Slashdot Mirror


NASA WISE Satellite Blasts Into Space

coondoggie writes "After a three day delay, NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer this morning blasted into space courtesy of a Delta II rocket and will soon begin bathing the cosmos with infrared light, picking up the glow of hundreds of millions of objects and producing millions of images. The space agency says the WISE spacecraft will circle Earth over the poles, scanning the entire sky one-and-a-half times in nine months. The idea behind the spacecraft is to uncover objects never seen before, including the coolest stars, the universe's most luminous galaxies and some of the darkest near-Earth asteroids and comets."

27 of 139 comments (clear)

  1. That's a long wait by For+a+Free+Internet · · Score: 4, Funny

    for the infrared flashbulb light to bounce back. Plus, won't this contribute to galactic warming? NASA under Barack Obama is clearly in league with the Italians who are out to destroy America's universe.

    --
    UNITE with the Campaign for a Free Internet because today, our future begins with tomorrow!
    1. Re:That's a long wait by Abreu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, so that's why someone was angry enough to go break Berlusconi's nose...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  2. Beautiful stars better see... by genghisjahn · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am only interested in the coolest, most popular, stars.

    --
    Sorry about the mess.
    1. Re:Beautiful stars better see... by vlm · · Score: 3, Funny

      I am only interested in the coolest, most popular, stars.

      ... combined with the well known ability of IR cameras to "see thru" clothing ...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  3. Bathing? by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it really "bathing" the cosmos? Don't most orbiting observatories just have sensors, not emitters?

    1. Re:Bathing? by Entropy98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe they meant "and will soon begin bathing in the infrared light of the cosmos"

    2. Re:Bathing? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe they meant "and will soon begin bathing in the infrared light of the cosmos"

      Impossible! Nobody ever mistypes, and nobody ever means things in a non-literal fashion. Your explanation, while seemingly reasonable, fails to account for this!

      Clearly what they were referring to is the fact that the WISE observatory is neither at absolute zero, nor a perfect absorber of infrared. Ergo, WISE will both emit and reflect infrared light, which will subsequently bathe the cosmos. Obviously that's useless for the telescope's observations, but it's still true.

      Though "bathe" probably isn't the right choice of words either. Infrared light is not sufficient to get you clean. Just an FYI to my fellow slashdotters prior to any family gatherings they may be attending this holiday season. ;)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Bathing? by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. It is a passive device, as you suspect.

      However, TFS can’t be entirely blamed for this mistake. It was copied and pasted directly from TFS.

      Better article – from the horse’s mouth, as it were. Some interesting tibits:

      Because the instrument sees the infrared, or heat, signatures of objects, it must be kept at chilly temperatures. Its coldest detectors are less than minus 447 degrees Fahrenheit.

      "WISE needs to be colder than the objects it's observing," said Ned Wright of UCLA, the mission's principal investigator. "Now we're ready to see the infrared glow from hundreds of thousands of asteroids, and hundreds of millions of stars and galaxies."

      WISE will see the infrared colors of the whole sky with sensitivity and resolution far better than the last infrared sky survey, performed 26 years ago. The space telescope will spend nine months scanning the sky once, then one-half the sky a second time. The primary mission will end when WISE's frozen hydrogen runs out, about 10 months after launch.

      Just about everything in the universe glows in infrared, which means the mission will catalog a variety of astronomical targets. Near-Earth asteroids, stars, planet-forming disks and distant galaxies all will be easy for the mission to see. Hundreds of millions of objects will populate the WISE atlas, providing astronomers and other space missions, such as NASA's planned James Webb Space Telescope, with a long-lasting infrared roadmap.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    4. Re:Bathing? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or an acid bath. (Which gets you very very very clean. ;)

      Bathing in baked beans (strangely, safe for work) is said to be nutritious.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  4. Not bathing the cosmos by Angst+Badger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm pretty sure we're talking passive sensors here, so it's not going to be "bathing the cosmos with infrared light" as much as it's going to be bathing in the infrared light of the cosmos. If scientists hadn't stopped writing in Latin, we wouldn't have these little word order screwups, now would we?

    But it's good it will be finding the coolest stars. Aside from giving us new insights into the age of the universe and stellar evolution, it'll give NASA something to boast about on Facebook.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  5. Bathing the cosmos with infrared light? by Grokmoo · · Score: 3, Informative

    The summary says it will be "bathing the cosmos with infrared light". What is this supposed to mean? The spacecraft will be detecting light, but will not be emitting it in any substantial quantity. In fact, WISE will be emitting very little infrared light at all (even for a spacecraft), as it is being kept cool for the next 10 months or so with an onboard supply of solid hydrogen.

    1. Re:Bathing the cosmos with infrared light? by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "scanning the entire sky one-and-a-half times in nine months" wha...? Why not just say "it will scan the sky in 6 months" (per TFA).

      Because it’ll scan the sky in 6 months, then scan about half of it again in 3 months before it runs out of the coolant needed to keep its sensors cold.

      In other words, it will scan the entire sky one-and-a-half times in nine months.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. Re:Scan Rate by Snowblindeye · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wouldn't that scan complete one sky in 6 months? It's kind of strange to report that it will do 1.5 in 9.

    It's because WISE has a limited life expentancy of 10 months. In that 10 months its expected to cover the whole sky 1.5 times.

    The life expentancy is only 10 months because the instrument needs to be cooled, which is done with solid hydrogen. Once the hydrogen is gone, the primary mission is over. Not sure if they have a plan for afterwards and can get secondary uses out of it.

  8. Re:Scan Rate by glop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The satellite only has enough cryogen to keep cool for 1.5 sky surveys. Hence the summary.
    I wonder if the satellite can still work without cryogen... I suppose it's going to be much noisier, but how much?

  9. Re:Scan Rate by CityZen · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ah, I'm wrong. From TFA:

    "After a one-month checkout period, WISE will spend six months mapping the whole sky. It will then begin a second scan to uncover even more objects and to look for any changes in the sky that might have occurred since the first survey, according to NASA. This second partial sky survey will end about three months later when the spacecraft's frozen-hydrogen cryogen runs out."

  10. SETI Application? by coolmoose25 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it would be interesting to see if this thing picks up any sign of ETI... You could make the argument that initial communications for ETI might be in the infrared spectrum, as this is what is required to search for asteroids that might wipe out your home world. Any sufficiently intelligent species should have such an early warning system, indeed - you might see that as a necessary capability for an "intelligent" species.

    --
    Brawndo: It's what plants crave!
  11. Red and Brown Dwarf companion stars... by jameskojiro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder if this will find any stars closer to the earth that proxima centari?

    It would be interesting if it found a brown or red dwarf companion to our star which orbits out beyond the ort cloud. An Ion or VASIMIR powered probe to this star would be cool and feasible even if it were up to 1/2 a light year away.

    What would everyone think if we found out that our solar system is just another binary star system amonst the trillions and quadrillions of other multiple star systems out there....

     

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    1. Re:Red and Brown Dwarf companion stars... by diablovision · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Given that Pluto orbits at close to 1/1000th of a lightyear from the Sun (up to 7 billion km versus about 10 trillion km in a lightyear), I think if there were a companion star at 1/2 a lightyear, we'd probably have been able to infer its presence by its gravitational disturbance on the outermost planets' orbits. Also, most binary systems have very tight orbits between the companion stars--a binary system with 1/2 a lightyear distance might be even more unusual than a unary star system.

      I suppose it is possible the Sun has a companion out there, but seems very unlikely to me.

      --
      120 characters isn't enough to explain it.
  12. Why pick such a bad article? by Eevee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Instead of going to some half-assed article from networkworld, why aren't we linking to the actual NASA WISE site? Original sources, people. It's not that hard.

  13. Another sad moment for Slashdot commenting by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I skimmed the summary not even noticing the stupid "bathing" thing', and then guess what 99% of the comments here are about?

    Every time a summary has the tiniest little compiler error in it, no matter what it's about, any interest that might have been gleaned from TFA is lost. All you karma whores storm in like a Black Friday Walmart crowd trying to score your 5, Funny first posts and you fill up this board with this redundantly unfunny goofballing- "huh huh huh it's bathing the cosmos not the other way around huh huh huh"! My heart pains for any infrared astronomer out there drowning in this shit.

    1. Re:Another sad moment for Slashdot commenting by clone53421 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I skimmed the summary not even noticing the stupid "bathing" thing', and then guess what 99% of the comments here are about?

      Please hand in your geek card on your way out.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:Another sad moment for Slashdot commenting by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      not error, misconception. Engineers and scientists hate those. Simplifying for a general audience while still educating is a grand thing, but care to be accurate still taken. So be glad we give a shit,

  14. I am a journalist by istartedi · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am a journalist, and I will not be denied the right to use "bathing the cosmos". It is, in my view, and elegant turn of phrase. Please do not bother me with all this science nonsense about sensors.

    Now excuse me, I have to get off to my 2nd job. It's not easy being a journalist these days. The paper could go belly-up any time. I moonlight writing advertising copy for real estate agents. There are tiny cabins that need to be described as "cozy", and houses needing tree work that need to be described as "nestled in the woods".

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  15. sometimes "hobbyists" can make discoveries by peter303 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A lot of this depends on how timely a given probe team makes the data available on the net. For example, earlier this year hobbyists measured out of ring plane bumps on Saturns rings during Saturn's vernal equinox. Then the rings were edge-on to the Sun and tiny out-of-plane excursions cast measurable shadows on the reset of the ring.

    A counter-example the Kepler project. They are NOT putting raw data on the web yet for the public to anyalyze. They probably have a private website somewhere with the data.

  16. final term of the drake equation by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the most melancholy facts about astromony is that that while at this time and for the near future we have a civilization capable of supporting advanced orbital telescopes, the solar system is currently positioned pretty much in the center of glactic plane--safer from intergalactic bombardment by cosmic rays, but also our view is clouded by interference from so many local objects that we cannot see as much, or as far, or as far back, as would be if the solar system happened to be in the part of its phase where its orbit kind of bobs up or down out of the galactic plan for a few hundred thousand years.

    The next time we'll have a clear view will be about 17 million years from now. That's for the northern sky. Add another 35 million years to that before we get a clear view to the south. I hope we're still here by then.

    1. Re:final term of the drake equation by lennier · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The next time we'll have a clear view will be about 17 million years from now."

      (adds to Blackberry calendar)

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC