Slashdot Mirror


Two Arrested For Zbot Trojan

An anonymous reader writes "Officers from the Metropolitan Police's Central e-Crime Unit have made Europe's first arrests in the battle against the ZeuS or Zbot Trojan which threatened to compromise thousands of computers. Officers arrested a man and woman, both aged 20 years, in Manchester for offenses under the 1990 Computer Misuse Act and the 2006 Fraud Act. Both suspects were interviewed by PCeU detectives and have been bailed for further in-depth inquiries to be completed. The arrests in connection with the malware represent some of the first in the world, and the first in Europe to combat the distribution and control of ZeuS."

25 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. 2 Down... by houstonbofh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    2 down, a billion to go. Sorry, I just can't get excited about 2 people caught.

    1. Re:2 Down... by Tynin · · Score: 5, Funny

      But it is good to see more women programmers coming into the field.

    2. Re:2 Down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But it is good to see more women programmers coming into the field.

      The downside is Trojan writers now can breed.

    3. Re:2 Down... by hcmtnbiker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Odd, I was under the impression they used the trojans to stop from accidentally breeding.

      --
      If i had one dollar for every brain you dont have, i would have $1.
    4. Re:2 Down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Odd, I was under the impression they used the trojans to stop from accidentally breeding.

      The Trojan company was started in a desperate attempt by computer makers to keep down the numbers of trojan writers. Sadly having never seen a female trojan writer most male trojan writers couldn't figure out what to do with the company's product. A few creative trojan writers did finally figure out a use, those can be spotted by the long balloons hanging from their computer desks.

    5. Re:2 Down... by Dupple · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, North West England - the UK

      --
      Watch those corners
    6. Re:2 Down... by socceroos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would be excited to know how they got caught. There might be an enjoyable story there.

      I would have imagined that if these two were smart then they would have completely covered/obfuscated their tracks every step of the way. From propagating the first copy of the trojan to making sure any profits/information was sent through an elaborate network of communication-encrypted proxies before arriving on a remote server from which they could connect to using a similar but different network of communication-encrypted proxies and download/view the information.

      I'd really love to know if they were just stupid, or if someone else was just way smarter. For the stories sake, I hope its the latter.

    7. Re:2 Down... by auric_dude · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Guardian would suggest that the met Police e-crime unit were involved in the take down http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/18/zeus-zbot-trojan-virus and the e-crime unit http://www.kable.co.uk/government-ecrime-review-home-office-14jul09 is part of GCHQ http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jun/25/cyberspace-war-computer-hacking-fraud. So may well be more to this than meets the eye.

    8. Re:2 Down... by Marcika · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry, I fail to see the link - I read all three articles and I still don't see the link between this arrest (which was a Met job, i.e. London/national police) and the GCHQ Cyber-Security Operations Centre (who are spooks, not policemen)...

    9. Re:2 Down... by LordSnooty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the neither of the last two articles there does it say that the Met Police's e-crime unit is part of GCHQ. The Met Police is the police force of London.

  2. Great news by T+Murphy · · Score: 4, Funny

    With the cops on the hunt, it sounds like people writing malicious code will have to be spending a lot more time indoors.

    Oh, wait...

  3. Re:Not mentioned in the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The internet, it's this shared thing right? So as long as you don't care about using it then yeah it's not your problem.

  4. Re:Not mentioned in the article... by Datamonstar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes. The theft of tons of personal information worth a ton of money is something that only affects Windows users.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  5. Windows only / not windows only by baomike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I try to be sympathetic to windows users, and even try to help on occasion
    but I am slowly losing any semblance of a positive attitude.
    The "who cares about windows users" keeps getting stronger.
    I can't protect everybody from themselves.

    1. Re:Windows only / not windows only by syousef · · Score: 3, Funny

      The "who cares about windows users" keeps getting stronger.

      What else do the evil voices tell you to do?

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    2. Re:Windows only / not windows only by socceroos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree, I do get a similar feeling. And although default settings are better on an OS like Linux, I can't help but think that those same users would manage to get infected on Linux too - if everyone started to switch.

      The only thing I know for certain is that I have more control over a Linux machine and as such have found them easier to diagnose and fix. Oh, and tonnes easier to reliably lock down.

  6. i hope there's a follow up story by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    it would be interesting to find out if they are merely patsies for a larger effort, or are genuinely isolated and inspired script kiddies

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  7. Oh please by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Idiots are everywhere. You think people won't write malware or trojans if macos or linux suddenly jumped to a majority market share? People write the shit for windows because its what everyone uses. Why would I bother with 1.2% of the linux users when theres 92% of windows users available? Nothing is idiot proof, not even linux.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Oh please by Provocateur · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better class OS will have better class Trojans written for it

      And with this kind of competition, quality improves, and everyone benefits! Win-win!

      Oh, wait...

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    2. Re:Oh please by garompeta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Like Sendmail, right?
      People tend to forget the good old days. They also forget that those days aren't that different now, what is different is the perception and the interest.

    3. Re:Oh please by zwei2stein · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, linux malware will be blue blooded fine cuban cigars smoking fine scotch drinking gentleman, much unlike windows malware which drinks cheap beer, smoke lucky strikes, lives in trailer park and has five kids with four men.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    4. Re:Oh please by Tellarin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "You try to create an idiot proof system, mother nature just creates a 'better' idiot." :)

    5. Re:Oh please by roguetrick · · Score: 2, Informative

      What the hell is wrong with lucky strikes! Its toasted!

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
  8. Re:I'm just wondering... by XSpud · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's because the UK's e-crime unit is part of the Metropolitan Police. I guess it doesn't make sense for each police authority to have it's own e-crime unit.

    PCeU - Police Central e-crime Unit

  9. Re:"National policing" by minasoko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, you're saying in a city with a population density of over 12,000 per square mile there are more reported instances of police mistakes, complaints and allegations of corruption than you find in a largely rural county with a density of 567 per square mile? Shocking.