Slashdot Mirror


US Air Force Confirms New Stealth Aircraft

DesScorp writes "Aviation Week reports that the USAF has confirmed the existence of a new, formerly secret stealth aircraft, designated RQ-170 Sentinel, developed at Lockheed's legendary Skunk Works. Rumors of a secret new jet have been flying since 2007, with longtime aviation journalist Bill Sweetman dubbing the possible aircraft 'The Beast of Kandahar' because of the urban legend-like reports from Afghanistan. The aircraft is a UAV, a pilot-less drone that appears to have some kind of reconnaissance-only mission for the time being. It's a tailless flying wing that resembles a fighter-sized B-2 bomber."

12 of 287 comments (clear)

  1. top secret by sentientbeing · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Theyre just telling us its a secret new invisible jet because they dont want to tell us what theyre really working on

    --

    ------
    beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    1. Re:top secret by mrsquid0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Afghanistan is a testing ground for the UAV. It is a fairly safe testing ground because the Afghanis do not have anything that has a realistic chance at shooting it down. The fact that it was at an international aeroport suggests that the US does not consider it to be one of their secret planes anymore. It will be interesting to see (five or ten years from now) what the real cutting edge of military aviation is in 2009.

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
  2. Re:Is it really that necessary? by afabbro · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like U.S. military is already at least 1, if not 2 generations ahead of its allies. Besides, its enemies still have WWII-level technologies.

    Does it really need to spend so much billions on finding -yet- more advanced stealth technology?

    Are you volunteering to fly missions?

    Yes, the military complex creates jobs, but there are jobs in OTHER SECTORS as well, which imho are more beneficial to the overall well being of human civilization.

    There is nothing as beneficial to mankind as Pax Americana.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  3. Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet it swoops overhead and downloads child porn to the hard drives of terrorists.
    They have no idea what they're in for.

  4. Re:Is it really that necessary? by rhsanborn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    American soldiers haven't had to fear death from the skies for 50 years because of America's complete superiority in the air. Similarly, America's ability to maintain that superiority into the future depends on continued funding and development of new technologies. It's foolish to stop development because we're good enough now. Halting the development of these technologies creates an environment in which no one has worked on advanced fighter aircraft for 30 years because "we were good enough back then" and we can't get back up to speed.

    The other problem is deciding when the time is that we need to start development back up again? Is it when we think possible enemies catch up? Is it when we are devastated by previously unknown technology from somewhere?

    I know we are fighting different kinds of wars now (counter-insurgency, gorilla warfare, etc), but I think it's unreasonable to pretend that we'll never need to worry about fighting large scale wars because we aren't fighting them now. The truth is, the threat of wars from foreign lands is not non-existent, and given that, the US military machine should work to be as prepared as possible for that eventuality.

  5. Re:Is it really that necessary? by maeka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No armor has ever saved as many lives as good, fresh, intel on enemy positions and movements.

  6. Re:Is it really that necessary? by lukas84 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd like to see some pictures of gorilla warfare. Are these mechanized or trained Gorillas?

  7. Re:Is it really that necessary? by DesScorp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I follow defense technology closely, and while I'm a critic of many new defense programs... I think the F-35 is becoming an overpriced boondoggle, for instance... I'm a firm believer that the US has to maintain a level of technology superior to its adversaries. You never want to go into an even fight. You want to be better in every way to the guy opposing you on the battlefield. That requires constant research. If you sit still, others pass you up.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  8. Photo by rlp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here's a picture of five of them in action.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  9. Possible Reasons Why by DesScorp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Any ideas on why they need such a secret and stealthy UAV in Afghanistan for? Obviously they weren't too worried about it if this Bill Sweetman guy was able to see it at the Kandahar International Airport.

    One, Sweetman didn't discover it in the field. He was likely first alerted to it when someone sent him the grainy photos of the bird in flight. He's probably the most prominent miltary aviation journalist in the world, so people come to him when they think they've found something secret.

    As to why it's in Afghanistan, that was a puzzle to me to at first, but some very good (and intriguing) theories have come up about it. For one, some note that not everyone in the Pakistani military is reliable in the Afghan war; there's a good chance some members are feeding intel to Al Qaeda and the Taliban. It's been suggested that since we've become very dependent on sending Predators and Reapers to hunt the Taliban in the desert, perhaps we don't completely trust Pakistani radar operators anymore. Perhaps we think they're sending what they know to the very people we're hunting.

    Another, even more intriguing possibility, is that China is right next door. And considering the luck we've had with conventional intel aircraft monitoring China, perhaps this is our way of keeping an eye on the growing Dragon. However, if we're actually penetrating Chinese airspace, then we're playing a very dangerous, Gary Powers-like game.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Possible Reasons Why by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are better pictures out there, including one of it on the ground.

      At least people think its the RQ-170, if its not, there are two strange planes out there.

      http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2009/12/kandahars-loch-ness-mystery-pl.html

  10. Re:Is it really that necessary? by glueball · · Score: 5, Informative

    Who had an Air Force?

    Korea=yes, for the duration
    Viet Nam= yes, for the duration
    Cold War = yes, the USSR and USA often flew matching flights.
    Iraq I = yes (for about 20 minutes)
    Al Qaeda = yes (4 planes for about 90 minutes)
    Iraq II = yes (for about 3 minutes)

    For the Future:
    Iran=yes (F-14s, thank you Jimmy Carter), MiG 29