Slashdot Mirror


NASA WISE Satellite Blasts Into Space

coondoggie writes "After a three day delay, NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer this morning blasted into space courtesy of a Delta II rocket and will soon begin bathing the cosmos with infrared light, picking up the glow of hundreds of millions of objects and producing millions of images. The space agency says the WISE spacecraft will circle Earth over the poles, scanning the entire sky one-and-a-half times in nine months. The idea behind the spacecraft is to uncover objects never seen before, including the coolest stars, the universe's most luminous galaxies and some of the darkest near-Earth asteroids and comets."

8 of 139 comments (clear)

  1. That's a long wait by For+a+Free+Internet · · Score: 4, Funny

    for the infrared flashbulb light to bounce back. Plus, won't this contribute to galactic warming? NASA under Barack Obama is clearly in league with the Italians who are out to destroy America's universe.

    --
    UNITE with the Campaign for a Free Internet because today, our future begins with tomorrow!
  2. Re:Scan Rate by Snowblindeye · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wouldn't that scan complete one sky in 6 months? It's kind of strange to report that it will do 1.5 in 9.

    It's because WISE has a limited life expentancy of 10 months. In that 10 months its expected to cover the whole sky 1.5 times.

    The life expentancy is only 10 months because the instrument needs to be cooled, which is done with solid hydrogen. Once the hydrogen is gone, the primary mission is over. Not sure if they have a plan for afterwards and can get secondary uses out of it.

  3. Re:Bathing? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe they meant "and will soon begin bathing in the infrared light of the cosmos"

    Impossible! Nobody ever mistypes, and nobody ever means things in a non-literal fashion. Your explanation, while seemingly reasonable, fails to account for this!

    Clearly what they were referring to is the fact that the WISE observatory is neither at absolute zero, nor a perfect absorber of infrared. Ergo, WISE will both emit and reflect infrared light, which will subsequently bathe the cosmos. Obviously that's useless for the telescope's observations, but it's still true.

    Though "bathe" probably isn't the right choice of words either. Infrared light is not sufficient to get you clean. Just an FYI to my fellow slashdotters prior to any family gatherings they may be attending this holiday season. ;)

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  4. Why pick such a bad article? by Eevee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Instead of going to some half-assed article from networkworld, why aren't we linking to the actual NASA WISE site? Original sources, people. It's not that hard.

  5. Another sad moment for Slashdot commenting by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I skimmed the summary not even noticing the stupid "bathing" thing', and then guess what 99% of the comments here are about?

    Every time a summary has the tiniest little compiler error in it, no matter what it's about, any interest that might have been gleaned from TFA is lost. All you karma whores storm in like a Black Friday Walmart crowd trying to score your 5, Funny first posts and you fill up this board with this redundantly unfunny goofballing- "huh huh huh it's bathing the cosmos not the other way around huh huh huh"! My heart pains for any infrared astronomer out there drowning in this shit.

    1. Re:Another sad moment for Slashdot commenting by clone53421 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I skimmed the summary not even noticing the stupid "bathing" thing', and then guess what 99% of the comments here are about?

      Please hand in your geek card on your way out.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  6. Re:Red and Brown Dwarf companion stars... by diablovision · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Given that Pluto orbits at close to 1/1000th of a lightyear from the Sun (up to 7 billion km versus about 10 trillion km in a lightyear), I think if there were a companion star at 1/2 a lightyear, we'd probably have been able to infer its presence by its gravitational disturbance on the outermost planets' orbits. Also, most binary systems have very tight orbits between the companion stars--a binary system with 1/2 a lightyear distance might be even more unusual than a unary star system.

    I suppose it is possible the Sun has a companion out there, but seems very unlikely to me.

    --
    120 characters isn't enough to explain it.
  7. final term of the drake equation by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the most melancholy facts about astromony is that that while at this time and for the near future we have a civilization capable of supporting advanced orbital telescopes, the solar system is currently positioned pretty much in the center of glactic plane--safer from intergalactic bombardment by cosmic rays, but also our view is clouded by interference from so many local objects that we cannot see as much, or as far, or as far back, as would be if the solar system happened to be in the part of its phase where its orbit kind of bobs up or down out of the galactic plan for a few hundred thousand years.

    The next time we'll have a clear view will be about 17 million years from now. That's for the northern sky. Add another 35 million years to that before we get a clear view to the south. I hope we're still here by then.