Slashdot Mirror


Scientology Attacker Will Be Sentenced To Jail

OBG writes "A Nebraska native charged with taking part in a massive cyber-attack against the Scientology website will be spending the next year behind bars. 20-year-old Brian Thomas Mettenbrink will plead guilty to the charge of unauthorized access of a protected computer for his involvement in the denial of service attack, which was orchestrated by the online group 'Anonymous.' Mettenbrink's is the second successful prosecution connected to the 'Anonymous' attacks. Last year, Dmitriy Guzner of Verona, New Jersey, was sentenced to a year and a day in federal prison for attacks on Scientology sites."

16 of 354 comments (clear)

  1. We are Anonymous. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We are Anonymous Cowards, all your base are belong to us.

    1. Re:We are Anonymous. by tehcyder · · Score: 3, Funny

      So if I murder Tony Soprano I should be punished less than if I murder your wife?

      As Tony Soprano is a fictional character, then yes.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:We are Anonymous. by joebok · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bart: Uh, say, are you guys crooks?

      Fat Tony: Bart, um, is it wrong to steal a loaf of bread to feed your starving family?

      Bart: No.

      Fat Tony: Well, suppose you got a large starving family. Is it wrong to steal a truckload of bread to feed them?

      Bart: Uh uh.

      Fat Tony: And, what if your family don't like bread? They like... cigarettes?

      Bart: I guess that's okay.

      Fat Tony: Now, what if instead of giving them away, you sold them at a price that was practically giving them away. Would that be a crime, Bart?

      Bart: Hell, no!

  2. gullibility test by chentiangemalc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientology Gullibility Test http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IQQE04_TCM

  3. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I find your ideas intriguing. I'd like to sign up for your newsletter.

  4. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    No you wouldn't. Because if you beat up millions of people, you'd be Chuck Norris, and the judge would be roundhouse kicked into oblivion before he got a phrase out, much less a longer sentence.

  5. Re:Heroes, not criminals. by Fizzl · · Score: 2, Funny

    RAMIREZ, TAKE DOWN ASSTHETANS WITH YOUR KNIFE

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like whimpering Lorem ipsum dolor foofaa

  6. Re:Justice by erroneous · · Score: 3, Funny

    [meme]
    Only one man has ever literally beaten up millions of people.

    And the jail has never been built that could hold Chuck Norris.
    [/meme]

    --
    erroneous: look me up in a dictionary
  7. Re:Justice by shilly · · Score: 4, Funny

    Given their well-known homophobia, you could have chosen a slightly more appropriate insulting name...

  8. Re:How do you define a religion? by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    There is a reason the "big three", hinduism and Bhuddism have lasted so long.

    Is it because they were founded a long time ago?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  9. Re:Justice by geegel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Huh? Last time I checked they had tremendous traffic going to their site.

    --
    right...
  10. Re:Heroes, not criminals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fag n. 1. An extremely annoying, inconsiderate
    person most commonly associated with Harley riders.
    2. A person who owns or frequently rides a Harley.

  11. Re:everyone click on this link: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hat trick.

  12. In the slammer: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Inmate: What're you in for?
    Guy: I beat up millions of people.

    [and everyone edges away]

  13. Re:Heroes, not criminals. by PRMan · · Score: 1, Funny

    Actually, he is insulting 1.63 percent of the population. Heck, there are almost as many Scientologists as gays.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  14. Re:Wow, that got... by jbezorg · · Score: 3, Funny

    True but I think his point is that the identity of the victim can have a huge impact on motive, good and bad, and motive does have impact on the punishment of the crime.

    i.e. In retrospect, killing Hitler would be considered a good thing by many and the motive justifiable.

    It's an extreme, yes, but just because someone mentions Hitler it doesn't mean it's automatically reductio ad Hitlerum.

    --
    I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull