Slashdot Mirror
Affordable and Usable Video Conferencing?
Sabalon writes "I work at a state university with remote sites, minimal space, and all the other usual bits. We used to have some dedicated-circuit video conferencing tools but those have fallen into disuse. The administration is now interested in being able to stream a class from site to site, or at least have a student at one site have visual interaction with a person at another site. My thought is that if Skype, uStream and others can do live video, there has to be some things out there that don't cost a fortune but work effectively. Key things would be the ability to use commodity web cams as a source, viewable on a PC (preferably all the main OSes) and the ability to add in other devices (say H.323 encoders) or desktop/application sharing. Are there decent products and solutions out there for us mere mortals?"
Cisco WebEx seems to fit the bill, although I'm not sure if it'll run on *nix.
I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class, especially since I rule.
After reading the article...why not just use Skype or Ustream as they mentioned?
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
Are there decent products and solutions out there for us mere mortals?
Just about anything will work -- unless your internet service provider sucks. Then you're kinda doomed. So do your homework on what low-latency providers are available or get a leased line between the sites.
#fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
You're not going to be able to usably capture a classroom lecture with webcam and associated microphone.
-Peter
Set up a water cooler inside an empty conference and the workers will gravitate there for a meeting. Of course, some of the biggest liars will try to dominate the water cooler. The plunger from the restroom will take care of that problem.