Slashdot Mirror


Uranus and Neptune May Have "Oceans of Diamonds"

Third Position writes "Oceans of liquid diamond topped with solid 'icebergs' of the precious gems could be on Uranus and Neptune. The first-ever detailed research into the melting point of diamond found it behaves like water during melting and freezing — with its solid form floating on the liquid. A large diamond ocean on one or both of the planets could provide an explanation for an oddity they both share: unlike Earth, they do not have magnetic poles that match up with their geographical poles." The article doesn't mention what the pressures might be like in these outer-planets environments, but the researchers found that liquefying diamond requires 40 million times Earth's atmospheric pressure at sea level.

25 of 347 comments (clear)

  1. Well, that's one way to get the space race moving. by mykos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd like to let everyone know that Mars is full of gold just under the crust, and every planet around Proxima Centauri is rich with uranium.

    Get that space program moving.

  2. For the dull knives in the drawer by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Insightful

    detailed research into the melting point of diamond found it behaves like water during melting and freezing -- with its solid form floating on the liquid

    I only point this out because you would be surprised at how many human beings don't know this, but for it to float to the top, that means its frozen state is less dense, hence expands, when freezes. Almost nothing else does this.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:For the dull knives in the drawer by v1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Water does that.

      Only because water (h2o) is a polar molecule. When we're talking diamonds and other similar materials we're talking raw elements (carbon in the case of diamond) which don't have the opportunity to be polar, and thus will always contract as cooled.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  3. Good riddance by langelgjm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Might be worth the cost of shipping if it did away with the diamond industry once and for all! Of course, what with marketing, De Beers would probably buy up the stock from Uranus and either dump it in the ocean, or sell it at 500% the price of normal diamonds as "space diamonds... the most romantic diamond yet. Shit that's been floating on the seas of Uranus for millions of years can now be on your hand - FOREVER."

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  4. pressure off by a magnitude by wizardforce · · Score: 5, Insightful

    40 million atmospheres is the kind of pressure that you'd measure under 400 million meters (400,000km) of material at a density of 1 g/cm^3 at a constant 1 g. Uranus and Neptune's gravity field is near 1g give or take and the density is not much more than 1g/cm^3 so the pressure in the core can not be 40 million atmospheres as there isn't ~400,000 km of material sitting above the core. Given that Uranus has a radius of ~25,000 km, density of ~1.27 g/cm^3, surface gravity of 8.7 m/s^2 and that the gravity field drops off roughly linearly with depth, the pressure is probably about a tenth of what TFA says diamond started to melt. Either someone dropped a zero where it didn't belong or Diamond isn't fluid in these planets' cores.

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    1. Re:pressure off by a magnitude by v1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1 atm = about 100 kilopascals

      according to http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1999/PavelKhazron.shtml, At the centre, the pressure is about 380GPa (380,000,000,000pascal)

      so pressure at earth's center is about 3.8 million atmospheres. Quite a bit shy of 40. But that's assuming the same radius and density, which are probably quite a bit off. But not by that much I don't think.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  5. Actually "Oceans of melted coal" by viking80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder why the headline isn't
    Uranus and Neptune May Have "Oceans of melted coal"

    "diamond" is by definition a solid crystalline form of carbon. If you melt it, it is by definition not diamond anymore.

    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org
    1. Re:Actually "Oceans of melted coal" by SpinyNorman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Obviously "liquid carbon" is the proper name, but I guess why they are calling it "liquid diamond" is because they are exploring the pressure/temperature region of the phase diagram where it solidifies into diamond (ergo diamond floating in liquid carbon).

      http://dao.mit.edu/8.231/carbon_phase_diagram.jpg

      I don't get whey they are saying liquid Carbon may exist on Uranus though - the phase diagram indicates a minumum temperature for the liquid phase of 4.5 x 10^3 K, and even the core of Uranus is nowhere near that hot. Neptune, maybe.

    2. Re:Actually "Oceans of melted coal" by wizardforce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Carbon's phase diagram shows quite clearly that Graphite becomes the less stable form as temperature and pressure increase to a sufficient degree. So bringing Graphite to these conditions would indeed convert to diamond as you freeze it out of the liquid phase.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  6. Re:Well, that's one way to get the space race movi by sznupi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Though if it would be possible to mine this form of coal in industrial quantities, it could suddenly become useful as a mineral... (yes, I know diamonds are useful already - but those are usually small amounts of manufactured ones). There's even one book by Stephenson more or less about it. And hey, you have whole moon out there full of hydrocarbons, in quantities many times greater than deposits on Earth.

    Is it impractical now? Hell yeah. Will it always be? I don't know. But I'm sure many people would laugh at you only few thousand years ago for suggesting that dark rocks can be used as a source of energy. A thousands years ago for suggesting the same with whale oil on industrial scale. 200 years ago with that black oily substance seeping from the ground here and there. Rocks from which people get mysteriously sick used for power generation and most powerful explosives? Tapping the power of a volcano? Splitting water to get to the Moon? That's insane!

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  7. Re:motivation by ppanon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    C) good luck designing something that could survive the pressures and temperatures that cause diamond to melt, and yet that would also be capable of escaping the gravity wells of Uranus or Neptune. They may not be Jupiter or Saturn but they're still gas giants.

    --
    Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  8. Re:can't you just make a diamond in the lab? by Urza9814 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes.

    Even natural diamonds aren't the slightest bit rare on Earth. It's just the diamond cartels that make it rare.

  9. Re:Much as I'd love to make a great pun about uran by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The atmosphere of Uranus is 83% hydrogen. If we can't turn that into fuel for a fusion reactor then we won't be operating in the atmosphere of that planet. So the planet has plenty of fuel, and fusion power is (as always) 50 years away.

  10. Re:can't you just make a diamond in the lab? by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is likely cheaper to create the technology to create perfect synthetic diamonds than to create the technology needed to fish them out of a gas giant ocean pressurized to 40 million pounds per square inch.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  11. Re:Finally by martas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i believe you mean expensive, not cheap

  12. Re:vindication for bluegrass by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Offtopic? - C'mon mods where's your sense of humour?

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  13. Re:Well, that's one way to get the space race movi by srothroc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not only that, but it would probably be much more practical to set up outposts near the supply to take advantage of them; if we can mine those diamonds, we should certainly be able to set up some industrial outposts to utilize the diamonds properly.

  14. Artificial Scarcity by newgalactic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Oceans of Diamonds"??? De Beers has that already. Have you ever heard of "Artificial Scarcity"?

  15. Re:can't you just make a diamond in the lab? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    However, they are not quite the same as of today's technology and can often be differentiated from natural diamonds because of minute differences in their characteristics.

    Are people really so shallow that they worry some random person on the street will pull out a magnifying glass and/or shine a UV lamp to "out" the synthetic-diamond-wearer?

    It looks the same in natural light, right? That's all anyone should care about.

  16. Re:Well, that's one way to get the space race movi by rdebath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yellow synthetic diamonds (nitrogen impurity) are easy to make, comparatively, and form the basis of a lot of the industrial uses. However, vapour deposition techniques are quite capable of making blue (with boron) or colourless synthetic diamonds that are visually indistinguishable from a pure volcanic diamond.

    In fact the only way to distinguish them is to do a chemical analysis (eg with UV light) and compare the result against the impurities listed in volcanic diamonds from all the known mines.

  17. Re:Well, that's one way to get the space race movi by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Might I suggest a magnetic rail based system to launch payloads from Luna to Earth. I have reason to believe such a system could be quite effective.

    Mycroft

    --
    https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  18. Re:Finally by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think you live in the DeBeers reality distortion bubble.

    The biggest diamond on earth can be made industrially for a few cents.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  19. But, Earth's magnetical poles do not... by carlhaagen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...align with its geographical poles. We were all taught this in 3rd grade. Our magnetic poles wander around the planet all the time, and are pretty far off from the geographical poles. This is called magnetic declination, and is something everyone who has studied basic navigation is well aware of.

  20. Re:Finally by Denial93 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If so, why isn't anyone at GE Superabrasives defecting and setting up a new corp to exploit this market anomaly, mass-produce all kinds of shiny super-tough stuff and gut the business of two market leaders in the process?

  21. Semi-precious diamonds by GooberToo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From Wikipedia:

    The traditional classification in the West, which goes back to the Ancient Greeks, begins with a distinction between precious and semi-precious stones; similar distinctions are made in other cultures. The precious stones are diamond, ruby, emerald and sapphire, with all other gemstones being semi-precious.[2] This distinction is unscientific and reflects the rarity of the respective stones in ancient times

    That means if diamonds were to be classified today, they would be downgraded from "precious" to "semi-precious". Diamonds are not rare in the least. In fact, all planets are likely to have diamonds. All planets with geological activity, present or in the past, are likely to have diamonds on or near their surface.

    I wish people would understand that the diamond market is completely artificially manipulated. Only industrial diamonds are mostly influenced by basic market supply and demand - but not completely. Diamonds which are used as precious stones have their supply tightly controlled so as to create artificial scarcity. Control on diamonds are so tightly controlled, in some countries (Africa), picking up a diamond without government permission (e.g. DeBeers) may result in execution on the spot. Think about that. If diamonds were so scarce, why would then need to specifically make legal provisions to allow for an extremely rare event of discovering a natural, rough diamond on the ground? Unless of course, they're not rare at all and diamonds really are commonly found simply laying on the ground. And people face execution because an unfeathered supply of diamonds to the market would crash their value over night.

    There are few things in the modern times which have caused more pain, misery, death, and mass slavery than Diamonds and DeBeers. But to be clear, DeBeers is not alone here.

    Few diamonds in the world, contrary to the conflict free marketing, are truly "blood-free", as as much as 60% of the "conflict free" diamonds are actually smuggled from "conflict zones". In other words, over half of every diamond you see in stores is there because of someone's murder, slavery (including children), and illegal imprisonment, torture, so on and so on.

    So remember nothing says I love you like blood, summary executions, and slavery. Its not just a moto, its fact.