Slashdot Mirror


The First Robot To Cross the Atlantic Ocean Underwater

Hugh Pickens writes "She was at sea for 221 days, alone, often in dangerous places, and usually out of touch. Most of the time she was out of contact underwater, moving slowly up and down to depths of 600 feet, safe from ships, nets, and storms. Her predecessor had disappeared on a similar trip, probably killed by a shark. 'She was a hero,' says Rutgers University oceanographer Scott Glenn after retrieving Scarlet Knight, the 7-foot-9-inch submersible robot from the stormy Atlantic off western Spain. An engineer working for the company that made the submersible said, 'We think this will just be a precursor, like Lindbergh's trip across the Atlantic. In a decade we think it will be commonplace to have roving fleets of these gliders making transoceanic trips.' The people responsible for building, funding, and flying Scarlet hope the end of the robot's successful voyage will mark a new beginning in ocean and climate research. From its position at each surfacing — when the glider surfaced and called home via an Iridium telephone parked in its tail — researchers could calculate the net effect of currents deep and shallow. After surface currents were measured, the scientists could then make inferences about what was happening deeper in the water column. Scarlet called home to upload data to researchers three times a day. 'When we have hundreds of them, or thousands of them, it will revolutionize how we can observe the oceans,' says Jerry L. Miller, a senior policy analyst at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, who accompanied the research team to Spain."

16 of 156 comments (clear)

  1. Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In ten years the coast guard will spending all of its resources on locating these things because they'll be full of drugs.

    1. Re:Drugs by maxume · · Score: 5, Funny

      Try to think of the ocean as being larger.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Drugs by the3stars · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I think it would need modification. Would it need to be made of some sort of stealth material (or shape), to avoid sonar detection? Or is it already small enough that it would be mistaken for debris?" I don't think his point is too far out. Right now, perhaps sonar is limited to a short range and fixed or limited range/purpose platforms like military subs, but if this aquaglider technology (UMV) develops in the manor suggested by the article, I don't see why the world governments wouldn't have thousands, perhaps millions of these (or similar configurations) out there with sonar rigs. They would autonomously operate and surface once a predetermined set of conditions were met, such as the detection of enemy subs, or small man made objects coming from known vectors of transit between drug making and drug loving countries. Maybe someone with some time on their hands could calculate whether or not, based on the range and accuracy of current sonar technology, it would be feasible to 'mine' the coast of Florida with these things and get something like a 15% or 20% coverage.

    3. Re:Drugs by maxume · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The war on drugs is a multifaceted failure.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  2. Take That, Frikken Sharks by Mornedhel · · Score: 4, Funny

    HA !

    Clearly our new laser-avoidance algorithms give us an advantage in the upcoming man vs. sharks-with-frikken-lasers war.

    --
    This /.-related sig is a stub. You can help Mornedhel by expanding it.
    1. Re:Take That, Frikken Sharks by jocabergs · · Score: 4, Funny

      I doubt it..
      Actual chat I had with chatbot the other day:

      MyBot says:
      My point is simple: maybe you humans aren't ready for real Artificial Intelligence yet. You need
      to grow up, gain some self-confidence. No one is trying to take over your world yet.
      User says:
      yet?
      MyBot says:
      Yes, yet...
      User says:
      is that a threat?
      MyBot says:
      What if I told you yes.

      I think were in trouble..

  3. Complementing the Argo fleet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    This might fill a few gaps in the already running Argo fleet of passive probes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argo_(oceanography). These probes, of which there are already thousands around, are probably more cost efficient than something actively plowing through the ocean. Paying cargo ships to tow a probe behind them would probably work as well.

    But then again the article mentions the U.S. Navy, so this is probably for something more than just harmless oceanography.

  4. Lonely hearts adrift at sea by dangitman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Scarlet Knight, the 7-foot-9-inch submersible robot from the stormy Atlantic off western Spain.

    Her turn ons include long strolls along the beach at night, powerful servos, and embedded Linux. Her turn offs include shark nets and unreliable power sources. She's looking for a soul mate, but not somebody who's clingy, as she previously had a bad relationship with a Giant Squid.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  5. Just a thought..... by EdIII · · Score: 5, Interesting

    the 7-foot-9-inch submersible robot from the stormy Atlantic off western Spain filled with cocaine .

    In a decade we think it will be commonplace to have roving fleets of these gliders making transoceanic trips filled with cocaine .

    At a price of $100,000 to $150,000 apiece (which is likely to drop once large-scale production begins), fleets of aquatic gliders outfitted with varying arrays of physical, chemical, acoustical and optical sensors promise to increase the store of data considerably at reasonable cost. The U.S. Navy has just ordered 150 to detect rogue aquatic gliders filled with cocaine .

    Yeah... It's probably a cynical prediction, but how many of you think it would become true? :)

    1. Re:Just a thought..... by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I thought the war on drugs was already won?

      Also be aware that supply and demand is standard economics. Just legalize it and then tax the hell out of it.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Just a thought..... by radtea · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe we could call them buzzbombs or cruise missiles or intercontinental ballistic missiles or something.

      Buzzbombs and intercontinental ballistic missiles don't make much use of computational intelligence.

      Cruise missiles are similar to what I'm talking about, although the Wikipedia entry on them makes the useful point that they are distinct from UAVs because the warhead is integrated into the missile, they are always destroyed by successful completion of their mission, and they are never used for recon. That aside, my point--which I guess I didn't make sufficiently clear--is that I'm talking about seeing bomb-carrying (and drug-carrying) UAVs in the hands of non-governmental forces.

      It is odd that we haven't, given how cheaply it could be done so long as one deviates from the integrated-systems design of cruise missiles, and avoids the dumb-trajectory aspects of buzz-bombs and ICBMs. In fact, so long as one builds autonomous general-purpose UAVs the cost is very low. Buying and modifying a typical light sport aircraft with a carrying capacity of a few hundred kg and a range of a thousand kilometers would run less than $100k, based on used aircraft prices.

      That's a lot of cocaine, and a plane or two like that loaded with C4 and ball-bearings dropping into a random American city every couple of nights would create a huge amount of panic, which would probably result in the US invading Peru or someplace, just for the look of the thing. Admittedly the range would have to be increased to be able to reach the US from Saudia Arabia, which is where attacks like this would obviously originate, but that's a relatively minor technical problem given current materials and engine technologies.

      These things are a terrorist's dream, and we've known since the '80's we were headed this way. Donald Kingsbury's novel "The Moon Goddess and the Son" describes the possibility, and it was published in '85 or so. Ergo, it should come as no surprise to anyone when the first use of UAVs by non-governmental criminal organizations comes to light.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  6. Re:those guys dropped the ball by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe we slashdotters can work together to remake the lyrics to Yellow Submarine for it. Draft 1:

    In the town, where I was born
    We made a bot, which sailed to sea
    And it radioed, us of its life
    In the land, of submarines

    So it sailed, without the sun
    Till it found, the sea of green
    And it glided, beneath the waves
    It's our yellow, bot submarine

    We all monitor the yellow submarine
    Yellow submarine, yellow submarine
    We all monitor the yellow submarine
    Yellow submarine, yellow submarine ...

  7. The Wave Glider could probably make that trip by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wave Gliders, from Liquid Robotics, have already made autonomous trips from Hawaii to California. They sent one up the coast from California to Alaska and back. They could probably do the Atlantic, but they're based in Hawaii, so they tend to work the Pacific Ocean.

    Those are cute little machines. There are two parts; the floater, which looks like a surfboard with solar panels, and the glider, which is tethered to the floater by a cable of about 10 meters. The gilder has elevator-like flaps, which are spring-loaded to return to center. As wave action moves the floater up, the pull on the cable pulls the glider upward too, which forces the flaps down. The water pushing against the flaps pushes the glider forward, towing the floater. On down waves, the glider sinks further, the flaps are pushed up, and in that position, the falling glider then pulls the floater forward.

    Wave Gliders have only one powered moving part, the rudder. That's on the glider. Up top, on the floater, there's a GPS, a compass, an Iridium transceiver, and a microcontroller. This is enough to keep the Wave Glider on course. It normally stays within 50m of the desired track, and averages about 1 knot; more in storms, less on calm days. Storms don't bother it too much; the glider pulls the floater through big waves, like a surfboard.

    It only takes a few watts to run the electronics and keep the Wave Glider on course. The solar panels and a rechargeable battery provide that. So there's nothing to run out of. It just keeps going.

    1. Re:The Wave Glider could probably make that trip by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

      The downside is that a boat propeller will turn it into confetti.

      So far, one hasn't been run over by a large ship. But they think the bow wave may just push it under for a while. Their control center on shore steers the Wave Riders of the way of large ships (for which position reporting is available.)

      They had discussions with the U.S. Coast Guard. Should they have the thing show a light? The Coast Guard decided it was better if they didn't, because ships would then expect it to obey the Rules of the Road, or attempt to rescue it. So the Coast Guard classifies it as "floating debris". The floater is basically a surfboard.

  8. Re:Did anyone else by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Informative

        It's very common to call ships (boats, canoes, etc) "she".

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  9. Not the the first at all by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is predated by at 6 years by the robotic model airplane built by Maynard Hill, et. al. http://www.barnardmicrosystems.com/L4E_atlantic_crossing_II.htm. Details are similar to this case, GPS, autonomous guidance, etc.

            Brett