Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla Thunderbird 3 Released

supersloshy writes Today Mozilla released Thunderbird 3. Many new features are available, including Tabs and enhanced search features, a message archive for emails you don't want to delete but still want to keep, Firefox 3's improved Add-ons Manager, Personas support, and many other improvements. Download here."

49 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. Tabs by sopssa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    a message archive for emails you don't want to delete but still want to keep

    Well that was cleverly written :)

    But tabbed email sounds interesting. It makes text editors, web browsers and many other apps so much better and makes so much sense for email application that I'm thinking why didn't Thunderbird have it before.

    One thing I would surely like to see in email clients however - the gmail like threaded conversation view. It's just so much better and nicer to use, but still many email applications tend to have the plain-list-of-messages view.

    1. Re:Tabs by Misanthrope · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's had that for ages
      To view emails as conversation threads, go to View, Sort By, and choose Threaded, (Unthreaded to stop showing threads.)

    2. Re:Tabs by robmv · · Score: 4, Informative

      yes, the only problem is that your replies do not show that way (unless it is a mailing list where you receive a copy of your own message). If there is some way to merge the Sent Folder with the threaded view using a search or some kind of virtual folder, please help us

    3. Re:Tabs by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 5, Funny

      a message archive for emails you don't want to delete but still want to keep

      What about for messages I don't want to keep but still want to delete? Does it handle those?

    4. Re:Tabs by Goaway · · Score: 4, Informative

      Threaded view is not conversation view.

    5. Re:Tabs by krobe · · Score: 2, Informative

      But you can set where sent items are kept, such as in the inbox, by going to tools > account settings > copies and folders

    6. Re:Tabs by mirix · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Stuff you don't want to have handy, but don't want to get rid of either was my interpretation. Like taking ancient files and putting them in a box in the basement, instead of taking up prime real estate in the filing cabinet. right?

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    7. Re:Tabs by Martin+Blank · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Outlook 2010 has something pretty close to that, including reading in from multiple folders. It's not perfect, but it's miles ahead of what previous versions of Outlook and just about every other standalone client have (at least in Windows).

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    8. Re:Tabs by Demetris · · Score: 5, Informative

      Go to Options > Advanced, and click the Config Editor button.

      Type hide in the Filter box to find the mail.tabs.autoHide preference.

      Double-click on mail.tabs.autoHide to toggle the preference.

      Cheers!

    9. Re:Tabs by Fez · · Score: 4, Informative

      A similar but not quite the same choice is available.

      When viewing a message, click "other actions" then "show in conversation"

      Your replies are threaded in when viewing a message this way, but it opens in a new tab.

    10. Re:Tabs by kizza42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Funny, the only thing thats keeping me from dropping Thunderbird and moving entirely to Gmail is the "plain-list-of-messages view" that Google is too stubborn to add for people like me that feel threading is a slower way of organizing things

    11. Re:Tabs by threexk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok, does anyone know how to turn off the tabs bar, or at least hide it when there is only one tab, like firefox does?

      In about:config, change mail.tabs.autoHide to true.

      (Tools->Options...->Advanced->Config Editor...)

      I personally wish you could disable tabs completely.

    12. Re:Tabs by dumfrac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You could try the Copy Sent to Current Add-on for Thunderbird.

  2. Sometimes there are ... by neonprimetime · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... slashdot story summaries i don't want to delete but still want to keep

  3. I blame the cold weather by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Funny

    because hell just froze over. First we get Chrome for Linux, then Thunderbird 3. What next, Duke Nukem Forever?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:I blame the cold weather by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Funny

      Side note: does anyone else think it's suspicious that both Chrome for Linux and Thunderbird 3 just happen to have been released on the same day that Wired started taking submissions for their vaporware of the year article?

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:I blame the cold weather by nine-times · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's kind of hard to call something "vaporware" when it's open source and you can download betas. Even if the project died right there, it wouldn't be vapor.

  4. A big step up from TB 2 for linux by rmcd · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been using Thunderbird 3 in beta for the last few months on an ubuntu system. TB 3 doesn't look dramatically different than TB 2, but the performance difference is *enormous*. TB 2 would crash frequently, it would periodically use all resources while it did heaven knows what, and Gmail IMAP was a disaster.

    TB 3 is responsive, hardly ever crashes (perhaps twice in 3 months), search is *way* improved, and it finally feels like first-rate software. My hat is off to the Thunderbird team.

    1. Re:A big step up from TB 2 for linux by ddegirmenci · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not only for linux. I am using Windows XP, and definitely agreed about the Gmail IMAP side, it's so much better now. It finally gives a real reason not to use the url ever again on my PC. I have yet to check the other things though, and it still doesn't do too good on newsgroups refreshing (in terms of speed) as far as I've seen.

  5. Conversation view != threads by Mountaineer1024 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Every single time I see this discussion, someone pipes up to say "but thunderbird DOES do threads!".
    That it does. And that has absolutely no bearing on the discussion at hand.
    Conversation view as provided by gmail gives you a single page for each entire conversation AND it inserts your replies online as appropriate.
    There's several other features that make conversation view work so well, but you'll have to actually try gmail to understand what we are talking about.

    1. Re:Conversation view != threads by digitalunity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All that does is make your inbox a mess.

      This thread reminds me of the instant-message type SMS text view on Palm Treo phones. No other phone that I have found does it the same way.

      I've been using Thunderbird 3 pre-release for quite a while now and even 3.0 doesn't do it quite right. But, it is what it is. It beats the pants off Thunderbird 2. Now if only enigmail worked on Windows as well as it does in Linux....

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
  6. Re:Low standards by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "hardly ever crashes (perhaps twice in 3 months), search is *way* improved, and it finally feels like first-rate software.".

    The specific releases he is mentioning are beta. Standards for 'numbers of times crashing' are different. I am guessing, but the 'first rate software' quote may also be speaking of look and feel. Thunderbird was good, but lacked polish. I have not tried any of the 3 series, but I will now that it's golden

  7. Hopefully improved. by jwriney · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the early releases I downloaded had the amusing "feature" of downloading every message in the background - not just headers, full messages, with attachments. According to the bug report, this was intentional, so that your folders would be accessible without being connected to the network, but it never seemed to know where to stop. It was *constantly* and repeatedly downloading messages, and ate 40 some-odd gigs before I noticed it and went back to 2.

    --riney

    1. Re:Hopefully improved. by mR.bRiGhTsId3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, that is lame. The first time I fired it up gmail disconnected me saying I had used my bandwidth quota for the day or some foolishness like that.

  8. Message Archive. by supersloshy · · Score: 2, Informative

    a message archive for emails you don’t want to delete but still want to keep

    To be more specific, the message archive is for emails that you want to get rid of, but don't exactly want to delete. Like if you're in a mailing list and want to clean out your inbox, but you don't want to delete all of (or at least some of) your messages in that mailing list. It's basically just another way of organizing things. Sorry if I didn't make any sense before :\.

    --
    "Our country is not nearly so overrun with the bigoted as it is overrun with the broadminded." -Archbishop Fulton Sheen
  9. Tabs by RalphSleigh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, does anyone know how to turn off the tabs bar, or at least hide it when there is only one tab, like firefox does?

    99% of the time I read my mail in the reading pane instead of popping open a new window, so the tabs bar is just sitting there with only one tab showing.

    Plus pressing the write button opens a new window instead of a tab anyway...

    --
    Come as you are, do what you must, be who you will.
  10. Great by Ark42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now I can't get to my calendar anymore. Thanks for synchronizing an update with the Lightning extension

    1. Re:Great by t0y · · Score: 2, Informative

      I had the same problem when installing the RC version. This add-on turns out to be very helpful while they don't manage to update lightning.

      The problem I have now is with the update feature. Having installed RC2, do I need to download de full version? It doesn't seem to be able to update itself.

    2. Re:Great by rmcd · · Score: 5, Informative

      You should try one of these:

      http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/

      I've found Lightning betas to be solid and have been using them for several months (I use GCalDaemon to sync with Google Calendar). I'd back up first just to be safe.

    3. Re:Great by Temujin_12 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should try one of these:

      http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/

      I've found Lightning betas to be solid and have been using them for several months (I use GCalDaemon to sync with Google Calendar). I'd back up first just to be safe.

      Mod parent up. The Lightning calendar plugin team has been craking out bug fixes and is well on its way to releasing.

      How Thunderbird has gotten this far without integrated calendaring (not just via plugin) I have no idea.

      --
      Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
  11. Does it matter all that much? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have been a Thunderbird user for as long as it's been around (and before it was "Thunderbird"), and I thought I would be one forever. Even once I started using Gmail for my personal email, I thought I'd need Thunderbird for my work stuff. But, you know, the university started offering hosted Gmail, and I decided to try it... and, months later, I don't miss T-bird at all.

    Thing is, I was one of the hold-outs. While quite a few staff and faculty here are still on desktop email, almost all of our students have preferred web mail for quite a few years now - even when the only web-based option was that gosh-awful "Webpine" (Hey! Here's a great idea! Let's use our awful, counter-intuitive, ugly Pine command line program as a design template for a new web-based email client!). So I wonder for how much longer any desktop email programs will even be considered relevant.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Does it matter all that much? by triplepoint217 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I personally prefer to know that I have a copy of my own emails stored on a computer that I control. Sure google is good at what they do and all and they are not evil, but server foul ups happen. It is also nice for when my laptop is not connected to the internet.

      Web apps also have some usability issues: no right click, usually less good keyboard shortcuts and/or clashes with browser. They loose screen real estate that the browser takes up. A tab within can't be easily alt tabbed to. There are not as many good options for say notification about new mail.

      Gmail and the like are nice for when I am not on one of my computers, but there are still many advantages to having an actual local client, some can probably be mitigated by browser interface improvements, but some are going to be a lot harder.

      So I for one am glad to see thunderbird is still being developed

    2. Re:Does it matter all that much? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny, I switched *away* from in the web-based GMail client, opting for Evolution (mainly because of it's calendar integration). Why? Well, I wanted to access my personal and work email through the same client. But, of course, I'm not gonna forward my work email to GMail. So the only solution available was to use an IMAP client, through which I now access both my work and gmail accounts.

      So, no, desktop clients are alive and well, and probably always will be, thanks to corporations and individuals who choose to run their own email services (Microsoft Exchange in particular).

  12. Lightning.... by shic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That seems quite an important extension - any idea when (or if) it will be supported by TB3?

    To me, it seems like an error of judgement to mainstream release a new version when key addons have not been satisfactorily updated. For the likes of Lightening, it isn't just eye-candy... and, for many, I suspect, breaking existing (addon) functionality will be unacceptable.

    That said, I'm looking forward to 'conversation' view - and I've craved an improved address book for years... though what I saw when I last took a peek at the Beta wasn't much better than in TB2.

    1. Re:Lightning.... by naveenkumar.s · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That seems quite an important extension - any idea when (or if) it will be supported by TB3?

      Try the lightning nightly builds. It worked with TB3 beta.

  13. Re:vCard support yet? by supersloshy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not sure, but More Functions For Address Book fixed that for me on TB 2.

    --
    "Our country is not nearly so overrun with the bigoted as it is overrun with the broadminded." -Archbishop Fulton Sheen
  14. Checking all folders for new mail with TB IMAP by jbn-o · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did you try setting mail.check_all_imap_folders_for_new to true?

    For as long as I can remember I've read on people's blogs (Tinymail's initial implementor's blog, for example) that GMail's IMAP has always been poor and that this is the fault of the implementor (Google), not the client. Van Hoof recommends Dovecot and Cyrus for IMAP service instead, but to be sure, people are probably more attracted to Google's gratis service and large mail quota even if it means allowing Google to index all of your mail.

    1. Re:Checking all folders for new mail with TB IMAP by DynamiteNeon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I dug around online for solutions and had this working in 2.0 reasonably well using mail.check_all_imap_folders_for_new.

      I posted this question on mozillazine a few weeks ago and got some more information, including the bugs listed in bugzilla which are still unresolved. I probably should have included those before.

      http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=1615305
      https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496119
      https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528009

  15. Lightning (and Sunbird) status... by CritterNYC · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lightning isn't ready yet, it's 1.0 release is lagging behind TB 3.0. You can use the current nightly builds and they should work with Thunderbird 3. They're marked as Lightning 1.0B1pre. You can grab a nightly here:
    http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/lightning/download.html#nightly

    They said they're basically at 1.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate status and hope to have the official 1.0 Beta 1 release out within a couple weeks, at least according to the Mozilla Calendar blog. Details are in the Mozilla Calendar Blog (currently offline):
    http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/calendar/

    We're going to stick with recommending Thunderbird 2.0 for a little bit on PortableApps.com because Lightning isn't ready, and it is (arguably) the most important Thunderbird extension. And recommending nightlies to regular users is a bad idea.

    1. Re:Lightning (and Sunbird) status... by dbIII · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lightning isn't ready yet, it's 1.0 release is lagging behind TB 3.0

      That's life doing the bleeding edge fandango - Thunderbird and Lightning - very very frightening.

  16. Re:Account Creator is a Pain by CritterNYC · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can just click Manual as you go through it. I found the automatic mode worked well in the different servers I set it up with. And it checks IMAP before POP for them (as most folks should be using IMAP these days anyway).

  17. Why the uber downloads by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (Note for those backwards people who still use POP: IMAP users normally download their message bodies on the fly.)

    Sigh. Been using the beta for a couple of weeks, so I'm familiar with this download-everything behavior. This is not actually a new feature. What's changed is that it's enabled by default. Which is, I agree, pretty dumb.

    Here's why they did this. This version has vastly improved searching (far and away, my favorite new feature) which doesn't work unless you have a local copy of the mailbox for indexing.

    (I find this a godsend. In the past, I've turned on the local copy feature and then used Google desktop search. The problem here is that the user interface for GD sucks. Also, on one of my machines, I can't get GD to even look at the local mailbox file — no idea why.)

    The way Firefox 3 does searching is Ultimately Kewl. (Won't try to describe it, go give it a try.) Naturally, they were proud of this feature and wanted everybody to try it. But just enabling such a potential bandwidth raper was dumb. Somebody should have designed a wizard or something so you could select the mailbox folders you wanted to index.

  18. Re:How to downgrade from FF 3.5 to FF3.0 ? by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am a PC repairman that covers a two county area. While I myself enjoy 2Mbs Cable (with no neighbors on cable,Yay me!) sadly new lines haven't been run by the cable/teleco duopoly since the mid 80s, so anyone even slightly out of town gets told "dial up or fuck off". So I have to know such tricks to help out my buttraped customers.

    Considering that the telecos are gouging to the tune of $130 a month! (yeah, no shit, that's what they charge here for dial up) and have shut out WISPs and other attempts to service the area (and thus cut off their $130 a month dial up gravy train) frankly I don't see how we will EVER get nationwide broadband without nationalizing the last mile and opening it to competition. They have a duopoly and will viciously shut out ANY competition that dares to try to gain an inch on their turf. I had a friend a few years back that tried to service one of these areas by paying $15k for a T-1 run and renting out connections and when they teleco saw their $130 a month customers start to drop off they jacked up his price to over $4k A MONTH and told him "don't like it? Try to sue us!" and was told by every lawyer he could find that the minimum for a drawn out fight with a teleco was 1 million+ and 10 years of his life. Needless to say he abandoned the T-1 and walked away.

    So please don't buy the "everyone can get broadband if they want it" bullshit. I can tell your from experience that there are still many areas that are being told "dial up or fuck off" and are being gouged truly insane amounts of money by the telecos. I myself tried to offer the local cableco $15k to run a line the whole 2 1/2 blocks to my mother, which would have also covered another 8 homes, 25 if they would have ran the whole half mile length of the road. Their answer? $75k UP FRONT, plus a FIVE YEAR no questions asked maximum package with NO price limits to what they could charge, or GTFO. Needless to say in the 29 years my mother's house has stood they have yet to move the whole 2 1/2 BLOCKS to where she is, so for her it is "dial up or fuck off". So yeah, for my customers and my mother it sucks, but it is a choice of that or abandoning their homes. Some choice, huh?

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  19. Re:TB3 Upgrade Warning - You'll need your password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.smartcomputing.com/techsupport/detail.aspx?guid=&ErrorID=29874

    Will help.
    The problem is that TB3 has Master Password clicked on by default. The bug is that if you didn't have a master password set (just keeps your pop passwords), then your stuffed.
    Back up your emails, uninstall TB3, reinstall TB2, assign a master password, reinstall TB3.

  20. Re:I don't get smart folders by WuphonsReach · · Score: 2, Informative

    Smart folders are an acquired taste.

    I personally monitor about a dozen mailboxes at work (IMAP shared mailboxes, project specific mailboxes, sysadmin type mailboxes that are shared via IMAP)...

    It took me about a month to finally get comfortable with "smart folders". It was there in TB v2, but wasn't as prominent. Once I rearranged my folder structure a bit in the individual accounts, I'm actually quite happy with Smart Folders. I'm happy with all the inboxes clumped together at the top of the window.

    Although sometimes I'll click the little arrows at the top of the folder list (that point left/right and are really tiny and easy to miss) to switch to classic view. Or I'll switch to only looking at "favorite" folders.

    The UI design choice of using those tiny arrows to switch folder views is a poor one. Or at least I should be able to right-click up there and change to a different view, which is what I tried a few times with no luck.

    --
    Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  21. Re:Account Creator is a Pain by WuphonsReach · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The account creator tool is a real pain in the ass. There's no simple option to just create a regular IMAP account. The menus kept resetting on me.

    Yeah, it looks like a race-condition. There's some sort of background task that tries to verify that the settings will work, but it doesn't grey out the UI boxes while it does that.

    It works well enough if:

    - You prefer IMAP
    - Your account domain matches up with the mail server domain

    But I could regularly get it confused.

    They're already working on 3.0.1. Figure out how to make it happen repeatedly, then submit a bug report.

    --
    Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  22. New quick search sucks big time by DrXym · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Thunderbird 2 had a fairly useful quick search bar. Type a word, hit enter, and your email list was filtered for just the search term. The list could be multi-selected, moved around and general managed in a normal fashion. The feature was handy for bulk operations since it was fast.

    Thunderbird 3 still has the search bar but results appear in a new tab. This tab does not show results as a list but in a fancy HTML based summary view. That's great if you were searching for a particular message but utterly useless for bulk operations. What if I want to drag and drop a few files around, or delete them or flag them as junk? Even as a summary view it is stupid since it only shows 10 results at a time with a More button at the bottom. FFS, stop mimicking an AJAX web application - the results are RIGHT THERE on the disk and you can certainly show more than 10 results at a time.

    The workaround is to create a saved search but that's even more hassle for something that could be achieved in seconds in v2.0. So much for progress. I suggest if Thunderbird 3.1 turns up, they put an option or two in to control this behaviour and remember what the user has chosen. There is even a "save search as virtual folder" option in the quick search menu suggesting someone was thinking of doing something like this, it just appears to be inexplicably greyed out.

    Thunderbird 3 has potential but it really feels like a regression in several important respects. It also inexplicably lacks things I would have expected to be improved. For example, you still can't select an email, and right mouse and create a filter from it. This is something that Outlook has had for donkey's years.

    1. Re:New quick search sucks big time by cenc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yea, who ever came up with that search "feature" seriously needs to be kicked in the head.

      On the left hand side, when I see for example an email address similar to my search parameter my inclination is to click on that and expect on the right a complete list of of all similar email. Instead I get some limited half ass list, that might (might) be related to my search.

      THE SEARCH SUCKS.

  23. Re:Doesn't work. by rmcd · · Score: 2, Informative

    What has been working for me (no guarantees about the future!) is to use this exact path (for win32):

    http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/win32-xpi/

    Note the "latest-comm-1.9.1". If I use nightly/win32-xpi/ instead --- that's what seem like it *should* work --- the extension doesn't work. Go figure. All of this may change, I am not sure what the differences are in the different locations.

    I know that this works because I just installed the release version of 3.0 and Lightning on my wife's laptop.

    I am disappointed that the Lightning folks have made it so hard to find an extension that works with 3.0. This seems *very* important.