Slashdot Mirror


Smartphones Receive Holy Blessing

jeffmeden writes "Plow Monday is normally for blessing laborers and their tools; as the name suggests it is aimed at those who work the land. A church service in London, England Monday decided to go after a more modern audience: office workers and their modern communication gadgets. From the Times article: 'The congregation at St Lawrence Jewry in the City of London raised their mobiles and iPods above their heads and Canon Parrott raised his voice to the heavens to address the Lord God of all Creation. "May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible," he said.'"

27 of 154 comments (clear)

  1. Has anyone noticed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Has anyone noticed that sampenzus is a worse editor than even Jon Katz could ever hope to be?

    1. Re:Has anyone noticed... by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and yet you are posting in one...

  2. Absurd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is this any more absurd than waving other tools in the air and praying for assistance from the divine?

    1. Re:Absurd? by fastest+fascist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it does, however, raise the possibility of holy tech support. Prayer circles praying for your tech problems to be solved, for a small fee, of course.

      I have a terrible feeling that already exists somewhere.

    2. Re:Absurd? by McNihil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not assistance they ask for, it is that the tool doesn't break/crash or become otherwise inoperable and IMHO that approach is less absurd and hints at the users humility.

      How much did a plow cost back in the day? If it broke? Without it you and the rest of the family would have a hard time to live.

      Now the absurd is that iPod's and the like should not be included. A persons main computer or server farm that pays the families bill... hell yes.

      But then again most modern people may be Atheists and could care less.

    3. Re:Absurd? by mosb1000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Apple users will first pray to Jobs, and only then resort to an alternative deity."

      Are you crazy?! A true believer would never pray to another deity. If Steve doesn't fix your problem, it's because it doesn't need to be fixed.

  3. How is this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How is this not Idle material? Or better yet trash can material. Who cares what some inane irrelevant church is doing in whatever part of the world.

    1. Re:How is this by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 4, Informative

      We care because sampenzus is posting idle shit outside of idle and cluttering up the other sections.

    2. Re:How is this by derGoldstein · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you don't care, why did you post? Take your hateful bullshit elsewhere.

      This is Slashdot. This *is* where people take their hateful bullshit.

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    3. Re:How is this by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Easy. Just go to "Help and Accounts" -> "Classic Index" -> "Authors" and untick samzenpus... which is what I have now done. See you folks later.

  4. The funny bit... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...raised their mobiles and iPods above their heads

    Taking your iPod to church? Why? So you can play games and listen to music instead of the sermon?

    Religion sure is a weird business.

    1. Re:The funny bit... by musichead · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not terribly odd - the church has been in the practice of blessing man's vices for some time. The church has a hostory of blessing pipes, why not tech gadgets? http://theophiliacs.com/2009/01/24/theology-and-pipe-smoking-part-ii/

    2. Re:The funny bit... by sznupi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just the iPods need exorcisms.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  5. Read as: by d34dluk3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Someone is trying to hard to be 'relevant'.

    1. Re:Read as: by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's just a new take on an old custom. Here in Belgium there's a lot of (older) people who get their car blessed once a year during the pilgrimage to Scherpenheuvel. It's silly but hey to each his own.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  6. Not to be left out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Something similar was tried recently at a Synagogue - the laptops got paraded around on chairs, the iPods were wrapped in a handkerchief and stepped on and the cell phones got the end of their antennas cut off.

  7. Technical support by ilsaloving · · Score: 3, Funny

    After examining many badly managed and virus ridden machines, I've often declared that nothing short of a reformat and an exorcism is going to get it working again.

    It's nice to know that *someone* is finally following through with my recommendations.

  8. random thoughts... by Theodore · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, would the sound of a 300 baud modem connecting be equivalent to Gregorian chant now?
    Is renewing DHCP equivalent to confession and absolution?
    Is SMTP prayer? What does God do when you spam him?
    Does your firewall have an angel with a flaming sword? Ours does.
    And should they really be using wireless if Lucifer is the Lord of the Air?

  9. Ooookaaaayyy... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 3, Funny

    May our tongues be gentle, our e-mails be simple and our websites be accessible...

    And the congregation responds: And may porn flow freely without fear of spam and malware.

    --
    That is all.
  10. Turn in your nerd card. by Singularity42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Faith is incompatible with being a nerd.

    1. Re:Turn in your nerd card. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 2, Informative

      Faith != Confidence.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    2. Re:Turn in your nerd card. by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is we're just conflating two different definitions of the same word. There's that definition ("Confident belief in the truth, value, or trustworthiness of a person, idea, or thing."), but the one that we should criticise is the one that is often supported by many religious people: "Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence." (or also "The theological virtue defined as secure belief in God and a trusting acceptance of God's will.")

      Faith should depend on evidence and reason - it should not simply be something to have for the sake of it.

  11. Re:Are they serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    They didn't just call it that, you know. Buildings in Europe can be centuries old, back when attitudes or conventions were different. Enlighten thyself.

  12. Exorcism for Windows viruses by Jon_Hanson · · Score: 3, Funny

    They need an exorcism ritual for Windows viruses as well.

  13. Re:Are they serious? by Jonathunder · · Score: 2, Informative

    The name is a reference to its location.

    From its website:

    "St. Lawrence was first built in 1136 in the east end of London in the old Jewish quarter..."

  14. Re:Are they serious? by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This church is called "St Lawrence Jewry"? What a confusing and possibly offensive (to Jews) name for a church. Unless there's something I'm missing about British English.

    It's not something you're missing about "British English." It's something you're missing about history.

    With just one search, you could have clarified the historical reasons for this. The name dates back to a time when Jews were welcomed into England (even as they were being persecuted elsewhere) after William the Conqueror arrived. The old Jewish quarter in London includes prominent streets like Old Jewry and nearby old landmarks like St Lawrence Jewry.

    "Confusing"? Potentially. But it's a reference to an address whose name is almost a millennium old. "Offensive"? Only if you don't know anything about history. It sort of reminds me of the idiots who want to remove the term "Providence Plantations" from the name of the state Rhode Island (whose official name is "The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations"), because they somehow think that "plantation" only refers to places where there were slaves. That's not what it meant in the 17th century, when the colony was founded.

    Historical ignorance offends me. In the name of reason, try to educate yourself before assuming that a term or name from centuries ago must be intended to offend people.

  15. Redundant by mosb1000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The content of your post is implied in all Slashdot stories, since there inevitably is someone who will find anything irrelevant.