Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft To Switch Focus To Windows 8 In July 2010
An anonymous reader noted a bit from Ars saying Microsoft will be switching internal focus from Windows 7 to Windows 8 in fiscal year 2010. Microsoft's fiscal year starts in July, which is only eight months away. According to Microsoft's roadmaps, the release of Windows 8 is scheduled for 2012."
The Ocho!
2012 OMG.... Always kinda knew it would be Microsoft to end the world...
Hey, I heard that Ubuntu going to be switching focus to 10.x next year as well! STOP TEH PRESSES!!!1!
Do we actually have anything to talk about regarding Windows 8, or is this just another thread where we trot out all the usual "ZOMG evil Micro$oft abandonware bloated faked figures blah blah blah"? Because that's getting kind of old.
If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
Yeah - you were thinking it.
I feel like I have been spoiled by the solid 6 years of time XP was on the market. I literally remember using XP in 8th grade and running it well up to my sophomore year of college. That is a HUGE amount of time. Microsoft can make huge gains by keeping the price of upgrades cheap. Cheap meaning 30-50$. They will have a happy pirate free user if they did that.
As a person supporting said software/hardware, I certainly cannot echo that sentiment :-/
Is it going to be like the Star Trek movies, where whether it sucks or not depends on whether it's odd or even?
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
Is Read this Article and take some important notes.
NOTES!
bells and whistles do not sell in the real world were work needs to be done.
People want a system/car/airplane/appliance that works, always. Not part of the time.
If you want to dick around get a Mac Book Wheel
Win8's new critical stop sound:
GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATES!!!!
Sorry.
Most large corporations have 3-year PC replacement cycle, and get pissed when the new thing is the same as the old thing except for the hardware.
Most large corporations have a staggered, consistently employed 3-year PC replacement cycle, couldn't care less about what software is installed since they're all imaged in-house, and prefer hardware to remain consistent as long as possible.
Wow, the 2010 Fiscal Year is ONLY 8 months away when 2010 is only 4 weeks away? Yeah, better start planning for this massive and abrupt shift... (yeah, I know the difference between a fiscal and a calendar year).
Seriously, though. Good for them. I think XP was out way too long and while I never really had a problem with it that wouldn't be inherent in any type of Windows (I'm just old enough to have missed out on needing to learn much about DOS, and PowerShell pisses me off by not being tcsh), and I think people got complacent with it. The long run of XP probably had as much to do with Vista fears as early bugs did. I purchased a copy of Vista Ultimate a few months ago, and I had no problems with it at all, other than shitty command line, but I was never really an XP user at home anyway.
The story yesterday with regards to Win 7 stealing more XP market share than Vista market share, I think backs this up. The XP users who were still hanging on were doing so because of perceived issues with Vista, which may or may not have been valid, so Win 7 is more for them than for anyone currently using Vista by choice. Kicking up the Win 8 cycle should keep interest higher, and hopefully they'll be able to deliver on time (yeah, yeah...), because 2 years plus 8 months is still sort of slow compared to Apple's releases, and like a glacier compared to some of the major Linux distributions or BSDs which are on might tighter release schedules.
Which version will Windows 8 be?
Windows 7 is Windows version 6.1
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7600] Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Tim S.
Isn't this late 2009? How is late 2012 four years later?
Are you doing math on a Pentium?
Isn't this late 2009? Are you still telling jokes about the original Pentium?
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law
Yeah, I'm sure he cries real hard each time he hears about someone who buys his product but does not use it.
Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
I started with a home computer in the 80s. Quite fun but cassettes were slow, so I got a PC with MS DOS 3.3
I upgraded to DOS 5 because of its memory management. I then installed Windows 3.1 upon DOS 5 because of the truetype fonts and word processing. It made me more productive.
(I also started using Linux because it allowed me to have a Unix at home without suffering that asshole sysadmin at the university, but this posting is not about Linux)
I upgraded DOS5+Win3 to Win95OSR because it was more stable and easier to use than 3.1, it had font smoothing, native TCP/IP and it was generally an OS vs DOS and a windowed shell. It made me more productive.
I skipped Win98 and WinMe because they offered nothing new.
I started using Win2000 because it was a real OS, much more stable and secure than Win95. It made me more productive.
I started using XP when nLite matured because I could remove the useless crap and XP is optimized for speed and supports network bridges and, most importantly, cleartype. It made me more productive
I've tried Vista and 7 but they have not made me more productive. I wonder if Microsoft can change that with 8.
I must've missed your posts in other stories, but could you please enumerate the number of major releases of other operating systems that you haven't used? Be sure to cover OS X, the various BSDs and Linuxes, OS/2, BeOS, real-time operating systems, and so on.
Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
There isn't an actual value.
There is a _price_ at which the two parties in question: buyer and seller, are willing to conduct an exchange at a given point in time.
You know how stores have sales? "15% off -- only today!" Is the product 15% less valuable today, and then tomorrow it reverts to being more "valuable"? If so, what is that value changed based on?
For all actors in the market and for all non-coercive transactions [i.e. where force or fraud are not involved], "value" is determined independantly by each party in the transaction, and what is true for both parties right now may not be true tomorrow. The product doesn't change, but the preferences and broader situation of the marketplace participants does.
Today, windows is "worth", say, $100 to me. Tomorrow, if I've lost my job, it won't be worth _anything_ to me. It's not like windows is suddenly a worse product because I've lost my job. But my framework for evaluating the "value" of things to me changes dramatically.
This isn't a new problem: it's [at first glance] wierd that Windows costs one amount in the US and a different amount in other places. Other places have a different standard of living than we do, so in such places the US based cost of a Windows license would be unthinkable.
In the US, most people have enough money that they figure the value they get from windows is worth about what they have to pay for it. Even though they pay a lot more than many other people do in other places. I think think most Americans would trade their position in the world so that they could have cheaper windows pricing, but those that would are free to do so. And in any situation, one is always free to decide windows doesn't represent a good value to them at the price Microsoft is willing to sell it for, and so no transaction has to happen.
My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
Ten years ago, I would have completely agreed with this post. Today, if anything, the Microsoft shills have taken over slashdot.
Well, I skimmed the replies and found an important point missing, concerning how Windows 8 will be marketed: If Windows 8 is going to be released in 2012, that means that sometime in late 2011, Microsoft will start telling us that Windows 7 is, in fact, dog shit.
But Windows 8 will solve all those problems, and be faster and more secure!