Slashdot Mirror


Nano-Scale Robot Arm Moves Atoms With 100% Accuracy

destinyland writes "A New York professor has built a two-armed nanorobotic device with the ability to place specific atoms and molecules where scientists want them. The nano-scopic device is just 150 x 50 x 8 nanometers in size — over a million could fit inside a single red blood cell. But because of its size, it's able to build nanoscale structures and machines — including a nanoscale walking biped and even sequence-dependent molecular switch arrays!"

4 of 266 comments (clear)

  1. Did we just break heisenberg's principle? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If it can move and place particles with 100% accuracy then at least at some point we know both where it is and how fast it's moving...

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  2. DNA by mxh83 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    does this mean someone can artificially alter their DNA using the nanobots?

  3. Exactly by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Exactly. Moving individual atoms and placing them where we want them is about as fine grained as we can get before we run into the Uncertainty Principle.

  4. Re:"Success Rate" not "Accuracy" by m0nstr42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "100% Accuracy" implies a positional error of zero meters (to infinite decimal places), which is obviously not what they're talking about.

    I caught that, too. But really "percent" doesn't even make sense as a unit of accuracy, does it? Unless it's fractional, in which case I'd take it to mean that if you want to make a relative move of x, you'll get something in the range (0,2x) or maybe (0.5x, 1.5x)? I mean, on the nano scale that's still kind of remarkable, but as you've pointed out it's just not what they mean. /pedantic