Slashdot Mirror


Prolonged Gaming Blamed For Rickets Rise

superapecommando writes "Too many hours spent playing videogames indoors is contributing to a rise in rickets, according to a new study by doctors. Professor Simon Pearce and Dr Tim Cheetham of Newcastle University have written a paper in the British Medical Journal which warns of the rickets uptake – a disease which sufferers get when deficient in Vitamin D. The study boils down to the fact that as more people play videogames indoors they don't get enough sunlight and this has meant the hospitals are now having to combat a disease that was last in the papers around the time Queen Victoria was on the throne." At least the kids are eating enough snacks with iodized salt that we don't have to worry about goiters.

13 of 254 comments (clear)

  1. Via Wikipedia by Bicx · · Score: 5, Informative

    Rickets is a softening of bones in children potentially leading to fractures and deformity. Rickets is among the most frequent childhood diseases in many developing countries. The predominant cause is a vitamin D deficiency, but lack of adequate calcium in the diet may also lead to rickets (cases of severe diarrhea and vomiting may be the cause of the deficiency). Although it can occur in adults, the majority of cases occur in children suffering from severe malnutrition, usually resulting from famine or starvation during the early stages of childhood.

    1. Re:Via Wikipedia by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      , usually resulting from famine or starvation during the early stages of childhood.

      And that's the real story: Parents who have turned their children over to the television, computer, and daycare centers of the world and neglecting basic nutrition. My sister is like that -- she is fed a diet of fast food and microwave meals because her parents can't be bothered to cook a meal (two income family). I don't think its intentional, people just assume there's no problem if it can't be seen.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    2. Re:Via Wikipedia by samkass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not sure why you threw daycare centers in there. Often they are much more strictly monitored than a child's home life and probably have prevented more of these cases than caused them.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    3. Re:Via Wikipedia by frosty_tsm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Please people, play some sports outside with your children. They spend so much time at their computer and console games that they're getting too difficult for us old folks to beat. And they're generally fairly annoying about it.

      You're just trying to handicap them. You're supposed to practice after they go to bed so you're ready to unleash a 13 hit combo on them. Or headshot them. Whichever.

      (before I get marked as evil, I mean IN GAMES)

    4. Re:Via Wikipedia by instagib · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You really can't take care of a family [...] without dual incomes.

      This is only true if you want to maintain your living standard as if you had no kids. Smaller car, no vacation, no restaurants, simple clothing etc. (i.e. how most people live in this world) would allow single income plus a 100% mother - just as a few decades ago. I am not saying that this is how it should be, just that the "want to have it all" is a definitive factor.

  2. The kicker: by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you spend so much time inside playing video games that you get a case of the rickets, you've got way more problems than just vitamin deficiency.

  3. Grain of salt... by Shanrak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm going to take this with a large grain of salt here. Does the publication in the British Medical Journal actually blame the rise on gaming, or is TFA simply adding the gaming aspect to it to generate a sensational article to post on a tech site with a large demographic who plays games. TFA only has a link to the BMJ homepage.

    Oh, and obligatory: correlation does not imply causation

    --
    This post may or may not contain cancer causing materials.
  4. Gaming? by MrMista_B · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bullshit.

    More likely the result of fear-tactic news scaring people into keeping their kids indoors 24 hours a day except for school. Playgrounds are where perverts lurk, remember? Gotta keep little Billy safe!

    Of course, indoors there are videogames - but there's also books, and television. Gaming is just one possible indoor activity - if you don't let your kids outside, don't be surprised if they end up fucked up.

  5. and of course by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has nothing to do with the media telling everyone that we shouldn't even risk a glimpse at the sunlight without a generous slathering with SPF 2 billion sunscreen and a hat.

  6. Re:Milk? by Renraku · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't listen to those people. You do NOT need sunlight to get vitamin D. Vitamin D is produced by your body when the high energy photons in sunlight break apart some chemical bonds in your skin and vitamin D is one of the results. However, it has also been isolated and produced externally for many decades. The vitamin D that you intake is almost as effective as the vitamin D produced by the sun.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  7. Re:Alrighty, clue me in by TheSync · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sunlight is photons. Energy. Vitamin D is matter. Vitamin D can't literally be in the sunlight.

    7-dehydrocholesterol, a derivative of cholesterol, is photolyzed in the skin (mostly in the epidermal stratum basale and stratum spinosum) by ultraviolet light between 270-300 nm wavelength in 6-electron conrotatory electrocyclic reaction. The product is pre-vitamin D3.

    Pre-vitamin D3 then spontaneously isomerizes to Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) in a antarafacial hydride [1,7] Sigmatropic shift. At room temperature the transformation of previtamin-D3 to vitamin D3 takes about 12 days to complete.

  8. Re:Sunlight is the key by idontgno · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unless the Wikipedia article is wrong, I think you're misinterpreting the flowchart.

    Ingestion of natural vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) from oily fish, egg yolks, and other vertebrate tissue sources, ingestion of natural vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) from invertebrate (usually fungal) tissue sources like mushrooms, ingestion of enriched foods with versions of either vitamin, or skin exposure to ultraviolet (which creates D3) all put vitamin D into the bloodstream. Then, the liver performs the first step of processing the vitamin, hydroxylation of either into calcidiol. Then, the kidney performs a second and final hydroxylation, conversion into calcitriol. This is the vitamin used by the tissues.

    In other words, sunlight is not involved with either hydroxylation reaction, only in one of the two sources (ingestion or skin synthesis) of the initial forms of vitamin D.

    If sunlight were involved in either hydroxylation reaction, we'd need to expose our livers and kidneys to sunlight, and that sounds quite painful and messy to me.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  9. Re:Milk? by blueg3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sources: blogs!