Slashdot Mirror


China Faces Piracy Suit Over Censorship Software

angry tapir writes "Web software filtering vendor CyberSitter has filed a $2.2B lawsuit against the Chinese government, two Chinese software makers, and seven major computer manufacturers for their distribution of Green Dam Youth Escort, a controversial Web filtering package the Chinese government had mandated to be installed on computers sold there. Researchers at the University of Michigan found that Green Dam copied code from CyberSitter."

8 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. I'll take Sovereign Immunity for the block by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the USA did this, it could remove itself from the lawsuit claiming "Sovereign Immunity" and it's game over. Are you telling us that China doesn't have this out clause?

    1. Re:I'll take Sovereign Immunity for the block by mi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Asking the USA for a judgment against China? Sounds like even if they win they don't get anything.

      China has plenty of assets in the US, which can be ceased, if the judge says so...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  2. Re:IN SOVIET CHINA... wait, they still are! by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A lot of copyright laws are international, and China is a signatory. There are good business reasons to do this, even though such laws are frequently and casually violated in China, even moreso than in the USA.

  3. Re:Tag this with goodluckwiththat by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, the USA could take that to the WTO... wait, we don't even respect the WTO anymore.

  4. Re:They may have solved the puzzle... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think you may have solved the puzzle.

  5. Re:IN SOVIET CHINA... wait, they still are! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A lot of copyright laws are international, and China is a signatory.

    They could, however, say "We're the fifth of the Earth's population, fucker", and make their own rules. A country of a billion does not automatically have to accept the rules of 300 million.

    Nor do we have to accept any rules they make, unless they want to send some of that billion over here to occupy us. Not saying that couldn't happen, but it's not going to happen over a copyright case.

    Besides, nobody is trying to say that U.S. law should apply anywhere but in the United States. But China has made a number of trade agreements, signed some treaties, and it's going to be interesting to see if they're willing to live up to those obligations. My guess is they won't.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  6. Re:Tag this with goodluckwiththat by hedwards · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You do realize that the Chinese state owns most of our debt, right? All the court would have to do is order the institutions holding the cash to release the appropriate sum to the winning party.

  7. Re:"Intellectual Property" hampers economic growth by matzahboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This has nothing to do with patents... Also, how can anything in the digital world survive without intellectual property laws? They are what makes pirating illegal. One company thinks of a brilliant idea, and suddenly all their competitors have copied it identically. There would be 0 reason to put any money into R&D. I agree with you that patent law needs help. But you can't completely get rid of all intellectual property rights. Most companies innovate to make money. There is no economic reason to innovate if your competitors will get the same benefits and not have to spend any R&D money/time.