Slashdot Mirror


PayPal Freezes the Assets of Wikileaks.org

matsh sends word that PayPal has frozen the assets of wikileaks.org. From their Web site: "Paypal has as of 23rd of January 2010 frozen WikiLeaks assets. This is the second time that this happens. The last time we struggled for more than half a year to resolve this issue. By working with the respected and recognized German foundation Wau Holland Stiftung we tried to avoid this from happening again — apparently without avail." The submitter adds: "Hopefully we can pressure PayPal to resolve this quickly, since this seems like a dangerous political decision."

41 of 403 comments (clear)

  1. Unsurprising by LightPhoenix7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has been going on for many years, with many different groups. Until people stop using Paypal, or some sort of oversight or audit is performed, it will continue to happen. Mayhap Wikileaks should try and dig up information on Paypal.

    1. Re:Unsurprising by rolfwind · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Until people stop using Paypal, or some sort of oversight or audit is performed, it will continue to happen.

      The Government has to step up and declare Paypal a bank. Banks can't take or freeze your money simply because they don't like what you do (which Paypal often does) - only the government can do that if you are in breach of laws.

      Now that the Government found their balls to stand up to China for once, maybe it can do the same with corporations.

    2. Re:Unsurprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Interestingly this is only a problem in US and western countries. Russia and Eastern Bloc almost fully uses WebMoney. There is no problems with locking accounts, transactions fees are really low and you can pay your phone, internet or tv bill with it (along with countless of other services). Cards to put money in to account are sold in every kiosk. Security is better too, if you require they send you one-time auth sms or you can have keyfiles to login.

      Paypal is shit.

    3. Re:Unsurprising by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Now that the Government found their balls to stand up to China for once, maybe it can do the same with corporations.

      Fail, fail. The government is standing up to China on behalf of a corporation. If our government actually believed in human rights, we wouldn't favor trade with China above all other nations.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Unsurprising by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Banks can't take or freeze your money simply because they don't like what you do (which Paypal often does)

      It's actually worse than that... they can take and freeze your money because they don't like what one of your business partners does...

      Now that the Government found their balls to stand up to China for once, maybe it can do the same with corporations.

      It's not the government that found a new pair, but Google!

    5. Re:Unsurprising by Minwee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's actually worse than that... they can take and freeze your money because they don't like what one of your business partners does...

      I think you're being overly generous. PayPal can take and freeze your money because they feel like it.

    6. Re:Unsurprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's actually worse than that... they (banks) can take and freeze your money because they don't like what one of your business partners does...

      Or they can simply hold the country's economy for ransom, take your money by government payout, issue themselves enormous bonuses, lend nothing and tell you to go fuck yourselves.

      At least the French knew when it was time for revolution.

    7. Re:Unsurprising by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Informative

      Banks can't take or freeze your money simply because they don't like what you do (which Paypal often does)

      It's actually worse than that... they can take and freeze your money because they don't like what one of your business partners does...

      They can screw you for just about anything, and have. http://www.paypalsucks.com/ Old news, but for some reason, no one knows.

    8. Re:Unsurprising by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Still amazed that no one at wikileaks has seen http://www.paypalsucks.com/ yet. No way I would trust paypal with anything, ever.

    9. Re:Unsurprising by GaryOlson · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Although this may be interesting, a little financial homework is required.
      wmtransfer.com domain is registered by SMP Bank, Moscow. From Moody's bank rating service,

      ...SMP Bank's currently limited franchise (which is in Moody's view to a substantial extent reliant on the bank's shareholders), high credit risk concentrations, low diversification of the bank's funding base and potentially volatile profitability

      .

      AS “SMP Bank” (until 17 June 2008 AS “Multibanka” – the Bank) was incorporated in the Republic of Latvia as a joint stock company “Multibanka” in 1994, in Riga and is licensed as a bank offering a wide range of financial services to enterprises and individuals. The address of the Bank’s registered office is Elizabetes iela 57, Riga, Latvia. The Bank has a branch in Liepaja and 12 offices in Riga, an office in Ventspils and Olaine, two offices in Daugavpils and representative offices in Moscow

      Once you read the financial statement, disbursement of profits, and this web of bank ownership, do you really want to use wmtranser.com?

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    10. Re:Unsurprising by no-body · · Score: 4, Informative

      > "they feel like it"

      Most of it is automated. They are running risk rules on transactions and if one hits a score, the account is frozen - they call it "limited".

      Can be anything - they sure won't publish their algorithms.

      And:

      Prohibited Activities

      You may not use the PayPal service for activities that:

      violate any law, statute, ORDINANCE or REGULATION

      (emphasis mine)

    11. Re:Unsurprising by AlamedaStone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not the government that found a new pair, but Google!

      When the Secretary of State (Hillary Clinton) calls out the Chinese about the hack attacks, I'd say that's the US Gov't finding a pair.
      I look forward to someone in the Government calling out PayPal/E-Bay for their shitty business practices.

      I watched parts of that speech. Was I the only one yelling at my TV, saying "WHAT ABOUT AUSTRALIA'S CENSORSHIP".

      But of course, despite naming an assortment of "bad" countries (you know. where they nais pas parle englais) that are filtering the internet, she didn't mention our friends in the AU.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    12. Re:Unsurprising by GaryOlson · · Score: 4, Informative

      SMP Bank has filed all the proper papers and provides the appearance of a bank. But, given that two of the bank council members are kleptocrats, whether or not SMP Bank is a bank is not the question. Are they any more trustworthy than Paypal?

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    13. Re:Unsurprising by h4rm0ny · · Score: 5, Informative


      We'll find out whether people care or not when there's an alternative.

      I formerly subscribed to Slashdot but I don't anymore because they now only accept Paypal. When they go back to accepting credit cards, I'll subscribe again. There have been other instances where I've avoided doing business with someone because it meant using Paypal. Don't trust them. Likely never will. It seems statistically unlikely that I'm the only one with this attitude toward them.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    14. Re:Unsurprising by ehrichweiss · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here's a thought for everyone: Corporations were demanding the same rights as individuals, right? How about we demand they have the same *repsonsibilities* as individuals, like being jailed for your crimes. I mean if the corps really want to move in that direction then let's give them enough rope to hang themselves. We've had to live with their laws so perhaps they're asking for this as well.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    15. Re:Unsurprising by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Who the fuck do you think hates wikileaks the most? The fucking government. People, quit relying on your goddamn governments to save the world and realize they are run by men, not angels.

    16. Re:Unsurprising by apoc.famine · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're not.
       
      There are a bunch of places that have missed out on my money because they only took PayPal. Free online games which rely on donations, websites like slashdot, places that do micropayments, charities, businesses, etc.
       
      I will NOT do business with PayPal. Period. I don't care what it's for, or how much it may potentially benefit me. I don't even care if it's just paying by credit card through them.
       
      PayPal is not a bank, is not accredited, can't be trusted, and will NEVER EVER touch any of my money or other financial assets. Should they decide to do ANYTHING, my only recompense is to try to sue a corporation with deep pockets.
       
      When it comes to my money, that's a risk I flatly refuse to take.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    17. Re:Unsurprising by Cimexus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sigh.

      For the 7385th time Slashdot, repeat after me: there is no censorship of the Internet in Australia.

      A couple of senators have put forward a proposal for a filter, that is all. One much more basic than China's. But this filter does not actually exist and probably never will given its widespread unpopularity. In fact it's not even to the stage of being an actual Bill introduced into the House or Senate yet. It's just an idea at this stage. An issue of public debate.

      Not to say we aren't worried about it or that the idea isn't reprehensible. But it doesn't actually ~exist~ at this point ... which is probably why Sen. Clinton wouldn't really say anything.

      There's a rather big difference between a random Senator saying "I would like to do X", and X actually happening.

  2. More info, please by Dorsai65 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why is PayPal freezing the account? What happened the first time, and what agreement was reached to thaw the account?

    --
    --- Asking inconvenient questions for over 30 years...
  3. maybe I'm missing something but... by ravenspear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If your organization used Paypal and they froze your assets once, and you "struggled for more than half a year" to resolve it, why the fuck would you STILL be using Paypal?

    1. Re:maybe I'm missing something but... by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem is that PayPal walks like a bank, talks like a bank and acts like a bank, but has so far been able to avoid being classified (and therefore regulated) as a bank. I'm not big on regulation, and my solution was to simply not use them anymore, but the FTC should crawl up PayPal's ass with a microscope. I'm pretty sure that's their Porsche in the parking lot...

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
  4. Unacceptable by s-whs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Paypal's behavious is unacceptable in many ways and it happens to many people.

    The most annoying thing is when you couple it to ebay, and anoying buyers file a not-received or not-as-described claim when it's clear they couldn't have received it yet, or you told them it was delayed because you were, say ill. As has happened with me.

    The bad thing is that this partly or wholly freezes your business section that depends on that. Unacceptable.

    Paypal and Ebay were once pretty good, the former because payments via bank transfer for small amounts internatioanlly were so expensive, but all that is gone now and the fees for large sums are also far too high...

    I suggest everyone use bank tranfers in EURO countries. IBAN/BIC payments are free if done with shared-cost.

  5. Probably some low level drone who didn't know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I doubt this is political. Paypal is notorious for freezing accounts based on some internal drone's mistake or a some programmed tripwire. There are countless horror stories about this: http://www.paypalwarning.com/ http://www.paypalsucks.com/frozen-accounts.shtml When you outsource all your employees and pay them 5 cents an hour or whatever slave wage they pay foreign workers, you get what you pay for.

    If it is political, then Paypal, as an organization is of unfathomable stupidity.

  6. Re:PayPal Regulation? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes. It is too much. As of Thursday our government is owned by the huge corporations. No one there is going to care if individuals are treated correctly or even if corps follow through their contracts.

  7. pecunix among others? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Paypal has a long history of doing this sort of thing to people.

    In addition to that, they have a history of requiring personal information from people (due in large part to US law)

    I believe it's time for an alternate, non-US based payment processor to take the place of paypal, the problem is there are so many to choose from. I like pecunix for their security (and the fact they aren't US based.. and use a market-maker approach, which helps to create competition in the exchange rates)

    But what about others? how come we're held hostage to paypal when other systems exist?

  8. Re:Burnt twice? by Entropy98 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfortunately Paypal is really the only option for a lot of smaller sites for whom a merchant account is too much hassle and expense.

  9. Wikileaks is webbugged! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems that there is a image from "alainfishing" on wikileaks main page. Read this interesting article about this:

    https://p10.secure.hostingprod.com/@spyblog.org.uk/ssl/wikileak/2010/01/paypal-suspends-donations-to-wikileaksorg-who-then-web-bug-their-own-website.html

  10. The only sane way to use Paypal... by knarf · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...is to empty the account every day. There is no sense in keeping any amount of money within their graps as they have shown time and time again they will freeze access without real cause or warning.

    I was part of the collective to buy i-Opener machines from the failed Netpliance company. We used Paypal to collect fund from participants as that seemed to be the best way at the moment... How wrong we were... Paypal froze access to the account once it had accumulated enough money for them to be profitable to draw interest from. Of course they did NOT block payment into the account, just access to the funds. They had no real reason to freeze the account and ignored their own rules in both freezing and unblocking the account. They just sat on the money for a month or two, drawing interest from it. When they finally unblocked the account - again without giving any reason whatsoever - the deal with Netpliance had almost bounced.

    Paypal is not a bank. Don't treat it as a bank. Don't entrust them with your money. Don't give them access to a debit account, only to a credit card.

    Paypal, in short, can not be trusted. Use it at your own peril, only use credit cards so you can reverse the transaction. Never ever accumulate any real amount of money on a Paypal account.

    --
    --frank[at]unternet.org
  11. Alternatives listed by Fortune/CNN by michaelmalak · · Score: 5, Informative

    The problems with PayPal are so infamous that no less than Fortune/CNN listed five alternatives

  12. Don't use PayPal by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is really the fault of the person who decided to keep their assets in a PayPal account. And this isn't the first time? Well, they just don't learn do they.

    PayPal can freeze accounts for any number of reasons, of which very few have to do with the owner of the account. If someone pays you with a stolen card or from an account that is suspected to have been compromised, that can trigger a freeze. Their support is notoriously bad, and their instructions for re-enabling your account are always overcomplicated.

    Let this be a lesson to anyone who receives money with PayPal.

    Money received => withdraw immediately

    NEVER HOLD A PAYPAL BALANCE.

    Always be ready to redirect payments to a backup account.

    1. Re:Don't use PayPal by clintp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Too bad it's +5, this should be +6 Insightful.

      Treat PayPal like the liquor store down the street that sells money orders and does Western Union wires. Sometimes they're a necessary evil to get money from point A to B. But you sure as hell don't keep your retirement money and the cash assets of your business in the store's cash register.

      --
      Get off my lawn.
  13. What are human rights ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fail, fail. The government is standing up to China on behalf of a corporation. If our government actually believed in human rights, we wouldn't favor trade with China above all other nations.

    Why treat China differently than our own country? The Supreme Court just ruled that only corporations have rights.

    Oh, sorry, I jumped ahead. That's the next week's chapter of America's March Back to Plutocracy.

  14. Re:PayPal Regulation? by evanbd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Did you read Stevens' dissent? Y'know, the thing that would have resulted as precedent had Kennedy voted with Stevens. No? Cause if you had you would have noticed it treated speech strictly as audible noise.

    The dissenting opinion being worse does not make the majority opinion a good one, or an improvement over the status quo.

  15. Re:Burnt twice? by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unfortunately Paypal is really the only option for a lot of smaller sites for whom a merchant account is too much hassle and expense.

    Uh... No... http://www.screw-paypal.com/alternatives/alternatives.html Also, having your account frozen and cash pulled from you bank is a bit of a hassle too. http://www.paypalsucks.com/ Never trust PayPal.

  16. Re:Burnt twice? by Entropy98 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have you actually tried any of those? Do you do any sort of serious business online?

    I've tried a few of those and they all have serious limitations.

    From the very article you linked: "No one service can match PayPal alone -- but all of these services exceed PayPal in the customer relations department. With skillful use of two or more of these services, buying and selling on eBay without PayPal is NO problem."

    With skillful use of two or more? The more difficult you make it for your customers to order from you the less money your going to make.

    From the list you linked to:

    Allpay.net -- Recommended for U.K. Only
    BidPay.com -- Out Of Business 2 Years
    CertaPay -- Recommended for CANADA Only
    Checkfree -- NOT RECOMMENDED
    HyperWALLET -- NOT RECOMMENDED
    Moneybookers -- Recommended for ALL
    Nochex -- Recommended for U.K. Residents and Certain Others
    Ozpay.biz -- Out Of Business 3+ Years
    Paymate -- Recommended for Australia & New Zealand
    ProPay -- Recommended for U.S. Sellers
    Xoom -- NOT RECOMMENDED

    So out of that entire list there are only 2 that will let a US seller sell worldwide and are not listed as "Not Recommended". Moneybrokers and Propay.

    I sell software on the internet and I've looked for alternatives to Paypal after having my account frozen.

    Moneybrokers wanted some proof or license or something (I don't remember exactly this was years ago) to show that I had the right to sell my software. After a few less than helpful email exchanges I gave up on them.

    Paypro, from their website, says you have to pay $60 a year to be able to accept all credit cards and you can only receive $3000 a month. This can be increased with a review of your credit and merchant history (if you have any). You can only accept Visa and $1000 a month with their regular plan.

    I guarantee you if you get enough problem transactions any merchant is going to freeze your account and hold your funds for a few months to make sure they don't get screwed.

  17. My personal PayPal horror story by Eric+Freyhart · · Score: 5, Informative

    My horror story with Paypal starts many years ago. I had a personal account with them since something like the late 90s, and never once had an issue with them. That was before I went into business for myself, and converted the account over to a business account around the year 2000. What a mistake.

    Now, let me just state the following:

    - We sold books, novels, and prints.
    - We sold works that were NOT adult.
    - We sold works that we clearly had the copyright on.
    - We were an independant publisher.

    I learned oneday that the account had been closed due to a violation of the Acceptable Use Policy. Well, we were in the business of self publishing, things like science fiction novels and fantasy books. We sold online through our own website and through Amazon.com. I contacted Paypal and got a nice lady on the phone who went over our online web site with me on the phone and could not find what would have been a violation. So the account was re-activated...

    Oh, then a few months later same thing. Account closed. This time with this message...

    In accordance with PayPal's User Agreement and Acceptable Use Policy, we have closed your account. Your funds may be held for 180 days from the date of your last transaction. After 180 days, you will be able to access your funds by requesting an online bank transfer or, if applicable, a check from PayPal. Please update your address or bank information as we cannot be held responsible for checks issued to an incorrect address. We do ask that you please remove reference(s) to PayPal from your site.

    I tried for over a month to get the account back in good standing, but was constantly told that the decision was final and there was nothing I could do. We sold everything on our main website through Amazon.com also (who never had any issue with the books we printed), and they also accepted Paypal as a payment method. Still to this day I have not been told a reason, nor given any information on why this action was taken. We simply gave up on Paypal and converted the site over to a real merchant account.

    3 years ago I sold the company and the assets to another publishing firm. I started a new enterprise under a new LLC and opened a Paypal account again. No problems, no issues. Oh, I must have been an idiot to think Paypal was not going to do it to me again...

    Well, my new account is now closed. It seems that Paypal has not blocked the company from using the account, but they did blacklist me. As soon as we went in to convert the account over to a business account I entered my SSN and wham! Account closed due to the original violation from over 3 years ago.

    Now, I was under the assumption in the United Stated that you could not blacklist a person from your business unless there was a dam good legal reason. And why won't they tell me what in the world I did to violate their user agreement? Its like being tried, convicted, and sentenced without as much as a ray of hope to prove your not guilty.

    I had a service rep fom Paypal (a manager) go over our new website (we sell clothing) and could not find a single thing that could possible violate any policies from Paypal, nor could he find any reason for this decision. But it is final, and over with.

    To make a long story short, I am now blacklisted from ever using Paypal again. No reason, no explanation, no way of proving that I am not guilty, and no way to do anything about it. It has been, to this day, the most horrible experience I have ever gone through. I kept getting the impression from Paypal that I was some sort of pornographer. I feel ashamed and tarnished by this decision, and will have to deal with it for the rest of my life.

    I personally recommend to anyone who asks me to stay away from Paypal. NEVER use this company, as you have NO protection under law from any harm they cause you or your company.

    Get a real merchant account. With a merchant account you deal directly with the credit card companies and

    1. Re:My personal PayPal horror story by David+Jao · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A business can simply choose not to do business with you at any time for any reason, even a secret one.

      Conversely, a potential customer can choose not to do business with Paypal at any time for any reason, or even for no reason whatsoever. The fact that Paypal terminates accounts arbitrarily and confiscates balances arbitrarily with no right of appeal is a damn good reason not to do business with them, regardless of whether or not they are acting legally. So I see nothing wrong with avoiding Paypal, or recommending that others avoid Paypal, or explaining why doing business with Paypal is a bad idea -- which is exactly what the GP did.

  18. Re:PayPal Regulation? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This isn't a left or a right thing. Both "sides" seem perfectly comfortable with it.

    "We don't need to give any more voice to the powerful interests that already drown out the voices of everyday Americans."

    -- Obama on recent SCOTUS Ruling

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  19. Contact PayPal and Ebay by omb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In Europe, at least, Ebay is a Swiss AG, headquartered in Bern, Switzerland

    Helvetiastrasse 15, CH-3005 Bern, Switzerland, Telephone 00 41 31 359 06 59

    and they are, of course, the Beneficial owners of PayPal.

    both of which, used to be a Luxembourg SARL, Luxembourg allows bearer shares.

    Under the Swiss-EU accords, judgements obtained under EU law, in member countries,
    are enforcible in Switzerland and thus in Kanton Bern. You can assume they speak
    EN DE FR IT, but if you want to give legal notice do it in one of the Swiss official
    languages ie DE FR IT

    Thus I suggest you write to the Geshaftsleiter (Ebay|PayPal) at the above address.

  20. I contacted Wikileaks by Arancaytar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's their response to my question:

    Hi,

    we are sure that we will get to the money at some point in time. Direct banking transfers generally are much better for us, as that prevents this issue from happening. If you can reverse it, and want to transfer directly, its fine by us. But cant say how much of a hassel that is.

    Thanks for the support and the solidarity!

    WikiLeaks

    On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:46:47PM +0000, Arancaytar wrote:
    > > Hello,
    > >
    > > I donated to you via Wau-Holland (using Paypal) on Jan 19. Should I
    > > attempt to reverse this payment in order to make a bank transfer
    > > directly (and is there any chance of that working)?
    > >
    > > Regards,
    > >
    > > --
    > > Arancaytar

  21. Re:Crooks get assets frozen, news at 11 by tobiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That could be viewed as flamebait, but you raise a valid point, so I'd like to offer a valid response. Wikileak's account was not suspended because they were convicted by any government of violating any particular law. They were convicted by PayPal itself, in the court of PayPal, in a manner that does not resemble any system.

    --
    "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -