Slashdot Mirror


Bing Gains 10% Marketshare

samzbest writes "According to ComScore's qSearch, Microsoft's retaliation against Google search, Bing, has gained significant market share, now facilitating close to 10% of US searches. That's a gain of two large points in five months."

5 of 514 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Being the new default doesn't hurt either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I recently installed the Google search provider in IE8. Not only did I have to "Find More Providers", but Google was hidden on the second page of the default list and mislabeled as "Google Search Suggestions". Accidents.

  2. Re:MSN/Live had about the same market share before by dingen · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sure they did some work on creating Bing, but even so it did replace both MSN Search and Live Search. So it really is no surprise at all that Bing has about the same market share than those combined.

    --
    Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
  3. Re:Being the new default doesn't hurt either by jefu · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had the same experience - it took some digging to figure out how to make Google the default search provider, and there were several Googles listed on the page where Google eventually showed up and no good information on which to choose. Worse yet, I was in the process of installing Windows 7 and it decided to install updates after I'd done this, and somehow managed to reset the default search provider to Bing in one of those.

  4. Re:Is it trickery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    microsoft is making themselves better and more productive? LOL I seriously hope you are joking. Bing is still very skewed to show positive results for things that MS is interested in gaining marketshare from.

    I really doubt it. I just did a search for "virtual machines". Something that Microsoft would dearly love to increase its market share in. The first result was a Wikipedia article. The second was VMWare, the third was from Sun, and the 4th was Virtual PC. If they were being biased, don't you think that they would put their product 1st?

    Same thing with doing a search for "database servers". On Bing the first result to an actual product is the 5th entry and it's for MySQL. On Google, the first result to an actual product is the 4th entry and it's for Microsoft SQL server.

    I could go on, but the reality is the reality is that Bing isn't that bad and no more biased to any of Microsoft's stuff then Google is.

  5. Re:I'm not sure I believe those numbers by lawnjam · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a slightly fairer comparison which excludes relative rankings.

    If you search for the name of my shop, Hannah Zakari, my website is the first result on every major search engine (I've just tried google, yahoo, bing, ask, search.com and baidu)

    People who have searched for "Hannah Zakari" in the past 30 days came from the following search engines:
    1. google 95.86%
    2. bing 1.60%
    3. yahoo 1.35%
    4. aol 0.75%
    5. search 0.30%

    The same period last year looked like this:
    1. google 92.77%
    2. live 2.95%
    3. yahoo 2.09%
    4. search 1.52%
    5. aol 0.57%

    The site is UK based, so this will be a geographically limited sample, but I'm not seeing a massive surge in Bing-age.