Slashdot Mirror


China Enforces Even Stricter Regulation On Games

eldavojohn writes "Chinese gamers have a pretty hard life. From crackdowns on 'undesirable' games to bans on gangster games to delayed World of Warcraft expansions, they suffer. The worst part is that in order to qualify for operating in China, you face a maze of conflicting bureaucracy and regulation. Well, it just got a little worse. Now, if you want to operate, you need to hire a 'specialist' to oversee content, and you need to 'enhance socialist values' in your game. They also want to limit in-game marriages and how many player-versus-player combat sessions one can engage in. The circular issued from China's Ministry of Culture contained all the vague verbiage giving them easier reign over who operates and who doesn't. It's a large market, but is it worth the gamble to game developers?"

235 comments

  1. No PVP? by TheKidWho · · Score: 0

    What? Why not? They don't like their people being competitive?

    Just wait until MW3 is made about China...

    1. Re:No PVP? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 0

      Just place Assassin's Creed III in the Cultural Revolution and watch heads explode.

    2. Re:No PVP? by tilandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't worry, as with all business in China you just have to know who to bribe.

    3. Re:No PVP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      PvP cuts into the gold-farming time - gotta keep pushing the GDP up!

    4. Re:No PVP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Mod parent up. This is how business is done in China. Anything from high finance to getting your kid into a good elementary school it's always about the who's, when's, and how much's of bribery. This mass of carefully crafted conflicting regulations is only the government officials fighting with each other over bribery turf. It is official policy. No one in China is ever prosecuted for this kind of crap unless they've run afoul of somebody higher up in political power. As soon as there is publicity, it's a signal that the person to be put on trial, innocent or not, convicted or not, has lost power and is now wearing a giant "kick me" sign.

    5. Re:No PVP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And that's different with respect to other countries, how? Good thing businesses are so honest in the US or EU countries that they are never giving bribes nor are their people in power accepting them. If only China could learn to be as honest, upstanding and incorruptible as the people in the US Congress and people like Obama and Bush they'd just have such a wonderful utopia.

    6. Re:No PVP? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1, Funny

      Probably best for an offshore dev team to do that, or "The heads that you explode might be your own"...

    7. Re:No PVP? by Applekid · · Score: 1

      And that's different with respect to other countries, how?

      Other countries have at least some amount freedom of speech.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    8. Re:No PVP? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "One of the things I have always found troubling about Westerners doing business in emerging market countries is that they sometimes take an almost perverse pride in discussing payoffs to government officials. It is as though their having paid a bribe is a symbol of their international sophistication and insider knowledge. Yet, countless times when I am told of the bribe, I know the very same thing could almost certainly have been accomplished without a bribe." --Source

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:No PVP? by jamboarder · · Score: 0, Troll

      And that's different with respect to other countries, how? Good thing businesses are so honest in the US or EU countries that they are never giving bribes nor are their people in power accepting them. If only China could learn to be as honest, upstanding and incorruptible as the people in the US Congress and people like Obama and Bush they'd just have such a wonderful utopia.

      How is this flamebait?

    10. Re:No PVP? by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Misclicked and mismodded your post, posting to remove

    11. Re:No PVP? by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      Because bribes in the US are under the table and are prosecuted; in China they are expected and no one cares.

    12. Re:No PVP? by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      And that's different with respect to other countries, how?

      Because in China, it not only occurs, it is expected. Read, for example, "The Outlaws of the Marsh", which is set in the Song Dynasty. Official bribery is part of Chinese culture.

    13. Re:No PVP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they just want them playing games with "socialist values." Free copies of BioShock for everyone!

    14. Re:No PVP? by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      This is NOT flamebait.

      Those who think it is are fools as there is no form of incorruptible government. Some are worse than others but even then it depends on who you are and it's very much a mater of perception.

    15. Re:No PVP? by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Other countries have at least some amount freedom of speech.

      What good is freedom of speech if it's just used to condemn you later? I donno if you've been paying attention but here in the US you might have the right to say whatever you like but it will get you on some government harassment list and fired from your job in a heart beat.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Leary

      Leary's first run-in with the law came on December 20, 1965. During a border crossing with his wife and two children from Mexico into the United States, marijuana was found in a bag in his car. After taking responsibility for the controlled substance, Leary was convicted of possession under the Marihuana Tax Act on March 11, 1966, and sentenced to 30 years in jail

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO

      COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert, and often illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at investigating and disrupting dissident political organizations within the United States. The FBI used covert operations from its inception, however formal COINTELPRO operations took place between 1956 and 1971.[2] The FBI's stated motivation at the time was "protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order." [3]

      Things have only gotten worse over time. The Constitution and even the laws of this country are meaningless to those in power. Don't ever forget your place and think you are free...

    16. Re:No PVP? by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Because bribes in the US are under the table and are prosecuted; in China they are expected and no one cares.

      Just because you haven't been asked for bribes, kickbacks or favors don't mean the rest of us haven't had to deal with it at some point and it is very common. The only real difference is people don't normally come out and say it here. So if you can't take a hint then you aren't getting the contract.

    17. Re:No PVP? by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Because in China, it not only occurs, it is expected. Read, for example, "The Outlaws of the Marsh", which is set in the Song Dynasty. Official bribery is part of Chinese culture.

      Yes it is but how is that better?
      Is It somehow better to hide the fact that you're a corrupt official?

      Now don't misunderstand I have no desire to move my ass to china but I gotta give them some respect for being up front about being evil. At least their people know how things work unlike over here where people think the government isn't evil and that big happy "we are helping you" smile is real.

    18. Re:No PVP? by tacarat · · Score: 1

      Money speaks rather freely everywhere, no?

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    19. Re:No PVP? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You are hilarious. The Western world works on bribes, you really think it's any different in China? It's not always cash, either. Sometimes it's jobs, or some other currency, which will be used to enhance money, prestige, or power for a given individual. Bribes are just a distillation of politics.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:No PVP? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Of course. If you pull up your container ship and fill out 389 forms and submit them to the appropriate 37 agencies you could be offloading it in a mere 17 weeks.

      Or, you could pay the guy supervising the dock $10k (with the supervisor distributing it as needed), and be unloaded and headed out to sea in a day or two.

      There is ALWAYS a legitimate way to do business. The guys taking the bribes wouldn't have it any other way - so that they can point to the official process when people come in questioning the practice of taking bribes. However, unless you have connections (just another form of a bribe - the ability to grant favors), the official process tends to be ineffective.

  2. Good for them! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Funny

    I heard they are banning all Wii games with the word "Party" in the title.

    1. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Based on their "enhances socialist values" criteria, Mario Party would be a hit with the gov't.

    2. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they don't want kids going around shooting their classmates in schools, not that they'd be dumb enough

    3. Re:Good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why?

      Because, politically, it's a one-party system.

      Whoosh.

    4. Re:Good for them! by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I heard they are banning all Wii games with the word "Party" in the title.

      Will they at least let people play Dance Dance Cultural Revolution?

    5. Re:Good for them! by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

      I hear Super Marx Brothers is good too...

      --
      If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
    6. Re:Good for them! by Bat+Country · · Score: 1

      I would buy Super Marx Bros.

      --
      The land shall stone them with the bread of his son.
    7. Re:Good for them! by toriver · · Score: 1

      Marxio and Luengels.

    8. Re:Good for them! by ArundelCastle · · Score: 2, Funny

      I heard they are banning all Wii games with the word "Party" in the title.

      Will they at least let people play Dance Dance Cultural Revolution?

      Sorry, they've just declared Dance Dancing as activity against the State because it involves standing in a Square.

    9. Re:Good for them! by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Sorry, they've just declared Dance Dancing as activity against the State because it involves standing in a Square.

      Does this mean they've banned square dancing as well?
      And all Final Fantasy games?

    10. Re:Good for them! by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      More like Groucho and Harpo.

  3. Of course by Improv · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are plenty of game developers that would love to capture part of the Chinese market. It's mainly developers that operate a bit too close to prohibited levels of hedonism and a few other touchy subjects that will have problems, and it's not like Chinese need games tailored to them - people taking the effort to make a game could go worldwide if their game won't work in China.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  4. nuts by Tom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a large market, but is it worth the gamble to game developers?

    Are you nuts? It's a market that in a few years will be 5-10 times larger than the US market, taking into account that asian cultures are more open to gaming in general (see Korea for example). If there is any single market in the world that's worth it, it's China.

    Other industry has been there, done that. Car manufacturers all knew after the initial surprises that if they open a factory in China, their blueprints will be copied and another chinese factory somewhere else will produce the same cars for a cheaper price. Some stayed out of China for that reason. Until the chinese began to buy cars. Then, they had no choice but to do it, because they couldn't sell on the chinese market without having a chinese factory. They did it knowing full well the damage they'd sustain.

    Frankly, ten years from now, game developers will probably wonder whether it's worth the trouble anymore translating their games for the US market.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:nuts by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But developing a game that pushes Socialist values and limits various gameplay could essentially RUIN your sales in every country BUT China.

      Is China > 50% of the market?

      Will China be > 50% of the market?

    2. Re:nuts by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But developing a game that pushes Socialist values and limits various gameplay could essentially RUIN your sales in every country BUT China.

      Game? Sales? China? They pay for games in China? Who'd of thunk it....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:nuts by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

      Are you nuts? It's a market that in a few years will be 5-10 times larger than the US market, taking into account that asian cultures are more open to gaming in general (see Korea for example).

      I may be a bit touched in the head to suggest staying out of the Chinese market to avoid unclear penalties and becoming a government tool, but I'm not crazy enough to generalize that many people or even try to compare Korean (I assume you imply South Korean) culture to Chinese culture. That's a brazenly occidental view of the world. Are you an expert on both?

      --
      My work here is dung.
    4. Re:nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Crowd Control Productions was really excited to have EVE Online in China... the Chinese server (which must be segregated from the rest of the world for legal reasons that also create technical reasons, so much for The Butterfly Effect) gets about 1500 users peak last I heard, and The Rest Of The World gets about 40,000?

      Now, 1 to 1 that puts China pretty well ahead against other developed countries, but it seems to me that it's far more feasible and profitable to not have to worry about Chinese law and cater to virtually anyone but them than have to dedicate resources and modify everything that works for everyone else to get another 4% of users.

      Other MMO's mileage may vary and obviously this doesn't particularly considers single player games.

    5. Re:nuts by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      ... does China pay >50% of your revenue?

    6. Re:nuts by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      10 years from now the average Chinese is going to say "Socialist values? Heck, we dumped that nonsense a few years ago."

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    7. Re:nuts by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      Frankly, ten years from now, game developers will probably wonder whether it's worth the trouble anymore translating their games for the US market.

      Yeah, kind of like how Chinese cinema is now destroying Hollywood.

    8. Re:nuts by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Working in the auto industry I can tell you first hand how much of a pain in the ass it is to sell in China. They basically require a bribe to import anything into the country. It's their way of making it so pricy to do business in an attempt to force companies to build factories in China. I'm not just talking about complete units, I'm talking about componant parts, service parts.. everything. Every part needs to have a costly certification done (where the company has to pay to fly 3-5 Chinese "inspectors" over and cover all their expenses for a couple weeks). The "inspectors" certify the mfg plant and processes and the parts. Only after a few months and a couple hundred thousand dollars can a location be certified.

      I can't imagine the fuss they'd create if the US sent inspectors to China to go through a 2 month review of every factory that ships product to the US. I also can't imagine why we even bother with China.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    9. Re:nuts by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      You're joking, right? There's absolutely no way the Chinese government is going to stop controlling information and oppressing its' people any time soon, and definitely not within 10 years.

      You're dreaming.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    10. Re:nuts by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Just how many "Socialist Values" does China have?

    11. Re:nuts by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think that it'll take 10 years. Their present system is, at least, classifiable as "crony capitalism with state intervention", and the proles(both city and country) are getting the shaft to a degree that would please any sneering Dickensian oligarch(though, since they are getting the same shit slice of a larger pie, their anger hasn't yet become unmanageable).

    12. Re:nuts by Applekid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But developing a game that pushes Socialist values and limits various gameplay could essentially RUIN your sales in every country BUT China.


      #ifdef REGION_CHINA
              gameRules.PVP = false;
              gameRules.GroupRules.Max += 5;
      #endif

      If Duke Nukem puffs on a cigar to a backdrop of the US flag in a cutscene, I'd see either the content re-rendered with a different flag texture or just removed outright. The commercial response to censorship will be the cheapest and shortest workaround to get within the law, not a group-up redesign.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    13. Re:nuts by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      haha, people have been saying this since Tiena square. Not happening any time soon; however there form of socialist/market is very interesting, and due mostly to Tienanmen square.

      There socialist i the half of income from imports goes into a giant savings that is used to establish and maintain a global business presence.

      In effect, any single US company is competing with the whole of China. If we don't adapt to that, then we will be doomed. As long as people are lying about something as simple and obvious as getting health care to people, I don't see it being a good political move to suggest taxing imports for the sole reason of leveraging industry from verses, or supporting a solid business ground work in 3rd world countries going to fly.

      The US and China are heading to the same point, but from different sides. The only question where will that point be?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:nuts by Mr+Otobor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Frankly, ten years from now, game developers will probably wonder whether it's worth the trouble anymore translating their games for the US market.

      Well, that hardly seems likely, even if the US is still "only" the number one market in 10 years :) (Maybe a different story 20 - 30 years out.)

      While I could imagine a collapse of UK/US to just "ENG", but I seriously doubt the English speaking market is going anywhere (UK, US, AU, CA, NZ, de facto second language for many in India, lots of other people who don't get to have games/manuals/books/etc. translated to their native language as part of the standard 8 or 10 translations done for most modern products.) Perhaps in another 100 or 200 years, English and Chinese will have begun to merge for real (if Chingrish isn't already on that path) but you're going to continue to have a huge English market if for no other reason than right now 400million+ speak English as a first language, and the majority of those are in countries that are not under any kind of population pressure or serious resource pressure (think US and Canada.). Also, you forget the language diversity within China... out of 1.2 billion "only" 850+ million speak Mandarin as a first language.

      China is rising, yeah, the US is going down, yeah, blah, blah, blah. It makes a nice headline and gets peoples' emotions up a bit, but the truth is more like, "China is rising and the US is... rising much more slowly. But is way, way far out ahead." Anyway, did anyone really thing the world could remain so massively imbalanced in power and prestige forever? (The answer, apparently, at least if you listen to news and posts like this, is "Yes.")

    15. Re:nuts by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You say this like the Chinese government could actually control 1.2 billion people if they really & truly yearned to be free.

      The population of China is like the elephant that can be fettered with a thin rope, because heavy chains were used during it's youth. They can only be restricted as much as they *let* themselves be restricted.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    16. Re:nuts by pwnies · · Score: 1

      Not quite. While the population of China is about 4.3 times the United States', the number of those connected to the internet is only slightly higher As it stands, China only has about 12 million more broadband subscribers than the US does. I highly doubt that it's going to increase by a multiple of five in the next few years, especially seeing as the majority of China's population is spread out over its rural areas.

    17. Re:nuts by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      But developing a game that pushes Socialist values and limits various gameplay could essentially RUIN your sales in every country BUT China.

      Game? Sales? China? They pay for games in China? Who'd of thunk it....

      There's a reason the games that do well there are pay-to-play.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    18. Re:nuts by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That goes without say. But "socialist values"? C'mon, China hasn't been socialist for quite a while now.

      Don't equate socialist with dictatorship. There are socialist dictatorships, but there are also socialist societies that are no dictatorships as well as dictatorships that are anything but socialist.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:nuts by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly what does controlling information and oppressing citizens have to do with Socialism?

      For that matter, what does the government of the PRC have to do with Socialism? Their situation looks a lot more like crony capitalism and kleptocracy mixed with old fashioned totalitarianism than a system where the workers control the means of production and allocate resources toward the common good...

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    20. Re:nuts by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Because they produce cheap crap cheaply. Period.

      Of course, if I don't give a shit about my workers (and have nonexisting work laws) I can produce dirt cheap as well. What I wonder is why no country bothers to go up in arms about that while we get to hear about every other shit going down on our planet, when A shoots B and we get asked for donations for the starving kids and whatnot.

      But maybe just 'cause they don't produce cheap shit for us.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    21. Re:nuts by qoncept · · Score: 1

      I may be a bit touched in the head ...

      What does that mean? Honest question.

      I'm not crazy enough to generalize that many people or even try to compare Korean (I assume you imply South Korean) culture to Chinese culture. That's a brazenly occidental view of the world.

      As far as I can tell, he isn't suggesting anything about any number of "people." He's discussing cultures. When you watch the History Channel, do you complain that a show generalizes the Aztecs and implies every single one of them murdered for sacrifice? Is it not true that asian cultures play more games? Again, an honest question. Occidental or not, I'm a lot more likely to believe Chinese people, as a whole, would be more likely to play more games than Americans.

      Are you an expert on both?

      Do you need to be an expert to make casual observations on anything? I'm not an expert on Ford Mustangs, but I can tell when one is red. I can say that Mustangs are faster than Ford Aspires. Always true? No. True in general? Yeah. But you aren't going to play your card here (or most of the time when people make comments about things they have no more insight in to than a fly) because (I'm assuming) it has no racial implications.

      --
      Whale
    22. Re:nuts by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      If your game has the capability to break the law - people will exploit it. The Chinese citizens will simply pirate the American version, or hack their region to be not China - and before you know it the game will be banned.

      You either ship your game with the limitations, or don't ship to China. World of Warcraft expansions are experiencing major delays because World of Warcraft basically has to be recoded this way. If it were as simple as a few lines of code, they would have patched it.

    23. Re:nuts by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1

      It's a market that in a few years will be 5-10 times larger than the US market

      China's GDP is 2-3 times smaller than the USA's (depending on how you count it). Though it is growing faster, some argue that China will never catch the USA.

      Not even mentioning the widespread piracy. Not even mentioning the Chinese people's reluctance to pay money to foreign companies...

    24. Re:nuts by mckinnsb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It goes just a little deeper than that.

      You have to consider the fact that games like Grand Theft Auto 4 and Assassin's Creed are not even capable of being released in China - not just because of particular things in the game which could be set by a configuration file or bypassed with a boolean (the main character is Slavic, shooting of 'Triad' gang members), but because of the raw nature of the gameplay itself. Granted, GTA IV is a very visceral example, but with these new restrictions, China is now going to have a say in the gameplay of every game that is released in China - and game developers are going to have to pay for it. To be honest, only huge software companies (Blizzard, Electronic Arts) are going to find developing a game for China profitable, because these "bureaucratic fees" are going to crowd out everyone else - and they are going to have to design these games specifically for China. The root poster is right - these new games are probably going to be much tamer than their non-Chinese counterparts, and will probably sell horribly outside of China, and will likely not be translated. The cultural wall remains.

    25. Re:nuts by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>>Is China > 50% of the market?
      >>>Will China be > 50% of the market?

      1.3 billion Chinese versus 0.4 billion Americans/Canadians + 0.5 billion Europeans + 0.1 Japanese
      57% > 43%

      Yes China will be >50% of the developed world's market. That's assuming they don't stumble due to an oil crisis (oil becoming scarce) which would prevent them from reaching US/EU/JP level of advancement.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    26. Re:nuts by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

      >>>China hasn't been socialist for quite a while now.

      (sings) What color is the sky in your world? (ahem). China is still socialist, ensuring their citizens have jobs, homes, amd/or food

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    27. Re:nuts by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Oh, they pay for games in China; I pay for games in China! 20 RMB for the latest XBOX title, 15 RMB for the newest Wii game, and the like...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    28. Re:nuts by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yearning to be free?!? Where did that idea come from? Chinese people aren't "yearning" for anything. As a matter of fact, they are intensely grateful to their government for making the present prosperity possible. It's better in China today than it has been at any time in their 5000 years of history, and it's only improving. It's a damn sight better than the Mao years when he murdered tens of millions and the lucky ones merely froze in unheated factories and classrooms. Oh, maybe they should go back to Chiang Kai-Shek and the warlords? Let's see...Empress Cixi? Nope, unmitigated disaster there, too. Unequal treaties, Opium wars, should I keep going back? The government could decree that every citizen gets a boot to the head daily from the security guards at every community entrance, and they'd still proclaim loudly that China is better off than it has ever been - and they'd be right. And the reason is the government. If the government wanted, the entire nation would still be living in poverty. 1.3 billion starving poor: the Chinese called it "1949-1976".

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    29. Re:nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Time to kick ass, chew bubble gum, and reflect on the teaching of Mao. And I'm all outta ass and bubble gum."

    30. Re:nuts by khallow · · Score: 1

      They don't actually argue that. Instead, they argue that China won't catch up in real GDP per capita to a 20th Century US continuing to grow as it used to.

    31. Re:nuts by el3mentary · · Score: 1

      Yes because 100% of chinese people will buy the games

      --
      I reject your reality and substitute my own.
    32. Re:nuts by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, this is probably the most ignorant comment I've seen in a thread absolutely chock full of them. Where the F is India in your little calculation? Brazil? Moreover, a single Westerner has the buying power of many Chinese.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    33. Re:nuts by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      As many as the Party says there is, Comrade.

    34. Re:nuts by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      (sigh). Okay. Let's assume that 10% of Americans, Europeans, Japanese are avid gamers, and that as China grows wealthier it will trend toward 10% too. Then we have:

      10% (1.3 billion Chinese versus 0.4 billion Americans/Canadians + 0.5 billion Europeans + 0.1 Japanese)
      0.13 billion Chinese versus 0.04 billion Americans/Canadians + 0.05 billion Europeans + 0.01 Japanese
      57% > 43%

      Same result.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    35. Re:nuts by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      What part of "really & truly yearned to be free" don't you understand?

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    36. Re:nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compare the Infernal Affairs trilogy to the Departed. The quality is there, if not the distribution. (And the fact that 1/2 the US is too zenophobic to consider watching a subtitled movie.)

    37. Re:nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is undeniably a huge market, the problem is, I think dating sense the British started making up their tea-trade deficit with opium, China has become very concerned about currency leaving the country. In the modern implementation, it mean that most of your profits from operating in China, end up with your Chinese "partner" companies, leaving the actual profits pretty small. I know that most of what WoW gets out of operating in china is a big boost to thier player base to assist their marketing.

    38. Re:nuts by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't have to "recode" just "recompile" if you use Applekid's method.

    39. Re:nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might have something to do with the fact that they are 'free'er' than they have ever been before. While their Government might place some heavy restrictions on them, they are no longer at the mercy of International machinations or on the losing side of 'free market' style deals that saw my own nation (UK) and many others benefit greatly at the cost of Chinese lives.

      They have more control over their own destiny than ever before, and its thanks to a Communist Government. Maybe one day they will desire to increase their liberty even further - but maybe they will decide the cost of said liberty at the expense of their quality of life is too much to pay.

      We gotta remember that just as one mans garbage is an others treasure - one mans inalienable rights are an others unnecessary risk.

    40. Re:nuts by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      While there are a lot of people in China, the disposable income per person in China is much lower than in the US and Europe.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    41. Re:nuts by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      And the current prosperity of China is in fact despite of it's government. See India for how China should be growing.

    42. Re:nuts by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      But they don't "yearn to be free." I've known several Chinese nationals at various jobs and generally speaking they don't mind their government.

      The problem is, as long as you play along, you're all good in China. If you decide you don't want to play along, you'll find no recourse.

      The Chinese government is BAD, but because they have the control they do, they are able to make sweeping changes in their economy that takes "western" cultures a lot longer to accomplish. If China wants to clean up a city, they'll force relocate everyone, build a bunch of new buildings, and they're done. You can't do that here.

      You speak of chains and restrictions and what-not, and make it sound as if "all that's needed is a simple uprising." In this day and age, more than any time in history, this is a very deadly proposition. And, things just aren't that easy. It's the same type of sentiment shared by people that say "you vote with your wallets." Sure, people can decide that a product sucks and not buy it, but there's also a lot of products that are hard NOT to buy. We simply can't stop buying gasoline. Boycotts don't work.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    43. Re:nuts by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      You are assuming that the 1.3 billion Chinese will have the disposable income to purchase games at the same level someone in America or Europe does. If they did, the GDP of China would be 4 to 5 times that of the US, it is not and is not going to be any time soon.

      China has a lot of people, a lot of poor people without the disposable income to purchase video games at the same price as people in the US and European markets.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    44. Re:nuts by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Sure sure. And as long as you play along, you'll probably be just fine. Of course, don't be fooled into thinking that there's no poverty and there's no upper class in China.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    45. Re:nuts by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Maybe you replied to the wrong person. I never used the words socialist or values in my post.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    46. Re:nuts by log0n · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      There are gaming software companies other than Blizz and EA?

    47. Re:nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If, if, if, if!!!

      Are you people dense? Do you lack basic reading comprehension?

    48. Re:nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the silliest thing I've ever heard. The Chinese love games like everyone else.

      But take it from someone who has sold software in China - they just don't like to pay for it, doesn't matter whether it was developed here or there. They won't buy.

    49. Re:nuts by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Did I mention the Chinese Gvmt? You're seeing things.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    50. Re:nuts by toriver · · Score: 1

      Well, they call themselves communist, the same way North Korea calls itself a democracy. But it is not for them to redefine: Both "communist" Russia and China were in effect feudal dictatorships with the Party taking the place of the aristocracy. Plenty of the followers of Lenin and Mao who believed in socialist and communist ideals were crushed (sometimes literally) when they saw the police states set up to repress the "liberated" people.

    51. Re:nuts by Sean0michael · · Score: 1

      Actually, you should keep going back. In the centuries before their first European contact, China was one of the most modern and richest societies on Earth. While Europe floundered between the collapse of the Western Roman Empire and the Renaissance, China did quite well for itself. You may have heard of the treasure ships of , who traveled in fleets of hundreds of ships far larger than Columbus's Nina, Pinta, or Santa Maria. His crew in the tens of thousands displayed their riches across the seas of South Asia (perhaps going as far as Iran and South Africa, though the historical record is speculative).

      China closed up after a handful of such voyages, essentially concluding that the rest of the world had little to offer as far as it could tell, and didn't want to be left open to another invasion a la the Mongols. They adapted to Western ideas and technologies more slowly than other societies, but they've been more prosperous than most empires for more years since the death of Christ than about anyone else.

      If anything, China is just getting back to it's historical place as #1 in the world.

      --
      Funtime Candy Wow! - my plan for eventually conquering Japan.
    52. Re:nuts by tpg0007 · · Score: 1

      More and more people are starting to think about freedom, especially political, now that they're getting rich. However I believe the last thing the world needs is a consumerist society 1 billion strong.

    53. Re:nuts by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Feudal dictatorships? Um. No. Russia ended feudalism in the 1800s when the Czar freed the serfs/slaves. And I don't think "feudalism" really applies to China, since feudalism was a Roman and later European concept.

      Russia and China were classic, conservative oligarchies - a system that is as old as history, and like you said, just a different form of aristocracy. The key difference is that where the old nobility didn't really care about the commoners, the Communist party actually did redistribute wealth in order to ensure everyone had a job. i.e. Economic socialism

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    54. Re:nuts by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      (sigh). Okay. Let's assume that 10% of Americans, Europeans, Japanese are avid gamers, and that as China grows wealthier it will trend toward 10% too.

      That's a huge, huge assumption. Even more important though is whether American/European and Chinese gamers will pay for games in the same manner (they currently do not). Blizzard liked to claim they had of World of Warcraft players worldwide, and various people started thinking that meant * of revenue, while not only is the cost different in asian countries, but so is the method of charging.

    55. Re:nuts by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Exactly what does controlling information and oppressing citizens have to do with Socialism?

      A lot. The redistribution of wealth requires squashing dissent from people who don't want their wages taken from them.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    56. Re:nuts by Rakishi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean China should be growing more slowly and incompetently?

      Compared to India, China has been way ahead in terms of economic growth. It took India two decades and a major economic disaster to even approach China's growth and it's still not rivaling it despite another two decades. You know why it took so long? Because India's government was blocked from implementing economic reforms. Yeah, really useful form of government they had.

    57. Re:nuts by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>You are assuming that the 1.3 billion Chinese will have the disposable income to purchase games at the same level someone in America or Europe does.

      Yes I am. With Americans and Europeans shipping factories over to China, the average Chinese citizen IS becoming more wealthy, and with the US and EU in deep debt/financial decline, Americans and Europeans will have less disposable income. I predict by 2020 Chinese workers will be on parity with us.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    58. Re:nuts by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, Microsoft Sony and Nintendo don't sell their XBOX, PS3, or WII games in Brazil or India. Their main markets are JP, US, and EU, so that's why I only used those countries for comparison. Those are the current markets.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    59. Re:nuts by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      And have you ever participated in a discussion?

      So, people aren't supposed to be able to disagree with you because you used the word "if?"

      Dumbass.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    60. Re:nuts by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      We're supposed to separate the entirety of "the Chinese people" with their government when discussing a key issue with their society?

      That makes no sense.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    61. Re:nuts by shentino · · Score: 1

      Make that "thin rope that will explode sometimes if you break it" and I'll buy it.

      I will never forget Tiananmen Square.

    62. Re:nuts by MMInterface · · Score: 1

      Frankly, ten years from now, game developers will probably wonder whether it's worth the trouble anymore translating their games for the US market.

      I don't think the question is whether it's worth the trouble. It think the question is can these companies make good games with these lame sets of rules, and will those games appeal to Chinese gamers. If that does not happen it will not matter how big their market is. Another issue to consider is how will the rules change in the future. The Chinese government is very aggressive at combating excessive gaming. Don't put it past them to decide that video games in general do not fit their socialist values. They have already done just that with other types of digital media.

    63. Re:nuts by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Now that's interesting. I'm from a fairly average place filled with average people and I've never had to make the distinction obvious. Are you from a Blue state, or Europe?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    64. Re:nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, what do you expect from a people that's educated on James Bond movies and Reaganomics?

      Socialist = bad
      Capitalism = good

      Of course, with the current turn of events,

      Wall Street = capitalism = bad
      Obama = socialism = bad

      So there really is nothing good left.

      Does anybody study these concepts beyond their labels anymore?

    65. Re:nuts by invalid_user · · Score: 1

      a single Westerner has the buying power of many Chinese.

      Not for long, with the sinking dollar.

    66. Re:nuts by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Informative
      Zheng He was on a mission to make the barbarians pay tribute to the center of the universe, the Chinese emperor. I'm not sure such things are a good idea. Moreover, the emperor squandered treasure on the useless fleets that would have better been spent on things like flood control and grain for starving peasants after there was no flood control and the rivers destroyed everything. The Chinese have an expression, "to eat bitterness" which means that you're a peasant who's totally screwed in life and not going anywhere. This expression is thousands of years old.

      China is just getting back to it's historical place as #1 in the world.
      They never were #1 in the world, they were #1 in China. They simply don't care about the rest of the world, everyone who is not Chinese and one of God's chosen people is a barbarian. Even referring to China as a single nation is disingenuous.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    67. Re:nuts by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Yearning for freedom is a Western cultural concept. Asian cultures, in general, yearn for indolence instead.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    68. Re:nuts by jandersen · · Score: 0, Troll

      .. the Mao years when he murdered tens of millions and the lucky ones merely froze in unheated factories and classrooms

      He must have been a supremely active guy, doing all that single-handedly. It is cheap and easy to sing along on that tune; but it is such a shame, since you are not far from the truth of the matter. As you say, China has made massive progress, especially in recent decades, but even the years under Mao represent progress; the Communists would not have won without him, and China would probably not have made it to the top of the world as an independent nation under Guomindang.

      Mao Zedong is far too often portrayed as a thoroughly evil person, which is nonsense. For one thing, nobody is thoroughly evil - if you can't acknowledge anything good about a person, then you are simply prejudiced. There is no doubt that some of his decisions in later years caused a number of major catastrophes; there is also no doubt that his leadership is what gave the Communists success. Where Guomindang's soldiers treated civilians with contempt and cruelty, the Communists did the opposite and therefore won the support of the people - and so on. If you study China's recent history without prejudice, you will find that Mao deserves at least a large part of the admiration he is regarded with in China; still, he should have left the power to more pragmatic types when the revolution was over. Great revolutionaries are rarely good administrators.

    69. Re:nuts by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Obviously that isn't completely true or you wouldn't hear about things like Tiananmen Square or the purging of the Falun Gong.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    70. Re:nuts by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Not for long, with the sinking dollar.

      Dollar sinks, placing it lower with respect to other global currencies. What happens when you have a low currency? It is cheaper to manufacture goods in that region. Isn't that EXACTLY what China is doing? Keeping their currency artificially low to encourage manufacturing?

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    71. Re:nuts by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      Let me tell you, if that dollar sinks, so does China's growth. Theres a reason why they buy so many reserves of dollars, and it ain't because they like the pictures. They are very dependent on the United States demand for their product.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    72. Re:nuts by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      For one, touched in the head means of diminished mental faculties, usually saying they're stupid, crazy, or both. For two, if you're asking if making ignorant(as in, you admit you don't know) statements based purely on the idea that Asian cultures are the same because the people are located in a large geographical region that you lump together, and the people look similar is quite crazy, and the definition of having an occidental view. That, of course, is stupid because you base your conclusion purely on your inability to distinguish that there may be grand differences between various Asian cultures. It is one of those situations where you should just keep your mouth shut.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    73. Re:nuts by qoncept · · Score: 1

      Sigh.

      Looking at and attempting to identify trends is a tool. You might have heard of it. It's not foolproof, and unfortuntely in this case it made eldavojohn say something. Implying that what the original comment said was racist was pure BS, though.

      I suppose I should have just said what I was really thinking all along, though. eldavojohn is a huge loser that does nothing but sit around on slashdot all day posting a comment carefully crafted to make it look like he has incredible insight to EVERY STORY POSTED.

      By the way, notice that I never claimed the view wasn't occidental. But "occidental", "racist" and "wrong" are all different words with different meanings.

      --
      Whale
    74. Re:nuts by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      Its an unfounded view, you're comparing a gaming trend amongst a very western oriented Asian country(South Korea) with China. If anything some light thought would make you think there would be some great differences there.

      The very existence of a mental block that causes you to associate disparate groups of people due to an occidental view is in direct conflict with the history and cultures of said people.

      The point of the matter is, when you have no idea what you're talking about, and you base unfounded observations on pure occidentalism, you would be much better served by keeping your mouth shut. Contributing bullshit to a conversation in order to make you feel like you have something important to say just makes you look like an asshole.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
  5. Best Plan Ever? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about I develop a game that caters EXACTLY what the Chinese government would like, and then they use their overpowered censorship and propoganda to promote it and only it...

    Question Marks

    Profit?

    1. Re:Best Plan Ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about I develop a game that caters EXACTLY what the Chinese government would like, and then they use their overpowered censorship and propoganda to promote it and only it...

      Question Marks

      Profit?

      sounds like you should get a us patent for that idea... you would hate for anyone else to do it

    2. Re:Best Plan Ever? by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

      How about I develop a game that caters EXACTLY what the Chinese government would like, and then they use their overpowered censorship and propoganda to promote it and only it...

      Question Marks

      Profit?

      That's a very profitable idea but you might want to consult with IBM about how history views those who comply with fascism for monetary return.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    3. Re:Best Plan Ever? by Improv · · Score: 1

      I don't think you know what fascism is if you're suggesting that the Chinese government fits the label.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    4. Re:Best Plan Ever? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      That's a very profitable idea but you might want to consult with IBM [ibmandtheholocaust.com] about how history views those who comply with fascism for monetary return.

      Interesting that you mention a historical example but fail to note the modern-day examples. Yes, I'm looking at you Google, Yahoo, and Cisco.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:Best Plan Ever? by Reason58 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a very profitable idea but you might want to consult with IBM about how history views those who comply with fascism for monetary return.

      I would definitely compare IBM's assistance in identifying, tracking and cataloging people for the Nazis during the Holocaust to PvP restrictions in World of Warcraft.

    6. Re:Best Plan Ever? by Eevee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can assure you that no matter how history views IBM, it hasn't affected IBM's stock prices one bit.

    7. Re:Best Plan Ever? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call providing hardware to assiting.

      Does Google assist in every crime someone does using a gmail address?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Best Plan Ever? by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I disagree with your assertion. China, with its definite nationalism and its growing corporatism, really is starting to look a lot more National Socialist than socialist. There are some facets of historical fascism that China does not match, but not even all of the reputedly fascist regimes had all of those facets. For instance, strong racism was more of a specialization of Nazi Germany. Fascist states likely Italy and Vichy France, pretty much followed the German lead on racism. Spanish fascism was much less racial and more of a religious/corporatist alliance.

      The great hallmarks of fascism are totalitarianism, nationalism and coordination of the economy by cooperating with big business instead of taking it over. There is also a concept of strength being its own goal. China does not really have a long history of corporations like the West does, but once it does have this sort of basis, it could well turn into something very close to the structure of the fascist countries of the 20th Century. Certainly, China is very much looking to increase its strength in as many ways as possible, and is certainly not against doing so at the expense of other nations.

      Needless to say, with a country as big as China and the fact that it is rapidly becoming a gigantic market that the old fascist countries could never dream of being, China's system may well merit its own label, but I think fascist is certainly a more accurate term than communist, or even socialist. After all, as someone pointed, there are socialist states and parties that are democratic and not overly nationalist.

    9. Re:Best Plan Ever? by B1oodAnge1 · · Score: 1

      I don't think you know what fascism is if you're suggesting that the Chinese government fits the label.

      According to Wikipedia:
      Fascism is a political ideology that seeks to combine radical and authoritarian nationalism with a corporatist economic system... Fascists believe that nations and/or races are in perpetual conflict whereby only the strong can survive by being healthy, vital, and by asserting themselves in conflict against the weak.

      Well?

      --
      RUGBYRUGBYRUGBY
    10. Re:Best Plan Ever? by Improv · · Score: 1

      Well what? That's an inadequately brief description, but it still doesn't come even close to fitting China.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    11. Re:Best Plan Ever? by Improv · · Score: 1

      There's no concept of the Volk, none of the imaginary past and an appeal to a spiritualist return, nothing resembling the philosophical background that underlay Fascism. Fascism had interesting tensions between Romantic philosophers (particularly Herder), it was an explicit reaction against Enlightenment-type thinking and modernity and it was very backwards-looking.

      I don't think being corporatist and not lassiez-faire in the western sense even puts China in the same ballpark as Fascist philosophy. China doesn't actually care a lot about what its people think and it's not trying to mold them, except to the extent that it wants to maintain the current political order. Anytime you see repression, you can trace it back to the leadership staving off a threat before it becomes threatening. Most of my (western) friends who have been to China describe it as being "differently free" than Western society - in many aspects business and personal liberties are greater than in most parts of the West (for better or worse).

      I agree with you that it no longer should be considered communist or socialist - since Deng Xiaopeng, what was once a non-orthodox Marxist country has left socialism far behind. It probably merits a description like "mixed-market oligarchy".

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    12. Re:Best Plan Ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No concept of folk? No concept of a rich history, a long period where the nation was powerful and respected, of golden ages long past, and conservative philosophy to be rediscovered and put into action once more? No movement against liberal thinking (ahem, Tienanmen Square?).

      China not trying to mold its citizens, "except to the extent that it wants to maintain the current political order?" Good grief, that's the whole problem, RIGHT THERE. The social conservatives are more deeply entrenched and more widely accepted there than any AM-radio blowhard could dream of in the West. Plus, anti-establishment activists there get to go to jail. Their search engines block, among other things, searches for the word "democracy" as if it's something worthy of censure.

      If you want to talk about glorious freedom, you've got to be talking about freedom for the rich, not the masses; the peasant class is massively repressed, and the working class is kept in strict control as well. Due process isn't any sort of a reliable thing, and executions, which are at the very least three times more common per capita than in the United States -- the accurate figures are a state secret -- usually get pushed through in local courts in very short order.

      You, sir, are a loon. Call China whatever you want, but it's doing everything it can to expand itself via an authoritarian regime. Calling it a free place to live is outright madness. You bet your incisors it's "differently free." As in, not very much.

    13. Re:Best Plan Ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, they came for the PKers, and I did not speak up, because I played on blue servers.

      Then, they came for the RPers, and I did not speak up, because I laughed at the great funeral raid of '06.

      Then, they came in with chat restrictions, and I did not speak up, because I didn't talk politics in my guild chat.

      Then, they came for the admins, and I did not speak up, because the one I petitioned didn't help me finish that bugged quest several months back.

      Then, they crippled WoW out of existence in order to prop up their own crappy-arse derivative mmo, and there was nobody left to speak up for me, the developers, or the players. ...

      It IS a matter of scale, but China's also known for its careful tracking of the working class, its monitoring and repression of various speech forums, its heavy-handed Internet censorship, and its severe punishment of dissidents, as well as for encouraging corporate espionage, engaging in heavy protectionism, and for involvement in a number of predatory investment practices. This is one very tiny front in a very big, so-far-cold, so-far-economic conflict. Ignoring the wee saplings at the edge of the forest lets the great woody expanse grow ever more broad and tall. A government has no freaking business forcing games, or books, or blogs, or newspapers, or local politicians, or educators to universally, unquestioningly, and vociferously promote their flavor of goodthink.

  6. All about palm greasing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These new rules sound like the are all about setting up the bureaucracy to ensure the state, and various officials, are getting their cut of your success.

    1. Re:All about palm greasing by boldtbanan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mod parent up. This law is basically saying "You must hit all of these subjective benchmarks." That's code for "You must pay us enough money to agree that you are hitting all of these subjective benchmarks."

      Laws are rarely about what's good for the people. They're usually about what's good for the lawmakers. Occasionally the two coincide.

    2. Re:All about palm greasing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laws are about what's good for the people. They're usually good for the lawmakers. the two coincide.

      Your statement has been approved by the ministry of culture. Please post to Slashdot.

    3. Re:All about palm greasing by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Don't underestimate the sincerity of people who legislate "socialist values" in China. Many of those people actually mean what they say. The Party remains in power by providing a harmonious society. Which is to say, standards of moral and ethical values. In fact, history shows that China gets restive when they get the feeling that top-down control is *not* being applied to solve problems. That's what happens when an Emperor and the imperial bureaucracy is the central focus of your society for about 3000 years.

      That's not to say that profit is not to be made on such laws, but these laws have their own purpose, above and beyond simply being cynical bids for bribery. Even if there was no profit to be made on them, they would still make these laws.

    4. Re:All about palm greasing by B1oodAnge1 · · Score: 1

      Occasionally the two coincide.

      [Citation Needed]

      --
      RUGBYRUGBYRUGBY
    5. Re:All about palm greasing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It actually started about 2000 years ago when the first emperor of China united the seven kingdoms. It must've felt like such a great feat that he wanted his dynasty to last forever. His idea was to ban all schools of thoughts but only one, that was whatever was endorsed by the emperor. To achieve that, he burned many books and buried alive many scholars. What the Chinese government is doing now is just the modern day version of the same kind of oppression. But the goal is the same.

      Anyone who says that the Chinese people wanted to be controlled does not understand that a so called "harmonious society" (you do know what that means?) has be to enforced by dictating how the people think, sometimes by violence.

      I think the political development in Taiwan is a good model for mainland China as well. It just shows it's not impossible to introduce democracy into the Chinese culture.

  7. Least of their worries by mikeljnola · · Score: 1

    It seems like trouble taking video games to market is the least of the Chinese people's worries regarding use of technology.

  8. And everybody thought ... by d'baba · · Score: 1
    Apple was bad.

    ---
    Hypertext isn't what it's marked up to be

    1. Re:And everybody thought ... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Maybe Apple and China should merge, eh?

      The Great Wall would have white, silver, translucency, and be slicky smooth.

    2. Re:And everybody thought ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would've modded you insightful, but I already posted on this article.

      The mentality of the Apple user resembles that of the chinese people.

      You give your freedom away in exchange for something. For the chinese, it's their life; for the Apple users, arty-farty-ness.

  9. Fuck china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let them go to hell. fuckwads.

  10. Huge Market, really? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is a software market in China? I mean one that generatess actual money, and doesn't just pirate everything?

    I guess 2% of a billion is a pretty big number.

    1. Re:Huge Market, really? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      If the Chinese consumer was anything like the U.S. consumer I would think this was another cloaked embargo/tariff and argue we should try our luck with the WTO. However, they're not. Most are pretty close to slave status which is why it's so hard for U.S. labor to compete with them.

      I'll lean more toward the government corruption angle.

    2. Re:Huge Market, really? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Depends if you consider "20 million" a big number. In most contexts, yes it is.

  11. They ignore one thing by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    ...none of those regulations apply to their goldfarming services targeted to large First World markets.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:They ignore one thing by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Of course, the gold farmers aren't having fun.

  12. People's Revolt of China by paradochs · · Score: 1

    If enough companies/games don't attempt to penetrate the Chinese market due to the ridiculous red tape and censoring, maybe the people will get upset enough to do something about it!

    1. Re:People's Revolt of China by invalid_user · · Score: 1

      If any company dare to not attempt to penetrate the Chinese market, it is sure to be severely punished in Wall Street.

      The effects on Wall Street is so short-sighted and over-reacted it won't be able to survive 2 quarters.

      Traders = America's biggest problems. Not chinese.

  13. Time to shelve Pac Mao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, not only do I have to get past the App Store but I have to get past Chinese censors. Just isn't worth it.

  14. Re:lol by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    By "take games seriously" are you referring to the people in their 20s that still spend all their spare time playing games? They need to grow up?

    Or do you mean the people that think games have are extremely influential on people... you think they need to grow up?

    Whether or not PvP is good or bad is one argument, but arguing that games don't really influence people is ridiculous. If nothing else, it consumes their time, for better or worse. Games - and all entertainment - is not a neutral activity, just as reading a book isn't. Movies, games, and books (and TV, radio, etc) all influence people; game creators, movie producers, and authors can push behaviors, points, agendas, etc. It's not the medium that makes something "neutral" or non-influential.

  15. How to enhance socialist values in games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. If you are playing the Call of Duty campaign and you pick up an ammo pack, you only get 1/10 of the ammo and the rest go to your NPC squadmates. If you point out that they are idiotic clowns that never pick up ammo to give to you in return, it's "Game Over" as you are sent to a reeducation camp to rid you of your bourgeoiseity.

    2. In Resident Evil, all the money you collect to buy items will instead be melted down to produce a golden plow. Instead, which weapons you get in the store depends on how badly you have played before. If you want that rocket launcher, you had better get shot up quite a bit before you visit. Make sure you drop those health packs behind a corner.

    3. In Betrayal at Krondor, if you haggle too much with a merchant, you are seeking to exploit your position of privilege to subdue to rights of the worker, and the labour union of every store on the world map will make their merchants refuse to sell to you.

    4. In Super Mario Bros., there's no point in playing, because the princess gets her just dessert after gorging on the paltry meals of the people. The revised edition has Bowser wear a top hat, and you are saving a revolutionary songwriter.

    5. In Zelda, you can only play the game once a year. This is because everyone in the game must take a turn in being allowed to use the sword, which is the only sword in existence. It is bourgeoise to claim that just because your parents were such-and-such, and you found a sword that someone else left in the forest, you should be allowed to keep it away from being shared with the people.

    6. In Harvest Moon, the amount of money you get allocated will be lower the more you produce. This is because everyone should give according to ability and receive according to need, and since you obviously dig like a freaking maniac while nobody else in the village does, you have just proved that you are able to dig like a freaking maniac which nobody else has. Since you were a capitalist before, it should be expected that you conceal part of the produce.

    1. Re:How to enhance socialist values in games by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      sorry to talk semantics, but that those most of those are more about Communist values, not necessarily socialist values.

      Still funny, though.

    2. Re:How to enhance socialist values in games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're talking typical theory, socialism is simply a transitionary stage towards communism.

      Reality appears to correspond to this, as in every socialist nation, more steps are taken to move closer to communism than to move away from it. This includes redefining language (e.g. "fair" is everything that moves closer to communism; "social taxes" are taxes that create a situation closer to communism whereas "antisocial" taxes are everything else) for its purpose.

      Clever marxists call themselves socialists and recognise that you can keep a situation where everyone gets a different SALARY, so long as the majority of their EXPENSES are in an approximate fixed ratio to their salary. For example, if you earn little you have zero taxes and get living and health expenses covered; if you earn more you pay a lot of taxes and have higher expenses. That the US is far from this today, much further than Europe, isn't relevant for a discussion of where the ultimate goal lies.

      In fact, I would challenge any "socialist" to define a steady-state socialist society that differs materially in its everyday life from communistic theory as prescribed by any of the typical, recognised Marxists, and how this steady-state socialist society actively refutes aspects of communistic theory. I don't think they will be able to.

      Still funny in spite of the obfuscation though.

    3. Re:How to enhance socialist values in games by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

      7. The Zerg are recast as the good guys in StarCraft.

      8. Civilization...*roll-eyes*.

      9. There'll be a different, and much harsher, response to disabling surveillance-cameras in Splinter Cell.

      10. In the GTA-series the police will have a 7th star that, if reached, launches a nuke at you. You die while being informed "unfortunately your family got caught in the blast too".

      11. Also in GTA, tanks will auto-dodge pedestrians.

      12. In sportsgames you'll lose at anything, except gymnastics and tabletennis.

      13. Health-kits in various games will become extremely difficult to find as they're now rice-seeds instead of steaks.

      14. Speaking of health, you don't lose health, you lose face *badabing*.


      16. All terrorists in various games wear yellow suits and move veeeery slowly when they attack.

      --
      If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
    4. Re:How to enhance socialist values in games by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're talking typical theory, socialism is simply a transitionary stage towards communism.

            Canada and Sweden prove you wrong. Both countries have very strong social values (incredibly high income tax, many other taxes, amazing benefits for the unemployed/unemployable, subsidized health care, education, etc). Neither country is on the verge of turning "communist" any time soon.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:How to enhance socialist values in games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you write is easily shown to be based on flawed assumptions. I can only speak for Sweden - there has been a significant backlash there against the socialist policies of the government, and in part the socialist vision has been obscured there by migration not going as planned. Refer for example to this:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweden_Democrats

      The trend from the socialist parties (that is - self-described socialists) is still seeking a greater and greater degree of government involvement, flatter and flatter spending power. Read their manifestos yourself. Sweden is one of the countries I specifically refer to when I mention redefinition of language - ask a Swede what a "social tax" is, and the definition will be identical to how anyone would define a "socialist tax".

      My challenge, by the way, for socialists to define an "end-result" "steady-state" society (or as close to such a definition as you can come in a changing world) that differs markedly from communism in very noticable ways obviously wasn't palatable to you either. For example, what should the highest income tax rate be in a perfect socialist society? Should there be an absolute cap on salaries? No socialist movement is willing to take any view on such questions, because they are ideologically identical to "communists-with-a-velvet-glove" and would be unable to think of or committ to anything that wouldn't brand them as communists. Otherwise they would have found such a view very easy to take.

    6. Re:How to enhance socialist values in games by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      The trend from the socialist parties (that is - self-described socialists) is still seeking a greater and greater degree of government involvement

            This is a feature of government - ANY government. Not just socialist or communist ones. Heh, just look at the US. All you need is time, and the government will grow, and screw the people it's supposed to represent. Because a government is a parasite. It LIVES off the back of the people. And in the name of "the common good" it sucks out more and more blood, until "the people" die in an oppressive society that ends up being "liberated" by someone else or collapses under economic failure, or the "government" dies in a revolution. Then after a brief happy period of weak government, the whole cycle starts again.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:How to enhance socialist values in games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, it depends. Of course, it's pretty possible to ask why the governments of the western world haven't filled 100% even given time to grow over the last thousands of years. There's plenty of powers on both sides typically: from anti-government you have opposition to 100% taxes (historically from somewhat wealthy and powerful people), basic economic realities in a trade-based society (power is wealth is production is physical initiatives is anathema to desk work), power struggles which lead to fragmentation, and a few liberal philosophers. From pro-government you have the desire to grow (by the government), the desire for safety (by the people), and I would argue an _absolute_ tendency towards larger governments, stemming from higher material wealth (which means that the distance to zero gets awfully large and people want protection from this) and a more and more specialised working life (meaning that productive value is generated by a smaller and smaller segment of society elite, so everyone else needs to be tax-funded to get a job). Depending on the power of each, governments might stay away from 100% size.

      Whether in addition to this you want a flat spending power and removal of differentiated wages and the possibility to own other people's means of production is another story. In my view the "clever marxists" of today have not only realised that their goals can be attained 100% by simply fixing the income/expenditure ratio, but also that the entire "removal of ownership of means of production" goal can be attained by universally very strong labour unions - if a labour union can at all times push for a wage that extracts 100% of potential profits from the owners under all economic circumstances, you're achieved the goal right there. All the fruits of labour go to the workers, none to the owners, and wealth becomes unable to produce more wealth.

    8. Re:How to enhance socialist values in games by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      10. In the GTA-series the police will have a 7th star that, if reached, launches a nuke at you. You die while being informed "unfortunately your family got caught in the blast too".

      So far as I'm aware, the use of nuclear weapons against human beings is something no Socialist state has ever done.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  16. Not so fast, sinophile. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    . If there is any single market in the world that's worth it, it's the United States of America.

    FIFY.

    Other industry has been there, done that. Car manufacturers all knew after the initial surprises that if they open a factory in China, their blueprints will be copied and another chinese factory somewhere else will produce the same cars for a cheaper price. Some stayed out of China for that reason.

    Good reason to stay out of a Second(Russia) World or Third World country(China/India/Brazil) and manufacture in a First World(US/UK/Pre-Expansion EU) one.

    Besides, you're selling largely to party bosses anyway. The rest are just junk-grade copies.

    Frankly, ten years from now, game developers will probably wonder whether it's worth the trouble anymore translating their games for the US market.

    They will translate for the US and it won't be a second-rate job. End of story.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Not so fast, sinophile. by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      You're still running a RS/6000? The rest of the world moved to the P Series years ago.
      http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/p/

      Get with the times already :)

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
  17. With all the rules and regulations they have.... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You could make a video game of getting guy developing and publishing a video game in China.

    Oh the Onion'y of it all.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  18. Just pay the bribe... by Amezick · · Score: 1

    Anyone but me recognize this as an EXCELLENT opportunity for these "specialists" to get paid? This IS China we are talking about.

  19. Its not a gamble. It just means you're a sellout. by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

    Any respectable company should boycott the Chinese market over this. It isn't a gamble to sell games to china that meet their criteria, however it does mean that you sold out your conscience for more profits. Personally I'd refuse to make changes from a piece of artwork to appease the establishment.

  20. Bribes by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Informative

    The funny thing is, by reading Slashdot, one gets the impression that the CCP (and thus the gummint) has clamped down on everything.

    Yet, I know people who travel there regularly and they state, you can get anything you want as long as you know where to go or who to talk to. Much is readily available in stores which is supposedly banned.

    China may pass laws, but the enforcement is a whole different matter.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Bribes by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So it's just like everywhere else, rules and regulations apply, unless you're wealthy enough?

      Umm... help me a bit, I'm confused, are that socialist or capitalist values again?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Bribes by longfalcon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you're kidding right?

      Bribery and corruption are accepted in many Eastern (and Middle Eastern) cultures. everyone does it, and if you don't, you don't get to play.

      when someone tries the same thing in the US or Europe, they always end up facing charges or at the very least looking for work somewhere else. if money buys immunity, then why did Enron, Worldcom, Madoff, etc. all end up prosecuted?

    3. Re:Bribes by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So it's like our country - tons of laws that are rarely enforced, until the politicians decide to "make an example" of someone and then they use those laws to arrest anyone they desire to arrest, because we're ALL guilty to breaking at least one law. China's more like us than different.

      BTW, why isn't China bankrupt yet? Perhaps it's because they watched the Soviet Union communist government fall, and they decided to evolve into a fascist state (privately-owned capitalist companies, but with strict centralized control).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    4. Re:Bribes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, capitalist or socialist, we need an occasional 'demon' of a scapegoat to prove our system is working.

    5. Re:Bribes by sukotto · · Score: 1

      Because it would be political suicide to let those particular ones go?

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    6. Re:Bribes by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Many reasons. They did not get involved in an Arms race to the same extent and their income comes from more diverse sources than the USSR's did are two good reasons. And of course, like you said, they've implemented levels of capitalism.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    7. Re:Bribes by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Informative


      There's a few sad exceptions I know of - all to do with the British arms industry. Last year, BAE was being investigated for bribery to a Saudi Prince (well known corrupt tosser Prince Bandar, but the British Government intervened directly to halt the investigation. Everybody and their dog knows that BAE are guilty - and the bribes amount to US$2bn. TheNew Labour government would eat poo if BAE Systems told them to. They have no pride where that company is concerned.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    8. Re:Bribes by ajs · · Score: 1

      you're kidding right?

      Bribery and corruption are accepted in many Eastern (and Middle Eastern) cultures. everyone does it, and if you don't, you don't get to play.

      when someone tries the same thing in the US or Europe, they always end up facing charges or at the very least looking for work somewhere else. if money buys immunity, then why did Enron, Worldcom, Madoff, etc. all end up prosecuted?

      The question you need to be asking is, if Enron, Wolrldcom, Madoff, etc. all came to light after years of milking their employees/stockholders/investors/etc., how many haven't come to light? What percentage of the scams do those represent?

      Your statement is a bit like saying, "my anti-virus software says it found and removed 3 viruses. It's just lucky for me that there were only 3 there to discover! Now, I'm safe."

      The correct take on bribery is that Western cultures have reached a relatively stable point where the amount of bribery and corruption is just small enough that it doesn't typically do to our economy what it just did over the past 2 years.

    9. Re:Bribes by ajs · · Score: 1

      This is the problem with MMOs overseas. They represent an organization which can be interacted with. It's widely accepted that once a product is out, its distribution can only be limited, not eliminated, but a company that's selling ongoing services can be forced to comply with regulations or simply shut down. Centralization is failure when it comes to dealing with repression.

      Perhaps it's time for me to dig up and re-think my decentralized MMO idea....

    10. Re:Bribes by longfalcon · · Score: 1

      you're kidding right?

      Bribery and corruption are accepted in many Eastern (and Middle Eastern) cultures. everyone does it, and if you don't, you don't get to play.

      when someone tries the same thing in the US or Europe, they always end up facing charges or at the very least looking for work somewhere else. if money buys immunity, then why did Enron, Worldcom, Madoff, etc. all end up prosecuted?

      The question you need to be asking is, if Enron, Wolrldcom, Madoff, etc. all came to light after years of milking their employees/stockholders/investors/etc., how many haven't come to light? What percentage of the scams do those represent?

      Your statement is a bit like saying, "my anti-virus software says it found and removed 3 viruses. It's just lucky for me that there were only 3 there to discover! Now, I'm safe."

      The correct take on bribery is that Western cultures have reached a relatively stable point where the amount of bribery and corruption is just small enough that it doesn't typically do to our economy what it just did over the past 2 years.

      those are merely the public ones. cases too small to make the national news happen all the time. people will always cheat and attempt to bribe officials to get ahead.

      my point is that as a culture, the West as made an effort to rein in these abuses by the rule of law, as it makes our economy a less-dangerous place to do business than, say, a country that will nullify your contracts if you don't grease the right palm.

      in the US, we prosecute bribery and corruption. in China the government arguably is run through bribery and corruption.

      i must caveat my post by saying that what we call "corruption" was the dominant business model around the world for a very, very long time (Renaissance Italy comes to mind). it is a recent luxury to have economic environment like we do.

    11. Re:Bribes by ajs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      my point is that as a culture, the West as made an effort to rein in these abuses by the rule of law, as it makes our economy a less-dangerous place to do business than, say, a country that will nullify your contracts

      You have an overly optimistic or perhaps an overly localized view. Is it perhaps the case that you are inured to the ritualized abuse that we engage in as a matter of course?

      Do you work for a company that employs lobbyists? Does your company comply with certification requirements by "working with" regulatory agencies to craft inspection guidelines? Do you think that money among other considerations doesn't get exchanged? Do you think it only happens in small quantities? Do you wonder how one goes about getting the best contracts with U.S. government interests overseas? Have you ever seen a company's executive management go through an IPO? Do you think that that process is not an outright manipulation of the market, favoring only a small faction of the largest investors in order to concentrate and maintain their position of wealth and power?

      We do have a more open system than some. We have a far more corrupt system that institutionalizes bribery than others.

    12. Re:Bribes by nidarus · · Score: 1

      Nothing's perfect, but scale matters.

      Saying that the west is as corrupt as China, means that when the west will actually become as corrupt as China, you'd have no problem with it.

      Such cynicism might make you look cool, but it's just lazy.

    13. Re:Bribes by longfalcon · · Score: 1

      what are you comparing us to?

      it sounds to me like you are a bit idealistic. you may not like the way the regulations are around IPO's but at least we make an attempt to follow them.

    14. Re:Bribes by ae1294 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      when someone tries the same thing in the US or Europe, they always end up facing charges or at the very least looking for work somewhere else. if money buys immunity, then why did Enron, Worldcom, Madoff, etc. all end up prosecuted?

      Madoff? REALLY are you that brainwashed? Do you have any idea how long that man was stealing money? The only reason ANYTHING happened to him was because of the crash.

      Enron? EVIL CEO Skilling is being held in a low-security prison in Englewood, Colorado. Enron's bankruptcy in 2001 eliminated more than 5,000 jobs and $1 billion in employee retirement funds. Skilling was sentenced to 24 years and 4 months but that's being reduced sloowly now that no one is paying attention. I think it's now down to 15 years after an appeal. 15 years in club fed translates into what? 7 years? He'll be out and cashing in his hidden assets before you make 1/10,000 of it and all he had to do was spend a few years kicking back and watching TV? HA count me in!

      You really should start making a list and checking up every year or so after the news has stopped caring.. Honestly that is a great idea for a website.. Hell maybe I will make one. It could be the next google.... Anyone wanna give me some startup money? I'll triple it within a year! Promise...

      As far as the rest. Do your own damn googling... I know you wont and even if you do have these people get out with no one ever even noticing.

      Keep living in your fairytale land where everyone gets a fair trail and justice is always severed. It must be a nice delusion, hell, maybe it's all those anti-depressants or something in those TV-dinners... Yumm...

    15. Re:Bribes by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      bravo. I get tired of everyone making arguments about a=b because situations occur in both places, ignoring quantity, quality, or even intention.

    16. Re:Bribes by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      my point is that as a culture, the West as made an effort to rein in these abuses by the rule of law, as it makes our economy a less-dangerous place to do business than, say, a country that will nullify your contracts if you don't grease the right palm.

      Guess you didn't have any money in the stock market in the last few years hu? The US economy came apart and the only reason why it wasn't worse than it has been is because we dragged everyone else down with us. Honestly China has been lending us money hand over fist... where do you think they are getting it from if there economy is so unstable? I mean sure if they didn't use slave labor and treat most of there people like crap they wouldn't be doing as great but hey who are we to judge? I wasn't around in the 60s but I hear black people where still being lynched for looking at a white women wrong... but I guess 50 years is a really long time and nothing odd or bad has happened since... I mean our government stopped spying on us and it's not like pedophiles aren't the new nigger or anything...

    17. Re:Bribes by longfalcon · · Score: 1

      bold type? check.
      caps? check.
      using the word "sheeple"? well. two out of three ain't bad.

      dude i think someone put something in your food...

      i'd point out that i never said the US was a law-abiding paradise, but i bet it would do no use. even a high school student knows that only an idiot thinks that everyone gets a "fair trail" in the US, let alone other countries. i guess i figured that the average slashdot reader was mature enough to know that no political system is perfect as long as people are involved.

    18. Re:Bribes by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Mocking bold - check
      Mocking caps - check
      You're doing it wrong - check
      Mental ill comment - +1, indirect
      Back peddling - check
      You're poorly Edumcated statement - check

      Wow your good

    19. Re:Bribes by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The biggest difference between bribery and corruption in China and in the West. When the finally do prosecute the people who took bribes and corrupted government they also pursue those people who paid the bribes, in fact the greater focus is on the one paying the bribe. In China where corruption charges are largely driven by politics (the majority are corrupt when your out of favour, you just get convicted for it) the people paying the bribes are pretty much forgotten about.

      As for China being a large market, that is a delusion, it might be a populace market but when you wages are cents on the dollar compared to western wages, that $40 game even when your forced to work a twelve hour day 6 days a week, is a whole lot of money letting alone dumping on top the cost of hardware and for online stuff and network connections.

      Which is why those in control of the corporo-fascist power structure like to so fiercely protect what little there is of it. China's market is pure and simple the ruthless exploitation of it's work force and environment in which they live and, this will continue until it collapse under the socio-economic and environmental pressures.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    20. Re:Bribes by orngjce223 · · Score: 1

      Making a list with "check" at the end of each statement - check
      Mocking mocking - check
      Misspellings - check
      Use of the word "edumacated" - check
      Bad grammar - check
      Use of +1 - check

      --
      Note: I was 13 when I wrote most of this. Take with several grains of salt.
    21. Re:Bribes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if money buys immunity, then why did Enron, Worldcom, Madoff, etc. all end up prosecuted?

      uhm... because they ran out of money?

    22. Re:Bribes by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Because they pissed off the wrong people. That's especially visible in the case of Madoff. He took the money of important people and squandered it. If he did the same from ordinary bank customers, he'd have gotten a bailout instead.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:Bribes by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Use of +1 - check

      Hey a girl on Slashdot, NEAT! Wow, like, I'm really talking with a real life girl... for like the first time EVER!!!! Do you wanna date my avatar???

      look... You don't like what I gotta say then just ignore it or hell better yet point out the errors. If you think I care what some random /.'er has to say then you're right... But only because it's depressing to point out valid points that are at least based on a quick google double check to only get an "OMG your some nut job" response.

      Honestly can you really say that even 24 years in jail is fair for these people? You should know they give people 30 years for a lot less and for things that don't really hurt anyone... Really I'm begging you as a nut job freak... save me... explain to me how our system is balanced because I just can't figure it out for myself because, well, I'm crazy...

    24. Re:Bribes by Labcoat+Samurai · · Score: 1

      Hey a girl on Slashdot, NEAT! Wow, like, I'm really talking with a real life girl... for like the first time EVER!!!! Do you wanna date my avatar???

      Hey, a creep on slashdot...

    25. Re:Bribes by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Hey a girl on Slashdot, NEAT! Wow, like, I'm really talking with a real life girl... for like the first time EVER!!!! Do you wanna date my avatar???

      Hey, a creep on slashdot...

      Really??? Claiming that I've never talked to a real life girl makes me a creep? Interesting take on my message as it must have lost something when converted to binary and back...

  21. Now, if only... by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

    Now, if we can only get Jack Thompson to learn Chinese and move to Beijing, we could finally get him out of our hair and inflict him on someone else. It would be a career move in keeping with his past "crusades". Of course, the Chinese may consider such a move an act of war.

    1. Re:Now, if only... by shentino · · Score: 1

      Nope, he'll just get taken by the thought police and made to vanish.

  22. Blah blah blah from the government by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I suppose y'all should have figured it out by now, but if not I'll spell it out and use small words. The Chinese government loves to pass new laws and announce new strategies. There is usually great fanfare, the press bleating like the contemptible sheep they are (the Chinese state-controlled press bleats too) and great discussions on the net as millions of electrons give their last and break up into neutrinos and photons. Then, six months later, nobody has heard of the act or law or whatever, because it's not enforced. This is the "secret" (pretty freaking obvious) of the Chinese government.

    They want you to be in violation of something. With all the legislation, it is impossible to comply with every single law without driving yourself out of business. Everyone knows it, and the Chinese government (at central, provincial, city, and district levels, which are all different and have little relation with each other) knows it too. They like knowing that they can shut you down at any time, but are usually content to let things go as long as you play ball. This kind of ball-play can be laissez faire for years or it can be an "I am altering the deal, pray I don't alter it further" kind of situation. You really have no way of knowing how it will turn out, and the government likes it like that. This is why it's so important to have buddies in government who can warn you of upcoming problems or give you some lamb's blood to mark yourself so the inspectors pass you over. I had one high muckety-muck vice-director of the municipal propaganda ministry hold my product in his hand as if he were weighing it, and said it was about 80% legal. I couldn't puzzle it out, either it's legal or illegal, how can legality be a percentage, and a guess at that! Later I got it...I felt pretty dumb. It was obvious, only my cultural blinders kept me from seeing it.

    And to those of you who are already hitting "reply" to say "durr, just like my country only my country is much worse", do you have a ministry of culture whose job it is to enhance socialist values? With lawyers and truncheons if necessary? You can joke all you like about capitalism taking over but there are plenty of true-believer Mao-worshipping socialists in the government.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Blah blah blah from the government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can joke all you like about capitalism taking over but there are plenty of true-believer Mao-worshipping socialists in the government.

      I know, we elected him and his cronies back in 2008.

    2. Re:Blah blah blah from the government by gedrin · · Score: 1

      Apparently I will soon have a Ministry of Culture controlling the content of my entertainment to enhance socialist values. Welcome to the People's Republic of Stormwind.

      --
      Moderation : -1 Conservative Viewpoint
    3. Re:Blah blah blah from the government by tpg0007 · · Score: 1

      This guy's got the right idea. What's said is totally different from what's done in China. It's like that with a lot of world governments to be sure, but still the prevalence makes a difference. MMOs because they're more resistant to piracy are the big slice of China's domestic game industry. Most of them have ads that put the infamous Civony to shame.

    4. Re:Blah blah blah from the government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it is happening in the U.S.

      "Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it... There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Reardon, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be
      much easier to deal with." Ayn Rand - 'Atlas Shrugged' 1957

    5. Re:Blah blah blah from the government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much what goes on in the good ol' U.S.A.

    6. Re:Blah blah blah from the government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      durr, just like my country only my country is much worse

    7. Re:Blah blah blah from the government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly right.

      I write for an English-language free magazine in a provincial city in China. The magazine is plainly illegal. Chinese rules on publications are rather strict, requiring a special publication authorization number, to start; the publisher looked into getting one, but being unable to do so, just ignores the regulations. He has been publishing for more than four years now. As long as he doesn't get too big, or do something controversial, the local government (which is almost always responsible for enforcement) is content to ignore him. I don't pretend to know how the Chinese government thinks but what DNS-and-BIND said above is the consensus understanding.

      Oh, and second to the comment about Chinese mercantile policy history above. I believe at one point Condi Rice to her counterparts in the Chinese government called their policies mercantilism to their faces, and their reaction was, basically, uh-huh.

  23. Desireable means their profit and agenda first. by Bob_Who · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its called a dogmatic National Interest. Welcom to international super power politics and self interest. Its how we all feel indignantly justified in our ethnocentric human nature. If the media is from a "foreign" undesirable culture then please feel free to steal it since we won't let you buy it, and you are a criminal anyway. But the legitimate stuff that they sell, first and foremost. America just can't seem to wrap their minds around the fact that China, the most populous nation by far, is not a democracy. If it we're, they'd out vote us every time. Which is exactly how they handle us anyway. Its like trying to push a sleepy grumpy Yak up a mountain with a twig. Moooooo.

    1. Re:Desireable means their profit and agenda first. by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Its like trying to push a sleepy grumpy Yak up a mountain with a twig. Moooooo.

      It depends on what you do with that twig. Yaks aren't so very bright, you know.

  24. Don't let developers become part of the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The gaming rules make the games part of the communism enforcement machine. This is different than car manufacturing or tupperware. Saying you have to have communism party values in the game enforces this oppressive behavior. Then the developer becomes part of the problem. Don't let $$$ be a motivation for oppression.

  25. Is it still worth releasing games in China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I was a U.S. game shop I probably wouldn't even consider releasing in China. Does China really generate that much revenue to make it worthwhile?

  26. That's the China fallacy by Xaedalus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "China's going to be a HUGE market!" is the China fallacy, which operates with the assumption that consumers in China are like consumers elsewhere, and that as soon as they get money they will become a gold mine.

    That is a fallacy that's been going on for three to four hundred plus years, and contributed directly to the downfall of the Qing Emperor, the Open Door policy, and all the other problems that China's been trying to recover from for the last hundred years. See, China's culture is very nationalistic and one of their flaws is that they believe they are the center of the Earth. In the mercantile age, that meant that China always exported its goods but would only accept silver from the West because western goods were always seen as 'inferior'. It almost bankrupted the British Empire, and did significant economic damage to the other Western countries, so they retaliated by basically taking over China's ports (and the whole country) to boot.

    To assume that once THIS happens then China will open up to the West is wrong. China will continue what it's doing right now with the currency, and with it's trade policies: accepting money (in the form of Treasury debt and other convertibles) and exporting its goods without buying our goods, because they do not want to be 'dependent' on us. This is at the heart of the Chinese currency manipulation problem - that China is doing exactly what it did 200+ years ago - hoarding monetary assets while not accepting imports from us and slowly bankrupting us. They're not doing it out of spite, they're doing it because to them, all other countries and cultures are 'inferior' to a degree and they want to be the center of the world - and the center never accepts help from the edges.

    That's why the best route for developers is to ignore China. Don't buy into the fallacy, because then you force China to accept your goods, and in doing so, you fix the imbalance.

    --
    Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    1. Re:That's the China fallacy by abigor · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, a post from someone with actual historical perspective. Well done. So many people think today's international problems are somehow new, like the world was just invented yesterday. There is nothing new under the sun.

    2. Re:That's the China fallacy by kklein · · Score: 2, Informative

      Someone else knows Chinese history!!!

      Yes, to everything you said. Just a little low-hanging fruit that you missed (but probably know), though:

      China doesn't just believe they are the center of the Earth; that's what the country is named. Westerners often wax quaint and endearing to the "Middle Kingdom," but that first character can mean "middle," but here it means "central." It isn't "Middle Kingdom;" it's "Central Nation!"

      The emperor used to make Western envoys dance for his pleasure to secure trade contracts. All these European trade ministers in the court, trying to dance around and amuse the emperor more than the last... And we're still doing it.

      The only chance the West would have ever had to have fair dealings with China would have been if we let Japan take it over. Now, I'm not saying we should have done that (we were right to stop them, of course), but it might have made more sense from a business perspective.

    3. Re:That's the China fallacy by crf00 · · Score: 1

      Xaedalus I very agree with what you said and thanks for the insight. I am interested to research further into your proposition. Can you provide me sources that support your arguments? Thanks.

    4. Re:That's the China fallacy by Xaedalus · · Score: 1

      Well, that'll force me to dig out all my old college textbooks ;-)

      So, a good place to start would be by researching the Open Door policy on Wikipedia to get an idea of what it was. The original policy was actually set in Berlin with regards to the Congo basin, but the US adapted it to China when the European powers were moving in to claim Chinese territory as their own. From there I would recommend looking at British mercantile trading and China in the 17th and 18th century, and that's where you'll see the literature about the trade imbalance between Britain and China - where the Emperor would only accept payments of silver from foreign envoys in exchange for shipments of tea, silk, spices, etc because of the native Chinese xenophobic attitude against foreign goods and ideas (you can blame the first Ming emperor for that - by some accounts the guy was mentally ill and xenophobic in the extreme). Britain was the first Western country to fall into the China Fallacy trap, and when they realized their currency reserves were dangerously low (they being the royal-sponsored trading companies like the British East India Company) that's when the British moved in and started seizing treaty ports.

      --
      Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    5. Re:That's the China fallacy by crf00 · · Score: 1

      Thanks! :)

    6. Re:That's the China fallacy by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Well, in this case they're selling us goods in exchange for IOUs. I'm not sure the US would need to mount an invasion to make that not pay off.

      I think the bigger issue this exposes is the nature of an economy in the first place. To be honest, half of the purpose of an economy is to give people something to do. Imagine a world where 10 people and a fleet of robots could meet all the food, clothing, and shelter requirements of the planet. Everybody else could be unemployed, except for the fact that the people who own the robots would insist that they somehow pay for food. Obviously this is an extreme case to illustrate a point - however, I think that many issues with economic slumps come back to this sort of a problem.

      In the case of a trade imbalance, the US workers have nothing to do since they're consuming but not producing. At least, not until they start their own businesses...

  27. mod parent up by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Funny how the USA has to deal with similar issues... but China-- they were supposed to be communist! They couldn't even keep the capitalist flame under control for a generation and its a wild fire already. The USA managed to go longer; but we in many ways are in the same boat anyhow... (for the religious zealots; surely you can now acknowledge a simple fire == capitalism analogy after the recent banking/credit/insurance mess. )

    1. Re:mod parent up by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Capitalism is not evil. It's genesis was born when one neighbor made shoes, another neighbor made horsewhips, and then they purchased one another's products. The fact that we've allowed corporations to grow out of control doesn't negate the value of the basic system

      I propose revoking all corporate personhood (i.e. no rights wjatsoever), so they can be regulated more effectively. We also need to stop buying-up all their shit. It's a bit hypocritical to complain about the evils of capitalism, and then turn-around and write a $1000 check to Comcast or AT&T or Microsoft

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:mod parent up by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      The recent banking/housing and insurance messes were caused primarily by .gov regulation. The banking/housing mess was originally caused by pressure from the government to lend to poor people so they could own their own house, at which point the banks began to seriously search for a way to offset the crappy balance sheets this directive produced, took the idea that 'solved' their balance sheets, and extended it to all classes of homes. That, combined with the low interest rates from the fed, caused the massive bubble that popped. The insurance mess is caused by many factors, but one of the biggest is all the federal regulations that bar insurance companies from operating across state lines.

    3. Re:mod parent up by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Yes. The funny business in housing can be traced to the 1990s HUD forcing banks to make loans to risky poor persons (or else face being drug into court for racism). Then the Congress tried to rein-in the exploding bubble, but various pro-poor persons Representatives it circa 2004. And eventually when those poor persons couldn't keep-up with their loans (no surprise) the whole thing came crashing down in 2007-8.

      Video proof -
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivmL-lXNy64
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iW5qKYfqALE
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMnSp4qEXNM

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  28. Re:Its not a gamble. It just means you're a sellou by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    actually, in providing the game even neutered, the Chinese will probably be forced to change over time. They will never really be able to keep a lid on cultural control and anyone that plays the actual game will be pissed that they are not allowed to play the good version.

  29. All American Developers MUST refuse. by AndyTheCoderMan · · Score: 1

    If you are an American and truly believe that our basic freedoms should be universal, then you are no less than a traitor to your own people if you agree to work under these guidelines. If a popular game like WoW was to make this stand you would have millions of people demanding change.

    1. Re:All American Developers MUST refuse. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      In the words of the immortal Inigo Montoya: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." In America, treason is:
      • Making war against the United States
      • Giving aid and comfort to the enemy

      That's it. It doesn't appear to say anything about exporting entertainment products. Oh wait, let me guess, you were just making an ignorant, wrong comment in order to be the biggest jerk possible to your fellow Americans. You know fuck-all about freedom and treason (and probably software development, too.)

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:All American Developers MUST refuse. by brkello · · Score: 1

      No, no they don't have to refuse. See, in America we have the freedom of choice. If a game developer chooses to alter the game so that it can sell in China, that is their choice. That is freedom. To call them traitors wins you stupid post of the day. You have freedom of speech so that you can say such things, but I would wish you would use your freedom of speech in ways that aren't sensational and moronic.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    3. Re:All American Developers MUST refuse. by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      But he didn't use the word "treason".

    4. Re:All American Developers MUST refuse. by Labcoat+Samurai · · Score: 1

      Errr..... I think it's acceptable to use the word informally. Not every use of the word "traitor" means "guilty of the high crime of treason".

      Also, Inigo Montoya was immortal? That explains surviving being stabbed in the gut and both arms and then riding off into the sunset with nary a sign of medical attention. Probably needed to cut off his head.

  30. Re:Its not a gamble. It just means you're a sellou by clem · · Score: 1

    Any respectable company...

    We'll let you know if we see any.

    --
    Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
  31. Mechwarrior 3 by jgtg32a · · Score: 2, Funny

    MW3 has been out for a while and I don't remember House Liao being mentioned.

    1. Re:Mechwarrior 3 by eagle8635 · · Score: 1

      I thought that too, but I guess 'MW' means 'Modern Warfare' now. But it's still Mechwarrior in my heart.

  32. Hmmmmm by multiplexo · · Score: 1

    The worst part is that in order to qualify for operating in China, you face a maze of conflicting bureaucracy and regulation. Well, it just got a little worse. Now, if you want to operate, you need to hire a 'specialist' to oversee content, and you need to 'enhance socialist values' in your game. They also want to limit in-game marriages and how many player-versus-player combat sessions one can engage in. The circular issued from China's Ministry of Culture contained all the vague verbiage giving them easier reign over who operates and who doesn't.

    Hmmmm, sounds like they took a page out of Apple's playbook.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  33. /. Ad on the right... by agentc0re · · Score: 0

    I saw this free game play ad on the right of the article, "Neverland"
    Oh it's so perfect. "Neverland" the place where Chinese never play games.

    --
    Sometimes, the answer is to just destroy it all.
  34. Good way to bring down communism by Alexpkeaton1010 · · Score: 1

    Have 20 million Chinese WoW addicts have their game taken away.

    1. Re:Good way to bring down communism by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      There hasn't been (legal) WoW in China for over half a year now!

  35. Everytime I see someting about China on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I log onto WoW and make sure my ore supplier is still there.

    He is.

  36. Wrong question. by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

    But is it worth the gamble to game developers?

    I think the question is it ethical to do so? Yes, this, like the fucked up Google results are one of those cases where you could suggest that the people of China are better served by a government manipulated service than no service at all, but what about us? What does it say about us?

    I would refuse to work for a company that made such compromises on freedom at all, I mean what do these guys tell their friends/family/kids?

    - What you do you do daddy?
    - Well I make sure the young population of china never gets a feeling of independence or self worth outside remaining subservient to the state honey.

    --
    But... the future refused to change.
  37. The more they tighten their grip, the more systems by bobjr94 · · Score: 1

    ...All they are doing is making a market for imported, pirated and bootlegged games. Want to be the cool kid at school, then pick you have the uncensored version of a game. A usb drive in your pocket, an SD card hidden inside a birthday card would be easy ways to slip games and other content into china.

  38. So Much For My Shareware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was really hoping that my Chinese-only shareware adventure game Holy Falun Gong Great Taiwan Super Tibetan Independence Skeleton Bash would make me rich, but it's not looking so good now. Maybe they'll let me sell it in China if I add a registration screen and transmit all player's names and IP addresses to the National Party Loyalty Enforcement Authority. Works for HP and Google!

  39. I think I know how by d34dluk3 · · Score: 1

    China Enforces Even Stricter Regulation On Games

    By "enforce" they mean "beat you to death if you fail to comply."

  40. Hmm... by shentino · · Score: 1

    Sounds almost exactly how the mafia operates.

  41. Fu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about the game developers learn enough Chinese to say "Fook Yoo" to China.

  42. Game is a important medium in China by dUN82 · · Score: 1

    Another important reason why the government is posing more restrictions on gaming in China is due to game itself is becoming an important medium in China, which you can effectively reach the youth group in China [as well as the last US election]. Probably the only channel the government left in the wild without censorship for the past decade. Young people in China really don't have much option to choose a hobby, the only thing that is cheap and people can have fun is online gaming, that is why internet cafes are still filled with young people and underage children [gov require to be 18 to enter internet cafes in china during schools which is poorly enforced].

  43. Enhance socialist values???? by leereyno · · Score: 1

    So in other words, in order for the thugocrats who run the Chinese prison state to make nice, you have to create games that lie?

    Communism is evil.

    Socialism is just a euphemism for Communism.

    The thugocrats in who run China have a profound understanding of Communism. It is a tool by which the ruthless few can gain and keep power over the helpless many.

    The thugocrats don't really BELIEVE in communism. What they do believe is that they should have power over their fellow man and that communism provides a way to do this.

    They hate democracy precisely because it would take power away from them spread it far and wide.

    I would not want to create content that justifies the rule of these thugs.

    But like someone else has already mentioned, in a corrupt society like China, it all comes down to who you bribe and how generous your offer is.

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    1. Re:Enhance socialist values???? by mqduck · · Score: 1

      No information is given about what those "values" are. Though I disagree completely with your assessment of socialism, you're correct that the rulers in China have zero interest in it. This is a country that defines "socialism" as a "harmonious [capitalist] society", with class struggle being the very antithesis of that.

      --
      Property is theft.
  44. Oh wow, racist much? by Gaffod · · Score: 1

    So what you suggest is that since South Koreans like Starcraft, the Chinese will bend over backwards to buy every game out there? What does South Korea have to do with China? Oh right, they're all "asian cultures". Cuz you know, there is this one monolithic cultural identity spanning the entirety of a quarter of the world's population with no variability whatsoever.

  45. blame the poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blame the poor,ignorant,gullable, or colored people for the whole problem. You need to find better sources for your education on the subject.

    Government didn't create the problem; the market did and the market has had working control of the important issues for at least a generation. WE WERE the government- to say government can't work is to say democracy doesn't work; WE are the failure, etc. The reality is that we (the people) no longer have the majority share of influence on a range of issues. WORKING CONTROL means they don't get everything, just most of what they want. I'll not even get into how the few relatively powerless regulators have been often corrupted as well.

    Government used to handle low income housing loans (thank FDR) until it was PRIVATIZED and industry influence ruled since (they made it private.) LOTS OF MONEY WAS MADE from these bad loans; some of us never drank the coolaid. Now you've been conned, you blame the dead and want more coolaid. Fine; go ahead, drink up.

    BTW, DEREGULATION caused it. From modern Nixon/Regan derivatives to the FRAUD of "financial products" AAA rated when they were junk. The real cause wasn't the junk mortgages but the FRAUD in trading the debts and the BANKS gambling like they did before the great depression. Its actually worse than the great depression! The system is more complex and more fundamentally screwed up. Sometimes I think the complexity is why they can keep propping it up all these years.

    Moore's new film might do you some good. Its really basic so it shouldn't go over your head.