Slashdot Mirror
DECAF Was Just a Stunt, Now Over
An anonymous reader writes to tell us of the de-activation of all copies of DECAF. The creators have announced that the DECAF project was nothing more than a "stunt to raise awareness for security and the need for better forensic tools." Originally DECAF was billed as a tool to stop Microsoft's forensic tool "COFEE" and was covered here earlier this week. In addition to their message of security the authors somehow manage to interject a discussion about religion, so who knows what the real goal was.
0xDECAFBAD
Ceci n'est pas une
When after reading that I reply with "WTF?"
Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
I can see what they are getting at but it is a real douche thing for them to be all "shame on you!" for downloading and using software that they themselves created, provided, and handed out. I can't see a whole lot of people taking them seriously, as a result.
When I saw the original announcement of this program, I was skeptical of what it was actually for. However, I didn't see this type of angle coming! LOL, wow!
If you actually downloaded this thing, let this be a valuable lesson. Don't be gullible. This could have been a virus for your computer, instead of one for your mind.
Considering that all but the first paragraph of the article was the religious message its self, I'd say that it is pretty clear what the goal was.
Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
I think you meant this:
1. Make fake software.
2. Make fake software work like it will outshine proprietary software.
3. ???
4. Prophet
"This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
Yeah well the atheists and libertarians that you don't like are merely posting comments on this site. I may not like libertarians, but I can't remember the last time one of them wrote a timebomb malware program, to go off at a set point, and give me a pro-libertarian screed.
Ironic that the message to be learned from a group of people pushing a religious agenda is "Don't be gullible."
You're doing it wrong.
I found that last part a little out of place, but then that's their site, so let them post whatever testimonial they want.
It's their site and their right, but in general using a technical discussion to shoehorn in religious promotion is considered bad form, to put it mildly.
Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
"deceiving people is against Christian principles. " != "no self-professed Christian has ever deceived anyone"
But why do you hate the ideas? I'm a weak libertarian myself and find that personal liberty is important. Don't generalize and say all libertarians are extremists. We don't all want to abolish the government. I'm curious about your ideas since I feel a decentralized government that helps those who truly need it, while not having ideas to force upon you about religion and ethics (marriage, alcohol, etc) would be the best deal. This is libertarianism for you.
Libertarianism is one of those few ideas that, if implemented and accepted, really would reverse the current trend of ever-expanding intrusive government and the general decline of personal liberty. For just that reason, it cannot be tolerated by anyone who stants to profit from this status quo. Such people include powerful politicians and influential members of the media. These are people who can influence the society and the prevailing opinions of the day quite a bit more than most people would like to admit.
It's no surprise to me that denigrating Libertarianism is another trendy bandwagon. That bandwagon is intended for people who won't personally investigate it and see what it's about on their own. If they did that, they'd quickly find that the Founding Fathers are some of the truest Libertarians who ever lived, except that back then it did not have such a name. They'd also see that throwing out those freedoms for any reason and with them the traditions of this nation is always a mistake, no matter how tempting.
Such people who form strong opinions and beliefs about things they have not investigated are sometimes called "useful idiots." They are extremely useful anytime you want to deceptively campaign against something. They are so useful because they will accept ideas from others and adopt them as if they independently came up with those ideas on their own. Look at the methods used here. The negative portrayal of Liberterianism is based almost exclusively on pretending like its most extreme form is its only form, and so anyone who calls himself a Libertarian is immediately equated with an anarchist or anarco-capitalist. This is a classic example of straw-man or red-herring demagoguery in the media. It's so easily refuted that there can be nothing accidental about it.
It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
Your answer clarifies the problem.
I'm going to do a bit of politics myself and see if I can influence things then. I actually went to a town hall meeting this month for the first time. I know one person who is a municipal councillor and he invited me because of my interests in politics. I suppose we should all do this and slowly nudge the laws towards liberty ourselves. If most politicians want power for power's sake like you say, that would be the only way to change things.
He did tell me that if I was really interested I could become influential with time, but that you had to know people that are already in the game to play it properly...
Sad isn't it?
Yeah but theres no advantage to it. Its sorta like a prostitute doing volunteer work
Would that be pro boner work?
First posting isn't trolling. It's...first posting.
In shockingly unexpected news, it turns out that a closed-source alleged anti-malware software was not trustworthy.
Who would have guessed.
What DECAF giveth, DECAF taketh away.
Libertarianism is one of those few ideas that, if implemented and accepted, really would reverse the current trend of ever-expanding intrusive government and the general decline of personal liberty.
Your words seem to be an extension of the no true Scotsman fallacy.
You'd have to start by telling us which version of Libertarianism you think will solve America's ills before we can have a learned discussion on the matter.
As a general comment though, history has shown that time and time again, when ideology and reality meet, ideology usually fails.
A more pointed comment is that America tried laissez faire economics (a principle key of most libertarian ideology) and its own excesses earned it a well deserved death.
Agencies like the EPA, FDA, SEC, FTC, etc were all formed as a direct response to libertarian practices.
[Fuck Beta]
o0t!