Slashdot Mirror
New Virginia IT Systems Lack Network Backup
1sockchuck writes "Virginia's new state IT system is experiencing downtime in key services because of a mind-boggling oversight: the state apparently neglected to require network backup in a 10-year, $2.3 billion outsourcing deal with Northrop Grumman. The issue is causing serious downtime for state services. This fall the Virginia DMV has suffered 12 system outages spanning a total of more than 100 hours, and downtime hampered the state transportation department when a state of emergency was declared during the Nov. 11 Northeaster."
In my experience, it is rare for a customer, even with professional IT staff, to properly specify their needs when it comes to technology. Why did Northrop, which presumably has experience in government systems, not design backups?
Palm trees and 8
Have you ever seen backup systems in Star Trek, for example? you haven't. The future requires no backups.
During the first six months of the year, state Department of Transportation workers faced 101 significant IT outages totaling 4,677 hours: an average of more than 46 hours per outage. One took 360 hours to fix.
That's 27 weeks of downtime in the space of 26 weeks, which raises a much more important question than why there's no network redundancy and that question is: What kind of fucking morons have they got running their systems?
But I thought the magic pixie dust of free enterprise would make outsourcing something to the private sector cheaper, more efficient, and better in every possible way?
Remember how Virginia's health records were compromised earlier this year?
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/05/1232240
Sounds like systemic ineptitude which is why I'm really looking forward to more government involvement in health care!
Most forget that the network provided by the NG crooks is NOT part of the Comprehensive Infrastructure Agreement (CIA). It is a seperate agreement that is a fixed cost agreement under which NG was supposed to replace “like for like”. They were supposed to install an MPLS network. MPLS (Multi Protocol Label Switching) allows for the prioritization of traffic to allow Voice traffic to travel over the same circuit as the data. It also supposed to be intelligent enough to encrypt data to essentially allow a VPN to be created from point-to-point.
None of the VPN has been done as promised, very few sites have used the VOIP option unless dictated to by VITA as part of new construction and most sites complain about network performance. Some agencies had totally redundant networks but were forced to pay more for less. 65% of VITA staff make over 90,000 a year. Again we pay more for less.
While I am not a NG fan, interestingly enough, most state managers at Agencies will tell you that working directly with NG allows things to get done, VITA just gets in the way. VITA wants to always be the interface, Waste Fraud and Abuse to pay high salaries for mostly unqualified folks. Throw out VITA and let the agencies be treated like customers by NG.
The IT Community Frowns Upon Your Shenanigans...
Northrop Grumman outsources part of it's own IT as well and it does not own some of it's systems they rent them or at least they did 1-2 years ago.
Is seems nobody RTFA (no surprise). The problem they're having is network outages at branch offices. I assume they're using DSL or such, with no way to connect if/when it goes down. Any one office probably has >99% up time, but when you have hundreds of offices and the remnants of a hurricane come through you can expect several of them to go offline, which is what's happening.
The article does not mention "backups" as in tape drives and off-site storage.
The article does mention lack of redundancy at the network carrier level.
My guess is that Northrop Grumman designed a network around single circuits connecting offices to data centers, and did not design the network to tolerate WAN link failures.
A stupid oversight for sure, but nothing that can't be easily remedied by ordering redundant WAN circuits from your telco of choice. Redundant routing gear would also be smart.
For all that are blaming government for this - they outsourced the design and implementation to a private company. That company screwed the pooch in design and implementation. Shame on both parties for not recognizing the risk of WAN failure.
-ted
If any story deserves this tag it is this. from the article:
"Virginia declared a state of emergency Nov. 11 in the face of record nor'easter rains and winds.
But without backup circuits -- which VDOT had before the Northrop Grumman outsourcing -- to take up the load, the transportation agency's Hampton Roads' IT network went out of service 23 times during the event.
"We called at 5:35 in the morning," said Gary Allen, VDOT's chief of technology, research and innovation.
"It took VITA four hours to open the help ticket" and begin to solve the problem."
4 hrs on a critical system seriously just to get started solving it?
"During the first six months of the year, state Department of Transportation workers faced 101 significant IT outages totaling 4,677 hours: an average of more than 46 hours per outage. One took 360 hours to fix."
wait, 4,677 hours? how could that be? There were 181 days in the first 6 months of this year, that's only 4,344 hours.. there was more downtime on the system than days in it's operational life! (did someone /0 here?)
Outsourced, no thanks... I think I'd rather dig up a Univac I to do work on, at least it would be more reliable
I *knew* there had to be some other reason why they closed half the interstate rest stops in VA, this is obviously where the money was (mis)spent...
From TFA:
Suddenly, I don't feel so bad for that 2 1/2 hour glitch last week :)
and has involved itself in the market in some way in the past
therefore, any prudent rational criticism of the free market and how it obviously fails can be explained away with creative rationalization that its the government's fault, somehow"
my favorite is how free market fundamentalists wish to blame the market crash of 2008 on government policies. rather than gee, i dunno, the clinton and bush administration deregulation policies? you know, deregulation: having the government less invovled int he market?
"what? my free market bubble and pop? nah, impossible! government's fault! pffft"
please study your banking panics of the 1800s: without regulation, free markets have innate imperfections which always result in catalcysmic failures. all you need is simple human psychology, no government need apply, to cause a market to crash. you either regulate it, leveling the playing field artificially, and therefore making it truly "free", or you leave it alone, letting it bubble and pop like mad, and allow monopolists to take advantage of natural imperfections in the market to leverage unfair behavior
free market fundamentalism is dead. your ideology is dead. fact: you need government involvement in the market for the market to run efficiently. fact: you need government policing and regulation of the marketplace to keep it "free" and egalitarian and equal for all players
if you don't understand these simple truths by now, or refuse to believe that despite the obvious proof, you're an idiot
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
as free market fundamentalists
it is a hallmark of the triumph of your fear over your intellect that you think that's what i am advocating for
examples of fear triumphing over intellect:
"gay marriage should be legal"
reaction:
"why do you think pedophiles should be allowed to marry boys and bestiality practioners to marry animals?"
#2:
"marijuana should be legal"
reaction:
"why do you want to legalize methamphetamine and heroin?"
#3:
"the government needs to regulate the market in order for it to be stable"
reaction:
"why do you want communist central planning"
do you see the hysteria at work in these examples?
in the future, i suggest you react to what i am actually saying, rather than projecting your irrational fears onto what i am saying, and reacting to that in hysteria
fact: an unregulated marketplace bubbles and pops due to nothing but simple human psychology, and naturally degenerates into a few powerful players dominating everyone else. without regulation, there is no such thing as a "free" market. a stable free market of equals, without regulation by some entity, is something that has never existed in the history of humanity. its a myth cooked up by libertarian fundamentalists, their garden of eden. its a fantasy of blindness in direct contradiction to obvious well-established human behavior:
1. people will take advantage of others, take advantage of natural imperfections in the market, and establish domination and exploitation of later arrivals to the marketplace
2. people will react in panic and fear at rumors, and destroy the market on nothing but emotion: calm rational decisions does not dominate the market
do you care to defy these simple obvious truths?
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
1. people will take advantage of others, take advantage of natural imperfections in the market, and establish domination and exploitation of later arrivals to the marketplace
2. people will react in panic and fear at rumors, and destroy the market on nothing but emotion: calm rational decisions does not dominate the market
do you deny either simple obvious truth?
how do you fight #1, and #2 then?
answer: you need the government to regulate it. duh
an unregulated marketplace bubbles and pops due to nothing but simple human psychology, and naturally degenerates into a few powerful players dominating everyone else. without regulation, there is no such thing as a "free" market. a stable free market of equals, without regulation by some entity, is something that has never existed in the history of humanity. its a myth cooked up by libertarian fundamentalists, their garden of eden. its a fantasy of blindness in direct contradiction to obvious well-established human behavior
this has been today's intellectual charity offering for you. do try to take advantage of the offering, and accept the fucking obvious for once in your life about this subject matter
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
you believe the market left alone takes care of itself, and the government makes it unstable
this is the opposite of reality: a free market is inherently unstable. government involvement stabilizes it
i'm sorry i don't have any books by crackpots to cite to prop up the fucking obvious truth for you
not like you would accept it
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
with someone who has seriously embraces an absurd premise: that markets left to their own devices are stable and egalitarian
markets left to their own devices bubble and pop, and are manipulated and dominated by entrenched insiders
to not understand this is equivalent to someone refusing to accept that that the sun rises and sets or that the tides go up and down. how can you have a rational discussion with someone who refuses to see and accept obvious factual aspects of the reality they live in?
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
no supplemental reading material from libertarian crackpots about the virginal holiness of the unregulated market?
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it