Blade Runner pretty much invented that cliche. I only wish an imitator would make the chucka-chucka-chucka sound when the character pans the image around.

      Sound guy, you on that?

    11. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As far as I know, 'cut' only means 'add/create' in movie lingo.

      Yeah, oh well. I added them, and then the re-recording mixer tossed out gobs of them, circle of life.

      "Cut" means I added it, in the sense that "I found these sounds in the library and then I 'cut' them so that they would sync up with the picture." Something about CGI special effects is that if you used the literal on-set sound of every shot in the movie, 2012 would be about 50% dialogue, 50% render farm fan hum.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    12. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 3, Informative

      It has been brought to my attention that people think I cut beeps out of the movie, based on the common English interpretation of the verb 'to cut.' I probably should have made it clear that I cut them "into" the movie, in accordance with the idiomatic Hollywood usage of the phrase. We apologize for the inconvenience. Flame on.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    13. Re:Flattering, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Panic-mongers do cause demonstrable harm and in the case of the LHC black-hole lies are known to have precipiated at least one death (a teenage girl who committed suicide.)

      Oh, my god, there are panic-mongers among us? What are we to do? How will we handle them? We're doomed!

    14. Re:Flattering, I guess... by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's wierd is it's the same chucka-chucka you hear in Alien when the Nostromo computer receives new orders, and it also pops up in various parts of Brazil, The Black Hole, Logan's Run etc. I think it's an old Bernoulli drive or some kind of dishwasher hard disk. You can hear what we're talking about it on the Amazon.com website, just audition track 1 of the Blade Runner soundtrack.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  13. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by thewils · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Taxpayers' money is spent on religion all the time. I don't see why this is any different. It's all fiction.

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  14. Oblig Movie Quote by Croakus · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's always an Arquillian Battle Cruiser, or a Corillian Death Ray, or an intergalactic plague that is about to wipe out all life on this miserable little planet, and the only way these people can get on with their happy lives is that they Do... Not... Know about it!

  15. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense? What's next? Scientific evidence, that there is no Santa Claus? That black cats crossing your path do not cause "bad luck" (whatever that is)?

    It's a blog post and a FAQ. That's it. No probe to prove there is no planet Nibiru, no expensive mission. Are you really worried that one man probably spent a few days writing this up?

    Frankly, I thought it was nice to hear that a NASA scientist is working to take the time to respond to a worried public and trying to minimize that time by having an informative page. When I was a kid, I wrote to NASA from Minnesota all the time. Every single time they responded. I still have fact sheets on all of their shuttle craft in my parent's closet. I read those things over and over trying to imagine how someone could come up with such amazing machines. Go ahead, spend a few minutes to hand write them a letter, you might be surprised with the response:

    Ask NASA

    Public Communications Office
    NASA Headquarters
    Suite 5K39
    Washington, DC 20546-0001
    (202) 358-0001 (Office)
    (202) 358-4338 (Fax)

    And if you came here to complain that NASA wastes tax payer money, you're in the wrong place. NASA's budget is about half of one percent of the Federal budget--don't even get me started on what our defense budget comes out to be. That's a ridiculously low amount of money for an agency that's charged with a major component of our future and probably the whole future of the Earth and its inhabitants.

    Your subject confuses me further ... what exactly are you implying these questions and blog are strawmen for?

    --
    My work here is dung.
  16. This is part of NASA's purvey. by Jack9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ignorance is not stupidity. NASA has addressed the ignorance. Good for them.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  17. I see potential in this by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, so if you run into one of these idiots, and she happens to be cute, just tell her that you are a Mao Shan master and you know the perfect ceremony to stop Nibiru from hitting the Earth, if you could just get a little help from her...

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:I see potential in this by prefec2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And if the "ritual" have been performed in the right way (after some training of course) the planet never shows up. So you were right, weren't you. And so you are a real Mao Shan Master.

  18. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Shagg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is the taxpayer's money being spent on this nonsense?

    It's a blog post and a FAQ. That's it. No probe to prove there is no planet Nibiru, no expensive mission. Are you really worried that one man probably spent a few days writing this up?

    They probably saved taxpayer money by writing a FAQ instead of getting repetitive calls from all the loonys.

    --
    Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
  19. No you don't by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Funny

    The economy is in a shambles and you need a job. You respond with "The FSM will return on Dec 24, 2012 and your death will be more horrible than you can imagine. The only way to prevent this fate is to kill yourself, preferably by drowning in a bowl of spagettios."

    Then you take his job after he kills himself.

    If he doesn't kill himself, drown him in a bowl of spagetti.

  20. Re:Why is NASA answering Hollywood Questions? by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The real crime is that you think it is okay for people to assume movies have any relation to reality to begin with. ALL movies would have your disclaimer, making it worthless.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  21. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mi is a hard core anti-government libertarian. For him, there is no excuse to thin to turn into an opportunity to bash the government. He's one of those people who think government can never, ever do anything good. If it looks good, you aren't looking hard enough. To people like Mi, NASA is just socialism for scientists and engineers who should be working in private industry.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  22. Re:Let them kill themselves by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And remove themselves from the gene pool.

    Almost no stupidity or suicidal tendancies are hereditary. Most mental disabilities are caused by accident or disease. A very large number of children are born every day with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome to (other then being alcoholics) perfectly sane, normal, intelligent people. The "Darwin Award" is pure bullshit; evolution doesn't work like that.

    If a stupid woman has fifteen kids and ten die, and you have never had sex, she won the Darwin game and you are its loser.

  23. Not stupid, just scared by darthwader · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lots of people have commented on how incredibly stupid these people are. I don't think it's quite that simple.

    I think that they're just scared. There's so much fear in our culture, people are scared of health care, scared of a black president, scared of terrorists, scared of oil prices, scared of cell phone companies, scared of pirates (the Somalian kind), scared of pirates (the MPAA kind), scared of the RIAA and MPAA, scared of swine flu, scared of unemployment, scared of having a job that doesn't pay a living wage, scared of peanuts, scared of global warming, scared of pollution, scared of home invasions, scared of floods, earthquakes and fires, scared of nuts with guns, scared of the government taking away everyone's guns.

    Fear makes you irrational. It suppresses the "carefully think about the situation" part of your brain, and supercharges the "fight or flight" part. If people stopped to think rationally about it, they would realize it is fiction. But the fear prevents them from thinking rationally.

    We live in a constant state of fear, and our culture (or our media, depending on how you look at it) keeps giving us more reasons to be afraid.

    What we need is more reason to be hopeful, not fearful. If we remove the irrational fears about health care, presidents, terrorists, MPAA, pirates, global warming, etc., then we would also have fewer irrational fears about the planet Nimbus crashing into Earth on December 21st, 2012.

    --
    I hate it when I make a joke and I get modded "+5 insightful". Mod the stupid comments "funny", not "insightful", pleas
  24. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

    Go ahead, spend a few minutes to hand write them a letter

    Well it wroked for Gordan Brown...

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  25. Re:spoiler tag needed by natehoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm sorry, you're concerned about the PLOT of a disaster movie? The plot. Of a disaster movie. Stay where you are, the people who are arriving shortly are there to help you. They are bringing you shiny things.

    Complete spoiler: Something scientifically impossible happens. Lots of people die and the laws of physics are apparently among the first casualties. Lots more people die. A few people suffer terrible injuries but somehow recover miraculously and are therefore immunized against death for the remainder of the film. Someone who is not in a position of authority overcomes great obstacles from clueless authority figures and breaks the laws of physics to come up with an impossible solution that, despite incredible odds, kills most of the people who disagreed with his/her theory in spectacularly ironic and/or morally righteous ways, and then works. Life immediately goes back to normal for all concerned, except those who are actually dead. The sun rises on happy people whose only complaint is that most of the people they know and love have been wiped out, but otherwise they are just so happy to be part of the small group of survivors who will soon be competing for what food is left before they descend into chaos and kill each other for stale crusts. But that can wait until the sequel.

    The plot is a thin device over which special effects are generously smeared. Go watch the trailer again, and eagerly anticipate the FXfest.

    Personally, the number of sheer coincidences and complete disregard for the laws of physics presented in the trailer I watched was enough to make me wonder about the state of science. Then I use my usual tactic... "just repeat to yourself 'it's just a show, I should really just relax'".

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  26. Re:Easy strawmen to knock off?.. by shrtcircuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "That's a ridiculously low amount of money for an agency that's charged with a major component of our future and probably the whole future of the Earth and its inhabitants."

    The scale compared to defense spending implies the amount of resources necessary just to keep humanity from destroying itself, before NASA can keep nature from doing it for us.

    Funny part is I give NASA better odds, though the people in charge of our world's various militaries also have a lot of personal profit to gain and lose by ensuring general continuity of human inhabitance, so they aren't as likely to push the "annihilate" button as some might think.

  27. Cinematic Neurosis by LatencyKills · · Score: 3, Informative

    This kind of thing is actually a documented mental illness (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1151359 among others). It began with The Exorcist leading to a bunch of people suddenly, literally, living in fear of their lives of being possessed by the devil. Later people watching Jaws, including some people living in Kansas far from any body of water that could reasonably contain a shark, became so afraid of shark attacks that they couldn't leave their homes. It doesn't happen often, but for those afflicted it can apparently be almost completely debilitating.

    --
    Jealously hoarding mod points since 2007.
  28. This is pretty simular. by pavon · · Score: 4, Informative

    The problem isn't people watching the movie 2012, it is the viral advertising surrounding it. They ran ads that made the movie sound a dramatization of a real idea rather than complete fiction, ala the Day After Tomorrow, and encourage them to search the web for the "real truth". The studio created a fake website purposing to be a scientific institute predicting a collision with earth in 2012. On top of this loonies have been talking about a 2012 apocalypse of some sort since we first understood the Mayan calendar, and latter some of them latched onto the Nimbiru idea after the books came out, so the internet is full of websites giving "evidence" of this catastrophe, many of whom claim to be scientific websites themselves.

    Yeah, people with a decent bullshit detector should be able to figure out that this is all crap, but it's not like they just watched a normal movie and thought it was read - the studio is trying to present it as though it were real, by making it a conspiracy that the mainstream is covering up.

  29. Why are you still talking? by DarthVain · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Kill yourself now, before its too late!"

    alternative ending:

    "Why bother, we are all gonna die in 2012!"

    alternate alternate ending:

    "Well its 2009, and the world ends in 2012, so if we take one number, 2009 and subtract it from 2012 you get the number 3. Its called math. So you should kill yourself in about 3 years. If you want to get really accurate, you could look at a calender and see what month it is, and what day, and really work out exactly when to do it! Either way, it isn't for awhile and your probably likely to die drowning looking up during a rain storm before that, so leave me alone..."

    alternate alternate alternate ending:

    "Don't worry about it we will be hit by a meteor or a comet long before then!"

    As an aside I have also heard that this Mayan 2012 prediction is all buffoonery. They Mayans thought their the world would end just like we think the world ends after December. It was their calender for keeping track of time. I think it was implied that you just restart the calender once the cycle is over. Perhaps it is so implisit that they didn't feel the need to explain this just the same we don't put a sticker on every calender we ever make that says "Not to worry, world not ending, new calender next year!"

  30. Education Time! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Informative

    A friend of mine is taking an Arky (Archaeology for those less hip) Class, as she is an ancient & medieval history major, and she is taking a class this semester SPECIFICALLY on the Mayans. Her Prof is one of the archaelogists who work on sites like Tucan. The prof held an open public lecture in the University of Calgary in the first week of November here. My friend and I both attended, and while I never did believe in the whole Mayan Myth it's interesting to see where its origins begin.

    So this prof is basically a Mayan pro, she can translate most inscriptions just by looking at them (no reference needed) and she intimately understands their number and Calendar system. The first thing to know about Mayan numbers is that they don't use Base 10, they use base 20. The other thing to know is that there is not ONE Mayan Language. They were similar to all of Europe, where the europeans had french, English, spanish, german, etc, the Mayans had about 6 to 8 different Variants. And with that in mind, they were never a single nation, each city had it's own king/queen type leader, and they peacably would trade with the other cities of the area. No one city was truly the capital, but those major trade hubs and those with rarer goods tended to prosper more than the little towns.

    Anyways, so the Mayans used 2 different Calendars, and I can't remember how big, but there was a sizable gap in between the usage of each (I think like 800 years?). But basically what it breaks down into is the Short count and the Long count.

    The Short count is very much like our Calendar today, 18 months of 20 days each with 5 days at the end of the year for some religious purpose (Similar to the egyptians). They also had Names for days of their week, like Monday Tuesday Wednesday (Except Mayan Gods instead of Norse Gods). So if I were to say, Friday, December 25th, you'd know I mean this Christmas and not last Christmas or the next Christmas because they don't land on a Friday. This works well for 8 years until Christmas lands on a Friday again. You could be more precise about the date if you gave me the year, which is where the Long Count comes in.

    We attribute a year to 365 days. So I would say that Dec 31 2009 would be day 733285. The Mayans didn't use years, they merely counted days. Which is neat in some ways because there were 20 days in a month (And they're number system is base 20, remember?) But also a bit of a hassle in others, because there are 18 months.

    So the way Archaeologists expressed their long count is in a series of numbers seperated by decimals (It looks like a long IP Address to me). Day 1 would be like 0.0.0.0.0.1 and Day 23 would be like 0.0.0.2.3 - - Except here's the kicker - Mayans didn't set day 0 as anything in particular. In fact, their creation story takes place well after 0. This leads many people to believe that the Mayans set a date in the future as some signifigance and worked their way backwards. What day that could be or what they believed it would be has yet to be discovered. There are some speculations. No, its not 2012.

    Essentially the numbers further to the left represent longer periods of time, so each 1.0.0.0.0 in the long count is really like 8767 years give or take, which is a really long friggen time, right? We celebrate every year pretty much, but every odd once in a while we hold huge celebrations, like when we ushered in the new millenia in the year 2000. That sort of thing was also important to the Mayans. If I recall correctly, we're roughly around the 13.0.19.0.0 era on the Mayan Calendar. So when it rolls around to be 13.1.0.0.0 - wouldn't that be a rollover worth celebrating? To the Mayans it would be. Guess what day that happens to fall on? You're right, December 21 2012.

    So now that you've got a crash course on the Calendar and how it works, where exactly does the Prophecy come in? I'll tell you. Amongst the ruins of cities, Mayans had what we call Stelas. They are basically big stones which have stories and such carved into them, very much like a monu

    1. Re:Education Time! by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Informative

      AH!

      I forgot "The Great Alignment".

      There is no real planetary Alignment scheduled for Dec 21, 2012, which the Movie shows as the Moon, Earth, Jupiter, Saturn, etc, all being PERFECTLY in line. Yeah no, not going to happen.

      As for the whole, Earth, and one of the constellations making a perfect line with the "Dark Rift" - Yes, that IS scheduled to happen! But guess how rare it is? It happened in 2008, and 2004, and 2000... and you get the idea. Its not very rare at all.

  31. How many people are actually worried? by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been noticing a lot of these "NASA Calms 2012 Fears" articles in the last few days, enough that it makes it sound like there's more of a story here than I think there really is. The real question is, how many people are actually worried about this? I'm guessing that it's a tiny number, and probably what happened is, a statistical blip caused a few of the crazier ones to contact NASA. So then he posts on the blog about it, and for some reason a lot of places pick up the story.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  32. Like, oh I don't know. Mythbusters? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That show has some REALLY bad science in it at times. For instance, one episode discussed the "myth" (rather old wives saying) that with breakfast cereal (the american kind) the cardboard box it comes in contains more NUTRITION then the cereal itself.

    The amazing mythbusters then went on to determine the CALORIE/ENERGY and FAT contents of both products. Do Americans REALLY need more CALORIES or FAT in their diets? Not once did they test EITHER of the products for NUTRITIONAL values, as in minerals/vitamins etc. They proved that sugar coated grain gives you energy. No shit sherlock. Your MOTHER is talking about nutrition as you find it in fresh vegetables, and fruit. Not a sugar cube or lump of butter.

    And yet many here at slashdot consider mythbusters as valid science and often quote their results to prove how silly a myth is.

    I seen another show where helicopters were discussed and the claim was made that helicopters do not have ejection seats. Correct. US helicopters do not, SOVIET helicopters did. How many believe a lie because they thought a documentary was a documentary?

    The truth, the real absolute, total and complete truth is not good entertainment and does not fit in a soundbite or between commercial blocks.

    And the truth is hard to understand because you need to understand an lot of complex subjects that you actually need to spend some time thinking about.

    What IS the mayan calendar and why is 2012 significant and as mentioned in the article is that different then 31st december 2009? If you don't understand WHAT a date really is, how time is tracked, then you COULD think 31st december 9999 would be an ending (which is rougly what 2012 is to the mayans). Silly if you TRULY understand calendars, numbers and such but many don't.

    For many people, magical thinking fills in the gaps between their understanding of the world and a LOT of us do it. Come one, be honest how much of your understanding of gravity is a rubber sheet with a weight on it? There is no rubber sheet, that is magical thinking to help your limited intelligence deal with the concepts thought up by truly brilliant people.

    So, don't be to condescending, you are no Einstein.

    Our world is filled with half lies to explain things away because explaining everything to everyone would explode the education system and not help getting the bloody toilets cleaned and garbage collected and even peoples wounds dressed.

    A simple story: In africa there used to be a believe that if you used a cooking stick twice, evil demons would posses it. White missionaries said this was silly superstition and forbid this practice. people soon dropped dead. Why? The evil spirit called food poisoning. This is LESS of an issue in colder climates like europe, but in the hot african sun food spoils far more rapidly.Oh, the story might not be true, but the gist of it is that sometimes "magical thinking" fills a gap between knowing that something is true and knowing the reason behind it.

    But we humans ain't perfect and we all can't spent all our time reading books. These people heard something, didn't understand it and nobody is willing to clearly explain it and then there are stations like Fox that even add to the fear mongering for their own gains. Hell even Discovery and National Geographic are happy to host a "lets scare people" show to get ratings. How are people to know the full truth when the lies are sold so much better?

    I think what NASA is doing is the right thing, but they should do it more clearly and get someone like Carl Sagan, someone who can talk plain english to explain it on tv on popular chat shows. SHOW people. Don't hide in the ivory tower sneering down, come out with the science. People LOVE science, but you need to open up to them, not by talking down to them, but by starting easy and then pulling them up. Why do you Einstein is such a celebrity? Because HE could do that. Few can. Certainly not most people here.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Like, oh I don't know. Mythbusters? by Thing+1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think what NASA is doing is the right thing, but they should do it more clearly and get someone like Carl Sagan [...]

      Yeah, that's just what the superstitious need: Zombie Carl to explain the not-coming apocalypse!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  33. I offer 2012 insurance by sp3d2orbit · · Score: 2, Funny

    OK, if you really believe 2012 is the end, I have a wonderful deal for you:

    I will give you 50% of the cash value for all your belongings AND you can keep them through 2012. IF the world doesn't end, I get to have your things in 2013.

    Any takers?

  34. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  35. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  36. Of course, there actually IS a planet Nibiru . . . by SEE · · Score: 2, Informative

    . . . because Nibiru is the name of Jupiter in the Babylonian compendium of astrology, Mul.Apin.

    Jupiter isn't going anywhere, of course.

  37. The New Dark Ages... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know plenty of people laugh at the superstitions of people in the Dark Ages, but science as we know it, didn't exist then. I mean Aristotle had some great ideas, but there was little or nothing to take the place of raw superstition until about the 13th or 14th century (at least in the West).

    But what is peoples' excuse today? How is it that people who presumably graduated from the American educational system are no better off than some dirt-farming peasant from barbarian times? Things weren't always this bad. If I had the choice of hiring someone with a high school education from 1909 or someone with a high school education from 2009, I'd choose the 1909 person, and 90% of the time I'd be better off.

    But of course or education system is fine, it just needs more money thrown at it.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  38. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote by PaganRitual · · Score: 2, Informative

    spacious reasoning; reasoning with large gaps where the logic just slips right through.

  39. Re:not close by WillDraven · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The 6 "days" of the creation are actually representative of 6 "creative periods" the duration of which has not been revealed, but is suspected to be between 1-2 billion earth years each.

    That still doesn't make any sense, the bible has earth, daylight and plants made before the sun and stars.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.