For consumers what is the benefit of another phone OS with another incompatible app store? What features does this OS have. Is it faster? Cheaper? Prettier?
Yeah, heaven forbid we ever make something new. Choice is bad, h'mkay?
What is perhaps interesting is that Lost has a lot more popular appeal than the examples I quote above, so maybe this type of storytelling is becoming more appealing to the average TV viewer?
a professor at the University of Edinburgh DOES = good science and for things like this... i think i'll ask someone i KNOW to be an expert.... good idea don't you think?
Come to think of it, it probably is a good idea. The more people get to know about this guy, the better.
Slashdot Mirror
Waterfox is 64bits and gets rid of a bunch of cruft that Mozilla puts in Firefox.
I had already swapped systemd-resolved for dnsmasq because that works.
OsmAnd is quite usable though.
Since when has Amazon actually been making a profit, then?
Slashdot keeps using technology from two decades ago.
Well, that's just because Lynx hasn't implemented the canvas tag yet.
Yeah, heaven forbid we ever make something new. Choice is bad, h'mkay?
If people just used Ubuntu, that wouldn't happen.
RT knows all about freedom of press, hm?
Spreading freedom.
I cnocur.
I thought that on ./ all that counted (except for laptops) was uptime, ie. not turning your machine off when you're not using it.
No you don't. A cinema isn't exactly a proper place to work.
Ghostery is marketeer self-regulation as well, blocking only scripts from companies who opted in to the program.
A translator from one top-heavy system to another is not pretty. Who'd have thunk it?
Isn't the standalone method (known since the eolas debacle) sufficient?
Listen you stupid machine, it tastes filthy! Here, take this cup back!
Nobody believes me when I say I have an "open mind" on pretty much any subject.
... information wants to XX XXXX.
I'd settle for restricting flash to site domain only.
What a novel concept!
If only pages would load as fast as they can be rendered.
What is perhaps interesting is that Lost has a lot more popular appeal than the examples I quote above, so maybe this type of storytelling is becoming more appealing to the average TV viewer?
What?
Because nobody ever told stories with large amounts of flashback before the advent of hypertext.
But if you tie it to a fancy buzzword, it's all new and exciting!
... they wouldn't notice us
no no no — you're supposed to say “Can you imagine...”
a professor at the University of Edinburgh DOES = good science and for things like this... i think i'll ask someone i KNOW to be an expert.... good idea don't you think?
Come to think of it, it probably is a good idea. The more people get to know about this guy, the better.