Slashdot Mirror


Google In Talks To Buy Yelp

There have been many rumors floating around concerning a possible buyout of Yelp by Google, but it appears that at least a few details have escaped, painting this as a much more serious possibility. Pointing the needle to something north of $500 million, the acquisition would mean a substantial step into localized business for Google. "Google has been showing greater interest in the local business market in the United States. It has expanded its profile pages for local businesses, which include location and hours, maps and reviews from other Web sites. In June, Google gave local businesses the ability to manage what people see on their profile pages, similar to what Yelp does. Google has been reaching out to local businesses with simpler ways to advertise on the search engine. It is also distributing stickers that businesses post in their windows and passers-by can scan with cellphones to get coupons or information about the business. The deal between Google and Yelp could still unravel, one person said, particularly if another acquirer comes forward now that details have leaked."

95 comments

  1. Does this remind anyone of... by Jurily · · Score: 3, Funny

    CueCat?

    1. Re:Does this remind anyone of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see any useless little hardware devices being pushed, so, no.

    2. Re:Does this remind anyone of... by Jurily · · Score: 1

      It is also distributing stickers that businesses post in their windows and passers-by can scan with cellphones to get coupons or information about the business.

    3. Re:Does this remind anyone of... by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Not really, because you can actually use the window codes while out & about. If the cuecat had been wireless with internal storage, or (like a phone) been entirely usable on its own, it might have survived.

      As it was, it made a decent contact barcode scanner(I still have a declawed USB model), but lousy for the intended use.

    4. Re:Does this remind anyone of... by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No. Reminds me of QR Codes which are very common in Japan, as most phones can read them, and extract some info like a URL.

    5. Re:Does this remind anyone of... by zn0k · · Score: 1

      I'm not that much into cell phones either, but I wouldn't go as far as calling them useless.

    6. Re:Does this remind anyone of... by Itninja · · Score: 1

      The only phone know of that can read this OOTB are the Android-based phones. Other, as far as I know, require the user to go find an app to do it.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  2. One of these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Google is just going to buy the internet.

    1. Re:One of these days by MatrixManiac · · Score: 1

      The Internet had a big part in an episode of The IT Crowd --> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDbyYGrswtg

    2. Re:One of these days by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      'Pointing the needle to something north of $500 million'

      So is this more or less than eastsouthwest of 50 cents?

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  3. good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and then hopefully they'll just delete it

    1. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You'll probably get marked as "Troll", although what you say is completely true.

      Recommendation sites like that are nearly useless. The last time I tried it, somebody recommended a fancy and expensive restaurant and raved about how great the food was. My wife and I went, and the food was utter shit. Extremely small portions, way the fuck too expensive, and it didn't even taste good.

      Then we checked another restaurant that we like, and found numerous negative recommendations that didn't correspond at all to the hundreds of times we'd been there.

      People's tastes just differ too much to make sites like these useful.

    2. Re:good by madsenj37 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's why they have options to make friends and have followers. People with similar tastes can recommend places to each other and avoid blindly following reviews.

      --
      Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
    3. Re:good by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      yelp is probably the best site I've found for reviews - no reviewed location has flawless reviews and they spot shills/remove them quite fast.

      You are correct that everyone's tastes differ, but that isn't anything for or against the site.

    4. Re:good by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Funny

      Seconded. I ate at a restaurant after seeing good reviews in Yelp and ended up shitting the food out. What a gyp.

      Does anybody else find eating out unattractive? I went out to dinner with a hot chick and all I could think about the whole time was the food being enqueued into my bowels, turning into shit, and finally being squirted out my anus into a small pool of water. Then, no matter how well each of us would wipe, there would still be trace amounts of feces in our underleg regions. The plan was to go clubbing afterward, which would cause us to sweat booty juices. I knew for a fact that both of us don't wear underwear on a regular basis.

      I tried to explain this all to her to her as she was eating her filet mignon, but she dropped her fork and knife and crossed her legs before she asked me to take her home. She never called again :(

    5. Re:good by grepya · · Score: 1

      Where are my mod points when I need them. Someone please mod parent Funny (or Hilarious if that's an option).

    6. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Except for their attempts to extort advertising from the businesses who's sites they have reviews of.

      I had 11 positive reviews and one "eh" review, they called me and asked me for money, I refused and 4 of my good reviews disappeared completely and three bad reviews appeared all within the space of four days of their call.
      The best part was that two of the bad reviewers had obviously never been to my business, the things they talked about are completely wrong.

      Yelp is a scam, it had potential but at this point it's just a scam.

    7. Re:good by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      You can report that to yelp and the users would be banned. Yelp has a system in place for that, and I've dealt with crap like that coming up myself (frequent yelper). You could flag the bad reviews as shills and watch them be taken down in a day, tops.

  4. I don't find Yelp very helpful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    most posts are friends of the business owner or simply whiners.

    1. Re:I don't find Yelp very helpful by Just+Justin · · Score: 1

      I guess it depends on where you live. I did live in Austin and there were tons of reviews for everything. I move to San Antonio and most places only have 2 to 4 reviews. So the chance of 1 or 2 business owner reviews that has a greater influence than when there's 40 reviews of the place. I mainly use it just to find a certain kind of business. If I want a place that mainly sells hamburgers and don't want generic fast food, I just search for hamburgers on yelp. You do have to read the reviews though cause some people do give some low scores for stupid stuff. "Waiter called me Jake when my name is Jack!! I'm never going there again!!" (2 stars)

  5. oh geeze... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 0

    I'm sure the EU will have something to say about this.

    1. Re:oh geeze... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Yelp only operates in the US.

    2. Re:oh geeze... by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      no, there is an yelp UK as well. I still don't get why the EU would care, though.

  6. $ yelp --help by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 3, Funny

    $ yelp --help
    Usage:
        yelp [OPTION...] GNOME Help Browser

    Help Options:
        -?, --help Show help options
        --help-all Show all help options
        --help-gtk Show GTK+ Options
        --help-bonobo-activation Show Bonobo Activation options
        --help-gnome Show GNOME options
        --help-gnome-session Show session management options

    Application Options:
        -p, --private-session Use a private session
        --with-cache-dir Define which cache directory to use
        --display=DISPLAY X display to use

  7. Idea by clinko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "It is also distributing stickers that businesses post in their windows and passers-by can scan with cellphones to get coupons or information about the business. "

    The business could just do free wifi w/the info on the "accept" page.

    It's not like I'm going to have a signal anyway, regardless of what A morbidly obese Luke Wilson tells me.

    1. Re:Idea by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      The business could just do free wifi w/the info on the "accept" page

      I've pushed just this idea on a few businesses. For a relatively low fixed rate, any storefront could get timely advertisements out passersby who need a wifi internet connection and who might just be interested in their products/ services. Win win for everyone.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
  8. Sorry, but this is stupid by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 2, Interesting

    500 million for a very simple website that has people reviewing restaurants and shit? Half the people on Slashdot would be able to clone that website in a couple of months (working alone!), and the user base is *not* worth half a billion (BILLION!!!).

    What is this world coming to?

    Or, what am I missing? Is yelp.com offering something other than people subjectively reviewing things like food?

    1. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Yeah I don't know what it is. If Google pumped out their own service like this, built it into all their apps, I'm sure they could even be innovative and make it better than what Yelp has done.

      Seriously, put your dev team on it for a week and you'll have a bigger base than Yelp does by the end of the quarter, without having spent half a billion dollar.

    2. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by ravenscar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I visited more than one small business in the Seattle area where the owner has made it a point to ask me to post my thoughts/comments on Yelp. They noted that the reviews were really quite powerful at either bringing in or keeping away new customers. Does it have a large user base? Is it worth $500 million? I don't know. What I can say is that I have the impression that young local businesses put a lot of stock in Yelp's ability to impact them.

    3. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by maxume · · Score: 1

      If you are better than Google at estimating the value of Yelp and costs of replicating it, you should be able cream them.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Go to Yelp. Look at what it is.

      Go to Google, Enter Google Maps. Type in "Restaurants in "

      Notice the Ratings and reviews all along the left bar.

      Tell me, what does Yelp Offer that Google does not have already coded. (Keep in mind that Google has tons of services already built, as you can see here.

    5. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by maxume · · Score: 1

      I have no idea. I'm happy to concede that the people involved in this at Google have a better picture of the situation than I do.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, exactly. I wonder what the motivation is. Is it the namesake and user base? It seems like Google could pull alot more if it marketted more, instead of buying out smaller competition.

      Could this be an evil act and I'm just blinded by my love for Google?

    7. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by maxume · · Score: 1

      What do you mean "yeah exactly"? A little ways up the page you are ranting about how stupid it is.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Well, according to the TFA they do have ~$30M/yr in revenue, so there is a real business model there

      * They have a brand name that's well known, at least among US city-dwellers. How often per day do you see those "people love us on yelp" stickers on businesses? That is valuable.

      * Yes, making a clone would be easy for google (or anyone else) but that doesn't mean anyone would use it (see also: Orkut) Without a critical mass of users, the site would be pointless.

      * The value of the user base depends on what you're planning on doing with them. If you have other local-search products that you think will make you money then buying yourself a builtin customer base can make sense.

    9. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by hondo77 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or, what am I missing?

      Why don't you put your money where your mouth is, Mr. Smartypants, and take a couple of months to clone Yelp and find out. Better yet, take four months and make a site that is twice as good! If it's so easy, then do it. Half a billion dollars for four months of work! What are you waiting for?

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    10. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by zokuga · · Score: 5, Insightful

      500 million for a very simple website that has people reviewing restaurants and shit? Half the people on Slashdot would be able to clone that website in a couple of months (working alone!), and the user base is *not* worth half a billion (BILLION!!!).

      What is this world coming to?

      Or, what am I missing? Is yelp.com offering something other than people subjectively reviewing things like food?

      Yelp is the first place I go to when I want to find a new place to eat...it is extremely useful in a big city where there is no way that any other site or publication has reviewed all of the eateries. The tech behind Yelp isn't revolutionary, but it's a pretty slick site to use. more importantly, it basically owns the market for local reviews. Saying that a couple people could clone the site is like saying a couple people could come up with a Gatorade-like drink over the weekend...the response to which would be...So?

    11. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      That was before I discovered that they already have the system in place. I thought they were doing it because they didn't want to do the work.

      Now I see they've done the work and it's just buying out a competitor.

    12. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      also, I understand you apparently have a love/hate with yelp per your last many comments, but what's the issue you have with them? I don't get it.

    13. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why don't you put your money where your mouth is, Mr. Smartypants, and take a couple of months to clone Yelp and find out. Better yet, take four months and make a site that is twice as good! If it's so easy, then do it. Half a billion dollars for four months of work! What are you waiting for?

      If you are going to pay me during that time, I'm all for it. However, I don't see the point - the American market is taken, and this site concept definitely wouldn't work in large parts of the rest of the world. I've just asked several friends from Western Europe (ages 20-40), nobody ever heard of Yelp, nobody knows of a similar local site and nobody would care.

      The point still stands: the website is shitty and could easily be made functionally better in a very short time. That doesn't mean it would attract users, the same as the iPhone is popular and objectively better phones aren't, or insert-your-own-analogy-here.

      If you know how to attract American users and have the money to pay me while I work, let's make a deal and we'll strike a goldmine.

    14. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Yelp doesn't seem to be anything special. I haven't used them before, but it looks like just another review site, in which there are dozens out there. Perhaps because I haven't used it fully I don't see the great beauty it has to offer Google.

      My Love/Hate is really with Google, not Yelp. I like Google, they provide me with a ton of free services like webmail, maps, and a decent search engine. It seems like anything they touch turns to gold and they constantly try to make the world a better place.

      Then they go and do something like tracking your information, or buying out a competitor, and I kind of wonder why. I mean I know they are in it for profits but they seem to be doing very well without purchasing competitors.

      Perhaps they are of the mindset its better for the starters of these smaller companies get paid a small royalty before Google inevitably dominates them with marketshare.

    15. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      Yes, perhaps he could. Except for that money thing.

    16. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Google pumped out their own service like this, built it into all their apps, I'm sure they could even be innovative and make it better than what Yelp has done.

      Isn't that what Google does when they buy other online services? Restructure it to integrate with their other online offerings?

      Seriously, put your dev team on it for a week and you'll have a bigger base than Yelp does by the end of the quarter, without having spent half a billion dollar.

      Presumably, their dev team is already doing other things (and, in the real world, it would take more than a week.) If they buy Yelp, they:
      1) Get a codebase and a team familiar with it that can improve it in directions Google directs,
      2) Get Yelp's existing userbase,
      3) Don't have to compete with Yelp with their own service.

      Instead of reinventing the wheel, they just need to tweak and integrate.

    17. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by maxume · · Score: 1

      But Google is so incompetent that they are wasting $500 million dollars, surely they can't stand up to a more efficient competitor.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    18. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by ottothecow · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Go to yelp...see how all the maps are provided by google (and how the sites usefulness often depends on finding nearby businesses)? Notice how all of the ads are provided by google? Since I didn't make a clickable link, how did you find yelp? did you google it?

      Looks like google already owns yelp...they provide the hardest to develop part of the website, they provide the revenue, and they provide most of the traffic (I rarely go to yelp first for a review...I search for the restaurant and then click the review link). Maybe they just want to make it official.

      --
      Bottles.
    19. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but then some executive can't brag later on about how he spearheaded a $500 million acquisition.

      Never underestimate the need for business executives to spend huge sums of money acquiring products they could have built in-house for a fraction of the cost (with a great increase in quality), for the sole purpose of stroking their egos.

      Sun's acquisition of MySQL is a perfect example of this. Had even a small fraction of those billions of dollars been spent on improving PostgreSQL, MySQL would be nothing more than an artifact by this point. A minor footnote in the history of computing.

    20. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is all fucking obvious and we now that.

      Just can't see why $500m. Sure, you save a lot of time, but $500m worth?

    21. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh, the iPhone had been mentioned negatively, -1 moderation was mandatory!

    22. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by LS · · Score: 1

      Half the people on Slashdot would be able to clone that website in a couple of months (working alone!), and the user base is *not* worth half a billion (BILLION!!!).

      Your user name is appropriate. Despite what armchair entrepreneurs such as yourself may think, building a highly usable and tuned website, while not difficult, takes a lot more effort than you think, even for "reviewing restaurants and shit". As someone who's spent more than two years building a site similar to Yelp for Beijing, and hearing everyone say "can't anyone just build that and take your business?", I can tell you that you are grossly underestimating the effort involved.

      Secondly, getting as many users as Yelp is not as easy as you think. Speak to people with lots of money. DAUs are still important these days.

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    23. Re:Sorry, but this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may own the national market for local reviews, but I'm pretty sure there are local sites that can kick its ass for local reviews. Take, for instance, b4-u-eat.com for the Houston area. It may not have a fancy-looking site, but it does have almost two decades of reviews and probably twice the restaurants as yelp (sorry, there are way more than 1270 restaurants around here), and by not using a rating system it avoids stupid reviews like "I bought a spicy cajun crawfish roll and got a spicy cajun crawfish roll and cajun and sushi doesn't go together so the restaurant sucks for selling it to me ;_; ;_; ;_; 1 star"

  9. Sooner or later... by migla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...to have progress, the people of earth will have to start owning the search and everything else that Google is into nowadays. Today most people probably think Google is doing a good job (and I'm not saying they aren't), but Google will become a middle man that we'd be better off without. The surfers should be in control of the means of searching. I hope the transition will go smoothly and painlessly.

    --
    Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    1. Re:Sooner or later... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah I've often wondered what the world will be like when Google has a new CEO.

      One that likes profits. And instant gratification.

    2. Re:Sooner or later... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the hell moderated this up to 4 on account of its incredibly insight? "The people of earth?" What does that even mean? How are we all going to join together and run a search engine?

    3. Re:Sooner or later... by Gudeldar · · Score: 1

      I see Google is rapidly replacing Microsoft in the minds of the tin foil hat crowd as their massive corporate oppressor. I can't wait to see Eric Schmidt as a borg. Maybe we can start using Googl€ too.

    4. Re:Sooner or later... by migla · · Score: 1

      I don't mean they'd be an oppressor, just that it would at some point become necessary to have an open and free alternative to move things forward, kind of like I believe that to get the best kind of OS, it will have to be Free and open source (and I'm not saying we're there yet when it comes to OS:s, but that proprietary and non-free is not the future).

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    5. Re:Sooner or later... by migla · · Score: 1

      The people of earth are the people of earth. We could come together using the Internet and Free/Open Source software.

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    6. Re:Sooner or later... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not really concerned. Actually, I think it's good that google expends business into all sorts of things.

      What happens if a certain company becomes too big in its certain field? Suddenly, the rules change. What was ok when you were "large" suddenly is not ok when you are "too large" and then governments come and split you up or do other nasty things only governments can think of. The company might be powerful, but governments still are the people who can (and will!) send other people - who will bring pepper spray, sticks, guns, and even tanks with them if they really have to.

      Now if google would "just" reach for information-world-domination as search-engine and a "few" other things... fine.
      But if they grow and grow and get more powerful, those already in power (governments, however they are recruited among a certain group of shadowy-reigning people) will realise a new player... and act.

      Microsoft was able to really, really barely evade that act - and google as a similar or even greater(!) potential to become dominant. Give it ten years of doing what google is doing now and someone they do not want to notice WILL notice.

      So it's good that google, with their aim to get informational world domination, expands. If their would not, they would STILL be too powerful, but not powerful enough for "them" to notice.

  10. ur doin it rong by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Of course people's tastes differ, but yelp can give you a ton of information from a bunch of different perspectives; sure it's a challenge to sort through it all but if you just read the first review and treat as gospel of course you will be disappointed. But if you look at negative and positive reviews and use them to learn about the restaurant (rather than just about someone's opinion of the restaurant) it can be really helpful. After a while you can "friend" reviewers whose comments you find informative and you can ignore those you don't. You can even look at menus and photos of the food; many restaurants have extensive photo albums contributed by users. And, best of all, you can contribute to this information -- if you have a favorite restaurant that is getting trashed by various reviewers, you can post responses.

  11. So... by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    Is it monopolistic or anti-competitive when Google does it? Will we put Borg implants on Larry Page's face?

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not gonna happen. Cmdr. Tuna Taco doesn't want /. to be de-listed.

      Lord Monckton reports on Pachauri’s eye opening Copenhagen presentation
      17.12.2009
      From The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley in Copenhagen

      In the Grand Ceremonial Hall of the University of Copenhagen, a splendid Nordic classical space overlooking the Church of our Lady in the heart of the old city, rows of repellent, blue plastic chairs surrounded the podium from which no less a personage than Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the IPCC, was to speak.

      I had arrived in good time to take my seat among the dignitaries in the front row. Rapidly, the room filled with enthusiastic Greenies and enviro-zombs waiting to hear the latest from ye Holy Bookes of Ipecac, yea verily.

      The official party shambled in and perched on the blue plastic chairs next to me. Pachauri was just a couple of seats away, so I gave him a letter from me and Senator Fielding of Australia, pointing out that the headline graph in the IPCC’s 2007 report, purporting to show that the rate of warming over the past 150 years had itself accelerated, was fraudulent.

      Would he use the bogus graph in his lecture? I had seen him do so when he received an honorary doctorate from the University of New South Wales. I watched and waited.

      Sure enough, he used the bogus graph. I decided to wait until he had finished, and ask a question then.

      Pachauri then produced the now wearisome list of lies, fibs, fabrications and exaggerations that comprise the entire case for alarm about “global warming”. He delivered it in a tired, unenthusiastic voice, knowing that a growing majority of the world’s peoples – particularly in those countries where comment is free – no longer believe a word the IPCC says.

      They are right not to believe. Science is not a belief system. But here is what Pachauri invited the audience in Copenhagen to believe.

      1. Pachauri asked us to believe that the IPCC’s documents were “peer-reviewed”. Then he revealed the truth by saying that it was the authors of the IPCC’s climate assessments who decided whether the reviewers’ comments were acceptable. That – whatever else it is – is not peer review.

      2. Pachauri said that greenhouse gases had increased by 70% between 1970 and 2004. This figure was simply nonsense. I have seen this technique used time and again by climate liars. They insert an outrageous statement early in their presentations, see whether anyone reacts and, if no one reacts, they know they will get away with the rest of the lies. I did my best not to react. I wanted to hear, and write down, the rest of the lies.

      3. Next came the bogus graph, which is featured three times, large and in full color, in the IPCC’s 2007 climate assessment report. The graph is bogus not only because it relies on the made-up data from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia but also because it is overlain by four separate trend-lines, each with a start-date carefully selected to give the entirely false impression that the rate of warming over the past 150 years has itself been accelerating, especially between 1975 and 1998. The truth, however – neatly obscured by an ingenious rescaling of the graph and the superimposition of the four bogus trend lines on it – is that from 1860-1880 and again from 1910-1940 the warming rate was exactly the same as the warming rate from 1975-1998.

      click to enlarge
      4. Pachauri said that there had been an “acceleration” in sea-level rise from 1993. He did not say, however, that in 1993 the method of measuring sea-level rise had switched from tide-gages to satellite altimetry against a reference geoid. The apparent increase in the rate of sea-level rise is purely an artefact of this change in the method of measurement.

      5. Pachauri said that Arctic temperatures would rise twice as fast as global temperatures over the next 100 years. However, he f

  12. This can only end one way by onyxruby · · Score: 3, Funny
    The conspiracy nuts will now be convinced that Google controls the back end and the front end of today's society. I'm just waiting for Google to buy out a transit agency or six in order to start giving the world Google Bus so they can advertise to those offline. They will then transport you to your destination using Google Bus after you will have picked it based upon finding them in Google Maps and reviewing them on Google Yelp.

    Meanwhile the rest of the world will be grateful that Google will not try to extort them for ad revenue to get a good rating.

  13. Will this make Yelp more or less evil? by ShatteredArm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wrote a review on Yelp once. It was very unfavorable towards what was probably the worst restaurant I have ever eaten at. The only other review was glowing (I'm assuming the restaurant owner wrote it). Yelp deleted my unfavorable review (which, I should add, contained no offensive material, obvious flames, or anything else that could warrant a deletion).

    In short, this is a bad idea. A website that seems to get revenue from censorship bribes is not a sustainable enterprise (and yes, I realize I'm making a major assumption here).

    1. Re:Will this make Yelp more or less evil? by Rossman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not only that, but there is no journalistic integrity with Yelp. I know someone who works for Yelp, and they take free shit from businesses that they've reviewed, which is ethically pretty uncool. They've also told me stories about how they've coerced bars into having functions they normally wouldn't have by effectively threatening the bar with bad reviews on Yelp. All in all it seems a very suspect operation and I personally wouldn't trust a single review from it.

    2. Re:Will this make Yelp more or less evil? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've seen tons of negative reviews on yelp. Do you have any evidence that Yelp actually deleted your review based on a bribe?

    3. Re:Will this make Yelp more or less evil? by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      That's why we need YelpBack, a site where business owners can write reviews of Yelp reviewers, so other business owners can be on the lookout. Then we can create a site called YelpRightBackAtEm - where the lambasted reviewers can write reviews on the business owners behavior towards them just because they were a Yelp reviewer. Then we can create a site called MetaYelp - where sociologists and psychologists can write analyses of the interactions on Yelp, YelpBack, and YelpRightBackAtEm. Then we sell the 3 new sites to Google for 1.5 billion dollars. Who's with me?

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    4. Re:Will this make Yelp more or less evil? by alen · · Score: 1

      i read somewhere in the last year that Yelp tries to blackmail businesses to "advertise" there or face a ton of negative reviews. i never use it even though i live in NYC. i know the good places or ask someone who knows about a place.

    5. Re:Will this make Yelp more or less evil? by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

      No, I'm pretty sure I stated that it is pure speculation on my part, but I can't think of any other reason they would have deleted the review. Like I said, there was nothing offensive in it, it was just unfavorable.

      But given that article Scareduck linked, it seems like a distinct possibility. All I can base it on is the following:
      * My review used to be there
      * My review is no longer there
      * There is a glowing five star review about that restaurant which actually mentions what time it opens

      If you can think of another more likely possibility, based on that information, I'd like to hear it.

    6. Re:Will this make Yelp more or less evil? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      I know someone who works for Yelp, and they take free shit from businesses that they've reviewed, which is ethically pretty uncool.

      Isn't that exactly how it works with technology reviews at the various game / hardware Web sites?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    7. Re:Will this make Yelp more or less evil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I came across yelp while reading CNET News headline one day.
      What's funny is that when there is news about yelp @ CNET News, business owners jump in to commet negatively about Yelp regarding its business practices. Do do a search on CNET news for "yelp" and read the negative comments. Boy, it is amazing how much shit loads yelp is getting not only from business owners but yelp users like yourself.

      The bottom line is that users like yourself whom write unfavorable reviews give Yelp a powerful tool to bride business owners to pay $$$ to remove your reviews that you might have spent 30 minutes written it up. Well, at least, this is what I am getting from reading those business owners' comments at CNET. It is amazing that Yelp charges business owners somewhere $300 US at the minimum to remove bad reviews.

      Google is evil.
      Yelp is evil.

      Google + Yelp = Google, you need help!

    8. Re:Will this make Yelp more or less evil? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      If you can think of another more likely possibility, based on that information, I'd like to hear it.

      Sure.
      * server error
      * server update
      * human error of someone maintaining the pages
      * you never actually finished posting it in the first place

      There are probably other possibilities; all far more likely than a conspiracy to censor an unfavorable comment about a local business.

      What was the local business, anyway, Occam's Shaving Emporium?

    9. Re:Will this make Yelp more or less evil? by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

      Considering the review was up for several weeks before being deleted, its getting unintentionally "lost" seems unlikely.

  14. Makes sense by dada21 · · Score: 1

    Yelp gets amazing ranking on all of the search engines, and it also has a huge user base of people who are happy to offer reviews for free. Google wants both of these: high page rank that can drive advertising income, and users who are dumb enough to post reviews for free.

    A Yelp killer would give the top moderated reviewers a piece of the pie.

    1. Re:Makes sense by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Google already has a review system built into Google Maps for Restaurants and Dentists and anything else Yelp has listed on their site.

      I would put my reputation as an estimator on the line to say that Google Maps probably gets more traffic than Yelp.

      Buying out the competition so you make more money is anti-competitive. I love Google as much as the next die-hard fan, but everything about this deal sounds like pure evil.

    2. Re:Makes sense by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      I don't see this as a buyout. They already link yelp from the maps reviews, so what is the big deal here?

      Even if they buy yelp, why does that mean they'd shut it down? yelp has a seriously huge base, and they do a lot more than reviews. If they were to shut down yelp a replacement would come quick, as it's used for an equivalent to meetup too.

    3. Re:Makes sense by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They wouldn't close it down, just like they didn't close down Youtube when they bought it out. Even though they have a competing business (Google Video) - its still all under the same roof generating profits for Google.

      Yelp would still run, Google would just be running it, gaining all of their revenue.

      Until I see a clear motive for Google doing this, It all just seems a little underhanded.

      Its clearly not to acquire their technology or products, they can find a far cheaper solution (500 million is alot of bucks). The only thing remaining that I see is the user-base, and taking over competition.

    4. Re:Makes sense by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      Google wants [...] high page rank that can drive advertising income

      Does Google really need to buy a company to improve their ranking in search engines?

  15. Why not? They're already trying to control.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. one of the things that makes us yelp: http://www.twentysteps.com/images/goorex.jpg

  16. Figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welp it was bound to happen.

  17. what you're missing by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or, what am I missing? Is yelp.com offering something other than people subjectively reviewing things like food?

    Yes. It's offering a social networking site for such people as well as a user-generated database of information about the restaurants (and other businesses) in their neighborhoods. It's like facebook meets wikipedia for food and drink nerds. It's incredibly useful in a large city where new restaurants and bars come and go constantly, and where there is a large mobile population of internet-savvy people with disposable income. People post photos and the reviews range from entirely vapid to densely informative. It's an opportunity for every wannabe food critic to write about what they love (or hate) and actually get readers without having to go pro ... (It's especially useful in a city like LA where print food journalism is already dominated by a single writer!) You can learn a lot about places that you would never get from a menu or the website or a newspaper review. It's not just restaurants, either -- bars, auto mechanics, bowling alleys, doctors, strip clubs, medical marijuana "dispensaries," and universities all have extensive pages of reviews. And you can network with writers you think are helpful or entertaining. Some networks organize parties and group dining events. It's great for travelers too -- I really like to eat out at izakayas (Japanese "tapas" pubs), for example; whenever I travel anywhere in the US that has some Japanese population, I always check yelp to find such places and read their reviews. I don't know if google owning yelp will be good or bad - I kind of like it the way it is now, though I could see its potential to be much cooler. Either way, though, people who use it regularly see a lot of value in it and I'm guessing that google sees a lot of value in those networks of generally young, educated hipsters with enough money to go out to eat all the time and enough free time to spend generating content (for free).

    1. Re:what you're missing by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info.

      I don't mean this in an offensive way, but - it looks like an "American" thing. Where I live, and in the several European countries I've been to, people don't go out to eat (if they do, any random fast food will do) and a bar is just a bar. I personally cannot even remember the last time I've been to a restaurant. It's cheaper and tastier to simply eat at home.

      I still don't see how information on Yelp could be worth more than 1-2 million instead of 500.

    2. Re:what you're missing by ratnerstar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, everyone knows Europe is not known for its restaurant culture. Oh wait, I meant bizarro Europe.

      --
      Just because you sold your soul to the devil that needn't make you a teetotaler. --The Devil and Daniel Webster
    3. Re:what you're missing by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Or, what am I missing? Is yelp.com offering something other than people subjectively reviewing things like food?

      Yes. It's offering a social networking site for such people as well as a user-generated database of information about the restaurants (and other businesses) in their neighborhoods. It's like facebook meets wikipedia for food and drink nerds.

      The problem that I have is that Google has all of this stuff already available to them, they simply haven't consolidated it into a single Application. They have social networking sites (Like Youtube even), they have a user-generated database of information about restaurants (see Google Maps for reviews on businesses).

      This appears either to be "2 lazy 2 copy&paste code" or anti-competitive.

  18. Now Bing has to buy something by Animats · · Score: 1

    Now Bing has to buy something. But what? Local.com? Does Microsoft already have a recommendation service somewhere in its Live system?

  19. Google is like a rich friend by ClosedSource · · Score: 2, Funny

    who buys all kinds of crap without knowing what he's going to do with it.

  20. There was a story about this a year or so ago... by IANAAC · · Score: 1

    I wrote a review on Yelp once. It was very unfavorable towards what was probably the worst restaurant I have ever eaten at. The only other review was glowing (I'm assuming the restaurant owner wrote it). Yelp deleted my unfavorable review (which, I should add, contained no offensive material, obvious flames, or anything else that could warrant a deletion).

    I can't remember where I read it - it may have even been linked here on slashdot - exposing Yelp's sales tactics to restaurants advertising on the site. Basically, they were guaranteed no adverse ratings and higher ranking in searches.

    I think Yelp is a good idea gone wrong considering the exposé. If only they'd found a less sleazy way of getting restaurants signed up.

  21. yelp as a brand by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    anti-competitive maybe, but if you think this is just about copying code, you're missing the point. When yuppies in NY, Chicago, LA, SF, NOLA, Vegas, and other cities in the U.S. get home from a great (or terrible) meal (or strip club or trip to the gynecologist), many of them want to "yelp" their experiences. They don't say "I am going to run home and google map the shit out of this place!" Reviews on google maps are useful but they are not really part of a social network; they are far more anonymous and disposable than yelp reviews. You don't "favorite" authors, you don't upload photos of your food (or photos of yourself), and you don't join groups of other users for sushi or whatever in real live fleshmeets. Yelp has just done the "Web 2.0" experience a lot more elegantly than google in this area. I suspect google doesn't just want the user base but also their sense of connectedness to each other.

    Yelp is not just code; it's an actual social network and it's a brand identity. I don't know if it's worth a half billion either -- those kind of numbers are meaningless to me since I don't buy and sell companies. But it's certainly something a hell of a lot more substantial than its codebase.

  22. If you love/hate google so much by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    you should go yelp about it!

  23. Yelp == SCAM by t0qer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A few others have made the same remarks. I figured I'd fire back with my own yelp experience from a business side.

    We've always been reviewed favorably on yelp. Then earlier this year a competitor decided to get in on the yelp gaming action. This competitor had all of their buddies go out and write unfavorable reviews of us. The review would always go like this..

    "Toqers business sucks because of
    ABCDEFG

    Oh and since they suck, you should to to
    X"

    X being, a location ran by our competitor. Most of the negative reviews were written by folks with 1 or 2 reviews, no real name or picture. The name and picture thing is important in yelp culture because it's "Real Reviews, by Real People"

    Around the same time we started getting calls from yelp salespeople promising if we paid them some outrageous monthly sum, they would make the default sort on our page descending. That way we get all the 5 star reviews first. When we declined somehow the choicest negative reviews floated towards the top.

    So we struck back..

    I started recruiting my regular customers to start writing their own reviews. My competitor cried foul. I told him I was bringing yelp new users, and there was nothing wrong with that. Me having my customers write good reviews was no worse than him having his friends write false/negative ones.

    One of my customers even went as far as to write a review containing a bunch of links to youtube videos. My competitor had said that we were an unlively establishment full of ugly people, and the youtube videos proved that to be completely false.

    The flagging wars

    So my competitor flagged the review with the youtube links citing yelp policy that "Offsite linking should be limited" That review got taken down. We fired back flagging reviews and citing yelp policy as well. Our competitor made the mistake of writing updates that "Are not new experiences" For example, one girl who became the girlfriend of the leader of these folks initially gave us a great review. When she started getting deep dicked she wrote an update review about how shitty we were. Technically she didn't have a new experience, so she got flagged, review removed. For a while every morning was spent dealing with this bullshit. I tried going through regular yelp channels and it was of no help. I begged yelp "Just take us off your service". They quoted DMCA safe harbor laws. I got sick of it, so I started dropping dox on reviewers, Jeremy Stoppleman, other Yelp Big wigs, etc. Me and some of our regulars started having our own version of photoshop Friday, pasting the faces of some of these douchebags on gay porn and what not. Sure it was childish, but we decided we to could hide behind "DMCA Safe Harbor". Fuck em.

    I don't know for sure if that worked, but the slurry of negative reviews stopped. The sort order on our yelp page suddenly changed. The owners son of the business I work at asked me to take down our photoshop friday and dox. Now it seems like we just have a cease fire.

    We haven't been asked by yelp again if we want to join their program. Yelp is really sleazy, to me it seems like they condoned our competitors behavior just to pressure us into giving them money.

    A lot of old time yelp regulars are giving up on yelp. Even AT&T has given up on them. In their last "Does your network do this?" Iphone commercial, they say "Find a great restaurant" That segment used to feature yelp, but now features Zagat.

    If you google "Yelp is a scam" you will find many many websites supporting this. Google please don't make the mistake of buying yelp.

  24. Re:There was a story about this a year or so ago.. by Scareduck · · Score: 4, Informative
    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

  25. Yelp deletes reviews by hkgroove · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've had two reviews deleted that were "unfavorable" from Yelp. These weren't just "I don't like this" bland reviews, but critiquing service, food, etc. justifying 1 or 2 star ratings.

  26. made by consumers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yelp was made by consumers that were willing to write the feedback. Would they get a pie out of this deal?

    1. Re:made by consumers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for your feedback, but the answer is no.

  27. Chowhound.com really screwed the pooch (pun...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chowhound.com was the best restaurant review site on the web until they were acquired (and basically destroyed via redesign by CBS Interactive).

    1. Re:Chowhound.com really screwed the pooch (pun...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf, this is Chowhound.com is a forum, not a review site idiot.