Slashdot Mirror


Why the IRS Should Automatically Fill In Returns With What It Knows

theodp writes "An article in the NY Times begins, 'In the digital age, filing income tax returns should be a snap. Important data from employers and financial institutions has already been sent to government computers. Yet taxpayers are still required to perform the chore of preparing a return from scratch, in many cases paying a software company for the privilege.' Why, if your needs are simple, can't you just download forms pre-filled with whatever data the IRS has received about you, make any necessary adjustments, and automatically get the IRS calculation of your taxes? Sounds reasonable, but the IRS rejected the President's proposal to give taxpayers the option to do so as 'not feasible at this time' due to delays in the receipt of W-2 and 1099 data. However, California managed to offer a pre-filled state tax return, which cost only 34 cents to process compared to $2.59 to process a traditional paper return. Despite the success of the pilot, meager funds have been allotted for the program due to the strength of its political opponents — 'principally, Intuit' — according to the state controller. Intuit argues it would be a 'conflict of interest for government to be both tax collector and tax preparer.'"

47 of 613 comments (clear)

  1. This is how it's done where I'm from... by Louai · · Score: 5, Informative

    In Finland you get a pre-filled tax sheet in the mail, you only have to return it if there are any changes you need to make. I'm currently living in the US, I find the amount of crap you need to go through to get your affairs in order absolutely stunning.

    1. Re:This is how it's done where I'm from... by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just wait until you do what I did and live in 4 different states in a year... Seriously 5 tax returns, some owed me, I owed some.

    2. Re:This is how it's done where I'm from... by hitmark · · Score: 5, Interesting

      thats quite a reminder that USA is a collection of nations internally while a single nation outwards...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    3. Re:This is how it's done where I'm from... by danpat · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I had the same problem when I worked in 3 different countries in the space of 18 months. What made it even worse was that each required you declare your "overseas income" for their tax year, and none of the three countries had tax years that lined up (some when from July->June, some when from October->September, the other, Jan->December). And on top of that, there were tax treaties between each that allowed for special rates for certain types of income. You'd get totally screwed if you didn't take advantage of the treaties, but it also required reading said treaties. Fortunately, many tax treaties are structured the same otherwise it'd be damn near impossible.

      I couldn't find a tax professional prepared to help out either. Most accountants like to keep things within their own borders.

    4. Re:This is how it's done where I'm from... by c-reus · · Score: 5, Informative

      In Estonia, you log in to the web page of the IRS equivalent, click "Next" a few times, then click "Confirm" and you're all done. No dead trees involved.

    5. Re:This is how it's done where I'm from... by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It can be even worse, too. Some counties have special taxes on residents, too.

    6. Re:This is how it's done where I'm from... by Neoprofin · · Score: 4, Informative

      The bastard thing is that most in the US overpay their taxes by having a portion withdrawn from each paycheck. "Paying our taxes" is just telling them that they ripped us off during the year and we'd like the money back.

    7. Re:This is how it's done where I'm from... by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm missing how its bad for the government. Right now, your employer sends your W2 to you and the IRS. You fill in a 1040 and send it to the IRS. If the IRS agrees, then everything is fine.

      Alternatively, the IRS could use the W2 to fill in the 1040 automatically for you and as long as you agree, then everything is fine.

      But in both cases, the same data is used and is available. And in both cases, the tax return is only accepted if both parties agree it is correct.

    8. Re:This is how it's done where I'm from... by idji · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In Austria it is even simpler than that. Do NOTHING at all unless you want to make some special claim because all normal claims - like number of kids, commuter-rebate and so on go through the employer. And you can change or add any data you like at anytime over the next 5 years in an online government portal / and the telephone hotline is free and there is no waiting and the people are really helpful.

  2. Conflict? by mapinguari · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Intuit would probably argue that it's a conflict of interest to be both a tax payer and tax preparer.

    1. Re:Conflict? by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Oh yes, the tax preparation services will fight this tooth and nail.

      Almost every year about this time I post some sort of rant about how wasteful it is that we don't even have a free, official online tax-filing website. It would save filers tons of time, it would save the IRS tons of money. But the tax preparers don't care about that (after all, $1 of intentional government inefficiency is 25 cents of income for them) and somehow, though I can't figure out how, this tiny special interest has the power to dictate government policy.

    2. Re:Conflict? by nbauman · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/all_summary.php?id=D000026667&nid=3868

      Intuit Inc

      Rank: 598th
      2008 total combined contributions: $818,259
      2008 federal-level contributions: $394,475
      2008 state-level contributions: $423,784

      That's a pretty good return on the dollar.

    3. Re:Conflict? by jenn_13 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Almost every year about this time I post some sort of rant about how wasteful it is that we don't even have a free, official online tax-filing website. It would save filers tons of time, it would save the IRS tons of money. But the tax preparers don't care about that (after all, $1 of intentional government inefficiency is 25 cents of income for them) and somehow, though I can't figure out how, this tiny special interest has the power to dictate government policy.

      It's not exactly "official", as you have to go to a third party, but you can file online free. I worked as a tax preparer one year, and from my experience, the reason most clients chose $tax_service instead of doing it themselves (paper or online) wasn't because they couldn't, but because $tax_service offered refund anticipation loans. Which means they get a check for several thousand, less a couple hundred in fees, the next day, rather than waiting a week or more for direct deposit of the full refund.

    4. Re:Conflict? by Ritchie70 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Getting your taxes right is your responsibility. The IRS can send you a suggestion, and for some significant percentage of the population, the IRS will get it right.

      Would they get me right? No, probably not. They don't know the cost basis for my stock sales, and they don't know when I bought those stocks, so they don't know short-term vs. long-term capital gain/loss.

      Anyone who can do a 1040EZ shouldn't have to do anything.

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
    5. Re:Conflict? by mysidia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is American consumerism so out of control we take out loans on anticipated income now, in order to spend it as soon as possible (with extra fees tacked on due to interest / finance charges) ?

      I wonder what happens to consumers who take said loans if the IRS "corrects" their return and eliminates their refund.

      I guess they bought their fancy toys/doodads by the time that happens though, and they can default on their anticipation loan in the same way they stopped paying their credit card bills and mortage; however.

  3. Funny that you mention California by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They still think I owe them over $5,000 for back taxes, even though all the documents were sent directly to them and they know precisely how much I made and/or didn't make, and only ever owed them about a hundred and fifty bucks (which has long since been paid off.) they stole a bunch of my money through withholding to which they were not entitled, and since I passed some arbitrary deadline without getting it all resolved, they intend to keep it. Fuck California and the California Franchise Tax Board in the neck.

    With that said, if you don't have to file if you make less than the exemption amount, why should you have to file if you don't have any unusual economic activity to account for? That's ridiculous.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. works fine in Sweden by BuR4N · · Score: 5, Informative

    pre-filled tax forms that you only have to sign and return have worked well here in Sweden for years, no conflict of interest at all. A couple of years ago, they even started with an SMS option, where you just can "ok" your pre filled tax form with an SMS code.

    If you want to add information, you can just fill in your own form and send it in, but I think its pretty common to just use the pre-filled tax form.

    --
    http://www.intellipool.se/ - Intellipool Network Monitor
    1. Re:works fine in Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, when I was reading your post, I thought Sweden, eh? Wavy line... wavy lines...

      Knocking at the door. Swedish male citizen goes and answers it.

      Beautiful blond is at the door. (Translated to American)"Hi, I'm with the Revenue Service and I have your tax form. Do you want to have sex before or after reviewing your tax form?"

      Swedish make citizen: "Um. Let me ask my wife. Honey, should I have sex with the tax collector before or after reviewing the form?"

      Beautiful blond Swedish wife walks in: "Listen YOU! We filed jointly so it HAS to be a threesome before AND after reviewing the form!"

      Tax collector: "That's IS the law! File jointly and it's a threesome! I'm terribly sorry!"

      So this is the way it happens over there, right? Really?!?

    2. Re:works fine in Sweden by nanoakron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Whilst I don't live in Sweden (I'm in the UK), I have to ask quite what your point is?

      The Swedes may pay more in taxes, but in return get free healthcare, good roads, low crime, free schooling and university, (i believe) free (or heavily subsidised) childcare, efficient public transport, and much more.

      They're also very highly rated in terms of their low wealth disparity (road fines for example are based on a percentage of your annual income so that a rockstar in a ferrari feels the same sting in their speeding ticket as does a poor person in a skoda), and human development index.

      I could go on. The key point is that nations all make decisions about their priorities - the US believes in waging war and keeping the poor unhealthy and uneducated, other nations do not.

      tl;dr - high taxes are worth paying if you get good services in return. Think of Sweden as the 'Apple' of nations, versus the 'Windows Me' of the USA.

    3. Re:works fine in Sweden by nanoakron · · Score: 3, Funny

      My apologies, I now recognise that your country is actually a shithole, and I will never make claims about it being a nice, clean, efficient, liveable place again.

      Although, I do apologise for the speeding ticket thing - it's actually Switzerland that bases fines on income.

      -Nano.

    4. Re:works fine in Sweden by mikael_j · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Which means that healthy people...

      Yeah, because you just know you'll never get cancer or get hit by a car. Or maybe you've got some special ability to plan this not to happen right after you got laid off from a job?

      ...who don't drive much...

      Taxes also pay for other pieces of infrastructure including bicycle paths and subsidies for public transport.

      ...and are long-ago graduates...

      "Hey! I got my free cake courtesy of my parents' generation, now why should I pay for the next generation's free cake?!"

      ...with no children...

      Ok, you may have a point here, were it not for a concept known as "solidarity" (look it up, the word is in practically every dictionary).

      ...pay to support people who want to freeload off the government.

      Most people who are receiving more money than they're contributing tend to feel pretty bad about this but most of the time it's also not as easy as "oh well I guess I'll stop having cancer/being paralyzed/being unemployed and start paying more taxes!". The current swedish government did some amazing arithmetics prior to the last election and claimed over and over and over again that the reason unemployment was so high wasn't because there weren't enough jobs but because those who were unemployed simply weren't looking for jobs hard enough, naturally they ignored people pointing out that all available numbers showed that for every available job there were something like 4-5 unemployed people, kind of hard to get rid of unemployment just by "trying harder to get a job" under those circumstances...

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    5. Re:works fine in Sweden by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Swedes may pay more in taxes, but in return get free healthcare, good roads, low crime, free schooling and university, (i believe) free (or heavily subsidised) childcare, efficient public transport, and much more.

      When the US is number 36 or 37 in terms of healthcare...but if you're poor...you're living like in a 3rd World country...doesn't say much about this country. I know people are going to bust my balls about how great is all the freedom we "enjoy" in this country. When you have around 17 percent of your population un/underemployed...these members aren't any better of than those living in Central America or Africa. I would love to be able to get my teaching degree...but with the outrageous cost/benefit to do so with governments firing teachers & such...it's not worth it. I would be thousands of dollars in debt & still un/underemployed as much as I am right now.

      I know some of you will tell me...love it or leave it. If I could afford to do so...I would move permanently to Canada/Europe in a heartbeat.

      They're also very highly rated in terms of their low wealth disparity (road fines for example are based on a percentage of your annual income so that a rockstar in a ferrari feels the same sting in their speeding ticket as does a poor person in a skoda), and human development index.

      Can't have that happen...since if you're rich...you're special. It's like the old question...what's the difference between being a porn star & the working poor in the US? The porn star is paid for having it done to them while the working poor gets it done to them for free.

      I could go on. The key point is that nations all make decisions about their priorities - the US believes in waging war and keeping the poor unhealthy and uneducated, other nations do not.

      As long as you have a religious/moral basis for practicing this type of behavior...it will continue. As a practicing Christian...I find US history/policies SHAMEFUL & not having a conscience to put an end to this behavior. There has to be a point where compassion/ethics/morality become a better way of life than being as rich as you can get. Jesus never said..."Do unto others before they do it to you". This should be put on US money...rather than "In God We Trust"...since it is the truth.

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    6. Re:works fine in Sweden by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It works in Sweden. The US is not Sweden - the relative cultural homogeneity of the Scandinavian nations is a really crucial part of their ability to conduct welfare states that are not overwhelmed by freeloaders, because that's the reason that ...

      [m]ost people who are receiving more money than they're contributing tend to feel pretty bad about this.

      That is not a given in the US. It has been my experience that most Americans I know who are big-government, welfare-state liberals grew up in places where government works. By contrast, most of the small-government, go-it-alone conservatives grew up in places where it doesn't. Don't forget that not all governments work...

  5. people are lazy by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    intuit is right: the government will claim this or that, and people will just accept it. when an honest mistake by the government, nevermind malicious intent, might wind up overtaxing someone. most people will wind up spending say $2,000 more on their taxes, accepting the government's proposal unseen, rather than reviewing it for mistakes

    i don't know about other people, but for me, i'd rather pull my own fingernails out with a wrench than do my taxes. however, the current status quo means that if there is an error, whether honest mistake or malicious, it is usually in favor of the individual, not the government

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:people are lazy by samkass · · Score: 5, Informative

      the government will claim this or that, and people will just accept it. when an honest mistake by the government, nevermind malicious intent, might wind up overtaxing someone. most people will wind up spending say $2,000 more on their taxes, accepting the government's proposal unseen, rather than reviewing it for mistakes

      I don't have a problem with that. You can't save everyone. The amount of efficiency in the average case would be so great, though, that overall I suspect it would offer more money to both the government AND the taxpayer.

      --
      E pluribus unum
  6. We've had that for years in Norway by TickTEC · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here in Norway, if you feel you have nothing to add, you don't even have to return the papers. Just sit back and relax. I've never had to fill out anything.

    --
    I'm gonna be famous, tell everyone!
    1. Re:We've had that for years in Norway by Kjella · · Score: 3, Informative

      And you say that like it's a *good* thing...

      You say that as if the government shouldn't know about it in the first place.

      You got income? Income tax.
      You got deposits? Capital tax on interest, wealth tax on balance
      You got loans? Deductions.
      You got property? Property tax.
      You got a car? Wealth tax.

      All of these are things you would have to declare anyway in order to stay legitimate. In many cases the government can't help but to know about it, employers have to file taxes as well including payroll, for properties and cars the government is the one tracking deeds and our version of the DMV registry and so on. All it does is saving you the paperwork, and there are lots of other taxes and deductions you have to correct yourself, it's not trying to cover everything.

      We are in fact rather suspicious of data storage and in favor of privacy protection, right now for example there's a debate on EUs data storage directive. Only the largest party of the ruling government is for, five are against and one is undecided but just recently their biggest region took a "no" vote with great majority. If they too oppose the directive, it would become Norway's first EU veto since 1994. I'm hoping that will happen.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  7. Beneficial to Be Difficult by tarsi210 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder how much the IRS figures into its revenue stream the profit obtained via people filing taxes and not knowing what they're doing. Folks who use professional preparation services no doubt get them correct most of the time and owe the correct amount (or get the right refund), but how many people are just doing it via paper and submitting, and, due to the arcane, maze of rules and regulations, overpay and don't claim the exemptions they should?

    Leave it up to the IRS -- they probably have it figured out that if they pre-fill items on forms, that means less error and less money. Plus, this gives them more opportunity to audit and assess fees. Whee!

    1. Re:Beneficial to Be Difficult by QuantumRiff · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And of course, why do individuals who know what they are doing have no way to pay or file with the IRS directly? I should be able to submit my 1040 electronically for free, from the IRS.gov website. Instead, I have to go to a 3rd party, where my income levels dictate I have to pay, even though I know what I need. That is just protectionism..

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    2. Re:Beneficial to Be Difficult by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder how much the IRS figures into its revenue stream the profit obtained via people filing taxes and not knowing what they're doing. Folks who use professional preparation services no doubt get them correct most of the time and owe the correct amount (or get the right refund), but how many people are just doing it via paper and submitting, and, due to the arcane, maze of rules and regulations, overpay and don't claim the exemptions they should? Leave it up to the IRS -- they probably have it figured out that if they pre-fill items on forms, that means less error and less money. Plus, this gives them more opportunity to audit and assess fees. Whee!

      As someone who has previously received a refund on tax paid in error, I think that IRS doesn't use the trick you're wondering about at all. If they find that you have overpaid, they refund the overpayment on their own.

      Of course they can't know what exemptions you are entitled to unless you have told them already, e.g. via the W-4 form that you filed with your employer and which the employer used to determine how much of your income to withhold for the IRS.

      For most people, the proposed method would probably work out just fine. Rich people who have complex tax filings would just continue to have their accountant handle the issues. Those who fall in-between could still use TurboTax :-)

    3. Re:Beneficial to Be Difficult by winwar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "But the government's not completely stupid -- if it was more beneficial, financially, to make the tax code simple, they would have done it years ago, IMHO."

      The tax code isn't simple because WE don't want it so. That's right, you and me, want it complex. Well, not exactly. We want deductions for home loan interest, education, and our pet projects. So does everybody else. Congress obliges. Hence the massive and complex tax code.

      A simple tax code would have modifications before the ink was dried. In the end, if people don't like the complex forms, they should stop using them. I've filled out many business related forms and found that they are only as complex as you want to make them. If you want to eke out the last penny of tax savings, go ahead. Just don't whine about the effort. Do you really think that if the tax code is simplified that you would pay less in taxes?

  8. Re:Why they shouldn't.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Mrs David Rosboro

    Our records show that none of your 27 children are currently in school. We can only assume that you are violating child employment laws or have
    eaten them. We will be performing an inspection on the 29th Jan to verify the health and status of your children.

  9. Increases Fraud by mikeplokta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the IRS pre-fills what the government knows about on the form, then that tells you what the government doesn't know about, and thus can safely be omitted. If you get a blank form, there's always the risk that the government knows about your offshore account and will prosecute you for omitting it.

  10. UK Tax Returns by nanoakron · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here in the UK, most people pay tax through the PAYE (Pay-As-You-Earn) scheme. The only people who regularly don't are the self-employed.

    This means that the majority of the working population NEVER need to file tax returns.

    However, some people do regularly file tax returns -

    1. People asked to do so through random audit
    2. If you are considered a 'high-rate' taxpayer (meaning you earn more than about £36,000pa).

    But, you can elect to file a tax return even if you earn less than the 'high-rate', and you can often get some money back for overpayments.

    I still can't believe the amount of hassle you have to go through in the US each year when it comes to tax-time.

    -Nano.

  11. In US private companies do this, only gov't can't by perpenso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the US private companies are able to fill in your data electronically. Your employer, banks, etc can download their data (essentially the forms the IRS has them mail to you) directly into your tax preparation software. It is only the gov't that finds such things infeasible.

    --
    Perpenso Calc for iPhone and iPod touch, scientific and bill/tip calculator, fractions, complex numbers, RPN

  12. Re:How could they justify an audit? by russotto · · Score: 3, Informative

    In fact, if you ask the IRS for advice on how to handle a tax issue, and they give it to you (which is unusual), they *still* disclaim responsibility for their possibly being wrong, and people have undergone financial and (I think) criminal sanctions *for believing what the IRS told them*.

    If you get the advice IN WRITING (I think this means dead trees), you can escape penalties and criminal sanctions. You're still on the hook for interest and taxes.

  13. What do you think happens today? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Look, it's not like the government takes my word for it on most of the numbers I submit, anyway. If I put in the wrong number from my W-2 or W-9, they replace it with the right number, and either send me the bill or deduct from my account if I underpaid. So if they were consistently lousy with their records, this would be happening all the time.

    I once got a letter from the IRS informing me that I didn't report interest income from a bank account I forgot about because it had so little money in it, so since I'd payed by direct deposit they just deducted the $0.15 from my account.

    Another time I got a digit wrong on my W-2 amount, and the IRS informed me that they'd corrected the amount and credited me with the $400 I didn't need to pay, and if I thought this was an error to please call them (even if I thought it was, would I?) They do the same thing for math errors you make.

    Anyway, my point is, for most of the basic things that you put on a 1040 in a boring year, the government already knows and more to the point already considers the numbers they have to be authoritative unless disputed.

    So... My employer and banks still send me the tax info they usually do, the gov sends me their numbers and calculated tax liability, and if it's all right -- which it probably will be, the gov gets their numbers from the same banks and employers I do after all -- then I just pay it and am done with it. If it's not you do the 1040-Difficult like normal. I'm not seeing the huge problem here.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:What do you think happens today? by mysidia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're fortunate it was just W-2 errors. If it's just a few one-off's by a few pennies, probably not in their interest to do much more than fix it.

      If you had significantly underreported on other forms like property exchange (1099B), or significant amounts on a 1099, it would have automatically triggered a full audit, probably.

      That doesn't mean the IRS records are good though, or that everyone always files the proper 1099s against you.

      They currently get the best of both worlds:

      They are reported the information, they can use to check your filings with.

      If less income was reported to them by people paying you than you filed, they either reap the profit, or correct and charge you a penalty for overreporting.

      If more income was reported to them for you by others than you reported, then they either fix the error or audit you depending on the circumstances, this might be an ad-hoc audit where IRS officers visit your house and seize your records for review, if the dollar amount is large, they will immediately suspect fraud.

      The reports that get filed to them aren't just to correct your errors, they also exist to detect dishonesty on your part.

      If they filled in the blanks for you, that would almost completely negate their advantage.

    2. Re:What do you think happens today? by mysidia · · Score: 3, Informative

      The proposed change prevents a taxpayer from being dishonest (by informing him of what the IRS already knows of his finances), and only gives him a chance to correct the records.

      The proposed system doesn't prevent a taxpayer from being dishonest: it makes it easier, because it informs the taxpayer of exactly which details the IRS is aware, and which they are unaware.

      It facilitates the taxpayer knowing what the IRS is unaware of, and thus assists the taxpayer in hiding money in future years..

      If the taxpayer is not presented with the info, then they have to be sure to report everything to really be certain they won't be caught red-handed.

      Probably the real 'big bad guys' such as insiders at the IRS, criminal orgs, etc, already know major blindspots, where they can elude dtection.

      If the IRS always reported everything it knew to the taxpayer... they'd lose a big part of their edge, they'd be opening up insight into the extent of info they get to the general public, resulting in opening up illegal tax fraud to the commoners, instead of just large entities with lots of money....

  14. Intuit Isn't the Only Problem by CodeBuster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The tax filing and preparation industry, of which Intuit is a part, has long been an obstacle to any change in the tax code that would serve to simplify and reduce the need for their services. However, they are far from the only special interest group with an incentive to keep the US Tax code as complex, opaque, and unintuitive as possible. The tax attorneys who help the wealthy arrange their affairs to minimize taxes under the complex rules, the Federal Law Enforcement agencies who periodically use the tax code as a tool to prosecute those who they cannot otherwise charge (i.e. organized crime, income from illegal activities, etc) and of course the tax accountants who work at all levels as guides through the byzantine labyrinth of the US tax codes. Each of these groups, and especially the attorneys (who are the number 1 contributors to the Democratic Party btw), lobbies vigorously against any change in the law which they perceive to be a threat to their ongoing and profitable stream of revenue. Few things in life are as certain as death and taxes after all and one would be hard pressed to think of a more stable source of revenue, as an attorney or tax industry insider, than a system mandated by the Federal Government that every American must use at least once per year.

  15. Why they WON'T by sonnejw0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They won't do it because then the tax payer knows what sources of income the government doesn't know about. The uncertainty now is enough to scare some people into declaring their tips, gifts, or private sales. Full disclosure from the government makes it easierto dodge taxes. The correlary is that more people might pay if the simply get a bill in the mail. Of course, that just "puts the burden" on "poor people", because the educated would be smart enough to get away with not declaring an overseas investment, and the poor would be too afraid not to send money they know the government wants.

  16. It will increase correctly filed taxes for most! by JakFrost · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You forget that you take responsibility for what is on the form, even if it is pre-filled the moment you sign it. There's nothing stopping the government from sending you a blank or zero form and you'll just sign it and send it in thinking that you won't get prosecuted for the offshore tax haven account that you have. They'll still go after you no matter what.

    Less Fraud, More Correct Taxes

    There will be no increase of fraud due to this but I predict that most people will actually send their taxes in quicker and more of them will be more correct than the current numbers. We already have the IRS eFile system to let you do the web form part but they are all blank. It would be nice if they were pre-filled in with your information already. You'll just glance at it, take your Standard Deduction instead of Itemized Deduction for most people, type in your bank account or credit card number to pay or receive payment. You wouldn't have to look for or dig out those W2 or 1099 forms trying to figure out all the income.

    Special Interests At Work

    The simple point is that in the United States the government is run by "special interest" groups. The founding fathers, especially Thomas Jefferson and James Madison warned us about the dire effects that special interest groups will have on the government if they are allowed to mass their money and influence the rule of the country. It's all in their speeches that we all should have been forced to read in elementary and high school history and civics courses. America's educational failure.

    Now what do we have, a special interest part such as Intuit who is responsible for the Turbo Tax software and their electronic filing service trying to prevent the government from offering a pre-filled tax form service to the people. Just imagine how quickly Intuit would change its mind if the government approached them and told them that they would be the sole company responsible for getting people's taxes filed and I can guarantee that the first year you'll be presented with almost completed and pre-filled forms once your type in your Tax ID number.

    Educational Gaming

    We need a multi-genra massively multi-player video game where at first you play a First Person Shooter with friends as a team of The Founding Fathers and you first kick the British out of the colonies, then it switches to Real Time Strategy game where you maneuver the troops during the colonial war, and later it switches to a Civilization type diplomatic game where you negotiate terms of the new constitution and treaties with European countries. It'd be a nice way to have kids experience a modern way of what the history taught us. Sprinkle in a good load of historic facts in the game and you'll have kids arguing their view points because of the game.

  17. Intuit are evil ... by aegl · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just got a pop-up from Quicken 2007 telling me that it will cease down-loading data from my bank at the end of April. If I want to keep being able to do this, then I'll have to upgrade to Quicken 2010.

    This is the second time that Intuit have made an incompatible change to the download data format (at least while I've been using it). So I'm going to assume that their business plan now includes a forced upgrade every three or so years. Time to start researching non-evil alternatives.

  18. Re:Why they shouldn't.. by spongman · · Score: 3, Funny

    those digits that start with 9

    what, like '9' ?

  19. After a generation nothing else exists by bussdriver · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It only takes about a generation and people begin to forget or even lose the imagination of the things the way they used to be.

    Government workers used to get paid reasonably close to the private counter parts. FACT. Public service was an honorable profession and for many it was worth the slightly lower wages (but increased stability.) Government workers were not thought of as incompetent crooks; well not all of them were - plus the bad ones tended to stick out MORE because there was more of a contrast and other well intentioned workers less tolerant of them. This was the general case long ago; now people can't even imagine the possibility of what was and did actually exist. Its so bad some people can't believe it ever was any better than it is today.

    On a local level, I've SEEN politicians sucker people into undermining and wrecking public services with the INTENT of replacing them with his friend's private business. I've seen this done and sadly; even when its so fast people can remember how much better it was before "reform" and expensive privatization with no real benefits -- not enough people get upset or notice to change the result. It actually takes something really really bad before it can be reversed. Its the fault of the citizens ultimately that this stuff happens. We've had a long term large scale more organized version of this going on in the whole country.

    I've seen money wasted on things that could have been done in-house simply because they don't want to compete with the contractors. Its crazy non-thinking behavior. I don't hire someone to cut my grass because I'm afraid I'm unfairly competing with them.

    The public and the officials set low expectations-- so we allow bad results because that is what we EXPECT to get. Any manager expecting little will eventually have their expectations met.

  20. Exactly right. MOD PARENT UP. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Informative

    When Ed Foster was still alive, each year his GripeLog would rate the most abusive software companies in the United States. Microsoft was usually first, of course, but once Intuit was rated the most abusive.

    The U.S. government is so corrupt that it amazes and scares me. Anything for those who want to make money using the power of government. When Saudis attack, invade Iraq? When Intuit wants something, use any foolish excuse to give it? Put a 6 times higher percentage of the population in prison as any European country? All part of U.S. government corruption.

  21. Re:Fair Tax by careysub · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I suggest you actually read the fair tax site. The fair tax provides a prebate check for taxes paid up to the poverty line, so the poor pay NO TAXES for spending on basic necessities. ...

    Ah! It is good the legally defined poor (... up to the poverty line ...) are spared annihilatory taxation on their subsistence income (but then, they have little wealth to contribute to the public coffers anyway). This then merely dumps even more of the cost of running the government on the Middle Class, who have seen their proportionate burden of taxation greatly increase while their income stagnated over the last generation.

    There is always another "fair tax" or "flat tax" stalking horse around the corner designed to further cut the taxes of the wealthy, rich, and super-rich even farther below their already historic lows. As with Intuit, those who already have, never have seem to have enough. It's a shell game and the Middle Class always ends up with the empty shell.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj