Slashdot Mirror


Tech Tools Fostering "Mini Generation Gaps"

Hugh Pickens writes "The NY Times has an interesting report on the iGeneration, born in the '90s and this decade, comparing them to the Net Generation, born in the 1980s. The Net Generation spend two hours a day talking on the phone and still use e-mail frequently while the iGeneration — conceivably their younger siblings — spends considerably more time texting than talking on the phone, pays less attention to television than the older group, and tends to communicate more over instant-messenger networks. 'People two, three or four years apart are having completely different experiences with technology,' says Lee Rainie, director of the Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project. 'College students scratch their heads at what their high school siblings are doing, and they scratch their heads at their younger siblings. It has sped up generational differences.' Dr. Larry Rosen, a professor of psychology at California State University, says that the iGeneration, unlike their older peers, expect an instant response from everyone they communicate with, and don't have the patience for anything less. 'They'll want their teachers and professors to respond to them immediately, and they will expect instantaneous access to everyone, because after all, that is the experience they have growing up,' says Rosen." Read below for another intra-generational wrinkle.
Another intra-generational gap is the iGeneration comfort in multi-tasking. Studies show that 16- to 18-year-olds perform seven tasks, on average, in their free time — like texting on the phone, sending instant messages, and checking Facebook while sitting in front of the television; while people in their early 20s can handle only six, and those in their 30s about five and a half. "That versatility is great when they're killing time, but will a younger generation be as focused at school and work as their forebears?" writes Brad Smith. "I worry that young people won't be able to summon the capacity to focus and concentrate when they need to," says Vicky Rideout, a vice president at the Kaiser Family Foundation.

13 of 322 comments (clear)

  1. Let me get out my violin... by Pluvius · · Score: 5, Funny

    They'll want their teachers and professors to respond to them immediately, and they will expect instantaneous access to everyone

    And they're going to be quickly disappointed.

    Rob

    1. Re:Let me get out my violin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      They'll want their teachers and professors to respond to them immediately, and they will expect instantaneous access to everyone

      And they're going to be quickly disappointed.

      Rob

      Dammit, we are tired of waiting for quick disappointment! We demand INSTANT disappointment!

    2. Re:Let me get out my violin... by sohp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's OK, they'll get their comeuppance when they go into the workforce and find management also expects instantaneous access to them -- 24/7/365.

    3. Re:Let me get out my violin... by Grundlefleck · · Score: 5, Informative

      Dammit, we are tired of waiting for quick disappointment! We demand INSTANT disappointment!

      I've been providing this to women for years!

      --
      I accept I know nothing. Insulting my ignorance is wasted on me.
  2. Instant response? I don't think so. by hackwrench · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dr. Larry Rosen, a professor of psychology at California State University, says that the iGeneration, unlike their older peers, expect an instant response from everyone they communicate with, and don't have the patience for anything less.

    I thought that one of the benefits of texting was that you don't have to have a response immediately, or even read it immediately.

  3. Too true by Icarium · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm in my early thirties and I avoid multitasking like the plague. My younger colleagues and siblings seem to have no problems with doing several things at once - but the flip side is they end up doing many things twice simply because they sacrifice focus for versatility. They're so busy trying to do too many things at once that they rarely get anything done properly.

    As for being always in contact, I couldn't care less. I'll usually answer as soon as possible, but I have no qualms when it comes to ignoring calls or messages if I'm busy with something, or simply don't feel like talking to someone. I don't expect people to be available on my schedule and see no reason why I am obligated to be always available when it suits them.

  4. Calling BS by clinko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would like to add this one:

    As a member of the "Net Generation", I feel we have tuned ourselves to calling out Bullshit...
    We have an ability to figure out that some stuff is the result of marketing vs. actual Buzz. That's why fake "viral videos" are so painful to watch.

    Examples:
    - Cyber Monday (We know this WAS fake, but stores use it to market now)
    - MySpace Buzz (We knew this was dead years ago)
    - CNN trying to be "hip" (We saw this from a mile away)
    - The ACTUAL relevancy of Twitter vs. what is said on TV (Regis has a twitter account, it's officially uncool)
    - 3DTV (A new one from this week due to CES. Seriously, I/We're not feeling it)

    Now we can easily add the phrases "iGeneration" and "Net Generation"

    We know these phrases are bullshit, but get ready to hear more about it.

  5. Re:The lack of attention span is certainly true! by dangitman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Many of these people born in the 1990s feel that the entire world should instantly respond to them and they get extremely impatient when it doesn't.

    Sounds like how teenagers have always been.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  6. Re:Bullshit level: High - Storm likely. by fast+turtle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get Off My Lawn Kids

    Having been classified as ADHD in the early 70's it's so nice to finally get my revenge now that everyone has been infected with the damn Attention Deficit Syndrome. Those who don't learn to focus and develop short term memory are bound to fail and I can sincerely state "Welcome to my World" - sukkers.

    --
    Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
  7. Re:It was better in the old days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let "true socializing" mean socializing with uninteresting people in your local neighborhood and "false socializing" mean socializing within boundaryless global pools of people who share your interests.

    My brother has met all kinds of people to go off-roading with in his larger than local sphere. That kind of possibility simply wasn't there before instant messaging made everyone seem closer to their shared interests. I'm certainly no authority on socializing, but I don't believe that there's any social sense of being a human being that's lost when you socialize over a text medium vs in person. If anything, it allows us to socialize with more people than ever before.

    Only thing that's not great about it is that we are likely to be more exposed to social networks we do not agree with, which may cause larger conflicts vs smaller isolated instances of ostracization. But that's inherent in the risks of globalization as a whole.

  8. Re:Bullshit level: High - Storm likely. by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...You are on Slashdot. You are not the norm. The fact you are even on this site shows that you are more inclined to use a computer than other people your age.

    As for TV, the quality of programming has gone downhill, even news shows are nothing more than glorified tabloids. Networks that used to have interesting programming has shifted to more crap. Discovery is more about blowing stuff up than explaining science, the History channel seems to be nothing more than WWII and explosions.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  9. Re:Bullshit level: High - Storm likely. by icebike · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I guess I'm Net generation. Except that doesn't sound right for anyone I know of my age group.
    Furthermore, I've always adopted the best tools for the job, and ignored blatant fads such as twitter.

    For work issues, I don't even answer email immediately, because I have no intention of serving as a brain trust for people who will not think. I let them age. The more I get from a single source the more I let them age.

    For recreational use, I still prefer an email for anything other than the "What time will you arrive" question via text.

    Thinking carefully, I can not come up with a single person I care to follow on twitter, but it is nice for breaking news issues if you are a news junkie.

    I think we are breeding the first generation of the BORG. People who can't think and can't act without first checking in with the collective.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  10. Re:Bullshit level: High - Storm likely. by RDW · · Score: 5, Interesting

    'Texting and facebook updating is a leisure activity, and doesn't mix with work at all.'

    I wonder how many of the other supposed differences are really down to the younger generation being, well, younger? A text message is probably cheaper than a voice call, which is handy if you're on a limited budget with a PAYG phone. A school or college age kid may have a wider social network than an older person in a full-time job, so online networking tools could be more useful. There be may less tendency to veg out in front of passive TV entertainment like an exhausted wage slave if you're out enjoying yourself all the time. Multitasking could be less difficult for a younger brain, etc. Of course, these are just the senile ramblings of an ageing mind, so take them with a pinch of salt. And get off my lawn.