Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

iPhone 3.1 Spotted In Field Testing

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the under-ripe-fruit dept.

kai_hiwatari writes "Digitizor reports that the next generation of the iPhone was spotted in the analytics log of an iPhone app called iBart. The device, it seems, was identified as iPhone 3.1 in the log. When iPhone 2.1 was spotted, it was followed by iPhone 3G."

10 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. News Flash by Akido37 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Company is developing follow-up product to an existing successful product!!

    Details at 11.

    1. Re:News Flash by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Informative

      Also, they really need to fix this summary. it should be "iPhone3,1", not "iPhone 3.1". The first is the format for an Apple product identifier. The second is likely to be confused with an iPhone OS version number that is already shipping to the general public and has been for several months.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  2. Newsflash: Apple developing another iPhone by jandrese · · Score: 4, Funny

    Important update: Its version number is 1 higher than the old one!

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  3. Re:Newsflash: Apple developing another iPhone by Whalou · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't wait for Mac OS XI: This one goes to eleven!

    --
    English is not this .sig mother tongue...
  4. LIKE ZOMFG!!!! by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Funny

    The only thing that could make this, like, even more awesome is if it were being used by Britney Spears!!!!!!11!

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  5. Dear Editors: by StarKruzr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That should be a comma in ("iPhone %d,%d",majorversionnumber,minorversionnumber), not a period.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Dear Editors: by teh+kurisu · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean /,

  6. Slight Error in Summary, Version Number Mismatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The summary says, "The last time when iPhone 2.1 was spotted, it was followed by iPhone 3G."

    But the version numbers actually are:
    iPhone: 1,1
    iPhone 3G: 1,2
    iPhone 3GS: 2,1

    The mistake in the summary isn't a big deal. But it does go into the big pile of little mistakes that we see all the time around here.

  7. Re:who cares? by cerberusss · · Score: 4, Funny

    I sure as fuck don't.

    OOOh! Technology, apathy and profanity -- all rolled into one little golden nugget!

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  8. next version? by GreyFish · · Score: 4, Funny

    So when do we see an iPhone 3.11 for workgroups?