Slashdot Mirror


Wireless Power Group Sees Standard Within 6 Months

alphadogg writes "The group developing a standard for wireless charging expects to complete its first specification within six months, opening the door for makers of cell phones, digital cameras and other devices to bring compatible products to market. Wireless charging lets consumers place gadgets on a mat that plugs into a wall outlet, and have the devices recharge automatically without needing to plug in each one. Apart from the gee-whiz factor, it's supposed to make life more convenient by letting people walk into their home or office, toss their gadgets onto a mat to recharge and forget about them."

28 of 152 comments (clear)

  1. Saving power by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Charging mats will recognize when a device is fully charged and then consume a trickle of energy in standby mode

    Okay thats interesting. We all use wireless (inductive) power in other places and while, yeah, the cheap plugpack segment is mostly switchmode now I wonder if there are places where the efficency of transformers could be improved with a digital back channel which says send me this much power.

    1. Re:Saving power by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      while, yeah, the cheap plugpack segment is mostly switchmode now I wonder if there are places where the efficency of transformers could be improved

      How about they improve the power supplies first? It's bad enough that there are all these cheap crappy switch-mode power supplies splattering harmonics of their switching frequency up and down the RF spectrum, but now they want to design them to radiate *more*?

  2. Not going to happen... by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We've tried doing this with physical plugs to no avail, even if one half conforms to a standard there will always be a few very popular device manufacturers -cough- Apple -cough- who will break the trend and inconvenience a large amount of users.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:Not going to happen... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's USB and in the EU manufacturers have agreed to a universal charger: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/jun/30/universal-mobile-phone-charger

    2. Re:Not going to happen... by noidentity · · Score: 3, Funny

      No problem! We'll just have an adaptor/receiver that you plug into your old adaptor. This will receive wireless power, convert it back to 120/240V AC, then power your old wired adaptor.

    3. Re:Not going to happen... by publiclurker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't worry, they'll also sell and adapter for that.

  3. Re:opportunities by PPH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, unless the baby implements the correct handshaking protocol with the controller there shouldn't be a problem. And as for metal, I'm assuming that the standard (or decent implementations of it) will deal with what to do in the event the mat detects that its deriving an unknown load (shorted loop, etc.).

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  4. Re:opportunities by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative

    You could put the baby beside a phone or camera which requests power, but even then its only five watts which is not going to do any damage.

  5. Strange limitation by cerberusss · · Score: 3, Informative

    The article mentions "The standard is for delivering up to 5 watts of power, which covers most smaller devices. "

    This sounds like a pretty low limit to me. My iPhone charger delivers 5 watts and it takes hours before it's charged. Now imagine you buy one of those matts and your family or colleagues throw their phones on the matt as well. At the end of the day, they might not even be charged!

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:Strange limitation by KazW · · Score: 3, Informative

      The article mentions "The standard is for delivering up to 5 watts of power, which covers most smaller devices. "

      This sounds like a pretty low limit to me. My iPhone charger delivers 5 watts and it takes hours before it's charged. Now imagine you buy one of those matts and your family or colleagues throw their phones on the matt as well. At the end of the day, they might not even be charged!

      I'm not sure how you missed this sentence, but this makes it pretty clear to me.

      Initial products are likely to come bundled with a small charging mat of their own, but if the technology takes off other companies are likely to sell mats that can charge multiple devices at once.

      --
      Geeks don't grock information, they grep it.
  6. Pointless by Samy+Merchi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't really see the point. As long as you have to put the device in a specific location anyway, I don't see that it's much of an improvement over having to connect it with your charger. You have to connect it with a location just the same, with this new tech, just the plug is different (a pad vs a plug).

    Wake me when you have a tech that charges my mobile from the moment I step in my home door and leave my mobile in my jacket pocket hanging in the foyer.

    Until that use case can be satisfied, I think this is just the same-old, same-old.

    1. Re:Pointless by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Informative

      as someone who builds (diy) and also fixes commercial gear, let me splain one thing to you.

      the jacks are pure shit and they fail in very short times if they see any use at all. most plugs have minimal strain relief and there is NONE at the socket side of things.

      if you go socketless, you have one less thing on the (mp3, phone, etc) to break on its main board.

      of course, you still have the line-out (etc) to worry about breaking, but repeated chargings on cheap connectors (they ALl are cheap chinese connectors) isn't ever a good thing. removing them is a good thing.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Pointless by Samy+Merchi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not about laziness. If it was about laziness, I'd jump on the new tech because it saves me the "arduous" step of *plugging in* (gasp). Instead I'm planning on staying with the far more demanding step of actually plugging in.

      It's about forgetfulness. As I grow older and more senile, I plain and simple don't *remember* to put my devices at their designated charging locations every single night. If there was a tech that charged my devices no matter where I left them inside the confines of my house, that would something that would produce a useful value add for me.

      Eliminating the plugging in phase does not produce a useful value add because I'm not so lazy that plugging in is some huge obstacle.

    3. Re:Pointless by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2

      I don't really see the point.

      Instead of twelve wires leading to twelve plugs going to a powerstrip or two before reaching the wall for a dozen devices, you have one wire going to the wall and the devices on a flat surface which may if you like be cluttered with other non-charging devices. Or you build it into your countertop or other piece of furniture so you don't even see that wire.

      No, the real problem is that these devices needing charging are mobile, and continue to be mobile when used in the home. People want to keep their iPods with them to listen to their playlists while walking room-to-room and their phones so they can answer them instead of forgetting them in one room while they're in another. You'd need a pad in easy reach in every room where someone spends any amount of time motionless: coffee table, kitchen counter, bedside table, bathroom counter, back of the toilet....

      A desk "blotter" that also charges the wireless keyboard and mouse, now that's useful!

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  7. Sure to be a hit by finity · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With all the /. users saying "this is going to be pointless," and "it's already easy enough as it is," this is sure to be a hit.

  8. Re:Correction by Hadlock · · Score: 2

    Number of times phone stolen from bedside table: 0
    Number of times phone stolen from office desk: 0

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  9. Re:opportunities by arielCo · · Score: 3, Funny

    You could put the baby beside a phone or camera

    No damage to the baby, but that phone/camera is toast as soon as you turn your head :)

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  10. Underwater photography (charging a sealed camera) by malkavian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This will be a huge boon to me.. One of my hobbies is underwater photography, and as anyone who does that will testify, you always have a nervous moment when you immerse the camera and housing at the start of a dive..
    This is because you have to seal the camera in a housing, sealed by a multitude of o-rings, each of which need to be cleaned and re-greased every time you open the housing. When you put the o-rings back in place, you have to look carefully for a hair, or a speck of grit or dirt, or anything that could compromise the seal in any way. If you mess up (even a single hair can cause a seal failure), you'll have a lovely view of rising water in your camera housing, and you camera will be so much junk (and you may kill the electronics in the housing too, which is expensive as well!)..
    This can really put a crimp in a holiday (no more photography for you! And you did have it insured, didn't you??)..
    There are really only two common reasons to crack a housing open.. To take the memory card out and back it up, and to recharge the camera/strobe batteries after a dive..
    As you need to recharge after most dives, nobody's really bothered much with wireless data transmission, but if you can wirelessly recharge, it's simple to add wireless data transfer too, so you'll not have to crack the case 'till you want to change the lens (which isn't too common most of the time) or strip it for cleaning (you could probably get away with once or twice a holiday, if that).. Much safer!

  11. Re:This is done already by Quantos · · Score: 2, Informative

    You guys do realize that there was a fellow named Tesla that did some really ground breaking work on this originally, right?

    --
    Some people are only alive because it's against the law for me to hunt them down and kill them.
  12. Re:curious... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article implies a data channel from the device to the charger so the charger knows when not to deliver power.

  13. Re:How efficient is this? by drawfour · · Score: 2, Informative
    From page 2 of the article:

    There is some loss in the system, however, and the technology being standardized is only about 70 percent efficient, Treffers said, meaning it is not a particularly green way to charge devices.

  14. Re:opportunities by icebike · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do babies come with Induction coils?

    Quote TFA:
    "The standard is for a technology called magnetic induction, in which power is transferred between metal coils built into the device and the charging mat when they are placed close to each other. "

    Its just a magnetic field folks.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  15. Re:Correction by Hadlock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Times cell phone has been stolen at all: 0
     
    Seriously, it lives in your pocket, or on your belt. How many times have you had your wallet stolen? Maybe you have an issue with keeping track of your personal belongings. I've never heard of any of my friends (mostly BB and iPhone users, fairly desirable phones, unlockable and use SIM cards) with stolen phones. Usually it's death by toilet, sidewalk or frustration (wall).

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  16. Re:opportunities by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do babies come with Induction coils?

    A few.

    A guy I worked with his son had broken the antenna on his implant in the playground at school. They could get it working by squeezing his head in just the right way to close the break in the antenna wire.

  17. Fear of power lines... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the public is already afraid of living near power lines (100yds away), what makes these manufacturers think that having a bunch of 'wireless power pads' is going to be any different? Or is this a case of a rabid chihuahua is no threat due to its size?

  18. Re:And when I'm somewhere else? by rdnetto · · Score: 3, Informative

    How about standardizing on a USB charging interface?

    I thought we already had

    --
    Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  19. energy loss by Fuzzums · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the fact that this process inevitably will cost more energy than plugging the device is seems unimportant...

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  20. This should be BANNED! by upuv · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK does any one else see this as completely nuts?

    At the moment the power output is relatively low. 5 watts ish. Lets think about this. This is BROADCAST POWER. It's going to leak into everything around it. There will be no such thing as 95% efficient transfer of power. So where does this residual power go. Well into everything around it. The closer something is the more it will receive.

    Very simple chemistry here. Entropy increase with energy. Entropy can simple be defined as the desire of a substance to reach it most random and natural state. ( There is probably a more accurate definition than that. ) AKA Entropy is all about things BREAKING DOWN. So if we add energy to a "thing" it ultimately will break down faster.

    I'm sorry but I don't want to be walking around in yet more energy radiation fields. Especially one designed to transmit POWER AKA ENERGY.

    5 watts gives way to 10 watts gives away to 25 watts gives away to stupid amounts of power. As "improvements" and legislation allow higher and higher output.

    This also strikes me as the most un-green tech out there. Simply a device that radiates POWER.