Slashdot Mirror


Russia Confirms Failed Missile Launch Caused Norway's Light Show

Ch_Omega writes "According to this article over at BarentsObserver, the giant spiral seen on the sky over Norway Wednesday morning local time has been confirmed to be the result of a failed Russian missile launch. Russia now confirms that '...the missile was launched from submerged position in the White Sea by the nuclear submarine Dmitri Donskoy. Studies of the telemetric data from the launch show that the two first stages of the missile functioned as they should, and that a technical malfunctioning occurred during the third stage.' There is also an article on this at The Daily Mail."

59 of 236 comments (clear)

  1. Well paint me surprised: by Fluffeh · · Score: 5, Funny

    And all this time I seriously thought that it was some unimaginably interesting plot all about a russian missile program, underwater subs and secrecy beyond everyone's wildest imagination. Wait... what?

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    1. Re:Well paint me surprised: by DJCacophony · · Score: 5, Funny

      Underwater subs?
      My god, it's worse than I thought.

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    2. Re:Well paint me surprised: by digitalunity · · Score: 4, Funny

      More interestingly, why were they shooting this off next to Norway? Maybe they were hoping it was so cold outside all the Norwegians would be inside and wouldn't notice...

      What exactly was Russia shooting at?

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    3. Re:Well paint me surprised: by martas · · Score: 4, Funny

      santa. they know if christmas dies, the american economy will succumb to the same fate very quickly.

    4. Re:Well paint me surprised: by vivian · · Score: 5, Informative

      as far as I know being able to launch a missile while the sub is submerged would be a huge leap forward in the nuclear arms race.

      This video seems to show underwater missile launches have been done for quite a while now...

    5. Re:Well paint me surprised: by zkp · · Score: 3, Funny

      They gave their software engineers vodka while they were working on the code for the missile. Apparently they significantly overshot the Ballmer peak.

    6. Re:Well paint me surprised: by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Informative

      Have you been living in a cave the past 50 years? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UGM-27_Polaris

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re:Well paint me surprised: by timothyf · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nearly all of the unfrozen sea that Russia has easy access to in the north is also relatively close to Norway (purple is the extent of sea ice):

      http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/NEWIMAGES/arctic.seaice.color.000.png

    8. Re:Well paint me surprised: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Russia was shooting at Kura polygon on Kamchatka. Of course, one would want to shoot from north-west: the rocket flies the longest distance possible, nearly exclusively over Russian territory (this time it seems to be launched from neutral waters), and mainly over polar seas and eternally frozen lands. Given that the Bulava rocket was never built correctly (not for sea launches, at least), not flying it above heavily populated areas seems like a good idea...

    9. Re:Well paint me surprised: by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Russia doesn't need to do anything to bring down the American economy. America did a fairly decent job of that itself not too long ago.

    10. Re:Well paint me surprised: by tbischel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What I want to know is can we hire them for the 4th of july?

    11. Re:Well paint me surprised: by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They hate us for our big-box retailers.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    12. Re:Well paint me surprised: by Cochonou · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Typhoon class submarines (the Dmitri Donskoi belongs to this class) are not supposed to fire missiles from underwater. They are supposed to break the ice pack to launch their payload. So, this is either a very interesting evolution, or bad reporting.

    13. Re:Well paint me surprised: by Loupitour · · Score: 2, Interesting

      as far as I know being able to launch a missile while the sub is submerged would be a huge leap forward in the nuclear arms race.

      This video seems to show underwater missile launches have been done for quite a while now...

      In France, all ICBMs are actually SLBM (Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missile) since all the land-based missile launchers have been dismantled in the late 90s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strike_Force_(France) I don't remember a test ending in a huge spinning spiral though. If this is a secret program, I guess they're doing it wrong...

    14. Re:Well paint me surprised: by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative

      as far as I know being able to launch a missile while the sub is submerged would be a huge leap forward in the nuclear arms race.

      It was, when the US and USSR both achieved it in 1960.

    15. Re:Well paint me surprised: by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

      What exactly was Russia shooting at?

      Well, duh. UFOs, obviously. The significant question is: what sort of exotic defence did they use to cause that response? Warp shields? Singularity field?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    16. Re:Well paint me surprised: by No+Grand+Plan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where've you been? They've been doing that since the Cold War.

    17. Re:Well paint me surprised: by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      To show their power, just like they have started flying strategic bombers past the Norwegian coast line towards the UK.

      Exactly. In Belgian news it was described as a missile which could travel 8000km and drop 9 atomic bombs.

      It's "inducing fear", distracting the public from something else (why show off their new "worlddestroying" missiles? And if they've tested 8 times before, like I read somewhere, why was it only now as visible? My family has a strong military history and I've always been told "the [military] official story is always PR, not truth.")

      It's poking the USA with a wink to the cold war; the US is weakened after been cannonfood in the middle east, ginormic debts and an economy belly-up, Saudi arabia cannot loan futher "We has to sell dubay, and don't have monnies nemaor because of electric cars :'(".
      It's the perfect time to fire off awesome fireworks and telling people it might be able to destroy the world in a eyeblink.

      Up next: Asia demonstrates military superiority, the middle east continues to develop atom bombs, Europe develops a European united army, India knees USA in the balls, USA drafts robots for duty, whips AI-scientists to be more productive and drafts 12yo fat kids to operate drones while Japans mechs are revealed, taking over control of the teen demography through hentai.`^_^

      I better start programming at a post-apocalyptic world. 2012 isn't global warming. (had been debumked, needed new fear; kthx Russia, bring more brides.)

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    18. Re:Well paint me surprised: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Typhoon class is able to fire ICBMs while fully submerged from any of its 20 silos. The system creates a huge gas-bubble over the launch-tube in which a propelling charge drives the rocket to the surface, then it ignites its rocket engine and continues as any ICBM.
      Recent development would be the RSM-56 Bulava, a Topol M-based marine ICBM, its test launches were performed from Typhoon class submarines while fully submerged. Videos of a Typhoon class launching a missile while submerged have been around for a while now, as well... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxf84ptXBWA 1:38 shows, as far as i remember, on of the akula / typhoon's silos.... the large amount of gas is visible.

  2. Back in the day... by GrahamCox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was once a time that Russia would have just kept schtum. How many UFO reports are due to similar failed firings prior to the end of the Cold War?

    1. Re:Back in the day... by bertoelcon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Everyone without a tinfoil hat knew it was a failed rocket of some kind.

      Thats because the tinfoil hats block that kind of mind control.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    2. Re:Back in the day... by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, UFO reports you!

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Back in the day... by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hah! That's what THEY want you to think!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. Re:Testing missiles? by ChipMonk · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sometimes, that really is what happens. Put a buoy out there, with a camera to record the missile reaching its target, or not. The delivery system and the detonation system are not necessarily joined-at-the-hip.

  4. Nuclear Armageddon or Computer Glich? by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So happy not to be living in the cold war. Today, I like to think it's harder for fictional missiles to start WW3. Fewer false positives. Of course, here the missile was actually launched...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Petrov

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:Nuclear Armageddon or Computer Glich? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2, Informative

      For ballistic missile launches, other nations are notified well in advance. In this case, Britain, France, and the US were certainly notified, and others may have been provided some level of notice as well.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  5. Re:Placement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because White Sea is free of ice year round. For that reason most major submarine bases and shipyards are located on its coast. Most of Russia's coastline is devoid of infrastructure needed to support naval operations or whatever they still have left.

  6. Re:Placement by sznupi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It was happening at quite high altitude, visible from vast distance, so it wasn't really at the doorstep of Norway, probably.

    Plus Russia doesn't have exactly that much of a coastline as the first glance at many typical maps would suggest - the northern regions are quite close to the north pole, so they end up heavily "distorted" in certain map projections.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  7. Re:Testing missiles? by hwyhobo · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was supposed to detonate over the polar cap and melt it to shut up the global warming deniers.

    --
    End anonymous moderation and posting on /.
  8. bloody nonsense. by Cr0vv · · Score: 5, Funny

    That was no danged failed launch of a missile. Has anyone seen the images? This reply by the Russians is a coverup. This event was far, far bigger in scope and influence. This event was viewed by people, there was no mention of a rocket or a missile, besides how could a device like a missile scribe a path in the sky like that, and then break off with a blue spiral? Ugh. These people must think we are so stupid. This is a spiritual event, not a rocket event. blackcrow.

  9. Re:Placement by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Worse, Russia doesn't really have a lot of ice-free coastline, especially during the winter. And the few they do have can easily be blocked from the open sea by NATO countries.

    It was one of the big issues during the cold wars, afaik even one of the core reasons for the Vietnam war.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. Bad fuel mix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Given the out of control spiral pattern maybe Vodka wasn't the best choice for rocket fuel even if it was greener.

  11. If they can repeat the behavior on a smaller scale by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a really cool new kind of fireworks. I've never seen one do this before.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  12. At least it wasnt a nuke plant going up... by thaddeusthudpucker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...Like in 1986 when it took radiation alarms going off in fucking SWEDEN before they admitted that they had literally nuked a city or two...

    1. Re:At least it wasnt a nuke plant going up... by DrKnark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nuking a city would in my mind imply an explosion created by nuclear reactions. The explosion in Chernobyl was created by good old chemical reactions (hydrogren gas).

  13. Re:Forth Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    : X DUP 1+ . . ;

  14. Re:Placement by dakameleon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought Vietnam was mainly a China vs US gig?

    Can't help with the reason for why it's relevant to USSR's coastal access, but in 196x China wasn't exactly in a position to sponsor a proxy war, having just taken a bit of a misguided jump. The proxy war was still between the USA and USSR.

    --
    Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
  15. Re:Placement by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Interesting

    North Vietnam was backed primarily by the Soviets, not the Chinese. In fact, shortly after the end of the Vietnam War, China and Vietnam got into a shooting match over the Vietnamese presence in Cambodia.

    The Soviets needed more warm-water ports, and Vietnam was willing to provide this. This also put a significant portion of the world's shipping lanes within striking distance of Soviet forces. The domino theory may have been an overblown fear, but a significant base of operations in that part of the world is all that the USSR needed to make a serious nuisance in case things heated up.

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  16. Re:Placement by styrotech · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're not thinking of Korea maybe? North Korea and China were close buddies. North Vietnam was better friends with the Soviets, and never really got on well with China.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Vietnamese_War

    The tensions between Vietnam and the Khmer Rouge that led to Vietnam invading Cambodia was a chance for the Soviets and the Chinese to have a little war of their own.

  17. Underwater aircraft launch of F-15 by viking80 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thye can even launch aircrafts from underwater aircraft carriers. When youtube asks you to confirm that you have a TOP SECRET security rating, you must answer yes to see video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clIUY0U0xAU

    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org
    1. Re:Underwater aircraft launch of F-15 by Sitrix · · Score: 3, Informative

      LOL, that video never gets old. :) Sad thing is that the whole "Submarine Aircraft Carrier" thing was done before plenty of times in the past. :)

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12u-ppn_Q3M --- Japanese Submarine Aircraft Carrier
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_aircraft_carrier

  18. A missile that hypnotizes you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe they want to create a weapon that hypnotizes you. And once you are hypnotized they recruit you hahaha

    1. Re:A missile that hypnotizes you by Archon-X · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is swirly thing above or below orange?

  19. Re:Placement by compro01 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Russia's coastline isn't that open when you look at it.

    1. North - Covered with ice during most of the year, including now, so testing here is not an option.
    2. East - Would take forever to get there from the sub bases on the west coast (You'd either have to go north and stay under the ice for weeks, or go south down the Atlantic, around Africa, and through the Indian ocean), so also not an option.
    3. West - This is the coast of the Baltic sea (And it shares coasts with Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and maybe Norway (I forget where the Baltic ends and the Atlantic beings)), from which you can get to the Atlantic, which puts you right at the south-western coast of Norway, and just a bit northeast of the UK.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  20. Total Freak Out by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Imagine though how freaked out one would be walking outside and suddenly seeing a giant spinning spiral with a sci-fi-ish blue trail passing through the middle. Based on the youtube vids I saw, one could actually perceive the spinning motion.

    And double freaked out if walking out of a movie theater after seeing a scary movie. That's just one goddam weird pattern.

     

  21. Re:Testing missiles? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

    So where was the missile supposed to go?
    Just a test run and then crash into the sea?

    Yes. At this point, they would be quite happy if it would at least do that properly. So far, there were 13 (known) tests, and 6 of them failed. Most importantly, the 2 tests preceding this one were failures. This for a weapon that was supposed to be in service 3 years ago originally, and at the beginning of this year was claimed to be fully operational by the end of it.

    Since this is supposed to be the next-gen uber missile to replace the venerable Topol-M, is supposed to be able to penetrate "any defense" (it's MIRV with EM shielding, and ability to maneuver and fire decoys in flight if it's shot at), and since it's the first weapon of that kind developed entirely in modern post-Soviet Russia (not a design developed in USSR, and not a project inherited from USSR), its success was supposed to prove that Russia is "up off its knees", and ready to take on the big boys if needed, as in the good old times... And since it's been such an abject failure so far, needless to say that it serves as a good target for related jokes these days.

  22. Aliens from outer space by mysidia · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Missile launch" is just a coverup.

    Norway's version of "It was just a weather balloon".

  23. ITS OKAY, FOLKS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Russia's just launching missiles from nuclear subs, that's all.

  24. Underwater launches by jamax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While reading through suprisingly ignorant comments on _new_ tech of launching an ICMB from submerged position (this is slashdot, we are all supposed to be armchair warriors with underdeveloped muscle tissue and oversized brains filled with data on weaponry we would never, ever see unless its on youtube) and replies of ppl putting the record straight I just want to add this little nugget of information here:

    In 199something (don't remember, but it was a crappy year in Russia - lost of bad news, the story got lost and resurfaced only in 2002 I think) Russian submarine has successfully launched ITS ENTIRE PAYLOAD in quick succession (as in several seconds between missiles) from submerged position - quite a feat of technology as well as personel training, since when launching more than one ICBM in quick succession one must take into account subs' weight change after the first missile leaves (it begins to surface), uneven wight distribution as pumps begin to fill ballast tanks with water to compensate just when the second missile fires, actual RECOIL begins to matter too - it's not much of a problem when you fire just once, but it becomes one if the sub's being shaken just as another missile is attmepting its launch..

    So all in all - ICBMS from under water = old news.

    Cheers

  25. Launch history of the Bulava by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    The launch history of the Bulava is discussed here. It's worked a few times, but they've been having failures in minor components like explosive bolts. That indicates quality control problems in the supply chain, not design problems.

    It's hard to restart an entire high-tech supply chain when there hasn't been any demand for years. The US lost the ability to build nuclear weapons for over a decade.

  26. Re:No Fool by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But this story is in the Daily Mail. Since I don't believe anything they say maybe Russia *hasn't* denied it?

    --
    It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
  27. Re:What happened to Russia? by cpscotti · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyway, we'll just drink vodka with friends and continue feeding our own conspiracy theories saying that in fact this is just a big decoy for something Yuri made to control everyone's mind into believing that, in fact, the "t.A.T.u." girls ARE lesbians!

  28. Obvious when you think about it. by KickInNutsAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's quite obvious when given some thought. Consider the following:

    You are at a party relaxing and enjoying yourself. At some point you lose track of your surroundings and time. When you come to, you remember being junk-kicked in your man business some 180 times. You're pretty sure in was someone you met at the party by the name of Ivan Jnkkckr. After a bit of investigative work you track down Ivan's number from another guest that attended the party. Ivan denies junk-kicking you in your man business.

    After further investigation and conversations with other party attendees, you come into possession of some cellphone video. The videos show quite Ivan's foot spinning in a spiral pattern while junk-kicking you in your man business some 180 times. You confront Ivan Jnkkckr with multiple videos showing from multiple angles the relentless assault on your now decimated nuts. Ivan then promply admits that he spiral junk-kicked your nuts.

    Obviously Ivan knew he had junk-kicked your man business; he just needed the video evidence to compel him to come clean.

  29. Tinfoil is a plot!!!11!eleventeen by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sure, that's what the Government and their Illuminati masters want you to believe. So you're wearing roughly a metallic hemisphere on your head, right? Sure, it reflects mind control rays coming from upwards and back, but what about rays coming from the front, hmm? Right, those get reflected and focused, like by a telescope mirror, inside your brain. And do you think that the proliferation of WiFi hotspots and police radars and whatnot at ground level is just a coincidence? Hmm? Wake up, people! ;)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Tinfoil is a plot!!!11!eleventeen by ex_ottoyuhr · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it's even worse. Tinfoil hats block most radio signals, but they amplify signals on certain bands reserved for government use.

  30. no, in fact china was hostile to vietnam by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Informative

    at first after world war 2 there was an idealism in the air that marxism/ communism would result in cooperation between russia and china. but this quickly fell victim to the usual imperialistic instincts of such vast empires. there were massive military buildups along the chinese-russian border, over stupid petty disagreements like tiny useless islands in the amur river (border between russia and manchuria). american intelligence got wind of this and sensed an opportunity: the tension between russia and china was one of the reasons nixon's about face on china and sudden seeking of warm relations with china at the time made so much strategic sense: drive a wedge between powerful enemies of the usa

    so when vietnam aligned itself with russia, it was sort of china's version of the united states' experience with cuba: a tiny southern country right on its border having the audacity to fall the influence of a powerful enemy. in fact, after the vietnam war, china had its own version of the bay of pigs (on a much larger scale): china and vietnam went to war

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Vietnamese_War

    100,000 vietnamese civilians were killed by the chinese in that 1979-1980 war. but the chinese lost this war badly, and chinese propaganda has pretty much covered the whole event up and erased the war from chinese history books. because it was embarrassing how badly china lost. to this day, chinese veterans of that war are officially shunned and denied benefits or even recognition

    you have to admire the vietnamese: they kicked out a major colonial power, the french. then they took on a world superpower, the americans. and finished it off by repulsing the regional power, china. in one long sustained 30-40 year very bloody struggle, the vietnamese kicked everyone's asses

    vietnam deserves much respect, they have suffered heavily for their rightful independence

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  31. Re:Testing missiles? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Most likely into Okhotsk..."

    Isn't that where they make kid's bib overalls?

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  32. Coincidence? by DarthVain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cold War ends, Global Warming Starts?

    Don't worry, its just the Russians in the fight to stop Global Warm...erm Climate Change.