Slashdot Mirror
Making a Liquid Invisibility Cloak
Researchers at Fudan University in Shanghai, China are proposing a method which could lead to the first soft, tunable metamaterial, the key ingredient in building an invisibility device. "The fluid proposed by Ji-Ping Huang of Fudan University in Shanghai, China, and colleagues, contains magnetite balls 10 nanometers in diameter, coated with a 5-nanometer-thick layer of silver, possibly with polymer chains attached to keep them from clumping. In the absence of a magnetic field, such nanoparticles would simply float around in the water, but if a field were introduced, the particles would self-assemble into chains whose lengths depend on the strength of the field, and which can also attract one another to form thicker columns. The chains and columns would lie along the direction of the magnetic field. If they were oriented vertically in a pool of water, light striking the surface would refract negatively – bent in way that no natural material can manage."
It's been a while but isn't that a shot of Bacardi 151 mixed into a glass of ice tea garnished with a lime?
Sounds very unlikely. We'll have magic wands way before invisibility cloaks.
eom
Oh ho ho ho ho!
I didn't see that one coming.
Did that joke have an invisibility cloak too?
Much cheaper way to hide weight than liposuction/gastric bypass and available in Walmart..
I was gonna go with the more obscure Way of the Shadows and say it sounds like they are making a ka'kari
I don't understand all these invisibility cloak stories on Slashdot over the years. Is it rooted in some fantasy about being invisible in the girl's locker room?
You can see through them with beer goggles.
...for the era of Chinese domination.
One that hath name thou can not otter
!= "invisibility cloak"
This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
Similarly, a hunk of silicon with strange electrical properties isn't a computer. And yet, the former is very useful if you want to build the latter.
Do you, like, just not understand how science works?
Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
an SEP field is better anyway
I mean, Aquaman is enough of a badass already, isn't he?
I can understand how they could use these materials (theoretically anyway) to make Julian Beever-style illusions (see http://www.moillusions.com/2007/12/julian-beevers-new-3d-sidewalk.htm). But a real invisibility cloak has to detect the direction of every photon striking it and deliver that proton in the same direction out the exact opposite side of the cloak, doesn't it? Otherwise the effect is likely to be like a Beever painting, viewable from only one precise viewpoint.
-------
Theory blazes the trail, but it can't pave the road
We poured the material in a jar so that you could see the effects, but unfortunately we now seem to have misplaced it. We'll update as soon as we found it!
All metamaterials are not created equal. A metamaterial is an electromagnetic medium created by a composite of tiny (very subwavelength) constituent structures, put together in such away that longer wavelengths see an "average" material with properties very different from those of the constituents. Usually, the goal is to use resonant effects in the microscopic constituents to make a material that is effectively very different from naturally occuring EM media. But this can be done for many different purposes.
A negative-refractive metamaterial is designed to have an effective "negative" index of refraction, which makes Snell's law (refraction) bend backwards, and can potentially be used for flat-lens near-field imaging, subwavelength imaging (again only in the near field), etcetera. The main practical difficulty here is that the most interesting applications of negative-index materials are in the visible or infrared regime, but negative-index metamaterials rely on metallic constitutents and metals become very lossy at those wavelengths.
Recent "invisibility" cloak proposals are based on the observation that there is a one-to-one mapping between transforming space to "curve around" the object being cloaked and keeping space the same and transforming the materials. So, if you can make materials with certain properties, they could effectively cloak an object by causing all the light rays to curve around the object just as if space were curved. Although this is mathematically quite beautiful, there are many practical obstacles to making this a reality. The proposal is to make the required materials via metamaterials, but these are NOT negative-index metamaterials. The required materials theoretically tend to require some singularities (points where the index blows up or vanishes), and trying to approximate that in practice inevitably involves losses which spoil the cloaking. In general, the bigger the object to be cloaked compared to the wavelength, the smaller the losses have to be, and the narrower the bandwidth is going to be. When you work out the numbers, you see that this is why all the experimental demonstrations of cloaking have only "cloaked" (reduced the scattering crosssection, but not to zero) objects that were a wavelength or two in diameter. Cloaking macroscopic objects at visible wavelengths is a fantasy because the material requirements are insane. The only remotely practical prospects seem to be cloaking objects on the ground (which makes things technically easier because the coordinate transformations are nonsingular) to long-wavelength radiation, e.g. cloaking something against radio waves.
If a thing is not diminished by being shared, it is not rightly owned if it is only owned & not shared. S. Augustine
someone get this news to harry potter and friends, unicorn tears are probably more rare than silver.
So next they will come up with a synthetic gland that can be implanted in a person's head..
Apparently you saw right through that one.
They gave up on trying to make ninja's of their own (since they can only make cheap imitation knockoff's) so they just said forget the ninja part! Let's just make all of our forces invisible!
My abilities are only limited by my imagination
Similarly, a hunk of silicon with strange electrical properties isn't a computer. And yet, the former is very useful if you want to build the latter.
Do you, like, just not understand how science works?
My ire was directed at the reporting, not the discovery or researchers (who I wish good luck).
Calling this discovery "Making a liquid invisibility cloak" is like calling the discovery of a new, slightly higher temperature superconductor "Making warp-capable flying cars".
Maybe sensational reporting of just about everything (eg the LHC) is causing the public's lack of affinity for science. All they see is hundreds of 'broken promises' made by the media about fantastic whizz-bang technologies that the research they are reporting on isn't even working towards.
This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
It's impossible to actually create an SEP field, because of course the ideas, research and manufacture are all SEP !
"Luke Raised his Macroculars to the sky and watched the Rebel ship be destroyed by the Imperial Star Destroyer"
To me this sounds suspicously like a Oil Filled Variable Focus Lens with higher magnification and image stabilization.
The big question though is this something new?
Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
I'll believe it when I see it.
alias possession='chmod 666 satan && ls
This seems like a great way to hide a satellite, if you can keep the temperature of the fluid regulated. Of course, you can't hide solar panels, so you'll need an internal power source.
[Insert lame Harry Potter joke here]
Harry: So we started out last night at the inn pounding liquid invisibility cloaks until Ron looked kinda cute ...
Very cool link, there was just a typo in your url.
The correct url is http://www.moillusions.com/2007/12/julian-beevers-new-3d-sidewalk.html
I anonymously thank you for introducing me to the Night Angel Trilogy. I'll have to do some more research, but it looks like an interesting trilogy.
actually it is because the public thinks the idea of these things working is actually cooler than if they actually exist. After you imagine something, if it takes a long time for it to actually work, the public is really bored with the idea already. It is only when one of these ideas has other capabilities that were never thought of before, maybe because the invention was not realized, that actual inventions become interesting again. When you have a connection with an object that you never would have thought before was possible. The media just creates the stories, because that is actually what the public cares about: the ideas, rather than the reality. Humans are dreamers above anything.
Actually no, just the fact of being invisible. In order to be invisible you have to refract all the light that would normally hit the object being invisible, meaning it would be in absolute dark. You could be invisible in the girls (or guys for the /.ers so persueded) shower room, but you couldn't see a blasted thing. Any lighted object within the cloak could also, possibly, leak out giving away your concealment. So even IF (a big if) the use of, say, an infrared camera, would allow you to see through the cloak, the use of it would give you away as the light from the screen/goggles could give you away. Not to mention you would have to use some containment of the matrix supporting the nano-particles (the fluid). A magnetic field strong enough to suspend water (i'm not even sure if there is such) would likely throw off the magnetic particles, so in turn you would need to have some sort of containment beyond the aqueous sphere. Think fishbowl. The container (fishbowl) in turn, would be visible being outside the sphere of invisibility. So you would see this great 'empty' spherical container just sitting there. Which, logic denotes, means the rat got out, elliciting chaos and panic in said locker room.
This is just one of the great physics problems that everyone has to come up with an 'answer' to, and get their jollies just from doing that. If you wanna be invisible in the girls shower room the best bet is still a very small drill and a pinhole camera, as any A/V geek knows all too well.
It would work "optically" if the Invisibility Cloak was made out of vegetable oil and you were made of Pyrex...
Vegetable oil and Pyrex has the same refractive index...
* put a small Pyrex jar into a larger one and then fill the smaller (inner) jar with vegetable oil and once it's full continue to fill the larger one with the overflow. The smaller (inner) jar will become invisible, to the naked eye.
On a more serious note this seems to be a big problem with all invisibility cloaks, of non supernatural origin (calm down HP fans), and that is they are all based upon modifying materials refractive index and thus bending the light around the object you want to hide.
That all sounds good but if you could do this to hide an object; If that object were a person since light doesn't hit them, or their eyes, not only would they be invisible but they would also be blind. I think most people asking Santa for a invisibility cloak would like to actually see what's in the girls locker room right?
A perfect invisibility cloak would change the person wearing it, along with the cloak, to a refractive index of air but again, they would be perfectly blinded by the process. In the case of RI = air then the light would go straight through them, included their eyes. So you either bend the light or have it go through your eyes and either way your in the dark.
I guess you could hide everything but your pupils, but in my book you wouldn't be invisible then, floating eyeball freak!
LOL
Nick Powers
Encryption: I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to encrypt it...
If you can configure the optical properties of this fluid on the fly, build an optical processor from it.
So sweet! Where can I get one of these new warp-capable cars??
"But this one goes to 11!"
by the joint companies Scholastic Books and Warner Brothers Films due to copyright infringement over the J.K. Rowling works Harry Potter."
Has the old saint in his forest not yet heard of it? That God is dead?
its 6:00am, I get up to go to the bathroom, I casually sit down while trying to wake up. WHO LEFT THE INVISIBILITY CLOAK ON THE TOILET!!!
I don't see the use in bothering to create such a device. I'm sure in military, magician and certain social circles this could have great value.
However, it seems like such technology... if possible... would be valuable in all kinds of truly useful application that could truly benefit society.
For example: wouldn't bending full spectrum light through a liquid medium controlled by an electric field be highly useful in the solar industry? I mean the cost of mirror alignment and replacement is a great cost factor in these systems.
Now I have no idea if this is really a useful application of this sort of technology... I'm just thinking aloud. But "Invisibilily Device"... come on, DON'T WASTE MY TIME. Even if it is possible, that would be a less important application for our sustained future. The very fact that this is in the "invisibility device" categories leads me to believe that such technology is not even close to been shown to be truly possible. IMO: This is fluff.
Alternatively, the researchers know that the only way to get their science research in the public eye is to attach it to some "wow" factor. Knowing full well that the true applications will likely be more useful (but less "wowful") in the real world.
I subscribe to the "I'll believe it when I see it" camp.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Veselago
for a start
then
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Pendry
then find copies of their papers. the veselago paper is a scan cause its reasonably old. the pendry paper basically shows that if you take a slab of material with negative permeability and permittivity then you get a perfect lens.
later people showed that you could have external neg refractive index cloaks that would compensate for the optical influence of the object to be cloaked.
start with vesalago.
Anyone know how this material responds to lasers? If it doesn't break, it might be a useful way of preventing resources on the ground from being "painted" by a laser (and subsequently bombed).
An internal system operation returned the error "The operation completed successfully.".
Humans are dreamers above anything.
A good thing too , otherwise there wouldn't be any inventions.
The problem is , just an idea isn't good enough : you need a plan to put it into practice , and you need money in order to bring it into a workable product.
That means you have to find investors, and 'Liquid Invisibility Cloak' sells better than 'Theoretical material with exotic optical effect' .
Slipping shoelaces ?
Ol' Hick'ry said "You kin take 'em by surprise,
If you just fire yer musket at the pupils of their eyes"
Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
It's sitting right in front of you, but it's covered with an invisibility cloak.
And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
send all the waste heat in the direction away from earth. that way it may be possible to make the side facing earth very close to invisible.
or just a stealth boy?
Watch this Heartland Institute video
So when does this turn into vaporware...?
Disclaimer: I am not god.
We may not be created equal
But we can be treated equal.