Slashdot Mirror


The Last GM Big-Block V-8 Rolls Off the Line

DesScorp writes "It's the end of an era in auto technology, as the very last big block V-8 engine from GM has rolled off the production line. The L18 engine was the last variant of an engine that had been in continuous production for over 50 years. The big blocks powered everything from the classic muscle cars of the '60s and '70s to heavy-duty trucks today. From the Buffalo News: 'When GM said last June the L18 would be eliminated by year's end, the announcement triggered another show of devotion to the product. Some customers ordered two years' worth of L18s, to put on the shelf for future use.' More than 5 million big blocks have been produced over the engine's history. The final big block engine to come off the line in Tonawanda, NY is headed for the GM Heritage Center in Sterling Heights, MI."

90 of 525 comments (clear)

  1. I just pictured an oil sheik... by istartedi · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...with a single tear running down his face.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:I just pictured an oil sheik... by More_Cowbell · · Score: 3, Funny

      You sir, win one internet.

      --
      Experience teaches only the teachable. -AH
    2. Re:I just pictured an oil sheik... by bennomatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I pictured a paraplegic mechanic saying, "She's a real beaut! Last of the V8's! Woulda been a shame to blow 'er up..."

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    3. Re:I just pictured an oil sheik... by bennomatic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank you. In my heart, I've been modded up by your comment.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    4. Re:I just pictured an oil sheik... by Huzzah! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or even - try this instead - "The last of the V8 Interceptors... a piece of history!"

  2. Innovation! by awyeah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It sounds like this is the result of innovation? I imagine that these "big-block" engines will be replaced by smaller-block V8s or perhaps more powerful V6s that have similar performance?

    The only bad part of this is some people are going to lose their jobs (according to the AP).

    --
    Why, no, I haven't meta-moderated lately. Thanks for asking!
    1. Re:Innovation! by Laebshade · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Screw V-6's. Inline 6's have more power and better reliability. Inline engines always do.

    2. Re:Innovation! by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Screw V-6's. Inline 6's have more power and better reliability. Inline engines always do.

      Shoehorn anyone? Inline V-8(or God forbid I-10 or 12) tends to be a bit of a reach for real estate under the hood.

      Regardless of "better" designs, we're witnessing an end of an era here, considering this format has survived for 50 out of the last 100 years of the automobile. A sad day indeed.

      You want an IT analogy? Fine. Sometimes it's about the finesse and raw power coming from a 1000W system with dual graphics cards and 15K RPM drives, and not always about "green" designs or overall reliability. Sometimes you want your machine to haul ass and look good no matter the cost.

    3. Re:Innovation! by couchslug · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "It sounds like this is the result of innovation?"

      More like the rise in fuel costs coupled with the recession.

      The big block Chevrolet is a simple, tough engine that produces excellent torque, is durable, very easy to work on and inexpensive to repair. Aftermarket support is excellent and one can build complete engines without using a single GM part.

      The powerplant of choice that replaced big block gas engines is the diesel, which is vastly more complex, brutally expensive to repair, difficult to work on even for well-equipped shops, and burdened with complex emission systems. Diesel fuel quality is always a concern, especially with low-sulfur diesel. They make great power, but you pay dearly for it.

      I'll be hunting more of them for spares (I just rebuilt a 366 for my C30 wrecker). Like the small block Chevrolet, these adaptable engines will be working for many decades to come.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:Innovation! by LaRoach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Er, inline V8? I do not think that means what you think it means...

    5. Re:Innovation! by mirix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While diesels do have their own problems, I've never seen a big block with over a million miles on it.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    6. Re:Innovation! by fm6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Regardless of "better" designs, we're witnessing an end of an era here, considering this format has survived for 50 out of the last 100 years of the automobile. A sad day indeed.

      What's sad is that GM had to almost go out of business before they'd finally acknowledge that such an inefficient engine type was obsolete. The handwriting's been on the wall since 19 ****ing 74, for crisakes. But GM couldn't change its mindset, and instead sat and twiddled their thumbs while the Japanese took away their business.

      I'm reminded of Sun's inability to shift to commodity processors. But then, I'm an embittered ex-Sun employee...

    7. Re:Innovation! by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 3, Funny

      An inline V8 would be an innovation.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    8. Re:Innovation! by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I suspect GM kept at it this long for a good business reason: tinkerers loved that kind of engine: relatively easy to self-repair and powerful. Now the only choices will be wimpy or too complex to self-service. The Duke boys will have to rely much more on Cooter now.

    9. Re:Innovation! by jhylkema · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Duke boys will have to rely much more on Cooter now.

      The General Lee was a Dodge Charger (well, many Dodge Chargers).

      Even the Duke boys knew better than to drive a GM product.

    10. Re:Innovation! by zippyspringboard · · Score: 5, Interesting

      While the big block wont EVER make it to a million, I've seen an awful AWFUL lot of diesels fail to make 500k. When it comes time to rebuild the engine the big block can be rebuilt several times over for what the Diesel will Cost. (atleast in parts and machining costs) Diesels commonly give twice the service life of their gas equivalents, anything more than that while not unheard of, is not to be expected either. (some gas engines go 400k too) Don't get me wrong, I would trade my Vortec 454 for a diesel in a heartbeat. But my motivation would be for the improved gas mileage. ESPECIALLY when Towing. The only reason I own Big block is for pulling a 10,000# trailer, and it does this VERY VERY well. But it get's about 10mpg when towing (15.5 when not) A Diesel would probably get 18mpg when towing and i could run homemade bio diesel. My tow vehicle with a big block is inexpensive, dependable, easy to work on, and gets pretty poor gas mileage....

    11. Re:Innovation! by bobdotorg · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm reminded of Sun's inability to shift to commodity processors.

      C'mon man - what this thread really needs is a car analogy.

      --
      __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    12. Re:Innovation! by Grimbleton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So obsolete that people went on a buying frenzy when they announced they were stopping production, because there was such a demand for them...

    13. Re:Innovation! by crispin_bollocks · · Score: 2

      Sorry, the exhaust note from a six sounds like Felix Unger clearing his sinuses. You may haul ass, but there's no sex appeal in the way it sounds.

    14. Re:Innovation! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Consumers kept buying them.

    15. Re:Innovation! by MikShapi · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think what they were saying is that pistons in a V configuration (e.g. V6, V8, V12 etc) are not in a line, hence they are not inline engines. An engine can either be a V or an inline, not both, much like a line can't be straight and curved at the same time.

      --
      -
    16. Re:Innovation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think the big-block was so much obsolete, as it was becoming irrelevant. Their "small block" V8 has been sold up to 400 cubic inch displacement for street use (that I'm aware of), compared to 454 for the big block. Nothing "small" about that!

      The few performance cars GM still builds with V8s use high revving small block designs to get their power. The big block has been used mostly in trucks for many years now, but the trend for high power in trucks has shifted to diesels.

      Even NASCAR abandoned the big blocks decades ago, in favor of smaller engines that still make more power than they can cope with on the super-speedways (thus the notorious restrictor plate rules).

      A dumb line in the article, though: the factory never put big block V8s into Corvairs, nor small block V8s for that matter. All Corvairs had air-cooled flat-opposed six engines (vaguely like Porsche 911s, but not nearly as well executed--take that fan belt arrangement, please!). Many hot-rodders did manage to stuff V8s into them, with the Olds Toronado engine-transaxle combination being a frequent choice. But that never came from the GM factory. A 455 CID Corvair--somebody should give one of those to Ralph Nader!

    17. Re:Innovation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That happens with anything nowadays that they discontinue, or people THINK will be discontinued. See, there's this idea that's been driven into people's heads over the past 20 years or so that getting your hands on anything that's scarce will be an easy road to riches. The old "money for nothing" ploy.

      If it's even remotely rare, some greedy, bottom feeding, unethical scumbag will buy the last of them, then put them back on sale at an inflated price, demanding huge profits while adding zero value.

      It's all part of today's get-rich-quick society. Nobody wants to work anymore, they want a scheme that extracts money from others and puts it into their pockets with no effort at all. The housing bubble was a result of this and also reinforced this notion.

    18. Re:Innovation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      So you're saying you prefer shallow, phoney, gold diggers who are only with you for you car over down-to-earth, uncouth, possibly buck-toothed women who are only with you for your car?

    19. Re:Innovation! by Rennt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes.

      But lets be honest here. Once there was this total hottie who slept with this guy because of his totally awesome car. But it never happened again.

    20. Re:Innovation! by mick232 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If IT companies started to phase out their 50 year old designs _now_, we would still be dealing with punched cards and probably not even use magnetic tapes. So you better look for more suitable analogies. No company buys a computer just because it hauls ass and looks good. Instead, they throw 3 years old machines away because they are not (cost) efficient anymore.

    21. Re:Innovation! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Informative

      But thats the thing about selling stuff. Your consumers can be 100% behind your old product. But then they all retire at about the same time and suddenly a solid market has evaporated. I said consumers kept buying the product. Past tense.

    22. Re:Innovation! by adamchou · · Score: 2, Informative

      uhhh... what? are you kidding me? M3 skidpad number is 0.98 and the 335i skidpad is 0.87

    23. Re:Innovation! by w0mprat · · Score: 5, Informative

      No not really, V-engines have a little added complexity, which may drag down reliability, but for all practical purposes there is no dramatic difference that makes a inline superior in peformance and reliability.

      A V allows you package more displacement in to smaller overall volume or to have less car to package around given in engine. Weight savings from a V engine boosts handling performance and economy. Yet an inline engine will be cheaper than a V, due to one, block, single manifolds, two camshafts instead of four.

      Difference in power may come from firing order, and the path intake charge and exhaust gas take and a small reduction in friction in a Inline 4 or 6. Inline 6s can have a good cross flow set up for top end power when mounted longitudnally in a front engined car (short straight intake runners and 6 into 1 headers, make a good turbo platform. BMW, Nissan and Toyota have exploited this to great effect in racing and in road cars. Aftermarket Nissan Skyline motors with 6-1 turbo manifolds make whopping power.

      In the end, V8s rose to greatnews because it was probably the best balance between a number of cylinders, dimensions, displacement etc. A four cylinder block is about as long as you want to go. Big displacement engines need a greater number of pistons to stop the piston speeds getting out of hand along with smoothness reasons. Eight cylinders is just right, for big power or a big engine.

      A inline 6, and a 90 degree V12 and a boxer six are probably the three ideal engines, having perfect balance. The greatest engine of them all on the balance of all considerations, including, cost, complexity and packaging is the inline four. That's why V8s are made out of two of them:

      American V8s most often really are just two inline four engines stuck together. Right down to the split-plane (cross-plane) crankshaft. Yes there are hack mechanics who have lopped off one bank of cylinders to make a inline four, it works. Unfortunatley cross-plane crankshafts have a lot of drawbacks including difficult to control vibration, unbalanced piston movement, poorer exhaust scavanging in certain exhaust configuartions and need for counterweights that add rotational inertia. Yes every American V8 you drove had a dirty kludge under the hood.

      IMHO, a real V8 has a flat plane crankshaft. Truly the correct format for a V8, better firing order, more power, more balance and even better sound :)

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    24. Re:Innovation! by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, but a V8 can't touch a straight six turbo in the "looks good and hauls ass" department.

      But a V8 turbo can sure as hell kick a straight six turbo in the ass. If your after HP and torque, the ol adage still holds true. There is no replacement for displacement.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    25. Re:Innovation! by Katchu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The handwriting's been on the wall since 19 ****ing 74, for crisakes.

      Yeah, but it was written in Japanese.

      --
      Keep Doing Good.
    26. Re:Innovation! by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Informative

      LS7 is 428 cubic inches, and is used in the Corvette.

      The biggest big-block sold in a road vehicle was 502 ci, for fleet vehicles. The engine in this article, the Vortec 8100, was 496 ci.

      Also, GM sold a 572 ci crate motor for off-road applications. Of course, the LS architecture scales to 511 cubic inches in off-road applications, and is lighter weight and I believe higher revving.

    27. Re:Innovation! by caluml · · Score: 3, Insightful

      much like a line can't be straight and curved at the same time.

      The Equator is both straight and curved.

    28. Re:Innovation! by adamchou · · Score: 2, Insightful

      my point was that anyone thats serious about performance wouldn't chose an inline configuration for an engine. They'd chose a boxer or v configuration over inline any day. And if there was free reign for engine choice, I'd be willing to be that the wankel motor might be chosen. Mazda would probably still be kicking ass in le mans if their wankel didn't get banned.

    29. Re:Innovation! by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Informative

      That happens with anything nowadays that they discontinue, or people THINK will be discontinued. See, there's this idea that's been driven into people's heads over the past 20 years or so that getting your hands on anything that's scarce will be an easy road to riches. The old "money for nothing" ploy.

      Well, there's 'rare' and then there's 'in demand'.

      The big block v-8 filled a niche. It's not a niche that can't be replaced, but it's a niche.

      Ordering a '2 year supply' isn't stockpiling in a hope to get rich, it's having a sufficient supply that you can still manufacture your product, whether it be an emergency water pump system, U-Haul truck*, mobile home, generator, boat engine, or what not until you've re-engineered your product to take a different engine. Or some Chinese company licenses the design and starts production...

      If it's even remotely rare, some greedy, bottom feeding, unethical scumbag will buy the last of them, then put them back on sale at an inflated price, demanding huge profits while adding zero value.

      Uh.... Sure that 'scumbag' is adding value: He's adding the value of it being available. He has to pay for warehousing them in good condition, sales staff to sell them, advertising to let companies know the product is still available(in limited quantities). He has to take the risk that it'll never sell, and in many states, play a percentage tax on their retail value every year. It's expensive to keep stock around.

      Not that some of what you mention doesn't happen, but from what I'm reading, GM fulfilled all orders in before a certain date, so the 'scum-suckers' at least can't rape the customers who planned ahead and stockpiled some of their own...

      *Still surprised these aren't diesel.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    30. Re:Innovation! by karnal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Anymore this sounds just like a "GET OFF MY LAWN" comment.

      I enjoy maintaining my own vehicle, and while I get the WTF moment when a part costs more than I'm expecting to pay (for instance, Ford wants 600$ for a light controller. 4 relays, a few transistors and caps... WHY!!!) I still notice that a new car has similar components to any other car out there.

      Yes, it's a little complicated by the electronics now and then, but you still have a motor, a transmission, battery tires oil younameit it's all there, user serviceable. Even the steering components haven't changed much - and things you do more often are still accessable. Ball joints, brake pads and rotors, oil, wheel bearings etc.

      With all the features cars offer today, I've got no complaints.

      --
      Karnal
    31. Re:Innovation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, right, because almost everybody likes to work on their own car.

      fm6 does not like to work on his own car; therefore, powerful, easily-serviceable engines should not exist. You can't argue with logic like that.

    32. Re:Innovation! by AndersOSU · · Score: 3, Informative

      then there's boxer engines, rotary engines, and even rotary piston engines.

    33. Re:Innovation! by DuckDodgers · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The only GM product to include the big block V8 from the factory was heavy duty pickup trucks. This engine hasn't been for sale in a Caprice, Impala, Corvette, Firebird, or Camaro for several decades. While you're right in general terms that GM has screwed up its products, product reliability, and understanding customer needs for a very long time, your specific example here is inaccurate.

      This huge old engine was excellent for towing, very nearly as strong as GM's large pickup truck diesel engine and far cheaper for both GM to build and purchasers to buy. High RPM performance was a joke, but this was built for running below 4000 RPMs, which is normal for an engine used to tow. This is a case where GM did something right, and sold something that customers in the target segment wanted to buy.

      The problem with a tiered product lineup is that you divide your resources in research, marketing, advertising, and design too far. Toyota grew from nothing to a juggernaut of the US market with just two brands: Toyota and Lexus. They only added Scion recently. Honda bit off a big chunk of the domestic manufacturer's market share with just Honda and Acura. Nissan has just Nissan and Infiniti. Hyundai has just Hyundai and Kia, and only now that they're highly successful are they considering a separate luxury brand.

      Ford has made an amazing turnaround in product competitiveness and desirability in the past four years, and they did it by selling Aston Martin, Jaguar, and Land Rover, cutting down their stake in Mazda, and reducing their number of Mercury models. Now they just have Ford, Lincoln, a bit of Mercury, and Volvo and Volvo is rumored to be for sale. GM is in the process of shutting down or selling Saturn, Hummer, Saab, and Pontiac and it has sold its pieces of Isuzu, Suzuki, and Subaru. The only reason Buick was kept is that it's GM's most successful brand in China. The only reason GMC trucks was kept is that most Buick dealerships are Buick/GMC dealerships.

      GM management is finally focusing on building 30 decent products spread across four product lines (Chevrolet, Buick, GMC, Caddillac) instead of 80 substandard products spread across twelve product lines, which was the mess they had in 2001.

    34. Re:Innovation! by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like the guys at the hardware store. Management? Not so much.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    35. Re:Innovation! by Amouth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      how about this - in NC you can't pass inspection if you have a check engine light code active.

      even i that code is a dealer only code
      even if the car runs fine and would even pass emissions if they used the sniffer

      dealer wants 85$ just to read the code out. and 90% of the time it is a set of things that can cause it and are dealer only parts.

      it has gotten to the point that you can't even get shop manuals for newer cars.

      and with the way ODB ties every thing together - that 600$ ford part is going to be the only one that might work - where as in my older cars i can wire it up the way i want so that it works, using parts of my choice.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    36. Re:Innovation! by couchslug · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "fm6 does not like to work on his own car; therefore, powerful, easily-serviceable engines should not exist. You can't argue with logic like that."

      He will make a fine customer...

      I'm a mechanic, so I'm fine with difficult-to-service engines that I don't own. Customers who fap to techno-complexity they don't understand are the same from computers to cars and trucks.

      Even if you never touch a wrench you pay for complexity when you buy the vehicle, and when you buy insurance you pay for the other fellow.

      Note that many modern engines are not worth rebuilding or even repairing after a few years. What dealers do to rebuild used cars is harvest drivetrains from wrecks and install them in vehicles whose engines have problems. It's not even worth doing head gaskets on most engines when you have access to wrecks, but the poor fellow who needs a top end job on his own vehicle pays out the arse because of the labor complex systems require.

      Big block Chevrolets have always been in such demand that they rarely go to the shredder and don't stay in salvage long. Not everyone needs a large V-8, but the tens of thousands who do will keep the aftermarket and salvage business going. It is possible to make smaller engines that don't suck to service, but that isn't much of a priority because that's the customers problem.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    37. Re:Innovation! by Thelasko · · Score: 2, Informative

      When it comes time to rebuild the engine the big block can be rebuilt several times over for what the Diesel will Cost.

      I feel the need to stress the fact that there are rebuildable engines and non-rebuildable engines.

      Semi engines are rebuildable. They have replacable cylinder liners and bearings that can be removed and replaced. Yes, this is expensive, but it's cheaper than a new engine. These are the engines that run for a million miles +.

      Most diesel pickup truck engines are non-rebuildable. Their bearings are replaceable, but the cylinder bore is actually part of the cast block. You can hone the bore, replace the bearings, and put in thicker rings, but you can usually only do this once.

      Big block gasoline engines, are also non-rebuildable. That is why you've never seen one run for a million miles. I'm sure it is possible to make one that is rebuildable, but there just isn't a market for them. People who put that many miles on an engine usually prefer the superior fuel economy of a diesel.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    38. Re:Innovation! by quanticle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not everyone likes to work on their own cars, but, for those who do, having a standard engine design like the GM big block (or the GM small block, for that matter) has been a boon. The fact that the basic mechanics of the engine have changed little since the '70s means that the engine is great for learning the basic principles of engine mechanics. Put another way, the GM big block was the Unix of V-8 engines.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    39. Re:Innovation! by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      GM makes sense if you think of it as a race between management and labor to see who could kill the company first.

  3. Good Riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now they can finally join the 80's and work on getting rid of leaf springs next.

    1. Re:Good Riddance by couchslug · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Now they can finally join the 80's and work on getting rid of leaf springs next."

      Leaves are versatile, easily stacked to suit intended use, and tough.

      If you want an F1 car by all means buy one, but leaf springs work very well on trucks and other applications where coil spring towers would be awkward (and coils risk coil bind when overloaded).

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Good Riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      but leaf springs work very well on trucks and other applications where coil spring towers would be awkward (and coils risk coil bind when overloaded).

      Not only that but it's easier to tie into supporting members (eg. the frame) so you can carry more sprung weight. This is why heavy-duty machinery almost always has leaf springs. Plus you need less lateral support and they are stronger in general.

      Leaf springs have their uses even on the most modern equipment.

    3. Re:Good Riddance by citizenr · · Score: 4, Funny

      leaf springs work very well on trucks

      like Corvette

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    4. Re:Good Riddance by huge+colin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      leaf springs work very well on trucks

      like Corvette

      Do you understand that the Hotchkiss rear suspension (which is what you're thinking of) involves a solid rear axle and is completely different from the transverse single composite monospring used by the Corvette (which uses IRS)? The Corvette has had fully independent suspension since 1963.

      I'm a fan of Jeremy Clarkson and his wacky antics too, but when he talks about American cars he's often quite wrong.

  4. big blocks by kqc7011 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Plenty of other big blocks being made, no real reason to want a 50 year old design of a cast iron lump. Lots of new ones being built and machined, mostly aluminum.

    --
    Passionately Indifferent
  5. A sad day by mirix · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the same way that the day the last caveman set down his club was sad.

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
  6. Somehow, some way... by bobdotorg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kill off another icon?

    I'm getting one of these and jamming it into my SAAB.

    Front heavy front wheel drive indeed.

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
  7. Had a 454 Suburban by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Interesting

    74 3/4 ton suburban with towing package. Damn that thing would pull anything. It got 11 miles per gallon in town, on the road, pulling a trailer. No matter what it always got 11 miles per gallon. Drive it 35 miles per hour or 85 and it still got 11 miles per gallon. Weird. I miss that big boxy thing. Nothing has that much room anymore.

  8. V-8's rock by Glock27 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's fine if these engines are being killed because something better (as powerful with better efficiency) has come along. If not, it sucks.

    To see which it is, just take a look at Ford Motor Company - you know, the one that ISN'T owned by the government! ;-)

    BTW, regardless diesel engines rock! :-)

    Once again, FUBO! =:-D

    --
    Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
    Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    1. Re:V-8's rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wrong. Diesel is lower in energy in gasoline per pound mass. Evenso, the difference is one of a few percent and not anywhere close to half as you claimed. The reason you get more thermodynamic efficiency is that diesels run at a higher compression ratio. The compression ratio that an engineer selects is a function of a number of variables the most significant of which is the type of fuel. Engines and fuels go hand in hand in the design process. One does not "rock" compared to the other.

      Vehicle fuel economy is another matter altogether. It very easy to have a vehicle that is diesel power that gets poor mileage.

      Regards,
      Jason

    2. Re:V-8's rock by anethema · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is a bit of a strawman argument if I ever saw one.

      When in your life have you seen mileage rated in distance per mass?

      It is distance per volume (since the volume is fixed in your tank, not the mass).

      Diesel is around 7% higher in energy released for the same volume of fuel burned. That is a free gimme there for good mileage. Most of the rest come from thus (wikipedia):

      "They burn less fuel than a petrol engine performing the same work, due to the engine's higher temperature of combustion and greater expansion ratio.Gasoline engines are typically 25% efficient while diesel engines can convert over 30% of the fuel energy into mechanical energy"

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  9. Re:diesel by terraformer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Big block v. Small block. The will continue to have V8s, just smaller ones. The classic GM big block was the 454 ci. They will continue to have the 350 ci.

    --
    Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
  10. the joy's of running a big block by onepoint · · Score: 2, Interesting

    so goes another point of history, maybe for the better, but there was something about when you opened the hood and you saw one, now you look under the hood and it's confusing. I guess age is getting the better of me LOL.

    well I guess you'll all start wondering what it was like to have 550hp+, and punching it, there is just a sound, not like any other sound, it's the sound of power, raw, and tamed by only your nerve as you head down the strip. light to light, pole to pole, neck to neck, blasting the traps at 145mph+ in mid 10's, then, only after the trophy is handed to you, you drive your car home, listening to the sweet rumble.

    I never had the balls to put slicks on, always felt that control at that level of speed was worth my life. lost a few - won a few, made me money while I was in school and never lost on the street ( nor was I caught ) and earn the respect of my peers in the parking lot. Had geek cred - grease in my blood - and I loved my "RAT" ... what more can you ask for when your 17 and it's 1983 ( well maybe DEC-VAX mainframe )

    anyway thanks for reading

    --
    if you see me, smile and say hello.
    1. Re:the joy's of running a big block by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      The engine being retired made 450HP which Ford is making with a midsized V-6 (ok only 415, but still). The Ford V6 is almost half the weight (449 lbs vs 734). Ok it's apples and bananas since one's a big truck V8 optimized for torque and the other's a race car V6 with twin turbochargers, but the point remains that old technology is old and there's very little need for 8.1L gas engine.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:the joy's of running a big block by Swampash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Newsflash: people who race cars on public roads are brainless tards and I pray that they die roasting in fiery crashes. Crashes with large inanimate objects, of course.

  11. A: Because it breaks the flow of a message by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Funny

    Q: Why is starting a comment in the Subject: line incredibly annoying?

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  12. Re:Two years' worth by afidel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pretty sure they are talking about things like boat manufacturers and water pump manufacturers. GM stopped using this engine in their trucks over 2 years ago, the production line was kept running to fill those outside customer orders. Since this beast needed 30% more displacement to produce 10% more torque and significantly LESS HP than the 6.2L V8 it's no surprise that GM stopped using it.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  13. old friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    good bye my old friend, you will be missed.

    as a gear head, not much is more impressive than a big ol rat motor sticking out of the hood of your car. I will really miss this motor, gas hog or not

  14. turn the page by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm old enough to appreciate the value of a piece of tech that has served so well for so long. Likewise, I have a soft spot for the land-line and the command line. But there are pleasurable vices that we simply can't afford to cling to, and the big petrol-burning engine is one of them.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  15. Re:I suppose it was inevitable by afidel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Uh, this was the 8.1L (496 cu) engine that's being retired, it was a true big block. It was also a big hunk of cast iron with iron headers and hence heavy as all get out (734 lbs shipping weight vs 564 for the 6200).

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  16. Q: Because its been used before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    A: Why am I about to log in to mod that redundant?

    Jeopardy. Use Jeopardy style. Then next time this all could have been avoided. Don't just rest on the laurels of other posters. Innovate or Die!

  17. asdfasdf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously though, does anyone else read the content first and usually skip the subject of a post?

  18. Re:DNS-and-BIND is a copypasta Jew by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dude. Get back on your medication. Seriously.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  19. car analogies by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The big block V8 is like the Itanium. Big and power hungry and a real commercial workhorse.

    It think people are sad because it would be like if Intel stopped making Core 2 Quads and decided all you needed was an Atom chip.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:car analogies by mick232 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right, but: Like the big block, the Itanium arch hasn't seen considerable enhancements for years. Now it's obsolete because there are more efficient and more economical designs, which exceed the Itanium also in absolute performance numbers. No one will miss it in the long term.

  20. Re:DNS-and-BIND is a copypasta Jew by mister_playboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That looks to be output from the Complaint Generator, so it involved less effort to create than your post did.

    It's probably a reference to the fact that DNS-and-BIND has used that exact post before.

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  21. Re:8.1L by afidel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really, because I don't see many soccer mom's with 8100's, more like farmers, construction crews, and race car drivers with towing loads of 7,000+ pounds. Oh and commercial trucks for intracity delivery and tow trucks.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  22. At least 10 years too late. by Eskarel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The reason GM needed to get bailed out by the government is because they ignored the evidence of every other country on earth and presumed US gas prices would always stay the same. If they'd produced the last of these ten years ago and started making cars which actually have something remotely resembling fuel efficiency, good design, or low carbon emissions, then American cars might not be a global joke, the government might be a couple of billion dollars less in debt, and a whole lot of Americans who used to work in the auto industry would still have their jobs.

    It took near bankruptcy to finally get GM to acknowledge that they had to actually innovate(or at least copy everyone else) rather than continuing with a technology which is 50 years old.

    1. Re:At least 10 years too late. by fons · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In Europe we also have GM. They're called Opel/SAAB here.

      All Opel/SAAB cars have modern competitive diesel engines. So apparently, GM DID invest in new tech.

      The question is, why did they not sell those engines/cars in the US?

      Maybe because US consumers were not interested? I'm not being arrogant here, that's a real question. I really don't understand.

    2. Re:At least 10 years too late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Contra the other response to your post, the big block to these in the US are two-fold, and neither is availability. Diesel is widely available, especially along highways. Not as much as gasoline, but not nearly rare enough to be problematic.

      The first of the big reasons is GM itself. The first diesels they brought out in the US were steaming piles of crap. Expensive, smokey, loud, and didn't last. The perception this left of diesels in the US still hasn't quite gone away, and probably won't completely until everyone who's ever owned or seen one of the old Oldsmobile diesels has died.

      The second is California. More specifically, CARB, the California state agency that sets emission standards for the state. They hate diesel, and set the emission standards for diesel engines much more strictly than for gasoline engines. Since several other stats copy the CARB standards, not meeting those standards means you're locked out of over half the US market. It's only been the last couple of years that the technology has advanced to the point where meeting them was even possible. Between ULSD (which was late coming to the US), and either urea or more advanced diesel engine techniques like direct injection, there are a few now available in the US market. (VW Jetta and Golf, Audi A3, BMW 335d, and a couple Mercedes models. That's it.)
      As a side point to this, it's extremely expensive to certify an engine for US use. Since diesel is seen as a minor niche market (see point one above) most manufacturers aren't bothering to do it.

      Given that VW is having problems keeping up with demand for the Jetta and Golf TDI, maybe this will change in a couple years, after the other manufacturers catch on. I'm not holding my breath.

      Which is a real pity. I'm kind of in the market for a new car, and I really want a eurospec Civic i-CTDi. Unfortunately, Honda isn't bringing their diesel out in the US at all. They were going to do so in the Acura TSX, but then couldn't get the emissions quite down with the automatic transmission (and the US loves its slushboxes) without a urea system. So they aren't. Which ticks me off, because I want the Civic. Smaller and lighter than the TSX, so the engine could meet the emissions standard. And if not, they could still do it up like the Civic SI, which is manual only anyway. Grrr. If only the local VW dealers weren't incompetent assholes...

    3. Re:At least 10 years too late. by winwar · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Diesel is always a bit of a difficult thing because it requires the infrastructure available to fuel it and the US has never been really big on Diesel."

      I am going to assume that you do not live in the United States and have never visited. Because I assure you that diesel is readily available at gas stations (though not quite as available as gasoline). I also assure you that there are plenty of small cars. I can also assure you that there is plenty of demand for diesels.

      Possible/probably reasons for lack of diesels?

      1. It was hard for diesels to meet emission standards with high sulfur fuel. So they couldn't be sold (especially in California). That is changing.

      2. The US manufactures made some of the crappiest diesels possible when they first introduced them. I doubt they could have done a worse job if they tried. Americans tend not to buy US cars because of perceived quality. Now imagine if they introduced diesels.... The popular Asian brands don't use diesels. And the European brands that have diesels available don't sell well (expensive for Mercedes, reliability issues for VW). Sort of a chicken and egg problem.

      3. Fuel cost. Diesel costs about the same as gasoline (often more, rarely less) in the US. Diesels also cost more up front to purchase.

    4. Re:At least 10 years too late. by winwar · · Score: 2, Informative

      "You need to keep in mind diesel is basically a byproduct of making petrol."

      Not really true. In general the two primary outputs from refining a barrel of crude oil are gasoline and diesel. Refiners will however optimize for one or the other (probably based on the type of crude they use, their setup, market, etc.)

      "This means diesel is actually pretty cheap compared to petrol."

      This is a function of demand. Diesel prices did not increase significantly due to the transition from high to low sulfur. They went up well BEFORE the transition in the US.

      Diesel has a pretty constant demand in the US (used in industry and large scale transportation of goods). It doesn't get the wild swings in price like gas but it often gets priced higher than gas (people can choose to drive less, businesses, not so much). The only way it falls to a low price is if the economy tanks.

      Diesel in Europe is cheaper (versus gas) due to the tax structure.

  23. Geometry says otherwise by Myrcutio · · Score: 2, Funny

    Think about that for a second. If it was straight, it would head straight out into space.

    The only object in existence that has curves but is still straight would be your mother.

    1. Re:Geometry says otherwise by gander666 · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is general relativity.

      "Straight" lines like the Gandfather post is primarily a Euclidean idea, and the extent of most people's view of geometry. However, Georg Riemann and those who followed describe a geometry where a plane isn't flat, lines aren't straight and many of the "truths" you learned in Highschool Geometry are no longer valid.

      Start with a course in differential geometry, move to topology, then on to General Relativity, and if you have the stomach for it, there is a book that ties it all together, "Gravitation" by Misner, Thorne and Wheeler.

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
  24. 3rd party still available by confused+one · · Score: 2, Informative
  25. gas at $6.62 / gallon by fantomas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By crickey! mileage explains why we don't get these big engines in Europe. Just did a quick calculation, my local garage charges GBP1.09 / litre for standard (95 octane) petrol/gasoline, that's approx $6.62 a US gallon. Would explain why these engines are very cool and impressive but you don't see them round here .. What kind of capacity fuel tanks do vehicles with these engines have?

    1. Re:gas at $6.62 / gallon by multipartmixed · · Score: 4, Informative

      European pumps dole out gas based on RON (research octane number), whereas in North American they use "pump octane", or "anti-knock index". AKI is calculated by averaging RON and MON (motor octane number). MON is determined experimentally on a special engine.

      RON-MON is usually 6 to 10 in North America. This is called the sensitivity, S.

      Given S=10, then,

      RON-MON = 10
      95 - MON = 10
      95 - 10 = MON
      MON = 85

      and

      95+85 / 2 = 90

      So 95 octane in europe is around 90 octane in North America, maybe a little higher depending on S.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  26. End of an era by characterZer0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a big sign of the end of the era of user-maintainable cars.

    Almost as sad as when the last VW Beetle rolled off the line in 2003 (after more than 60 years).

    --
    Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
  27. Who cares about lifetime? by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If a diesel makes it to 500k it will have saved you so much in fuel costs compared to gasoline that you can afford to throw it away and still make a massive profit.

    Plus I'm not so sure the difference "complexity" is anything like you claim. Modern diesels are computer controlled so they're a lot cleaner then the old ones and don't need anywhere near as much extra hardware to meet smog standards.

    Diesels are perfect for American SUVs. American drivers are conditioned to expect grunt at low revs, which gasoline engines are terrible at delivering (you need a big thirsty V8 to do it). Diesel engines are much more suited to American expectations so you can have a smaller engine ans get double the savings in economy.

    If you start extracting diesel from Algae then it will be much cleaner and more consistent than petroleum-diesel and you can probably get rid of all the emissions-control junk which is needed for diesel engines today.

    --
    No sig today...
  28. Re:What's different vs the Audi engine? by wolf.sama · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, first thing, the _Big block_ has gone, not the small-block. Audi makes V8 for car applications, so, you'll always have a better mileage in a Audi S4 than in a GM truck made for pulling 10,000lbs. Audi V8 are also very recent, the first one ... mounted on ... the Audi V8 was a 3.6 V8, by no means a big block Compared to US standards, it might seem a "baby block" with it's 219cid This 1989 V8 already had quad-cam (OHC) and a Bosh Motronic engine management. Audi made V8 from scratch, seeing the others mistakes. GM made the V8 history, OTOH. The Big-block was a dinosaur, it was time to get to something else. Plus, all the spares a still available ! so no fear for all the users.

    --
    When fiction hits reality, dreams have no air-bag.
  29. Re:Really? by netsavior · · Score: 4, Informative

    Workers who now get 70% of their salary for not working... it is a small consolation, but it is something. Plus 3% of this plant's output is now closed off, NOT the whole plant.

  30. Re:Really? by d3ac0n · · Score: 2, Informative

    Correction:

    The Big block V8 line is being closed. The Tonawanda Engine plant still makes smaller engines. But there aren't positions for the V8 guys, so they are all laid off. So not as bad as I originally stated. Doesn't make it any less painful for the area though.

    Apologies for any confusion.

    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  31. Re:Hilbert Space Cadet by fireylord · · Score: 2, Interesting

    you confuse me. is the cow standing on the back of the first turtle?

  32. Re:8.1L by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Informative

    > So what kind of racing involves towing 7000+ pounds on the track?

    Dunno, but I think the OP was talking about towing 7000+ pounds *to* the track.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?