Slashdot Mirror


Light Resonators Used To Move Nano-Sized Objects

ElectricSteve writes "Scientists at Cornell University report they can now use a light beam carrying a single milliwatt of power to move objects and even change the optical properties of silicon from opaque to transparent at the nanometric scale." As the article says, such an advancement "could prove very useful for the future of micro-electromechanical (MEMS) and micro-optomechanical (MOMS) systems."

63 comments

  1. missing tag by fivethreeo · · Score: 5, Funny

    transparent aluminum

    1. Re:missing tag by middlemen · · Score: 5, Funny

      single MOMS

    2. Re:missing tag by DJGrahamJ · · Score: 1

      I clicked this link in my RSS reader for the sole purpose of seeing how long it took for a MOMS joke.

      I'm saddened that I had to wait all the way to post #2.

    3. Re:missing tag by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

      Micro Inductive Light Force?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    4. Re:missing tag by amnezick · · Score: 0

      any connection to this

      --
      mov ax,4c00h
      int 21h
  2. How nice. by SEWilco · · Score: 4, Funny

    This story moves me slightly.

    1. Re:How nice. by XPeter · · Score: 1

      But your body has billions of nano-sized things. Shouldn't you have plowed into the wall?

      --
      "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
    2. Re:How nice. by Tibia1 · · Score: 1

      The future is looking bright now that some light has been shed on this previously transparent topic.

    3. Re:How nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But your body has billions of nano-sized things.

      That's not what your MOMS said!

    4. Re:How nice. by ae1294 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The future is looking transparent now that light has been shed on this previously opaque topic.

      Please read at least the summery next time before posting, thank you! - /. Asshole #1547521
      P.S. I must be new here...

      I wasn't off-topic as THIS! IS! SLASHHHDOOOOT!!!!

  3. Makes things obvious in Soviet Russia by gringer · · Score: 0

    This is an example of using some light to cast an issue.

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
  4. That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You should see how my laser pointer makes the cat move!

    1. Re:That's nothing by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Does this work on Schroedinger's cat?

    2. Re:That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right now, it does and doesn't...

    3. Re:That's nothing by crazyjimmy · · Score: 2, Funny

      maybe.

    4. Re:That's nothing by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Yes and no.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  5. Future switching? by sander · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if this will be used in future optical routers and switches or even processors - if the opaque-transparent (and back) switch happens fast enough, you could easily do a very large number of parallel on-off switches to optical pathways. No need for lots of MEMS/MOMS mirrors any more.

    Imagine a nanoscale thinking machines cm-5, except the light panels would then actually be part of the computation, controlling which nodes are on or off.

    1. Re:Future switching? by NoYob · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was thinking of tractor beams, myself.

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    2. Re:Future switching? by aflag · · Score: 1

      Yes, cloud + lightning paradigm.

    3. Re:Future switching? by vegiVamp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Don't you mean Cloud + Sephiroth ? This *is* slash, after all.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  6. Sonic screwdriver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In a few years?

    1. Re:Sonic screwdriver by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      In a few years?

            Or quite possibly, a few years ago...

            (TARDIS sounds in the background)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  7. Yes, but.. by girlintraining · · Score: 0

    How quickly can they make the switch? The latency of the individual components dictates the design.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  8. MOMS? by ickleberry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Srsly, who comes up with these acronyms? and don't say it was mom

    1. Re:MOMS? by martas · · Score: 1

      pop?

    2. Re:MOMS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I played all the way to the end of World of Goo because Mom told me to.

    3. Re:MOMS? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's an acronym. It has no meaning, it's just an abbreviation of Micro-OptoMechanical Systems. Perhaps you were waiting for someone to make a totally contrived name, where they start with the name and make dumb words up to fit it? The sort of "acronym" that sounds hilarious the first time you say it, and gets progressively less funny each time?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:MOMS? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      SRSLY... Standard Resonant Simplified Laser Yield?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    5. Re:MOMS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sort of "acronym" that sounds hilarious the first time you say it, and gets progressively less funny each time?

      Since when are jokes funnier the 2nd time around...?

  9. How about giving credit where due? by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article doesn't give the names of any of the people involved in this, or any links where more detail can be found. Isn't it bad enough that researchers are paid crap; do they have to be anonymous too? How about giving these people some credit for their work.

    1. Re:How about giving credit where due? by Steve525 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My guess is it's Michal Lipson's group:

      http://nanophotonics.ece.cornell.edu/

    2. Re:How about giving credit where due? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here, let me shine some light on the subject.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:How about giving credit where due? by amirulbahr · · Score: 2, Informative
      This article does:

      The research by postdoctoral researcher Gustavo Wiederhecker, Long Chen, Ph.D. '09, Alexander Gondarenko, Ph.D. '10, and Lipson appears in the online edition of the journal Nature and will appear in a forthcoming print edition.

    4. Re:How about giving credit where due? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/nature08584.html
      IAAA
      (I am an author of the paper)

    5. Re:How about giving credit where due? by Interoperable · · Score: 1

      Researchers don't much care about recognition on /.. They're getting a Nature publication out of this so you can bet that they're fairly happy with the exposure it's getting. Although from the looks of it, it's not that uncommon for that group, damn impressive publication record. Nano, nano, nano; they've got the right buzzword to collect high-profile publications anyway.

      --
      So if this is the future...where's my jet pack?
  10. I for one, by ae1294 · · Score: 2, Funny

    won't be happy until I can cast magic missiles at these issues.

    (You thought I was going to welcome our new micro-watt light resonator using overlords didn't you... Well there I just did...)

  11. Fusion? by ae1294 · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if something like this could be used to apply a strong enough force to allow one to make a micro-sized fusion reactor?

  12. Next Week by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny

    Heavy Resonators Used To Move Mega-sized Objects

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Next Week by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      That’s called an American discotheque. ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  13. Telekinesis! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny
    Less than a single milliwatt of power in a beam that moves things? Could this be the basis for the wide spread reports about telekinesis.?

    Anyone who thinks it is telekinesis, please raise my hand.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Telekinesis! by drmitch · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Umm... I would LOVE to see a RATE of energy production move ANYTHING. I think they meant millijoule of energy. Please don't tell me that I'm the only one that saw this.

    2. Re:Telekinesis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't talk about a milijoule laser.... lasers produce rates of energy, (well transform if you will), and they are in fact talking about a milijoule laser causing the movement. Your confusion is that the energy rate isn't in reference to the amount of energy causing the movement.

      And you are properbly the only one who saw this, since most others would not make such a simple mistake in reasonning.

  14. 1 mW is just a single milliwatt? by amirulbahr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is it just me or does the term "single milliwatt of power" sound odd? It seems to imply something discrete that comes in ones and twos and threes and so on. Why wouldn't you just say "a 1 mW light beam"?

    Now let's see if I get the -1 Off-topic that this post surely deserves.

    1. Re:1 mW is just a single milliwatt? by rossdee · · Score: 2, Funny

      As opposed to a married milliwatt?

    2. Re:1 mW is just a single milliwatt? by amirulbahr · · Score: 1
    3. Re:1 mW is just a single milliwatt? by martas · · Score: 4, Funny

      CLICK TO MEET SINGLE MILLIWATTS IN YOUR AREA!!!!!!

      oh damn, apparently /. filter doesn't have a sense of humor, so I can't post that... maybe now I can? yes!

  15. More info by Steve525 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the same basic result as a previous article:

    http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/10/26/1856230/New-Optomechanical-Crystal-Allows-Confinement-of-Light-and-Sound

    The structure in the current article is a ring resonator in this article. In the previous article the structure was a grating based resonator.

    I found an article with better information:

    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=optical-force-gradient

  16. Really, Slashdot? by billsayswow · · Score: 0

    Singles? Movement? Changing optical properties? Nano-scale? Future of MOM systems? Slashdot, making sex jokes easier than your MOM system since 1997.

    1. Re:Really, Slashdot? by XPeter · · Score: 1

      +1 Well played, sir.

      --
      "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
  17. Only Nano-sized? by Norsefire · · Score: 0

    This is hardly news. Get back to us when they can move Emacs or Vim-sized objects.

    1. Re:Only Nano-sized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows nothing would be able to move an Emacs-sized object.

    2. Re:Only Nano-sized? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      No thats an Eclipse sized object.

  18. Look at me everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at me, I am holding a flashlight behind my solar sail! woooo! See you next week, or not!

    1. Re:Look at me everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anything, you should be pointing the flashlight AWAY from your solar sail, in the opposite direction that you want to go in - think a rocket.

      Disclaimer: IANAP, and I'm not sure if Newton's Laws apply to solar sails (though I find it difficult to imagine they wouldn't).

      (PS. inb4 WOOOOOOSSSHHHHH)

  19. Re:missing tag,Christmas gifts look... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    goatse, tubgirl and GNAA I can take. But now SPAM, on my slashdot? Someone please ban this fucker.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  20. IAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am an author on the paper this article is on, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/nature08584.html. Feel free to ask any questions.
    -Sasha G.

  21. silicon nitride deformation - mirrors/light paths by brindafella · · Score: 1

    Sarah, I could envisage a silicon nitride crystal (as described) having a mirrored surface attached, and being used to route light into various paths depending on the applied light pressure -- a multiple path switch. Is this possible? Does it make sense? Or, am I mis-reading what may be possible by the deformation you describe? Peter

    --
    Looking at space, radio, science and computing from a 'down-under' amateur enthusiast perspective.
  22. Re:silicon nitride deformation - mirrors/light pat by tuxicle · · Score: 1

    Mirrors reflecting mirrors? High tech sorcery, I say!

  23. The paper can be read, as usual by f3r · · Score: 1

    http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.0794 Unlike in the original article, this one (the paper itself) cites the names of the authors...