Slashdot Mirror


STEREO Satellites Spot Solar Flare Tsunami

westtxfun writes "The STEREO satellites recently confirmed the existence of solar mega-tsunamis when they captured height data after a sunspot recently erupted. The scale of this tsunami literally dwarfs the Earth's diameter — it was 62,000 miles high and raced across the surface at 560,000 mph! STEREO A and B orbit 90 degrees apart and luckily, one was overhead while the other saw the eruption on the limb. This gave NASA scientists enough data to confirm the tsunami wasn't a shadow, solving a modern solar mystery. The images are simply stunning, to boot."

89 comments

  1. is it sending a stream of neutrinos? by alen · · Score: 1, Funny

    that will hit the earth's core and cause the plates to shift like in 2012?

    1. Re:is it sending a stream of neutrinos? by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      No, but it might be a sign that our sun is dying, and that we need to send Cilian Murphy and a nuclear bomb the size of Manhattan into the sun's core to reignite it.

    2. Re:is it sending a stream of neutrinos? by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      I'll buy that for a dollar!

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    3. Re:is it sending a stream of neutrinos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the sun is dying and it stops burning fuel it will have first under gone a Nova. A nuke the size of Manhattan or any other city of your choice isn't going to stop this process. The sun is big. It is really big. Even though it's relatively small compared to most stars it is enormous. It just made a surface wave larger than the Earth. The tiny nuke the size of what ever won't even be noticed on the sun.

    4. Re:is it sending a stream of neutrinos? by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      But what if we sent *two* nukes?

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    5. Re:is it sending a stream of neutrinos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sun is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to the sun.

    6. Re:is it sending a stream of neutrinos? by nhytefall · · Score: 1

      Only if instead of Cillian Murphy, we can put the transport on auto-pilot, and fill it politicians.

      Their collected hot air should be enough to get things rolling again.

      --
      0100010001101001011001 0100100000011010010110 1110001000000110000100 1000000110011001101001 0111001001100101
    7. Re:is it sending a stream of neutrinos? by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Nice re-write, Sir... Well done!

      A nuke the size of Manhattan is not going to have any effect on the sun, you would need a nuke the size of Jupiter to get any effect noticeable on the sun.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  2. Re:A way to solve tsunamis problems on Earth ? by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Informative

    Reading TFA is uncharacteristic for most slashdotters, but this one is definitely worthwhile.

    Solar tsunamis pose no direct threat to Earth. Nevertheless, they are important to study. "We can use them to diagnose conditions on the sun," notes Gurman. "By watching how the waves propagate and bounce off things, we can gather information about the sun's lower atmosphere available in no other way."

    "Tsunami waves can also improve our forecasting of space weather," adds Vourlidas, "Like a bull-eye, they 'mark the spot' where an eruption takes place. Pinpointing the blast site can help us anticipate when a CME or radiation storm will reach Earth."

    And they're pretty entertaining, too. "The movies," he says, "are out of this world."

    Pun aside, the movies ARE great. RTFA please, everyone! You'll be glad you did.

  3. Surf's up by Darth+Sdlavrot · · Score: 5, Funny

    kawabunga.

    1. Re:Surf's up by MoralHazard · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Who the hell modded this "offtopic"? Waves, surfing, hello?

      I swear, some of the responses and mod decisions I've been seeing on Slashdot lately make me wonder whether people are browsing in their sleep.

    2. Re:Surf's up by Coren22 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Lately? I think this has always been an issue with /.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    3. Re:Surf's up by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The average IQ of a moderator these days sits somewhere between a sea sponge and a dog turd.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Surf's up by jbezorg · · Score: 1, Informative

      Someone with mod points and an agenda to "clean up slashdot"? Half-life and Portal references were modded "offtopic" on the recent LHC article. Or maybe someone is just modding random comments following the order of the mod selection dropdown. "offtopic" for the first comment, "flamebait" the second, "troll" the third...

      --
      I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    5. Re:Surf's up by imamac · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else see the irony of this being modded "Insightful"?

    6. Re:Surf's up by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      The average IQ of a moderator these days sits somewhere between a sea sponge and a dog turd.

      Hey! Why are you insulting dog turds?

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    7. Re:Surf's up by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Why is he insulting sea sponges? At least they multicellular organisms.

      And arguably more sensuous and useful than moderators.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:Surf's up by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      It seems that 'redundant' is the current theme here though. Why? I don't know, probably somebody who can't surf.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    9. Re:Surf's up by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 2, Funny

      Finally Norrin Radd has a chance to prove he's not just a poseur. I mean, seriously, has anyone actually seen him surf anything?!

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    10. Re:Surf's up by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      Damn straight - sponges hold 25 times their weight in water. Imagine how much waterfront land would be flooded if it wasn't for the sponges! They could be the key to combating higher water levels from global warming!

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    11. Re:Surf's up by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Wow, a post commenting about moderation that is moderated Redundant, that is rather funny.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    12. Re:Surf's up by TempeTerra · · Score: 1

      How dare you insult the intelligence of moderators? I have mod points, and I'm going to mod you down right now!

      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
  4. It is probably 62 miles by Eukariote · · Score: 1

    The article speaks about a 100,000 km high (62,000 mile high) tsunami. Assuming that they are referring to the initial height of the surface wave, that is no doubt a typo since the sun's diameter is only 14 times that. Likely, they meant something rather less such as 100,000 m or 100 km. That's still a big wave though.

    1. Re:It is probably 62 miles by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah sorry, SOMEONE put a comma instead of a decimal. Growing trend.

    2. Re:It is probably 62 miles by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Did you see the animation? That wave looks to be easily 1/14th of the solar diameter, especially near the origin.

      What I learned from this article is that sunspots explode. Never knew that; I thought they faded away...

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    3. Re:It is probably 62 miles by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

      Looking at the movies in TFA, I think one hundred thousand kilometers at 1/14th of the sun's diameter could actually be correct. The wave is gigantic if I interpret the movie correctly.

    4. Re:It is probably 62 miles by drerwk · · Score: 1

      I don't know, if you look at the side view, the initial eruption of the wave looks like it could be 5% or 10% the diameter of the sun.

    5. Re:It is probably 62 miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Empirical proof that indeed it is better to burn out than it is to fade away!

    6. Re:It is probably 62 miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some fade away, some explode - just like human zits.

    7. Re:It is probably 62 miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and it looks like the sun is burping...

  5. Ahead, not OVERhead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Just correcting the summary, one spacecraft is *ahead* of the other (and of Earth) -- not "overhead". Also, they don't orbit 90-deg apart. They were ~90-deg apart for the even in question but are currently 127-deg apart. This value will increase as they continue in their orbits around the Sun. (By Feb 6, 2011 they will be 180-degrees apart, and will both be "behind" the Sun in ~mid-2015.)

    1. Re:Ahead, not OVERhead... by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 1

      I think they mean overhead with respect to the solar event, as shown in the first movie in the article.

  6. Exclamation points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    exclamation points have no place in article summaries!

  7. Solar wave? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You imbeciles, clearly they are a series of solar particles!

  8. Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's 2 years early!

  9. 120, not 90 by necro81 · · Score: 3, Informative

    A correction from the summary: the two spacecraft are nearly 128 degrees apart, not 90. They were launched into slightly different heliocentric orbits that cause the angle between them to increase by about 21 degrees per year. They've already passed through the L4 and L5 Lagrangian points of the Sun-Earth system. In Feb 2011, they'll be on opposite sides of the Sun, then start to converge once again.

  10. They really thought it might be a shadow? by ender- · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FTA:

    "We wondered," recalls Gurman, "is that a wave—or just a shadow of the CME overhead?"

    Really? They thought it was a shadow? And what pray-tell would be shining brightly enough from above the CME material, to cast a shadow onto the surface of the Sun?

    They didn't really think that through, did they?

    1. Re:They really thought it might be a shadow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTA:

      "We wondered," recalls Gurman, "is that a wave—or just a shadow of the CME overhead?"

      Really? They thought it was a shadow? And what pray-tell would be shining brightly enough from above the CME material, to cast a shadow onto the surface of the Sun?

      They didn't really think that through, did they?

      I thought the same exact thing.

      As a filmmaker somewhat familiar with lighting (in practice not the raw physics mind you) I was wondering what exactly could be shining brightly enought to cast a shadow of anything on the surface of the sun...

      If this was a theory they were seriously considering I give them 10 out of 10 for imagination but minus a billion for logical thinking baby.

    2. Re:They really thought it might be a shadow? by necro81 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It could be that a chunk of the CME was cold and not very luminous, but another chunk farther out was (the corona is very bright and hot, after all). Stereo images in multiple spectra, and it is well known that portions of the corona are much hotter than the surface of the sun, so it could be that in particular wavelengths the corona can cast shadows onto the sun's surface.

      In any event, this was a comment made by a project scientist - a solar physicist - someone who probably knows more about the subject than you or I.

    3. Re:They really thought it might be a shadow? by AlecC · · Score: 1

      Sloppy wording - absorbtion by the CME i.e. you are looking through the CME.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    4. Re:They really thought it might be a shadow? by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 4, Informative

      It seems counter-intuitive but the sun's corona is brighter than it's actual surface. It's possible that some cooler ejecta from a solar flare could cast a shadow.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    5. Re:They really thought it might be a shadow? by nefertitian · · Score: 0

      UFO

    6. Re:They really thought it might be a shadow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A shadow in our direction, like an eclipse? Sounds ok to me.

    7. Re:They really thought it might be a shadow? by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      Darker things between the sun and the observer cast a shadow outwards, ie. a solar eclipse.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
  11. Too much gaming... by Taibhsear · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone else see the gifs and think "BOOM! HEADSHOT!"

    1. Re:Too much gaming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I havent played CS since they released Source.

  12. Recent? Try February. by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    From the article :

    The twin STEREO spacecraft confirmed their reality in February 2009 when sunspot 11012 unexpectedly erupted

    Since when does 9 months ago count as 'recent' ?

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  13. Re:A way to solve tsunamis problems on Earth ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wonder if we had anything observing the opposite side of the Sun when this happened. Seeing the effects that occur exactly opposite of the flare might tell us something about the Sun's core.

  14. Shadows? by Java+Pimp · · Score: 1, Troll

    "We wondered," recalls Gurman, "is that a wave—or just a shadow of the CME overhead?"

    Shadows on the surface of the sun?

    Must have been light from Venus reflecting off some swamp gas...

    --
    Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
    Kull: She told me she was 19!
  15. 2012 by binaryartist · · Score: 1

    I am going to investigate of if China is building Arc ships

    --
    When a thief sees a saint, all he sees are his pockets!
  16. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The slow response to this Tsunami is clearly George Bush's fault.

  17. Re:Recent? Try February. by mcgrew · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Since when does 9 months ago count as 'recent' ?

    Get off my lawn!

  18. Improved Long Distance Radio Propagation? by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For the sake of us amateur radio operators, I sure hope so. HF DX has sucked for the last few years.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
  19. Large CME? by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wait a minute. Wasn't a CME this big supposed to completely destroy the power grid? Wasn't this supposed to plunge us back into the stone age?

    So what happened?

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Large CME? by JRManuel · · Score: 3, Informative

      It depends. If the CME is headed toward the Earth, it could. Otherwise, no. CMEs are like shotgun blasts: a lot of scatter, but you still have to aim the gun in the right direction.

    2. Re:Large CME? by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      The earth made its reflex save, duh.

      Did it occur to you the Coronal Mass Ejection might not be pointed at us?

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    3. Re:Large CME? by Nautical+Insanity · · Score: 2, Funny

      The earth made its reflex save, duh.

      Good thing too because the CME receives a huge bonus to damage based on the target's intelligence score.

    4. Re:Large CME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The earth made its reflex save, duh.

      Good thing too because the CME receives a huge bonus to damage based on the target's intelligence score.

      Phew, we're safe then, here in Washington DC...

    5. Re:Large CME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      p>Good thing too because the CME receives a huge bonus to damage based on the target's intelligence score.

      Then we have nothing to worry about?

    6. Re:Large CME? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Haven't you been keeping up? These days it's all about mutating neutrinos and microwaving the earths core.

      Popcorn, anyone?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  20. Re:Recent? Try February. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sun is over 4.5 billion years old. Slightly less than how old you feel when you see your kids have grown up.

    9 months is but a blink of an eye.

  21. Anihilation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone else look at that movie and think that the whole thing could go "boom", like, anytime? OMG, that would NOT be pleasant.

    1. Re:Anihilation by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      That would really suck. Our sun dials wouldn't work anymore.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
  22. Still way better than digg/reddit by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    Sure, but Slashdot still facilitates the best discussion on the net.
    But I think in general as people grow up and find better things to do they move on. So it's always going to be broken because the best people move on.

  23. Re:A way to solve tsunamis problems on Earth ? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

    Well, the one that was 90 degrees away will have seen the other side of the sun as well. The video on the front page doesn't show that half though.

  24. A watched Sun never boils by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

    Well, at least STEREO proved that phrase wrong.

    We now know the Sun boils and splashes like a pot of hot chili on a stove. Now, who's going to clean up the cosmic stove top of all the solar splatters?

    1. Re:A watched Sun never boils by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Entropy.
      (http://www.multivax.com/last_question.html)

  25. HAHAHAHAHAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot still facilitates the best discussion on the net.

    Hello, kdawson's incognito account!

    Idiot.

  26. Re:Recent? Try February. by theelectron · · Score: 1

    Geologic time?

  27. Re:Recent? Try February. by oneiros27 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, I confirmed it with one of the scientists (Joe Gurman) cited in the article -- there was an article from March that was inaccurate, and this was a correction to that previous article.

    But, instead of marking it as a correction, it was posted as a new article. (I can't find the older article, so I don't know if it was removed)

    They also linked straight to the movie, rather than to the explanation of what is being seen in the movie, or cite the original posting of the article, which had different images:

    http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/news/SolarTsunami.shtml
    http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/stereo/news/solar_tsunami.html

    Joe also said that this was in fact "tsunami-like" in that it was the result of an initially downward wave that reflected back up, as opposed to other CMEs.

    (and I probably should've added a disclaimer earlier -- I work for the STEREO Science Center)

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  28. Hey Poindexter! by paiute · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's tsunamis, not tsunami's.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  29. looks like a mammogram to me by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i guess i need more RPG instead of so much TNA

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  30. Shades of Praxis? by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    "Stardate 2322.1, Captain's log, Stereo A, Linux commanding. After three years, I have completed my first assignment as master of this vessel, cataloging gaseous planetary anomalies in Alpha Quadrant. We're continuing our mission under full gravitational power. I'm pleased to report that ship and programming have functioned well."

    *starts a cronjob*

    *rumble...rattle-rattle-RATTLE-RATTLE..*

    ALERT! ALERT!

    "Sir, we're getting a massive energy reading, dead ahead!"

    "On screen!" ...

    "My...God! Shields! SHIELDS!

    --
    [End Of Line]
  31. Re:Recent? Try February. by conspirator57 · · Score: 3, Funny

    (and I probably should've added a disclaimer earlier -- I work for the STEREO Science Center)

    I'm sorry, this is /. Primary sources are not allowed to be involved in the conjectural, ad hominem disputes that pose for debate on this forum. You are welcome to contribute to some other topic, provided that you know nothing about it. Have a nice day.

    --
    "If still these truths be held to be
    Self evident."
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  32. Cosmic Fun and Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK -- I get it. The sun is lighting its "hot gases" with nuclear fire, emitting what is probably the biggest flaming fart in this end of the galaxy. Bad diet of black holes on top of frozen comets no doubt...
    Very funny, Sol.

  33. Re:Recent? Try February. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you only need to append a disclaimer if you're trying to sell us something. You're not here for marketing, you're here for science! :)

  34. they are building Daedalus-class ships by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    they are building Daedalus-class ships

  35. Re:Recent? Try February. by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

    because scientists never market their theories? apparently the last conference I was at was a hallucination.

    it was damned honest of the GP to provide that context. I laud him/her for it.

    --
    "If still these truths be held to be
    Self evident."
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  36. Re:A way to solve tsunamis problems on Earth ? by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    ...anticipate when a CME or radiation storm will reach Earth

    It'll be at least eight minutes..

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  37. Stereo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, they have a stereo image, but when will 5.1 channel version be available?

  38. Re:A way to solve tsunamis problems on Earth ? by 4181 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if we had anything observing the opposite side of the Sun when this happened.

    The project's orbital information page states that the two spacecraft are currently separated by 128 degrees. (They orbit about 0.05 AU inside and outside earth's orbit, so that their orbital periods are 346 and 388 days, and their separation changes by about 44 degrees annually.) The entire sun will be visible when they achieve 180 degrees separation in February 2011. With earth based observations, the full sun will continue to be visible another eight years. A few months of contact will be lost in 2015 as they pass behind the sun. (If only Ulysses was still operating, we could get some polar views as well. It should be silently making its next solar passes sometime around 2013-2014.)

    STEREOs lunar gravitational slingshot (animated at the project's orbital simulation page) was very cool.

    They are supposed to be searching for Trojan asteroids as they pass through Earth's L4 and L5 Lagrangian points, but I've not heard of any results yet.

  39. Re:A way to solve tsunamis problems on Earth ? by 4181 · · Score: 1

    If only Ulysses was still operating, we could get some polar views as well.

    I suppose it would also help if Ulysses had been equipped with a camera.

  40. Only 2400 MT? by Wolfkin · · Score: 1

    "packing as much energy as 2400 megatons of TNT"

    That seems a bit low, doesn't it? Only two orders of magnitude more than what we've produced in a single nuke explosion?

    --
    Property law should use #'EQ, not #'EQUAL.
  41. Re:Recent? Try February. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, actually, the folks who run the NASA STEREO portal page, and the science writer, Dr. Tony Phillips, both lot track of this story for several months. It then appeared on the portal page,

    http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/stereo/news/solar_tsunami.html ,

    with the wrong videos, I got all bent out of shape, and Tony posted better video and graphics at the Science @NASA page. All three (including http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/news/SolarTsunami.shtml cited above) now have the short video clip that Dr. Angelos Vourlidas was referring to when he said the movies "are out of this world."

  42. Too Much DBZ by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who, upon reading "Solar Flare Tsunami", said it in the delivery of some overpowered fighter yelling his attack out:

    SOLAR FLARE TSUNAMI!
    RAGING DEATH BLAST!
    LINEAR TAX RATE!
    SPINNING SIDE KICK!
    HADOUKEN!

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-