Slashdot Mirror


Royal Society Releases Historic Science Papers

krou writes "To celebrate its 350th anniversary, the Royal Society has released a number of historic science papers and made them available online via its Trailblazing website. Among the papers are Benjamin Franklin's notes on his kite-flying experiment, a paper on black holes co-written by Professor Stephen Hawking, manuscripts from Sir Isaac Newton showing 'that white light is a mixture of other colours,' and a few other interesting details such as 'a gruesome account of a 17th century blood transfusion.'"

10 of 83 comments (clear)

  1. Links? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know what's cool about the web? Pages can contain hyperlinks to other pages! For example, if you write a post saying that Benjamin Franklin's notes on his kite-flying experiment are available on the web, you can use these fancy "hyperlinks" to help people find the articles!

    Of course, it appears that the articles were already on the web, and the trailblazer website is just a very, very cool index of existing information. But, I think it's required that every slashdot summary contain at least one easily verified and incorrect fact, so that readers will be more engaged with the website and read more advertising.

    1. Re:Links? by haderytn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What advertising?

  2. Re:Ceaseless quest... by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    For what? More funding based on dubious data?

    Yeah, that rotten Isaac Newton admitted in an email that he drew the apple larger than scale to make the diagram easier to read. Blasted hippy-haired liberal!
       

  3. Re:Ceaseless quest... by leoc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Haven't you heard? Newtonian physics has been discredited after someone hacked into his quill and pen set.

    --
    STFU about slashdot bias.
  4. Re:This might have saved... by bughunter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, this is fascinating stuff, especially as I'm reading Quicksilver right now, in which are depicted "plausible recreations" of some early Society experiments in optics, chemistry, physics, and physiology, including a rather gruesome account of the live dissection of a dog.

    Stephenson also breathes some life and character into historical figures associated with the Royal Society, not the least of whom are Newton and Leibniz. Worth a read if you have any interest in the history of science.

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  5. 1834 End of Spanish Inquisition by NoYob · · Score: 5, Funny
    I was going through the timeline and at 1830 it shows a big white dot with a pop-up "Spanish Inquisition Ends".

    I never saw that coming.

    --
    It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
  6. Re:This might have saved... by ksemlerK · · Score: 5, Informative

    including a rather gruesome account of the live dissection of a dog.

    A live dissection is also known as a vivisection. It is derived from the Latin term meaning, to cut life: “Vivis” (life) and “Sectus” (to cut).

  7. Re:F v. S ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a long s.

  8. When facts were respected by MosesJones · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Royal Society really does typify the content led questioning society that the world used to be. By establishing a body (The Royal Society) with the express intention of enabling that form of dicussion it represented very much a broad view that facts were what moved society forward rather than opinions.

    How far we have fallen from 200 years ago into a world where opinion matters more than facts and where its routine for big companies in particular to hide data that doesn't match the outcome that they want.

    The current pieces around Climate Change are a great example as to how far we have fallen, people with zero background, training or experience in a field are claiming that their opinions are just as valid as someone who are studied a field for 20 years.

    We have people questioning doctors and demanding antibiotics
    We have people believing rubbish like homeopathy because their "opinion" is it works
    We have presidents believing that FAITH in something (WMDs) is more important that actual facts
    We have people questioning evolution because their FAITH says it isn't so

    Hopefully in 100 years our great-grand-children will look back on this as the biggest era of deliberate human stupidy. Its not often the past is actually better but the basis of the Royal Society and indeed the society which it represented 200 years ago is a much more rational and measured one than the FoxNews driven debates of today.

    I often think that Fox News would be firmly on the "gravity denier" side if it had been around at the time of Newton.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:When facts were respected by panthroman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...how far we have fallen, people with zero background, training or experience in a field are claiming that their opinions are just as valid as someone who are studied a field for 20 years.

      Um... questioning authority is kinda the hallmark of science. I understand what you're saying - science is underappreciated - but empowering people to seek the truth for themselves is what science is!

      The 16th century's Glorious Revolution was society saying "How come we have to believe Galen? I'm gonna dissect some humans myself and see what's inside." We didn't need authority to be our conduit to truth: we could seek truth directly. (At the same time, people were rebelling against needing the Pope as a conduit to God, and voila, Protestantism.)