Slashdot Mirror


Barnes & Noble's Nook, Reviewed

harrymcc writes "Barnes & Noble's Nook — the most significant e-reader since Amazon's original Kindle — hits B&N's retail stores today. I've published an extensive review of the device, which is also the first e-reader to run Google's Android OS: It's an interesting and capable gadget in many ways, but the interface — which is sluggish and somewhat quirky — isn't polished enough to render it a Kindle killer."

16 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. Killer by Zerak-Tul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What e-books need is not a kindle-killer but a dead-tree-killer.

  2. Don't Need a Kindle Killer, Exactly by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just need something that forces Amazon to keep innovating and keep pricing competitive.

    Thanks, B&N!

    1. Re:Don't Need a Kindle Killer, Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because it simply isn't possible that the cost of materials plus a reasonable markup would come out to the same price. And let's completely ignore the number of other ebook readers that are in the $200-300 range while we're at it. It's all a giant conspiracy.

  3. WiFi by Gopal.V · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Speaking as someone not living in the US ... and hence out of the AT&T whispernet, the fact that this can work over WiFi is a huge plus.

    I'd totally pay 250 US for it, just for kicks. Especially if they'd publish something like a bird watcher's guide, which where I really miss having a ton of searchable content, but without the bulk to carry around.

  4. To beat Kindle you need better policy by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps it is my slashdot bias, but the story about Kindles having books removed from readers' machines still strikes a sour chord with me. I recognize that most consumers don't know a thing about and many don't care. I don't see much difference between book burning and book deleting. To me the reasons, are irrelevant. Abuse will always emerge when opportunity is given.

    1. Re:To beat Kindle you need better policy by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And yet they did not issue a firmware update that would remove the easily abused feature.

      When rights are able to be taken away, they are no longer rights -- they are privileges. I'd just as soon buy an actual book.

      Apologizing for behavior is one thing. Making sure it never happens again is quite another.

      With all this DRM everywhere, all we are really ensuring is that 1000 years from now, no one will know who we were or what we did.In the short term, we are losing public domain. In the long, we are losing our identity.

  5. Kindle killer? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Amazon's reluctance to let the gadget out of the US market earlier makes the Kindle just another e-book reader, it has no iconic status that would warrant the "killer" adjective for any competitors, who are competing against it in equal footing pretty much everywhere.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  6. Awesome. by purpledinoz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm glad that more e-readers are starting to come out. I hope to get one after a couple more generations and a huge price cut. Plastic Logic is coming out with an e-reader soon too. Yay for competition.

  7. What does a book offer that a reader doesn't? by professorguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A book offers permanence. Books are created so the only infrastructure required to receive the information within is your brain. And how can you get rid of books authorities no longer like? Well, because of the light infrastructure requirements, you CAN'T. No book burning has ever deleted an entire work from the culture.

    But if a corporation decides to "burn" an e-reader book, can they? They sure CAN! And the book will be gone with no chance of ever discovering an unburnt copy.

    Sorry, no. The function I want is PERMANENCE. That cannot be built into an e-reader.

    1. Re:What does a book offer that a reader doesn't? by Nikkos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "No book burning has ever deleted an entire work from the culture"

      That we know of.

  8. Re:Mandatory AT&T contract? by CrosseyedPainless · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the FAQ: No. There is no charge for your nook's wireless features. You do not need a contract.

    As for the file transmisson: B&N is short on details. Since the OS on the nook is Android 1.5, I'm guessing someone will find a way to hack the firmware, even if B&N isn't helping.

  9. Re:Mandatory AT&T contract? by zaq1xsw2cde9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Nook is the same as the Kindle in that respect. The contract for service belongs to the device and is lifetime no cost for the owner of the e-book. The 3G company doesn't even know who you are to charge you. That contract is handled between the manufacturer and the 3G company OEM.

  10. Re:Why buy either? by slim · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Definitely e-ink is the feature that makes these special.

      - Much more readable, because it reflects rather than transmits light
      - Readable in bright conditions, for the same reason
      - Low power drain when showing static pages

    Ironically, in a way, e-ink isn't good for much *except* e-readers (yet) because of the cost, the fact it's monochrome and the poor refresh rate.

  11. Re:wtb more booklike reader by tgd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Have you used an eBook, like daily?

    Its better the way it is. The reading is more natural, its easier to hold, its easier to use than a book in confined settings (or laying in bed, I've found).

    Just because books had facing pages for 400 years doesn't mean its automatically the ultimate user experience for reading ...

  12. Re:Why buy either? by Ephemeriis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Could someone please explain the advantage of a dedicated e-book reader? I don't understand why I would buy either when I can get a netbook for $50 more (at worst) that can read both PDFs and Amazon e-books. Is it the battery life of these things, or is the hardware form factor really nice? I don't know.

    The battery life is generally rated in days, as opposed to hours.

    They are typically shaped more like a book or slate, and less like a laptop. A netbook is going to have the keyboard sticking out of the bottom and the screen is oriented horizontally rather than vertically.

    The e-ink screen is more like a printed page, and easier to read under similar lighting conditions. LCDs typically have problems with bright light, and can cause eye strain after prolonged reading.

    Both the Kindle and the nook offer free 3G to purchase ebooks, which your netbook probably wouldn't.

    If you don't read much and you just want something that can display a PDF, obviously an ebook reader isn't going to be necessary. Just throw it at your computer.

    But if you read for recreation, an ebook reader can be very nice. It allows you to condense a huge book into a very small and portable form factor. It allows you to carry a large selection of books with you. It allows you to quickly and easily purchase more books without having to locate the nearest bookstore. And it is designed to allow you to keep reading for hour after hour, day after day.

    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  13. Library of Alexandria by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No book burning has ever deleted an entire work from the culture.

    Are you sure no works died with the Library of Alexandria?